Where are all the pictures?

[Buddy]

I know that my ISP's news service is pretty shoddy, but I seldom see the
pictures that folks are referring to here. I can see some going back to
12/18/06, so it can't all be retention.

It's just that I see a lot of replies, but quite often not the original
post.

TIA
--

><<XX>:> Buddy

[Cyli]

On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:52:49 -0500, Buddy >
wrote:

>I know that my ISP's news service is pretty shoddy, but I seldom see the
>pictures that folks are referring to here. I can see some going back to
>12/18/06, so it can't all be retention.
>
>It's just that I see a lot of replies, but quite often not the original
>post.
>
>TIA


Check with your ISP's support folks. They may not be allowing binary
pics over a certain size. Lots of ISPs, especially smaller ones,
don't like binaries because they use up a lot of disk space and
bandwidth.
--

r.bc: vixen
Minnow goddess.Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc..
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

[Cyli]

On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:52:49 -0500, Buddy >
wrote:

>I know that my ISP's news service is pretty shoddy, but I seldom see the
>pictures that folks are referring to here. I can see some going back to
>12/18/06, so it can't all be retention.
>
>It's just that I see a lot of replies, but quite often not the original
>post.
>
>TIA


Check with your ISP's support folks. They may not be allowing binary
pics over a certain size. Lots of ISPs, especially smaller ones,
don't like binaries because they use up a lot of disk space and
bandwidth.
--

r.bc: vixen
Minnow goddess.Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc..
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

[Buddy]

Cyli wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:52:49 -0500, Buddy >
> wrote:
>
>> I know that my ISP's news service is pretty shoddy, but I seldom see the
>> pictures that folks are referring to here. I can see some going back to
>> 12/18/06, so it can't all be retention.
>>
>> It's just that I see a lot of replies, but quite often not the original
>> post.
>>
>> TIA
>
>
> Check with your ISP's support folks. They may not be allowing binary
> pics over a certain size. Lots of ISPs, especially smaller ones,
> don't like binaries because they use up a lot of disk space and
> bandwidth.
Thanks, that sounds reasonable. Haven't got any recent fishing pictures,
but I did stop at the harbor yesterday after the snow.

--

><<XX>:> Buddy

[Buddy]

Cyli wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:52:49 -0500, Buddy >
> wrote:
>
>> I know that my ISP's news service is pretty shoddy, but I seldom see the
>> pictures that folks are referring to here. I can see some going back to
>> 12/18/06, so it can't all be retention.
>>
>> It's just that I see a lot of replies, but quite often not the original
>> post.
>>
>> TIA
>
>
> Check with your ISP's support folks. They may not be allowing binary
> pics over a certain size. Lots of ISPs, especially smaller ones,
> don't like binaries because they use up a lot of disk space and
> bandwidth.
Thanks, that sounds reasonable. Haven't got any recent fishing pictures,
but I did stop at the harbor yesterday after the snow.

--

><<XX>:> Buddy

[daytripper]

On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:17:29 -0500, Buddy > wrote:

>Cyli wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:52:49 -0500, Buddy >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I know that my ISP's news service is pretty shoddy, but I seldom see the
>>> pictures that folks are referring to here. I can see some going back to
>>> 12/18/06, so it can't all be retention.
>>>
>>> It's just that I see a lot of replies, but quite often not the original
>>> post.
>>>
>>> TIA
>>
>>
>> Check with your ISP's support folks. They may not be allowing binary
>> pics over a certain size. Lots of ISPs, especially smaller ones,
>> don't like binaries because they use up a lot of disk space and
>> bandwidth.
>Thanks, that sounds reasonable. Haven't got any recent fishing pictures,
>but I did stop at the harbor yesterday after the snow.

Those are *definitely* Out Of Season right now...

[daytripper]

On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:17:29 -0500, Buddy > wrote:

>Cyli wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:52:49 -0500, Buddy >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I know that my ISP's news service is pretty shoddy, but I seldom see the
>>> pictures that folks are referring to here. I can see some going back to
>>> 12/18/06, so it can't all be retention.
>>>
>>> It's just that I see a lot of replies, but quite often not the original
>>> post.
>>>
>>> TIA
>>
>>
>> Check with your ISP's support folks. They may not be allowing binary
>> pics over a certain size. Lots of ISPs, especially smaller ones,
>> don't like binaries because they use up a lot of disk space and
>> bandwidth.
>Thanks, that sounds reasonable. Haven't got any recent fishing pictures,
>but I did stop at the harbor yesterday after the snow.

