Re: My dog is gay!

[Wolfgang]

"rw" > wrote in message
m...

> Are you a Vogon?

Good God, you are stupid.

Wolfgang

[Wolfgang]

"rw" > wrote in message
m...

> Are you a Vogon?

Good God, you are stupid.

Wolfgang

[rw]

Wolfgang wrote:
> "rw" > wrote in message
> m...
>
>
>>Are you a Vogon?
>
>
> Good God, you are stupid.

Can't get anything past you.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

[rw]

Wolfgang wrote:
> "rw" > wrote in message
> m...
>
>
>>Are you a Vogon?
>
>
> Good God, you are stupid.

Can't get anything past you.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

[Wolfgang]

Amanita, Love Ewe wrote:
> > > > I am a 13 year old zit factory with a random sentence generator and
you are an idiot
"rw" > wrote:
> > > I am so.
Wolfgang wrote:
> > Good God, you are stupid.
"rw" > wrote:
> Why, yes, I am.

No ****.

Wolfgang

[Wolfgang]

Amanita, Love Ewe wrote:
> > > > I am a 13 year old zit factory with a random sentence generator and
you are an idiot
"rw" > wrote:
> > > I am so.
Wolfgang wrote:
> > Good God, you are stupid.
"rw" > wrote:
> Why, yes, I am.

No ****.

Wolfgang

[rw]

Wolfgang wrote:
> Amanita, Love Ewe wrote:
>
>>>>>I am a 13 year old zit factory with a random sentence generator and
>
> you are an idiot
> "rw" > wrote:
>
>>>>I am so.
>
> Wolfgang wrote:
>
>>>Good God, you are stupid.
>
> "rw" > wrote:
>
>>Why, yes, I am.
>
>
> No ****.
>
> Wolfgang

You've just demonstrated what a witless, gullible, lying **** you are. I
never wrote what you quoted me as writing.

I know perfectly well what's going on, Wolfgang. You're furious with me
for pointing out a couple of stupid errors on your part, and we all know
(yes, we do) that you cannot admit even the slightest innocent mistake,
because that would threaten your fantasy of being some sort of
uberintellectual Nietzchean superman. That's exactly what make catching
you in an error so much fun.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

[rw]

Wolfgang wrote:
> Amanita, Love Ewe wrote:
>
>>>>>I am a 13 year old zit factory with a random sentence generator and
>
> you are an idiot
> "rw" > wrote:
>
>>>>I am so.
>
> Wolfgang wrote:
>
>>>Good God, you are stupid.
>
> "rw" > wrote:
>
>>Why, yes, I am.
>
>
> No ****.
>
> Wolfgang

You've just demonstrated what a witless, gullible, lying **** you are. I
never wrote what you quoted me as writing.

I know perfectly well what's going on, Wolfgang. You're furious with me
for pointing out a couple of stupid errors on your part, and we all know
(yes, we do) that you cannot admit even the slightest innocent mistake,
because that would threaten your fantasy of being some sort of
uberintellectual Nietzchean superman. That's exactly what make catching
you in an error so much fun.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

[Wolfgang]

"rw" > wrote in message
m...
> Wolfgang wrote:
> > Amanita, Love Ewe wrote:
> >
> >>>>>I am a 13 year old zit factory with a random sentence generator and
> >
> > you are an idiot
> > "rw" > wrote:
> >
> >>>>I am so.
> >
> > Wolfgang wrote:
> >
> >>>Good God, you are stupid.
> >
> > "rw" > wrote:
> >
> >>Why, yes, I am.
> >
> >
> > No ****.
> >
> > Wolfgang
>
> You've just demonstrated what a witless, gullible, lying **** you are. I
> never wrote what you quoted me as writing.

Hey, it's all right there in black and white.

> I know perfectly well what's going on, Wolfgang.

Well, yeah, sure you do.

> You're furious with me
> for pointing out a couple of stupid errors on your part, and we all know
> (yes, we do) that you cannot admit even the slightest innocent mistake,
> because that would threaten your fantasy of being some sort of
> uberintellectual Nietzchean superman. That's exactly what make catching
> you in an error so much fun.

