Why is this getting no play??
 

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
Both of them are disgusting
representatives of the people. They are dirtier than a dirt road.

Dave


I'll withhold comment on Kerry, but you are full of **** on Biden. I can
think of no more honest, decent man in the US Senate, period. A kind soul
and good family man, you have utterly no clue what you are talking about.
You see, David, it's one thing to support whomever you wish. When you have
to resort to made-up bull**** to justify your selection, it diminishes both
your argument, and yourself.....
Tom

Why is this getting no play??
 

"DaveS" wrote in message
...
On Oct 9, 10:37 am, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"DaveS" wrote in message

...
On Oct 8, 9:28 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

Have you been sleeping for the last 8 years? Your team DOUBLED the
total deficit during that time. No one who actually followed current
events would be so shameless to have said what you said and expect to
be taken seriously. Bill, seriously, your stuff sounds like it came
out of some time warp.

Dave

You are a dum fock.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Why don't you just cue up your Ron Paul stuff. And your statement that
Obama is a declared socialist is proof positive that you will need to
go to re-education camp for a few years when I am made Commissar of
ROFF.

Dave

I guess you have not paid attention to M. Obama's life statements. And Ron
Paul would probably be better than either, but I do also do not support
him..

Why is this getting no play??
 

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
John Kerry and Joe Biden have done more for the poor, the sick
and the elderly than you will ever have the capacity to equal.

Oh, really. Not with their monies. They pass the tax bills so we
have to pay, and pay for them too. Both of them are disgusting
representatives of the people. They are dirtier than a dirt road.

What a tool. Louie, you disappoint me.

The GOP is going to lose and lose big. Deservedly so because
conservatism and especially neo-conservatism has proven to be
practically, intellectually and morally bankrupt.

Do try to be a good and gracious loser if you can.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Why is this getting no play??
 

On Oct 7, 7:08*pm, wrote:
On 7 Oct 2008 23:03:57 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:



wrote in
:

On 7 Oct 2008 22:37:32 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...a-na-aviator6-
2008oct06,0,1670799.story?page=1

Maybe for the same reasons Obama's pot and blow usage isn't...

Speaking only for myself, I don't think that anyone who hasn't done a
few wild things in their youth is fit to be a leader as an adult. *I
don't begrudge a person their mistakes, only not learning from them.

HTH,
R

How many plane crashes do you have to have to show you're not learning from
your mistakes?? *At least 4, I imagine.

How many strikeouts do you have to have to be leading home-run hitter of
all time...? *But I see what you're saying...Obama could have a bad day,
get all coked up and high on Thai stick, freak out, and start pushing
buttons or something, whereas McCain shouldn't be allowed to fly fighter
jets anymore...fair enough...


We paid for the fighter jets and McCain is lucky that he didn't kill
anyone with his joyriding.

Why is this getting no play??
 

On Oct 7, 7:40*pm, Scott Seidman wrote:

Cleland was a hero, too, Dave. *Why was it OK to post mortem his PH, but
asking why we don't know about McCain's early aviation problems is
questioning his heroism?


.. because Dave's idea of political discourse is to lie.

Why is this getting no play??
 

Oh. I believe you. In fact I made some nice change shorting some issues
before things went into complete freefall. Actualy I look at the present
situation as a buying opportunity, but I don't want to move too soon or
abruptly.
My questions were in response to beancounter's prediction of a the liklihood
of a stampede to sell assets in anticipation of an increase in capital gains
taxes. The profits I referred to are the type of long term capital gain
profits he was talking about. The number of people, who have made long term
capital gains in this market and for whom the threat of increased taxes
thereon would tip their decision to sell, are not numerous enough to
constitute a "stampede" .

Bob Weinberger
..

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:36:40 -0700, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:


"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message
...
swnip
In the coming months - when investors realize that
Obama will raise the cap gains rate - there could be
a stampede of asset sales as investors rush to take their
profits now to avoid Obama's doubling of the tax rates next year.

As compared to the current stampede? With the exception of precious metals
and possibly a few other tangible assets, what profits?

Bob Weinberger

Bob, trust me on this or don't, but there is ALWAYS honest profit to be
made in any market - if someone is losing money, someone is making it.
Hell, if it weren't for the "Great Depression," you very well might have
never heard of Joe Kennedy and his spawn. And we made money in October
'87, which was another supposed "end of the world." In fact, if they
listened to me, at least two ROFFians made something on the order of 25%
on whatever they invested in the last coupla months. Hell, I'm up about
65% or so on the year.

HTH,
R


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Why is this getting no play??
 

On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:27:37 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:


"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message
...


In the coming months — when investors realize that
Obama will raise the cap gains rate — there could be
a stampede of asset sales as investors rush to take their
profits now to avoid Obama's doubling of the tax rates next year.


there should be an overabundance of cap gains at the moment, you think?
Tom

There well could be. There have been lots of profit-making
opportunities in the last 4-6 weeks.

TC,
R

Why is this getting no play??
 

"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
Both of them are disgusting
representatives of the people. They are dirtier than a dirt road.

Dave


I'll withhold comment on Kerry, but you are full of **** on Biden. I can
think of no more honest, decent man in the US Senate, period. A kind soul
and good family man, you have utterly no clue what you are talking about.
You see, David, it's one thing to support whomever you wish. When you have
to resort to made-up bull**** to justify your selection, it diminishes
both your argument, and yourself.....
Tom


Honest? Give me a break. Look up plagiarism.

Why is this getting no play??
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
John Kerry and Joe Biden have done more for the poor, the sick
and the elderly than you will ever have the capacity to equal.

Oh, really. Not with their monies. They pass the tax bills so we
have to pay, and pay for them too. Both of them are disgusting
representatives of the people. They are dirtier than a dirt road.

What a tool. Louie, you disappoint me.

The GOP is going to lose and lose big. Deservedly so because
conservatism and especially neo-conservatism has proven to be
practically, intellectually and morally bankrupt.

Do try to be a good and gracious loser if you can.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Obama will probably be the next POTUS. And we are screwed as a country. We
are screwed with McCain, but even more so with Obama.

Why is this getting no play??
 

On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:34:51 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:


"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
.. .
Both of them are disgusting
representatives of the people. They are dirtier than a dirt road.

Dave


I'll withhold comment on Kerry, but you are full of **** on Biden. I can
think of no more honest, decent man in the US Senate, period. A kind soul
and good family man, you have utterly no clue what you are talking about.
You see, David, it's one thing to support whomever you wish. When you have
to resort to made-up bull**** to justify your selection, it diminishes both
your argument, and yourself.....
Tom

Whoa, now, let's not start canonizing St. Joe quite yet. Granted, he is
among the better of the lot, but "no more honest, decent man in the US
Senate" and a "kind soul?" That's pushing the envelope a bit, at least
in the implication. Granted, as Senators go, he's up there, but your
description is a bit, well, over the top. I mean, if you'd have said
something along the lines of that among a pack of cutthroats and
murders, he'd at least give a man a fair chance, I'd agree, but to imply
that he is some paragon of all things virtuous...well, please...

TC,
R