Those are *definitely* Out Of Season right now...

[Chris S]

Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
Http://hawknest.us/pics/Plum.JPG

And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
Http://hawknest.us/pics/Mike.JPG
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

[Chris S]

Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
Http://hawknest.us/pics/Plum.JPG

And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
Http://hawknest.us/pics/Mike.JPG
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

[Chris S]

Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
See if it works this way :)

--
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

"Chris S" > wrote in message
. ..
> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
> Http://hawknest.us/pics/Plum.JPG
>
> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
> Http://hawknest.us/pics/Mike.JPG
> --
> --
> Chris S
> Replace com with net to e-mail
> ---
>
>

[Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers]

"Chris S" > wrote in message
. ..
> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
> See if it works this way :)

Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
NWC I assume?
--
Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers
http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com
G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods
http://www.herefishyfishy.com

[Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers]

"Chris S" > wrote in message
. ..
> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
> See if it works this way :)

Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
NWC I assume?
--
Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers
http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com
G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods
http://www.herefishyfishy.com

[The Great Gazooka]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:39:56 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers"
> wrote:

>
>"Chris S" > wrote in message
. ..
>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>> See if it works this way :)
>
>Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
>NWC I assume?
By golly yeah...............you ****ing spammer.

[The Great Gazooka]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:39:56 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers"
> wrote:

>
>"Chris S" > wrote in message
. ..
>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>> See if it works this way :)
>
>Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
>NWC I assume?
By golly yeah...............you ****ing spammer.

[Chris S]

SHHHHH......... ya :)
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

"Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Chris S" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>> See if it works this way :)
>
> Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
> NWC I assume?
> --
> Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers
> http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com
> G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods
> http://www.herefishyfishy.com
>

[Chris S]

SHHHHH......... ya :)
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

"Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Chris S" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>> See if it works this way :)
>
> Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
> NWC I assume?
> --
> Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers
> http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com
> G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods
> http://www.herefishyfishy.com
>

[Dan, danl, Redbeard uh Greybeard now]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:17:43 -0600, "Chris S"
> wrote:

> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>See if it works this way :)
>
>--
>--
Nice!
How is the new that new boat working out...Done any ice breaking with
it? ;<}

Dan

Remove the x for e-mail reply
1996 HD Sportster 1200S. N9JBF. Bass fishing Aficionado!
www.outdoorfrontiers.com www.SecretWeaponLures.com
A proud charter member of "PETAF", People for Eating Tasty Animals and Fish!!!

[Dan, danl, Redbeard uh Greybeard now]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:17:43 -0600, "Chris S"
> wrote:

> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>See if it works this way :)
>
>--
>--
Nice!
How is the new that new boat working out...Done any ice breaking with
it? ;<}

Dan

Remove the x for e-mail reply
1996 HD Sportster 1200S. N9JBF. Bass fishing Aficionado!
www.outdoorfrontiers.com www.SecretWeaponLures.com
A proud charter member of "PETAF", People for Eating Tasty Animals and Fish!!!

[Chris S]

Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

"The Great Gazooka" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:39:56 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Chris S" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>>> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>>> See if it works this way :)
>>
>>Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
>>NWC I assume?
> By golly yeah...............you ****ing spammer.

[Chris S]

Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

"The Great Gazooka" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:39:56 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Chris S" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>>> And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>>> See if it works this way :)
>>
>>Yup, those are northern Wisconsin smallies. The lake you go to after the
>>NWC I assume?
> By golly yeah...............you ****ing spammer.

[Chris S]

"Dan, danl, Redbeard uh Greybeard now" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:17:43 -0600, "Chris S"
> > wrote:
>
>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>>And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>>See if it works this way :)
>>
>>--
>>--
> Nice!
> How is the new that new boat working out...Done any ice breaking with
> it? ;<}
>
> Dan
Nope its in the garage for the winter :( Hope to get it out in the last part
of March.......
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

[Chris S]

"Dan, danl, Redbeard uh Greybeard now" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:17:43 -0600, "Chris S"
> > wrote:
>
>> Here's one from Steve's Area in Wis this fall. Almost a 5 lber :)
>>And this is a friends 5+ next day at the same area.
>>See if it works this way :)
>>
>>--
>>--
> Nice!
> How is the new that new boat working out...Done any ice breaking with
> it? ;<}
>
> Dan
Nope its in the garage for the winter :( Hope to get it out in the last part
of March.......
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

[The Great Gazooka]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:19:00 -0600, "Chris S"
> wrote:

>Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
>--
Dumbass.......He can take his ****ing G&S guide service and shove it
up your naive ass. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
golly!!!