Um......o.k., you caught me. You're right......of course. It was all an
elaborately constructed cover-up designed to draw attention away from my
bone-headed error. I mean, given the context of that discussion, who could
possibly have predicted that Joe Idaho would capitalize on my
misidentification of a cultural icon and my confusion over the distinction
between a breed of sheep and a sub-atomic particle with a sly allusion to Al
Martino?

Wolfgang
who, breaking with tradition, offers an apology to all of roff.

[Wolfgang]

"rw" > wrote in message
m...
> Wolfgang wrote:
> > Amanita, Love Ewe wrote:
> >
> >>>>>I am a 13 year old zit factory with a random sentence generator and
> >
> > you are an idiot
> > "rw" > wrote:
> >
> >>>>I am so.
> >
> > Wolfgang wrote:
> >
> >>>Good God, you are stupid.
> >
> > "rw" > wrote:
> >
> >>Why, yes, I am.
> >
> >
> > No ****.
> >
> > Wolfgang
>
> You've just demonstrated what a witless, gullible, lying **** you are. I
> never wrote what you quoted me as writing.

Hey, it's all right there in black and white.

> I know perfectly well what's going on, Wolfgang.

Well, yeah, sure you do.

> You're furious with me
> for pointing out a couple of stupid errors on your part, and we all know
> (yes, we do) that you cannot admit even the slightest innocent mistake,
> because that would threaten your fantasy of being some sort of
> uberintellectual Nietzchean superman. That's exactly what make catching
> you in an error so much fun.

Um......o.k., you caught me. You're right......of course. It was all an
elaborately constructed cover-up designed to draw attention away from my
bone-headed error. I mean, given the context of that discussion, who could
possibly have predicted that Joe Idaho would capitalize on my
misidentification of a cultural icon and my confusion over the distinction
between a breed of sheep and a sub-atomic particle with a sly allusion to Al
Martino?

Wolfgang
who, breaking with tradition, offers an apology to all of roff.

[rw]

Wolfgang wrote:

> "rw" > wrote in message
> m...
>
>>You're furious with me
>>for pointing out a couple of stupid errors on your part, and we all know
>>(yes, we do) that you cannot admit even the slightest innocent mistake,
>>because that would threaten your fantasy of being some sort of
>>uberintellectual Nietzchean superman. That's exactly what make catching
>>you in an error so much fun.
>
>
> Um......o.k., you caught me. You're right......of course. It was all an
> elaborately constructed cover-up designed to draw attention away from my
> bone-headed error. I mean, given the context of that discussion, who could
> possibly have predicted that Joe Idaho would capitalize on my
> misidentification of a cultural icon and my confusion over the distinction
> between a breed of sheep and a sub-atomic particle with a sly allusion to Al
> Martino?

Dan Marino. And don't forget the one about the capitol of Norway. But
maybe your all time funniest error was when you blamed a simple spelling
mistake on your spell checker, which suddenly started working again for
no apparent reason.

>
> Wolfgang
> who, breaking with tradition, offers an apology to all of roff.

I don't know anyone, online or off, for whom I have more contempt than
you. It would be tempered with pity if you weren't such an insufferable
prick. You're resentful of your small little life because you just know
that you're really the smartest person in the world, and that your
station should be higher. So you come to ROFF to build yourself up, but
the way you do it is by tearing others down. Too bad that plagiarism no
longer works in the Google age.

My God, you are a pathetic piece of nasty ****.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

[Wolfgang]

"rw" > wrote in message
m...
> Wolfgang wrote:
>
> > "rw" > wrote in message
> > m...
> >
> >>You're furious with me
> >>for pointing out a couple of stupid errors on your part, and we
all know
> >>(yes, we do) that you cannot admit even the slightest innocent
mistake,
> >>because that would threaten your fantasy of being some sort of
> >>uberintellectual Nietzchean superman. That's exactly what make
catching
> >>you in an error so much fun.
> >
> >
> > Um......o.k., you caught me. You're right......of course. It was
all an
> > elaborately constructed cover-up designed to draw attention away
from my
> > bone-headed error. I mean, given the context of that discussion,
who could
> > possibly have predicted that Joe Idaho would capitalize on my
> > misidentification of a cultural icon and my confusion over the
distinction
> > between a breed of sheep and a sub-atomic particle with a sly
allusion to Al
> > Martino?
>
> Dan Marino. And don't forget the one about the capitol of Norway.
But
> maybe your all time funniest error was when you blamed a simple
spelling
> mistake on your spell checker,

Hm......well, o.k., I guess I should have guessed that even YOU
wouldn't believe that my spellchecker actually WRITES all this stuff.

