teaching english structure

[deriant]

I have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like. See:
http://www.disengs.blogspot.com

[Donut]

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:47:21 -0700 (PDT), deriant >
wrote:

>I have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
>Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like. See:
<snip>

I may be wrong, but I suspect this was meant to be sent to Fred's
inbox directly.

Don

[Wolfgang]

"deriant" > wrote in message
...
>I have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
> Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like. See:
> http://www.disengs.blogspot.com

What means?

Wolfgang

[riverman]

On Aug 20, 3:47*pm, deriant > wrote:
> I have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
> Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like. See:http://www.disengs.blogspot.com


I love it. Check out the very first review question:
---------------------------------------------------
TASK 1: Change the <indicated> words with shall or will

1. It <is going to> dark this evening.
--------------------------------------------------

And the right answer is.....?

No wonder people say English is a difficult language to learn.

--riverman

[rdean3REMOVE@bellsouth.net]

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:15:08 -0700, Donut > wrote:

>On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:47:21 -0700 (PDT), deriant >
>wrote:
>
>>I have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
>>Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like. See:
><snip>
>
>I may be wrong, but I suspect this was meant to be sent to Fred's
>inbox directly.
>
>Don

Given Myron's post, it shall appear he received it some time ago...

HTH,
R

[Fred]

On 20-Aug-2008, Donut > wrote:

> have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
> >Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like. See:
> <snip>
>
> I may be wrong, but I suspect this was meant to be sent to Fred's
> inbox directly.

I think not.
My command of the Enblish language, Ii do believe, is probably far superior
to yours
Perhaps thats why you have the tag DONUT
Is that the shape of your head?

Fred

[W. D. Grey]

In article
>,
riverman > writes
>On Aug 20, 3:47*pm, deriant > wrote:
>> I have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
>> Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like.
>>See:http://www.disengs.blogspot.com
>
>
>I love it. Check out the very first review question:
>---------------------------------------------------
>TASK 1: Change the <indicated> words with shall or will
>
>1. It <is going to> dark this evening.
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>And the right answer is.....?
>
>No wonder people say English is a difficult language to learn.
>
>--riverman

It's easy if you're Welsh :-)
--
Bill Grey

[riverman]

On Aug 21, 12:26*am, "Fred" > wrote:

> I think not.

Oh, you don't have to convince us of THAT. :-)


> My command of the Enblish language, Ii do believe, is probably far superior
> to yours

And I give you, gentlemen, the POTW.

--riverman

(I mean, you just can't write this stuff!)

[riverman]

On Aug 21, 1:15*am, "W. D. Grey" > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> riverman > writes
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Aug 20, 3:47*pm, deriant > wrote:
> >> I have found some examples of teaching English Structure based on
> >> Communicative Approach. that applies EGRA, PGR, and the like.
> >>See:http://www.disengs.blogspot.com
>
> >I love it. Check out the very first review question:
> >---------------------------------------------------
> >TASK 1: Change the <indicated> words with shall or will
>
> >1. It <is going to> dark this evening.
> >--------------------------------------------------
>
> >And the right answer is.....?
>
> >No wonder people say English is a difficult language to learn.
>
> >--riverman
>
> It's easy if you're Welsh :-)
> --
> Bill Grey- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Good thing, too. :-)

--riverman

[Fred]

On 21-Aug-2008, riverman > wrote:

> I think not.
>
> Oh, you don't have to convince us of THAT. :-)
>
>
> > My command of the Enblish language, Ii do believe, is probably far
> > superior
> > to yours
>
> And I give you, gentlemen, the POTW.
>
> --riverman
>
> (I mean, you just can't write this stuff!)

=========

There are some nasty mofos on this list.
I need this ****?

Fred

[riverman]

On Aug 21, 6:53*pm, "Fred" > wrote:
> On 21-Aug-2008, riverman > wrote:
>
> > *I think not.
>
> > Oh, you don't have to convince us of THAT. :-)
>
> > > My command of the Enblish language, Ii do believe, is probably far
> > > superior
> > > to yours
>
> > And I give you, gentlemen, the POTW.
>
> > --riverman
>
> > (I mean, you just can't write this stuff!)
>
> =========
>
> There are some nasty mofos on this list.
> I need this ****?
>
> Fred

Aww, lighten up, Ferd; you're rapidly becoming a regular. And you're
the most fun ROFF has had in quite a while.

:-)
--riverman

[Fred]

On 21-Aug-2008, riverman > wrote:

> here are some nasty mofos on this list.
> > I need this ****?
> >
> > Fred
>
> Aww, lighten up, Ferd; you're rapidly becoming a regular. And you're
> the most fun ROFF has had in quite a while.
>
> :-)

Its still nasty **** - do you think that you are Wolfgang - if so you better
watch it as he probably gets a beating regularly from someone that he ****es
off.

Fred

[Wolfgang]

"Fred" > wrote in message
...
>
> On 21-Aug-2008, riverman > wrote:
>
>> here are some nasty mofos on this list.
>> > I need this ****?
>> >
>> > Fred
>>
>> Aww, lighten up, Ferd; you're rapidly becoming a regular. And you're
>> the most fun ROFF has had in quite a while.
>>
>> :-)
>
> Its still nasty **** - do you think that you are Wolfgang - if so you
> better
> watch it as he probably gets a beating regularly from someone that he
> ****es
> off.

Hm......