[The Great Gazooka]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:19:00 -0600, "Chris S"
> wrote:

>Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
>--
Dumbass.......He can take his ****ing G&S guide service and shove it
up your naive ass. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
golly!!!

[Donut]

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 06:28:39 GMT, The Great Gazooka
> wrote:

>On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:19:00 -0600, "Chris S"
> wrote:
>
>>Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
>>--
>Dumbass.......He can take his ****ing G&S guide service and shove it
>up your naive ass. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
>golly!!!

ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1

[Donut]

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 06:28:39 GMT, The Great Gazooka
> wrote:

>On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:19:00 -0600, "Chris S"
> wrote:
>
>>Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
>>--
>Dumbass.......He can take his ****ing G&S guide service and shove it
>up your naive ass. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
>golly!!!

ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1

[Chris S]

Big words coming from an idiot typing on a computer.
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

"The Great Gazooka" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:19:00 -0600, "Chris S"
> > wrote:
>
>>Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
>>--
> Dumbass.......He can take his ****ing G&S guide service and shove it
> up your naive ass. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
> golly!!!

[Chris S]

Big words coming from an idiot typing on a computer.
--
--
Chris S
Replace com with net to e-mail
---

"The Great Gazooka" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:19:00 -0600, "Chris S"
> > wrote:
>
>>Gazooka Grow up !!!!!
>>--
> Dumbass.......He can take his ****ing G&S guide service and shove it
> up your naive ass. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
> golly!!!

[Ken Fortenberry]

Donut wrote:
> The Great Gazooka wrote:
>> ... He can take his f****** G&S guide service and shove it
>> up your naive a**. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
>> golly!!!
>
> ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1

Donut is correct Mr. Gazooka. That faq is the generally accepted
convention concerning advertisements in Usenet newsgroups. The
relevant section is this one:

================================================== ========================
5. .signature advertisements.

....

Typically, it is considered bad manners to put more than four lines of
information in your .signature, regardless of what those four lines might
say or contain. Gigantic ASCII pictures of dragons, for example, are
annoying when you have to see them every time a certain person posts.

Similarly, it's considered bad manners to put an advertisement in your
..signature and then post a lot of empty or nearly-empty articles simply
to get your .signature into various newsgroups.

On the other hand, if you post meaningful, responsible messages in groups
you're actually interested in, and those messages happen to have the
address of your Web page tacked on at the end, few people will complain.

Just keep .signature advertisements extremely short and sweet. Let your
Web page contain the sales pitch -- the .signature should usually be
little more than a listing of your URL and perhaps a mention of what sort
of business you're in.

Restraint and responsibility are everything -- if you've got those, people
will sit up and listen to you.
================================================== =========================

As you can plainly see Mr. Gazooka your potty-mouthed tirade is
out of line. Steve's .signature conforms in all respects to Usenet
convention and is a perfectly acceptable form of advertisement on
a Usenet newsgroup devoted to fishing.

It's ignorant fools like yourself, Mr. Gazooka, who give the rest
of us SPAM kops a bad reputation. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

[Ken Fortenberry]

Donut wrote:
> The Great Gazooka wrote:
>> ... He can take his f****** G&S guide service and shove it
>> up your naive a**. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
>> golly!!!
>
> ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1

Donut is correct Mr. Gazooka. That faq is the generally accepted
convention concerning advertisements in Usenet newsgroups. The
relevant section is this one:

================================================== ========================
5. .signature advertisements.

....

Typically, it is considered bad manners to put more than four lines of
information in your .signature, regardless of what those four lines might
say or contain. Gigantic ASCII pictures of dragons, for example, are
annoying when you have to see them every time a certain person posts.

Similarly, it's considered bad manners to put an advertisement in your
..signature and then post a lot of empty or nearly-empty articles simply
to get your .signature into various newsgroups.

On the other hand, if you post meaningful, responsible messages in groups
you're actually interested in, and those messages happen to have the
address of your Web page tacked on at the end, few people will complain.