> which suddenly started working again for
> no apparent reason.

You know, I noticed that too. What an amazing stroke of luck (for me)
that you are perhaps the world's leading authority on Microsoft
product deficiencies, ainna? So, why did it do that?

> > Wolfgang
> > who, breaking with tradition, offers an apology to all of roff.
>
> I don't know anyone, online or off, for whom I have more contempt
than
> you.

Well, there's roughly 3 billion women.

> It would be tempered with pity if you weren't such an insufferable
> prick.

Alas! Your pity was my last best hope! :(

> You're resentful of your small little life

Actually, that small little wee tiny life is about all I've
got.......it would hardly be in my best interest to be resentful of
it, now would it?

> because you just know
> that you're really the smartest person in the world,

Well, Feynman's still dead, and there's something just a wee bit fishy
about that Hawking guy.

> and that your
> station should be higher.

Huh? What's higher than Emperor of Usenet?

> So you come to ROFF to build yourself up, but
> the way you do it is by tearing others down. Too bad that plagiarism
no
> longer works in the Google age.

Why do you build me up (build me up) Buttercup, baby
Just to let me down (let me down) and mess me around
And then worst of all (worst of all) you never call, baby
When you say you will (say you will) but I love you still
I need you (I need you) more than anyone, darlin'
You know that I have from the start
So build me up (build me up) Buttercup, don't break my heart

> My God, you are a pathetic piece of nasty ****.

YOU, on the other hand, are having quite a week! You have, thus far,
demonstrated that I don't know the capitol of Denmark, the capitol of
Norway, where Copenhagen is, who John Elway is, who John Denver was,
the difference between a quark and a neutrino, the difference between
a neutrino and a merino, the difference between a city and a cookie,
the location of Fenway Park, where the Chicago Cubs play baseball, who
Dan Marino is, and who Alfred Cini is......and it's only Thursday!

One can hardly wait to see what the rest of the week has in store.
:)

For Kennie:

WRITER'S WORKSHOP
LESSON III: Verisimilitude.

> > I thought this was gonna be a thread about Copenhagen.

> You mean the smokeless tobacco?

No, the capitol of Ecuador. [BAD! NO one will buy it.]

No, the capitol of Fawn Lake. [BAD! Mythical place. No one will buy
it.]

No, the capitol of Holland. [BAD! Copenhagen IS the capitol of
Holland......what's the point?]

No, the capitol of Norway. [PERFECT! 87% of readers will miss it.
When the error is pointed out to them by a super sleuth they will look
it up. Mission accomplished.]

See?

Wolfgang

[Wolfgang]

"rw" > wrote in message
m...
> Wolfgang wrote:
>
> > "rw" > wrote in message
> > m...
> >
> >>You're furious with me
> >>for pointing out a couple of stupid errors on your part, and we
all know
> >>(yes, we do) that you cannot admit even the slightest innocent
mistake,
> >>because that would threaten your fantasy of being some sort of
> >>uberintellectual Nietzchean superman. That's exactly what make
catching
> >>you in an error so much fun.
> >
> >
> > Um......o.k., you caught me. You're right......of course. It was
all an
> > elaborately constructed cover-up designed to draw attention away
from my
> > bone-headed error. I mean, given the context of that discussion,
who could
> > possibly have predicted that Joe Idaho would capitalize on my
> > misidentification of a cultural icon and my confusion over the
distinction
> > between a breed of sheep and a sub-atomic particle with a sly
allusion to Al
> > Martino?
>
> Dan Marino. And don't forget the one about the capitol of Norway.
But
> maybe your all time funniest error was when you blamed a simple
spelling
> mistake on your spell checker,

Hm......well, o.k., I guess I should have guessed that even YOU
wouldn't believe that my spellchecker actually WRITES all this stuff.

> which suddenly started working again for
> no apparent reason.

You know, I noticed that too. What an amazing stroke of luck (for me)
that you are perhaps the world's leading authority on Microsoft
product deficiencies, ainna? So, why did it do that?

