Homer, Alaska vs. Valdez - for fishing and sightseeing

[Jen]

My boyfriend and I are planning a trip to Alaska in late may/early
June 2004. He would like to do some halibut fishing. We both want to
sight-see in Prince William Sound. Which would provide the best
experience:

1. Marine Highway from Valdez to Whittier to see the sound, and
halibut fishing charter in Homer (combined with King Salmon if they're
running – we'll be there in late May),

2. Halibut fishing charter in Valdez (or Whittier?) to sight-see and
fish in the same trip

Option 2 is cheaper, but will it provide an adequate opportunity to
sight-see and fish when compared to Option 1?

Thanks for any advice.

[[email protected]]

Been a while since I've been up that way, but I don't remember Halibut being
that big a thing in Valdez or Whittier, but Homer that's a different thing.
There should be some Kings in the mix at the same time. The run into
Whittier has lots of glaciers on it, but with the global warming lately I
don't know how much you'll see in the water, hear the glaciers that used to
be in the water when I lived up there 25 years ago are now quite a ways up
the valleys. Anyway where Kachemak Bay enters Cook Inlet is a hotspot, Homer
is almost on top of it. I imagine the Glacier Bay runs and the one out of
Yakatat would be the most productive if you want to get close and personal
with a glacier. The run into Haines and Skagway is far prettier than Valdez
or Whittier. Lynn Canal is a fjord with waterfalls going into it all over
the place.

[Rob S.]

(Jen) wrote in message >...
> My boyfriend and I are planning a trip to Alaska in late may/early
> June 2004. He would like to do some halibut fishing. We both want to
> sight-see in Prince William Sound. Which would provide the best
> experience:
>
> 1. Marine Highway from Valdez to Whittier to see the sound, and
> halibut fishing charter in Homer (combined with King Salmon if they're
> running ? we'll be there in late May),
>
> 2. Halibut fishing charter in Valdez (or Whittier?) to sight-see and
> fish in the same trip
>
> Option 2 is cheaper, but will it provide an adequate opportunity to
> sight-see and fish when compared to Option 1?
>
> Thanks for any advice.

If you want to fish for Halibut, then you'll want to go out to Homer.
A beautiful trip in and of itself.

[chip]

New here,I would go to homer for the halibut.I would be looking at july
with salmon derby going on. Skagway is far more scenic than valdez.You
won,t see all there is of alaska in a week/month.Thats like going to
disney for a day.

[LeRoy Williams]

Homer is for halibut !!!


"chip" > wrote in message
...
> New here,I would go to homer for the halibut.I would be looking at july
> with salmon derby going on. Skagway is far more scenic than valdez.You
> won,t see all there is of alaska in a week/month.Thats like going to
> disney for a day.
>
>
>
>

[Outdoors Magazine]

Jen,
A friend of mine from AK sent me the following for you:
-----Original Message-----

Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:18 PM

Subject: Re: Homer, Alaska vs. Valdez - for fishing and sightseeing



James:

Homer is too busy and commercialized, and the halibut fishing while 'famous'

is not as scenic..you wind up in Cook Inlet, which is murky and boring.

However, if the kings are in you can usually find a combo trip where you

fish 'butts on slack tide and troll for kings when during the rips....so the

fishing can be better, but its still a real scenic yawner (but recall that I

lived there 15 years/travel there, so that's a "locals" perspective).

Valdez is far more attractive, and while not as notorious for halibut it's

where all we "locals" went/go...stay away from the tourists on the Kenai.

Maybe fewer fish, but typically larger in Valdez. Valdez arm has no king

fishing, but if you get out into the Sound and over toward the east near the

Copper River, the king fishing is typically better than the Kenai, but with

smaller fish. Don't know where they're thinking of staying, but there are

few places in either Valdez or Homer...and at that time of the year will be

getting pretty booked up.

The ferry ride Valdez-Whittier is okay, but the ferry moves right along and

the view are "too far out" for the most part. You can go right past the

Columbia glacier and not see it if the fogs down. In Valdez, there's an

outfit called Stan Stephens charters that runs great trips around there,

used to have a smaller boat that got fairly close to the glacier (though

that was when it stuck out into the bay more), and they also have drop-off

options if you want to kayak/camp if memory serves. Also, for a less

"touristy" run, they can go from Valdez-Cordova-Whittier on the Ferry and

stay a few days to screw around Cordova, which is a pretty cool place as

you'll see way more stuff. Whittier is almost always torrential rain and

almost no visibility, so don't expect much....basically an ugly shipping

terminal/railyard surrounded by steep mountains in a narrow fjord, with

visibility typically about 500' AGL in the summer...much, much nicer in the

dead of winter as it's cold and clear, but still open water.