Interesting observation. For the record, Myron, you are not me. Any
beatings you have received as a result of this deception are not your
rightful property and should be returned to their lawful owner with all
deliberate speed in order to avoid any possible legal repercussions,
potentially including, but not limited to, the deployment of heavily armed
tactical units with surly dispositions.....or not.....at dicklet's
discretion.

But, we digress.

Wolfgang
the good news is maybe the lumps aren't malignancies after all.

[Tim J.]

Fred typed:
> On 21-Aug-2008, riverman > wrote:
>
>> here are some nasty mofos on this list.
>>> I need this ****?
>>>
>>> Fred
>>
>> Aww, lighten up, Ferd; you're rapidly becoming a regular. And you're
>> the most fun ROFF has had in quite a while.
>
> Its still nasty **** - do you think that you are Wolfgang - if so you
> better
> watch it as he probably gets a beating regularly from someone that he
> ****es
> off.

Well, Fred, I know you don't read my posts any longer, but that won't make
this any less entertaining for me. . .
Myron is a good guy. I've met him, fished (not "catched") with him, and had
a beer with him. As far as I can tell, he's met more roffians than just
about anyone else here, and I don't recall any of these people calling him a
"mofo." Calling someone a "mofo" is by far one of the nastiest, lowest
insults around. So I guess it's okay for you to do that ****, but everyone
else has to be nice to you, eh? Once again <sigh>, if you would just proof
what you write before you hit the send button, the pain would be greatly
reduced for the rest of us here, where what you write is all we have. A typo
here and there is no big deal, but many of your posts are near unreadable.

Oh, and I've tried beating Wolfgang, but he's pretty fast at picking up a
beer. ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

[Dave LaCourse]

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:24:06 -0400, "Tim J."
> wrote:

>I've met him, fished (not "catched") with him, and had
>a beer with him.

Well, I have fished AND catched with him. So, nana-nana-nahnah. Also
had a few beers and meals with the big guy. And yes, he snores.

Dave

[Fred]

On 21-Aug-2008, Dave LaCourse > wrote:

> Well, I have fished AND catched with him. So, nana-nana-nahnah

Dave

Incorrect use of the language
nana-nana-nahnah - its spelled wrong.

Its

nana nana nyanana

You should know that

Fred

[riverman]

On Aug 22, 6:14*am, "Fred" > wrote:
> On 21-Aug-2008, Dave LaCourse > wrote:
>
> > Well, I have fished AND catched with him. *So, nana-nana-nahnah
>
> Dave
>
> Incorrect use of the language
> *nana-nana-nahnah - its spelled wrong.
>
> Its
>
> nana nana nyanana
>
> You should know that
>
> Fred

Hey, Ferd scored a point! So now its Ferd: 1, ROFF: 15,769.

--riverman

And now I have to go take all the monogramming out of my shirts that
says 'Wolfgang' and 'Mofo'. Rats.

[Dave LaCourse]

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:53:13 -0700 (PDT), riverman
> wrote:

>On Aug 22, 6:14*am, "Fred" > wrote:
>> On 21-Aug-2008, Dave LaCourse > wrote:
>>
>> > Well, I have fished AND catched with him. *So, nana-nana-nahnah
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Incorrect use of the language
>> *nana-nana-nahnah - its spelled wrong.
>>
>> Its
>>
>> nana nana nyanana
>>
>> You should know that
>>
>> Fred
>
>Hey, Ferd scored a point! So now its Ferd: 1, ROFF: 15,769.
>
>--riverman
>
>And now I have to go take all the monogramming out of my shirts that
>says 'Wolfgang' and 'Mofo'. Rats.

Actually Fred is using the western version of nana-nana-nahnah.

So, subtract that point.

d'op

[Fred]

OK moryn - thanks

So now its Fred 2 and ROF 15. 798
I get two points

Fred

[jeff miller[_2_]]

Wolfgang wrote:

> "Fred" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>On 21-Aug-2008, riverman > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>here are some nasty mofos on this list.
>>>
>>>>I need this ****?
>>>>
>>>>Fred
>>>
>>>Aww, lighten up, Ferd; you're rapidly becoming a regular. And you're
>>>the most fun ROFF has had in quite a while.
>>>
>>>:-)
>>
>>Its still nasty **** - do you think that you are Wolfgang - if so you
>>better
>>watch it as he probably gets a beating regularly from someone that he
>>****es
>>off.
>
>
> Hm......
>
> Interesting observation. For the record, Myron, you are not me. Any
> beatings you have received as a result of this deception are not your
> rightful property and should be returned to their lawful owner with all
> deliberate speed in order to avoid any possible legal repercussions,
> potentially including, but not limited to, the deployment of heavily armed
> tactical units with surly dispositions.....or not.....at dicklet's
> discretion.
>
> But, we digress.
>
> Wolfgang
> the good news is maybe the lumps aren't malignancies after all.
>
>
>

oh god...absolutely fabulous. much more of this and i'll start wearing
those adult diapers. at my age, uncontrollable laughter apparently
invokes uncontrollable bladder. i think i've ****ed my britches from
laughing so hard...and, well, laughter being the best medicine and all...

jeff (suitably soiled... and grinning because it's better to be ****ed
off than ****ed on, though not near as humorous)

[Charlie S.]

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:43:18 -0400, Dave LaCourse
> wrote:

>On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:24:06 -0400, "Tim J."
> wrote:
>
>>I've met him, fished (not "catched") with him, and had
>>a beer with him.
>
>Well, I have fished AND catched with him. So, nana-nana-nahnah. Also
>had a few beers and meals with the big guy. And yes, he snores.
>
>Dave
>

TMI, Dave. TMI. :-)