> > Wolfgang
> > who, breaking with tradition, offers an apology to all of roff.
>
> I don't know anyone, online or off, for whom I have more contempt
than
> you.

Well, there's roughly 3 billion women.

> It would be tempered with pity if you weren't such an insufferable
> prick.

Alas! Your pity was my last best hope! :(

> You're resentful of your small little life

Actually, that small little wee tiny life is about all I've
got.......it would hardly be in my best interest to be resentful of
it, now would it?

> because you just know
> that you're really the smartest person in the world,

Well, Feynman's still dead, and there's something just a wee bit fishy
about that Hawking guy.

> and that your
> station should be higher.

Huh? What's higher than Emperor of Usenet?

> So you come to ROFF to build yourself up, but
> the way you do it is by tearing others down. Too bad that plagiarism
no
> longer works in the Google age.

Why do you build me up (build me up) Buttercup, baby
Just to let me down (let me down) and mess me around
And then worst of all (worst of all) you never call, baby
When you say you will (say you will) but I love you still
I need you (I need you) more than anyone, darlin'
You know that I have from the start
So build me up (build me up) Buttercup, don't break my heart

> My God, you are a pathetic piece of nasty ****.

YOU, on the other hand, are having quite a week! You have, thus far,
demonstrated that I don't know the capitol of Denmark, the capitol of
Norway, where Copenhagen is, who John Elway is, who John Denver was,
the difference between a quark and a neutrino, the difference between
a neutrino and a merino, the difference between a city and a cookie,
the location of Fenway Park, where the Chicago Cubs play baseball, who
Dan Marino is, and who Alfred Cini is......and it's only Thursday!

One can hardly wait to see what the rest of the week has in store.
:)

For Kennie:

WRITER'S WORKSHOP
LESSON III: Verisimilitude.

> > I thought this was gonna be a thread about Copenhagen.

> You mean the smokeless tobacco?

No, the capitol of Ecuador. [BAD! NO one will buy it.]

No, the capitol of Fawn Lake. [BAD! Mythical place. No one will buy
it.]

No, the capitol of Holland. [BAD! Copenhagen IS the capitol of
Holland......what's the point?]

No, the capitol of Norway. [PERFECT! 87% of readers will miss it.
When the error is pointed out to them by a super sleuth they will look
it up. Mission accomplished.]

See?

Wolfgang

[Ken Fortenberry]

Wolfgang wrote:
> <snip>
> For Kennie:
>
> WRITER'S WORKSHOP
> LESSON III: Verisimilitude.

Hard to tell which is more preposterous, that someone whose
so-called writing is little more than barely intelligible
garrulous bombast would have the brass to offer anyone else
a "writer's workshop," or that you'd really expect anybody
to believe the contrived lies concocted to explain away your
open displays of ignorance.

Tell us Wolfie, who wrote "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Ken Fortenberry]

Wolfgang wrote:
> <snip>
> For Kennie:
>
> WRITER'S WORKSHOP
> LESSON III: Verisimilitude.

Hard to tell which is more preposterous, that someone whose
so-called writing is little more than barely intelligible
garrulous bombast would have the brass to offer anyone else
a "writer's workshop," or that you'd really expect anybody
to believe the contrived lies concocted to explain away your
open displays of ignorance.

Tell us Wolfie, who wrote "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Wolfgang]

"Ken Fortenberry" > wrote in
message om...
> Wolfgang wrote:
> > <snip>
> > For Kennie:
> >
> > WRITER'S WORKSHOP
> > LESSON III: Verisimilitude.
>
> Hard to tell which is more preposterous, that someone whose
> so-called writing is little more than barely intelligible
> garrulous bombast would have the brass to offer anyone else
> a "writer's workshop," or that you'd really expect anybody
> to believe the contrived lies concocted to explain away your
> open displays of ignorance.

Oh my, yes, that IS a tough one.

> Tell us Wolfie, who wrote "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" ?

Ummmmmm........Franklin Pierce Adams?

Wolfgang
who's got a VERY good feeling about this one! :)

p.s. wanna know what maclean said in "a river runs through it"?