Just keep .signature advertisements extremely short and sweet. Let your
Web page contain the sales pitch -- the .signature should usually be
little more than a listing of your URL and perhaps a mention of what sort
of business you're in.

Restraint and responsibility are everything -- if you've got those, people
will sit up and listen to you.
================================================== =========================

As you can plainly see Mr. Gazooka your potty-mouthed tirade is
out of line. Steve's .signature conforms in all respects to Usenet
convention and is a perfectly acceptable form of advertisement on
a Usenet newsgroup devoted to fishing.

It's ignorant fools like yourself, Mr. Gazooka, who give the rest
of us SPAM kops a bad reputation. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

[The Great Gazooka]

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:51:12 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
> wrote:

>Donut wrote:
>> The Great Gazooka wrote:
>>> ... He can take his f****** G&S guide service and shove it
>>> up your naive a**. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
>>> golly!!!
>>
>> ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1
>
>Donut is correct Mr. Gazooka. That faq is the generally accepted
>convention concerning advertisements in Usenet newsgroups. The
>relevant section is this one:
>
>================================================== ========================
>5. .signature advertisements.
>
>...
>
>Typically, it is considered bad manners to put more than four lines of
>information in your .signature, regardless of what those four lines might
>say or contain. Gigantic ASCII pictures of dragons, for example, are
>annoying when you have to see them every time a certain person posts.
>
>Similarly, it's considered bad manners to put an advertisement in your
>.signature and then post a lot of empty or nearly-empty articles simply
>to get your .signature into various newsgroups.
>
>On the other hand, if you post meaningful, responsible messages in groups
>you're actually interested in, and those messages happen to have the
>address of your Web page tacked on at the end, few people will complain.
>
>Just keep .signature advertisements extremely short and sweet. Let your
>Web page contain the sales pitch -- the .signature should usually be
>little more than a listing of your URL and perhaps a mention of what sort
>of business you're in.
>
>Restraint and responsibility are everything -- if you've got those, people
>will sit up and listen to you.
>================================================== =========================
>
>As you can plainly see Mr. Gazooka your potty-mouthed tirade is
>out of line. Steve's .signature conforms in all respects to Usenet
>convention and is a perfectly acceptable form of advertisement on
>a Usenet newsgroup devoted to fishing.
>
>It's ignorant fools like yourself, Mr. Gazooka, who give the rest
>of us SPAM kops a bad reputation. ;-)
Oh Mr Fartinberries...........this gospel truth you just pulled out ,
shove it back.

[The Great Gazooka]

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:51:12 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
> wrote:

>Donut wrote:
>> The Great Gazooka wrote:
>>> ... He can take his f****** G&S guide service and shove it
>>> up your naive a**. Stupid fools like you encourage spammers ......by
>>> golly!!!
>>
>> ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1
>
>Donut is correct Mr. Gazooka. That faq is the generally accepted
>convention concerning advertisements in Usenet newsgroups. The
>relevant section is this one:
>
>================================================== ========================
>5. .signature advertisements.
>
>...
>
>Typically, it is considered bad manners to put more than four lines of
>information in your .signature, regardless of what those four lines might
>say or contain. Gigantic ASCII pictures of dragons, for example, are
>annoying when you have to see them every time a certain person posts.
>
>Similarly, it's considered bad manners to put an advertisement in your
>.signature and then post a lot of empty or nearly-empty articles simply
>to get your .signature into various newsgroups.
>
>On the other hand, if you post meaningful, responsible messages in groups
>you're actually interested in, and those messages happen to have the
>address of your Web page tacked on at the end, few people will complain.
>
>Just keep .signature advertisements extremely short and sweet. Let your
>Web page contain the sales pitch -- the .signature should usually be
>little more than a listing of your URL and perhaps a mention of what sort
>of business you're in.
>
>Restraint and responsibility are everything -- if you've got those, people
>will sit up and listen to you.
>================================================== =========================
>
>As you can plainly see Mr. Gazooka your potty-mouthed tirade is
>out of line. Steve's .signature conforms in all respects to Usenet
>convention and is a perfectly acceptable form of advertisement on
>a Usenet newsgroup devoted to fishing.
>
>It's ignorant fools like yourself, Mr. Gazooka, who give the rest
>of us SPAM kops a bad reputation. ;-)
Oh Mr Fartinberries...........this gospel truth you just pulled out ,
shove it back.