Why does Richard Bonilla think he can advocate assassination and getaway with it?
 

On Dec 28, 2:50*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
more drivle from dumb **** dems

* *http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DM5Y9X5ggxzA

Please look at Bonilla's tape. PLEASE DO.
Particularly look towards the end where these clever tricksters are so
loaded that they get really sloppy and rush the frame clipping so
there is almost no correspondence between the video movement of the
Senator and the sound.

Again, by the look of the work I am guessing the guys who did it are
very tech dated. The speed and viciousness of the 2000 plus comments
also suggests a certain repeating pattern by our America hating
countrymen.

Funding these operations, coordinating them, organizing and carrying
them out has become a profitable industry. Max Blumenthal is one of
the best researcher/investigators of the networks that do this stuff.
I will be posting some sources and a list of some of the known people,
front groups and scam foundations responsible for this kind of stuff
based on Blumenthal's work, as well as some of their proven propaganda
techniques. Considering the some of the older members of these cliques
have backgrounds as Trotskyite Communists and in the Lyndon LaRouche
cult organization, it is not surprising that the propaganda is
sometimes very heavy handed. The stuff coming from the Colorado based
"Family" organization (DR Dobson etc) is generally much more
sophisticated, and so it is harder to detect the prints of their
sticky fingers.

I am not saying that the Senator might not have a drink at the end of
a long day in the Senate. Its a bi-partisan tradition. But the
"enhancement" of the video is easily detectable.

To Repeat:
IMHO of course. You can see where the video was crudely doctored and
the sound track was processed. The tip-off is the wave pattern of the
slurs- too "mechanical." Pretty funny really. Easy to do to a tired
older man with a Western accent.

By the time the origins of the tape and its "perfection" are
untangled, the tricksters will have moved on. But, for us old timers,
I'll just say that the Nixon dirty tricksters did better work in the
1970s. This job looks like an old KGB "film school" product. Crude
but
effective. Miami Cuban if I were guessing.
Dave

tea anyone??........
 

On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:42:52 -0800 (PST), "~^ beancounter ~^"
wrote:

and unbelievable. Stupidy is not rare.

There is no such word as "rare".

- Dan
--
Daniel G. McGrath
Binghamton, New York
e-mail: dmcg6174[AT]gmail[DOT]com

tea anyone??........
 

On Dec 28, 11:28*am, Dan McGrath wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:42:52 -0800 (PST), "~^ beancounter ~^"

wrote:
and unbelievable. Stupidy is not rare.

There is no such word as "rare".

- Dan
--
Daniel G. McGrath
Binghamton, New York
e-mail: dmcg6174[AT]gmail[DOT]com

Er, rare is a word. "Stupidy" is another story.
Dave

Why does [email protected] hate America so much?
 

"~^ beancounter ~^" wrote in message
...

Why does Mark Bowen hate America so much?
 

On Dec 28, 4:50*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
more drivle from dumb **** dems

Moron.

g.

tea anyone??........
 

On Dec 28, 1:28*pm, Dan McGrath wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:42:52 -0800 (PST), "~^ beancounter ~^"

wrote:
and unbelievable. Stupidy is not rare.

There is no such word as "rare".

- Dan
--
Daniel G. McGrath
Binghamton, New York
e-mail: dmcg6174[AT]gmail[DOT]com

Well, you've pretty much defined dumbass for us, anyway.

giles
who sometimes wonders.....

tea anyone??........
 

On Dec 28, 7:29*pm, Giles wrote:
On Dec 28, 1:28*pm, Dan McGrath wrote:

On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:42:52 -0800 (PST), "~^ beancounter ~^"

wrote:
and unbelievable. Stupidy is not rare.

There is no such word as "rare".

- Dan
--
Daniel G. McGrath
Binghamton, New York
e-mail: dmcg6174[AT]gmail[DOT]com

Well, you've pretty much defined dumbass for us, anyway.

giles
who sometimes wonders.....

Wasn't this "Go easy on the Newbees Monday" or is that on Fridays?
Dave

tea anyone??........
 

DaveS wrote:
On Dec 28, 7:29 pm, Giles wrote:
On Dec 28, 1:28 pm, Dan McGrath wrote:

On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:42:52 -0800 (PST), "~^ beancounter ~^"
wrote:
and unbelievable. Stupidy is not rare.
There is no such word as "rare".
- Dan
--
Daniel G. McGrath
Binghamton, New York
e-mail: dmcg6174[AT]gmail[DOT]com
Well, you've pretty much defined dumbass for us, anyway.

giles
who sometimes wonders.....

Wasn't this "Go easy on the Newbees Monday" or is that on Fridays?

Daniel isn't a newbee in AUE:
http://alt-usage-english.org/McGrath.html

--
James

tea anyone??........
 

On Dec 29, 2:37*pm, James Hogg wrote:
DaveS wrote:
On Dec 28, 7:29 pm, Giles wrote:
On Dec 28, 1:28 pm, Dan McGrath wrote:

On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:42:52 -0800 (PST), "~^ beancounter ~^"
wrote:
and unbelievable. Stupidy is not rare.
There is no such word as "rare".
- Dan
--
Daniel G. McGrath
Binghamton, New York
e-mail: dmcg6174[AT]gmail[DOT]com
Well, you've pretty much defined dumbass for us, anyway.

giles
who sometimes wonders.....

Wasn't this "Go easy on the Newbees Monday" or is that on Fridays?

Daniel isn't a newbee in AUE:http://alt-usage-english.org/McGrath.html

--
James- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

James, Thanx
Have someone close to me with a similar issue on the specterm. I,
(hopefully we,) will cut him some appropriate slack, hopefully. Thanx
again.
Dave

tea anyone??........
 

On Dec 29, 4:25*pm, DaveS wrote:
On Dec 28, 7:29*pm, Giles wrote:





On Dec 28, 1:28*pm, Dan McGrath wrote:

On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:42:52 -0800 (PST), "~^ beancounter ~^"

wrote:
and unbelievable. Stupidy is not rare.

There is no such word as "rare".

- Dan
--
Daniel G. McGrath
Binghamton, New York
e-mail: dmcg6174[AT]gmail[DOT]com

Well, you've pretty much defined dumbass for us, anyway.

giles
who sometimes wonders.....

Wasn't this "Go easy on the Newbees Monday" or is that on Fridays?
Dave

I dunno. I never signed a treaty, swore an oath, made a pledge,
crossed my heart and hoped to die, etc.

giles
hey, meat is meat.