[Wolfgang]

"Ken Fortenberry" > wrote in
message om...
> Wolfgang wrote:
> > <snip>
> > For Kennie:
> >
> > WRITER'S WORKSHOP
> > LESSON III: Verisimilitude.
>
> Hard to tell which is more preposterous, that someone whose
> so-called writing is little more than barely intelligible
> garrulous bombast would have the brass to offer anyone else
> a "writer's workshop," or that you'd really expect anybody
> to believe the contrived lies concocted to explain away your
> open displays of ignorance.

Oh my, yes, that IS a tough one.

> Tell us Wolfie, who wrote "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" ?

Ummmmmm........Franklin Pierce Adams?

Wolfgang
who's got a VERY good feeling about this one! :)

p.s. wanna know what maclean said in "a river runs through it"?

[Wayne Harrison]

"Wolfgang" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ken Fortenberry" > wrote


> > Tell us Wolfie, who wrote "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" ?
>
> Ummmmmm........Franklin Pierce Adams?
>
> Wolfgang
> who's got a VERY good feeling about this one! :)
>
> p.s. wanna know what maclean said in "a river runs through it"?
>
>

play it again, sam?

yfitons
wayno (and, and, um, do ya wanna know who wore blue and who wore gray?)

[Wayne Harrison]

"Wolfgang" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ken Fortenberry" > wrote


> > Tell us Wolfie, who wrote "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" ?
>
> Ummmmmm........Franklin Pierce Adams?
>
> Wolfgang
> who's got a VERY good feeling about this one! :)
>
> p.s. wanna know what maclean said in "a river runs through it"?
>
>

play it again, sam?

yfitons
wayno (and, and, um, do ya wanna know who wore blue and who wore gray?)

[Wolfgang]

"Wayne Harrison" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Wolfgang" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Ken Fortenberry" > wrote
>
>
> > > Tell us Wolfie, who wrote "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" ?
> >
> > Ummmmmm........Franklin Pierce Adams?
> >
> > Wolfgang
> > who's got a VERY good feeling about this one! :)
> >
> > p.s. wanna know what maclean said in "a river runs through it"?
> >
> >
>
> play it again, sam?

I sai.......um.......oh......heh, heh......never mind. :)

> yfitons
> wayno (and, and, um, do ya wanna know who wore blue and who wore
gray?)

You wore blue.......I was in lemony satan.

Wolfgang
ah yes, i remember it well.

[Scott Seidman]

"David Snedeker" > wrote in news:ch88k1$a2i$0
:

>
> "rw" > wrote in message
> m...
>> Wolfgang wrote:
>> > "rw" > wrote in message
>> > m...
>> >
>> >
>> >>Are you a Vogon?
>> >
>> >
>> > Good God, you are stupid.
>>
>> Can't get anything past you.
>>
>
> I know. Its just amazing isn't it. But he did say that John Denver was a
> Quarterback for the Broncos. I even recorded the date in my diary.
>
> Dave
>
>

Would it diminish the experience in any way if you were told that not many
people watching that thread actually believed for a moment that Wolfgang
thought that John Denver was a QB for the Broncos?

Scott

[Scott Seidman]

"David Snedeker" > wrote in news:ch88k1$a2i$0
:

>
> "rw" > wrote in message
> m...
>> Wolfgang wrote:
>> > "rw" > wrote in message
>> > m...
>> >
>> >
>> >>Are you a Vogon?
>> >
>> >
>> > Good God, you are stupid.
>>
>> Can't get anything past you.
>>
>
> I know. Its just amazing isn't it. But he did say that John Denver was a
> Quarterback for the Broncos. I even recorded the date in my diary.
>
> Dave
>
>

Would it diminish the experience in any way if you were told that not many
people watching that thread actually believed for a moment that Wolfgang
thought that John Denver was a QB for the Broncos?

Scott

[Ken Fortenberry]

David Snedeker wrote:
>
> I know. Its just amazing isn't it. But he did say that John Denver was a
> Quarterback for the Broncos. I even recorded the date in my diary.

Wolfie is an annoying little jerk, but his nastiness is a
pure and heartfelt nastiness, his nastiness is natural and
unstudied, one hesitates to conclude that he was born nasty,
but without getting into that whole nature, nurture thing,
it's obvious that nastiness pervades his whole being.