Anyway, those are my thoughts.

Theodolphus Hekarz




--
James Ehlers

Outdoors Magazine
www.outdoorsmagazine.net




"Jen" > wrote in message
om...
> My boyfriend and I are planning a trip to Alaska in late may/early
> June 2004. He would like to do some halibut fishing. We both want to
> sight-see in Prince William Sound. Which would provide the best
> experience:
>
> 1. Marine Highway from Valdez to Whittier to see the sound, and
> halibut fishing charter in Homer (combined with King Salmon if they're
> running - we'll be there in late May),
>
> 2. Halibut fishing charter in Valdez (or Whittier?) to sight-see and
> fish in the same trip
>
> Option 2 is cheaper, but will it provide an adequate opportunity to
> sight-see and fish when compared to Option 1?
>
> Thanks for any advice.

[Philip R. Gantt]

I hope you don't mind if I put my 2 cents in here.

I have a friend on the Kenai who happens to be a fishing guide. I've
been up there twice a year for several years now, but my only problem is
that my kids catch bigger fish than I do. Last 4th of July my daughter
Julia, who was 6 months pregnant at the time, caught a 65# king in the
Kenai. Before that, my 10 year old daughter caught a 50# king.

My biggest was 42# and I caught that one in the nearby Kasilof River. I
actually caught 4 kings that day, all over 30#, and kept only the
female. I like the Kasilof better than the Kenai as it is much less
crowded and quiet as drift boats (no motors) are used in this shallow
river. The Kasilof also gets a very strong run of sockeye in the
summer, not to mention the steelhead and dollies that are prevalent.

Outdoors Magazine wrote:

> Jen,
> A friend of mine from AK sent me the following for you:
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:18 PM
>
> Subject: Re: Homer, Alaska vs. Valdez - for fishing and sightseeing
>
>
>
> James:
>
> Homer is too busy and commercialized, and the halibut fishing while 'famous'
>
> is not as scenic..you wind up in Cook Inlet, which is murky and boring.
>
> However, if the kings are in you can usually find a combo trip where you
>
> fish 'butts on slack tide and troll for kings when during the rips....so the
>
> fishing can be better, but its still a real scenic yawner (but recall that I
>
> lived there 15 years/travel there, so that's a "locals" perspective).
>
> Valdez is far more attractive, and while not as notorious for halibut it's
>
> where all we "locals" went/go...stay away from the tourists on the Kenai.
>
> Maybe fewer fish, but typically larger in Valdez. Valdez arm has no king
>
> fishing, but if you get out into the Sound and over toward the east near the
>
> Copper River, the king fishing is typically better than the Kenai, but with
>
> smaller fish. Don't know where they're thinking of staying, but there are
>
> few places in either Valdez or Homer...and at that time of the year will be
>
> getting pretty booked up.
>
> The ferry ride Valdez-Whittier is okay, but the ferry moves right along and
>
> the view are "too far out" for the most part. You can go right past the
>
> Columbia glacier and not see it if the fogs down. In Valdez, there's an
>
> outfit called Stan Stephens charters that runs great trips around there,
>
> used to have a smaller boat that got fairly close to the glacier (though
>
> that was when it stuck out into the bay more), and they also have drop-off
>
> options if you want to kayak/camp if memory serves. Also, for a less
>
> "touristy" run, they can go from Valdez-Cordova-Whittier on the Ferry and
>
> stay a few days to screw around Cordova, which is a pretty cool place as
>
> you'll see way more stuff. Whittier is almost always torrential rain and
>
> almost no visibility, so don't expect much....basically an ugly shipping
>
> terminal/railyard surrounded by steep mountains in a narrow fjord, with
>
> visibility typically about 500' AGL in the summer...much, much nicer in the
>
> dead of winter as it's cold and clear, but still open water.
>
> Anyway, those are my thoughts.
>
> Theodolphus Hekarz
>
>
>
>

--
Regards,
Philip R. Gantt
Phil's Fine Foods, Inc.
http://www.seasoned.com/
http://www.grillmates.biz/
http://www.mgfalaska.com/