Nasty little jerks are beneath you. The folks on roff who
have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
decent pimple on your ass. Oh yeah, he's annoying AND a pain
in the ass AND he's a pus filled blemish of a jerk .... hmmmm,
OK, on second thought maybe Wolfie WOULD make a decent pimple
on your ass. Still, don't you think it's kinda gross to pop ass
pimples in public ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Mark Bowen]

"Scott Seidman" > wrote in message
. 1.4...
> Would it diminish the experience in any way if you were told that not many
> people watching that thread actually believed for a moment that Wolfgang
> thought that John Denver was a QB for the Broncos?
>
> Scott

WHAT! You've got to be kiddin' me, right?

Mark --I guess the next thing you'll be tellin' me is that George Plimpton wasn't the
greatest quarterback the Lion's ever had!--

[Mark Bowen]

"Scott Seidman" > wrote in message
. 1.4...
> Would it diminish the experience in any way if you were told that not many
> people watching that thread actually believed for a moment that Wolfgang
> thought that John Denver was a QB for the Broncos?
>
> Scott

WHAT! You've got to be kiddin' me, right?

Mark --I guess the next thing you'll be tellin' me is that George Plimpton wasn't the
greatest quarterback the Lion's ever had!--

[Ken Fortenberry]

David Snedeker wrote:
> Hey Ken, remember when a rave on ROFF might include poetry, or a clash of
> views on Derida?

Well hell, you could have popped the ass pimple for attributing
"The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" to Lord Byron but instead chose
to fixate on John Denver, so don't wax too nostalgic over the
diminished level of discourse around here.

But yeah, I do remember. This place started going downhill when
it became over-populated with North Carolinians. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Ken Fortenberry]

David Snedeker wrote:
> Hey Ken, remember when a rave on ROFF might include poetry, or a clash of
> views on Derida?

Well hell, you could have popped the ass pimple for attributing
"The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" to Lord Byron but instead chose
to fixate on John Denver, so don't wax too nostalgic over the
diminished level of discourse around here.

But yeah, I do remember. This place started going downhill when
it became over-populated with North Carolinians. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Frank Reid]

> Nasty little jerks are beneath you. The folks on roff who
> have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> decent pimple on your ass. Oh yeah, he's annoying AND a pain
> in the ass AND he's a pus filled blemish of a jerk .... hmmmm,
> OK, on second thought maybe Wolfie WOULD make a decent pimple
> on your ass. Still, don't you think it's kinda gross to pop ass
> pimples in public ?

Hey, Wolfy does have his uses, i.e. "Wolfy, you distract that bear whilst I
go for the truck."

--
Frank Reid
(always looking for someone's good side)
Reverse email to reply

[Frank Reid]

> Nasty little jerks are beneath you. The folks on roff who
> have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> decent pimple on your ass. Oh yeah, he's annoying AND a pain
> in the ass AND he's a pus filled blemish of a jerk .... hmmmm,
> OK, on second thought maybe Wolfie WOULD make a decent pimple
> on your ass. Still, don't you think it's kinda gross to pop ass
> pimples in public ?

Hey, Wolfy does have his uses, i.e. "Wolfy, you distract that bear whilst I
go for the truck."

--
Frank Reid
(always looking for someone's good side)
Reverse email to reply

[Frank Reid]

> Nasty little jerks are beneath you. The folks on roff who
> have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> decent pimple on your ass. Oh yeah, he's annoying AND a pain
> in the ass AND he's a pus filled blemish of a jerk .... hmmmm,
> OK, on second thought maybe Wolfie WOULD make a decent pimple
> on your ass. Still, don't you think it's kinda gross to pop ass
> pimples in public ?

Hey, Wolfy does have his uses, i.e. "Wolfy, you distract that bear whilst I
go for the truck."

--
Frank Reid
(always looking for someone's good side)
Reverse email to reply

[Wolfgang]

"Scott Seidman" > wrote in message
. 1.4...
>
> Would it diminish the experience in any way if you were told that not many
> people watching that thread actually believed for a moment that Wolfgang
> thought that John Denver was a QB for the Broncos?

Let 'em be, Scott. This is the denouement. This is what the whole exercise
was for.

Wolfgang

[Wolfgang]

"Scott Seidman" > wrote in message
. 1.4...
>
> Would it diminish the experience in any way if you were told that not many
> people watching that thread actually believed for a moment that Wolfgang
> thought that John Denver was a QB for the Broncos?

Let 'em be, Scott. This is the denouement. This is what the whole exercise
was for.

Wolfgang

[GregP]

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 02:15:19 GMT, "asadi...."
> wrote:

>I'd really like to know you in the biblical sense.
>Reply to group for a little horizontal bedside baptism.
>
>all my love...
>
>john


A program that knows the rules of grammar and has
access to a decent word list with a modicum of
associations just to avoid appearing totally random ?

[GregP]

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 02:15:19 GMT, "asadi...."
> wrote:

>I'd really like to know you in the biblical sense.
>Reply to group for a little horizontal bedside baptism.
>
>all my love...
>
>john


A program that knows the rules of grammar and has
access to a decent word list with a modicum of
associations just to avoid appearing totally random ?

[Wolfgang]

"GregP" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 02:15:19 GMT, "asadi...."
> > wrote:
>
> >I'd really like to know you in the biblical sense.
> >Reply to group for a little horizontal bedside baptism.
> >
> >all my love...
> >
> >john
>
>
> A program that knows the rules of grammar and has
> access to a decent word list with a modicum of
> associations just to avoid appearing totally random ?

Nah, that's just John.......you get used to it after a while.
:)

Wolfgang

[Tim J.]

Wolfgang wrote:
> "GregP" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 02:15:19 GMT, "asadi...."
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I'd really like to know you in the biblical sense.
>>> Reply to group for a little horizontal bedside baptism.
>>>
>>> all my love...
>>>
>>> john
>>
>>
>> A program that knows the rules of grammar and has
>> access to a decent word list with a modicum of
>> associations just to avoid appearing totally random ?
>
> Nah, that's just John.......you get used to it after a while.

Once again, you're WRONG! ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
(howz about another apology?)
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

[Tim J.]

Wolfgang wrote:
> "GregP" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 02:15:19 GMT, "asadi...."
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I'd really like to know you in the biblical sense.
>>> Reply to group for a little horizontal bedside baptism.
>>>
>>> all my love...
>>>
>>> john
>>
>>
>> A program that knows the rules of grammar and has
>> access to a decent word list with a modicum of
>> associations just to avoid appearing totally random ?
>
> Nah, that's just John.......you get used to it after a while.

Once again, you're WRONG! ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
(howz about another apology?)
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

[Wolfgang]

"Tim J." > wrote in message
...
>
> ...(howz about another apology?)

I got a busload that I've never been able to find a use for. You want
'em one at a time or all at once?

Wolfgang
who is otherwise well disposed toward sending them to a good home free
of charge.

[Wolfgang]

"Tim J." > wrote in message
...
>
> ...(howz about another apology?)

I got a busload that I've never been able to find a use for. You want
'em one at a time or all at once?

Wolfgang
who is otherwise well disposed toward sending them to a good home free
of charge.

[Jeff]

ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
> Nasty little jerks are beneath you.


> The folks on roff who
> have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> decent pimple on your ass....

hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>

jeff

>

[Jeff]

ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
> Nasty little jerks are beneath you.


> The folks on roff who
> have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> decent pimple on your ass....

hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>

jeff

>

[Jeff]

ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
> Nasty little jerks are beneath you.


> The folks on roff who
> have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> decent pimple on your ass....

hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>

jeff

>

[Ken Fortenberry]

Jeff top posted:

> ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!

No, you insufferable ****tard, I post my replies in the
conventional place because I have a modicum of respect
for most of the folks here on roff who take the time to
listen in on my conversations.

If you weren't rude, stupid and lazy you'd do the same.

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Jeff]

preach it to your lemmings...and, rub on.
but at least you are correct in one thing: recognizing you for a nasty
jerk does not require reference to the placement of your posts.

jeff

Ken Fortenberry wrote:

> Jeff top posted:
>
>> ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!
>
>
> No, you insufferable ****tard, I post my replies in the
> conventional place because I have a modicum of respect
> for most of the folks here on roff who take the time to
> listen in on my conversations.
>
> If you weren't rude, stupid and lazy you'd do the same.
>

[Jeff]

preach it to your lemmings...and, rub on.
but at least you are correct in one thing: recognizing you for a nasty
jerk does not require reference to the placement of your posts.

jeff

Ken Fortenberry wrote:

> Jeff top posted:
>
>> ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!
>
>
> No, you insufferable ****tard, I post my replies in the
> conventional place because I have a modicum of respect
> for most of the folks here on roff who take the time to
> listen in on my conversations.
>
> If you weren't rude, stupid and lazy you'd do the same.
>

[Jeff]

David Snedeker wrote:

> "Jeff" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
>>meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
>>least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>
>>
>
> Are you saying that Wolfgang is a more balanced and witty asshole than I am?
> On the one hand I think I feel a lawyer slur coming on, but maybe not. And I
> do not recall you and I meeting in our briefs. I think I would remember
> that. We met fully clothed as I recall.
>
> Dave
> See, I can be just as much of a balanced and witty asshole as Wolfman.

much better...and much appreciated. keep at it.

jeff

>

[Jeff]

David Snedeker wrote:

> "Jeff" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
>>meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
>>least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>
>>
>
> Are you saying that Wolfgang is a more balanced and witty asshole than I am?
> On the one hand I think I feel a lawyer slur coming on, but maybe not. And I
> do not recall you and I meeting in our briefs. I think I would remember
> that. We met fully clothed as I recall.
>
> Dave
> See, I can be just as much of a balanced and witty asshole as Wolfman.

much better...and much appreciated. keep at it.

jeff

>

[Jeff]

David Snedeker wrote:

> "Jeff" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
>>meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
>>least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>
>>
>
> Are you saying that Wolfgang is a more balanced and witty asshole than I am?
> On the one hand I think I feel a lawyer slur coming on, but maybe not. And I
> do not recall you and I meeting in our briefs. I think I would remember
> that. We met fully clothed as I recall.
>
> Dave
> See, I can be just as much of a balanced and witty asshole as Wolfman.

much better...and much appreciated. keep at it.

jeff

>

[Wolfgang]

"Jeff" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!
>
> Ken Fortenberry wrote:
> > Nasty little jerks are beneath you.
>
>
> > The folks on roff who
> > have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> > decent pimple on your ass....
>
> hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
> meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
> least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>

Judging by an (admittedly not very close) examination of what we've seen
leaking out of it all over this place for the past several years, I'd say
there isn't much Dave's ass could borrow from my meager pharmacopoeia that
would do it much good. Wit, were it mine to bestow, would be of little use
to someone who hasn't any. As for Dave and balance......well, that is
perhaps the strangest and most evocative juxtaposition yet seen on ROFF.
:)

Wolfgang
sorry, snake, you lose by a red cu........um.......uh.......a hair.

[Wolfgang]

"Jeff" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> ah...so that's why you bottom posted your reply to dave!
>
> Ken Fortenberry wrote:
> > Nasty little jerks are beneath you.
>
>
> > The folks on roff who
> > have met the both of you know that Wolfie wouldn't make a
> > decent pimple on your ass....
>
> hmmm ... well, having met both, (though in dave's case, it was a brief
> meeting), and judging from the writings here, i think wolfgang would at
> least lend balance and some necessary wit to the ass. <g>

Judging by an (admittedly not very close) examination of what we've seen
leaking out of it all over this place for the past several years, I'd say
there isn't much Dave's ass could borrow from my meager pharmacopoeia that
would do it much good. Wit, were it mine to bestow, would be of little use
to someone who hasn't any. As for Dave and balance......well, that is
perhaps the strangest and most evocative juxtaposition yet seen on ROFF.
:)

Wolfgang
sorry, snake, you lose by a red cu........um.......uh.......a hair.

[Ken Fortenberry]

Jeff top posted:

> preach it to your lemmings...

Preach ? To my lemmings ?

You rude, stupid, lazy types sure do have some strange notions.
That wasn't preaching and the only lemming I've got here is
Wayno and I had to steal him from the Village Idiot's junk yard.

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Ken Fortenberry]

Jeff top posted:

> preach it to your lemmings...

Preach ? To my lemmings ?

You rude, stupid, lazy types sure do have some strange notions.
That wasn't preaching and the only lemming I've got here is
Wayno and I had to steal him from the Village Idiot's junk yard.

--
Ken Fortenberry