![]() |
What's a boy to do?
wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:38:41 -0600, Kevin Vang wrote: In article , says... According to your theory, that dart can easily and readily strike any point on the disk or any point outside of the circumference created by the selection of the first and second points, up to and including "un-measurably" close to the inside or the outside of the circumference, but can never actually strike a point on the circumference. IOW, the third point (Dart C) can only create a second radius that must be less than or greater than the first radius. With not being able to select a second point on the circumference, arcs, in such a world, don't exist. If arcs don't exist, geometry, trig, etc. begins to break down. In the failure cascade of interrelated bits , it takes all math down with it. It's not that the arc doesn't exist, and we cannot choose points on that arc. The point is that the probability of hitting that arc with a dart is 0. Intuitive explanation: Suppose your dartboard has radius 1. Throw a dart at the dartboard, and let r1 = radius from the center of the dartboard to the dart. Now throw a second dart, and let r be the radius. Then the probability that r = r1 is number of values of r for which r = r1 1 ------------------------------------------- = ------------ = 0. number of possible values for r infinity More technical (and more correct) explanation: If we assume that every point on the dartboard is equally likely to be hit, then the probability that r = r1 is: measure of the set for which r = r1 0 -------------------------------------- = ------------ = 0 measure of the dartboard pi * 1^2 because the dartboard is a 2-dimensional surface, the appropriate measure is area. The measure of the entire dartboard is the area of a circle with radius 1, so the area is pi*1^2 = 1. The set of points for which r = r1 is the circle with radius r1. Since the circle is just a curve with width 0 on the plane, it has area 0. Slightly more technical (and more correct): Not every point on the dartboard is equally likely to be hit. Apparently. The word on the street is that at least some are completely unhittable, what with the probability of doing so being zero or infinitely small or pi-r-square or, well, something all dangerously full of symbols and greek letters and ****... If p(r,theta) is the probablility density function giving the probability that the dart hits point (r,theta) in polar coordinates, then the probability that r = r1 is: / r1 | p(r,theta) dA / r1 0 ------------------------- = --- = 0 / 1 1 | p(r,theta) dA / 0 because we are integrating with respect to area, and the top integral is done over a region with area 0, so the value of the integral is 0. SEE! SEE! I WARNED YA, BUT NOO-O-O-O-O... IAC, three answers, each "and more correct" than the previous one. Interesting. Is this progression going to lead to something infinitely correct (or something to at least stick a fork in and call "done"), or is the probability of hitting that target zero, too? HTH, Kevin And I'm pretty certain that mathematics doesn't all disappear if somebody doesn't understand one bit of it. Hey, go easy on me, I'm learning...for example, I've already learned that when 2 math whiz-types and a rat-gutter answer a question, the odds that they will come up with the correct answer is like one in a gazillion or bazillion or some other REALLY big ol' number... And right back at ya, Pythagoras Hee, hee, hee. Wolfgang is it just me or has anyone else noticed that the probability of surrenders in general (and dicklet's in particular) being gracious tends to decrease over time? |
What's a boy to do?
wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:03:10 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote: wrote in message . .. On 1 Nov 2006 16:46:23 -0800, "Wolfgang" wrote: SNI-I-I-I-IP I will simply confine myself Well, no, you didn't do either, but perhaps you should... to making a proposition open to anyone. Give me three darts and a prediction of where they will land relative to one another in terms of distance from the center of the target, and I will prove you wrong EVERY time. :) Gee, it seems like this might be an attempt at a sucker bet...OK. I accept. And I'd offer that you couldn't even do it ONE time... and that you couldn't do it even if given a 3-dimensional "dartboard"...but don't pee all over yourself, here's another hint: the taxpayers of Olathe, Kansas are probably very glad you can't do it even that one time...why, heck, one might say that's the essence of an industry... HTH, R ...I feel generous, here's another hint: ya better go back to sucker-bet development school - with the "bet" above, it doesn't matter how, when, or if you throw them... The beauty of saying nothing is that you can never be proved wrong and that you never have to retract a statement, ainna? One can only suppose that someone suggested this strategy to you and that you stick to it without a hint as to its efficacy out of sheer dogged inability to think of anything else to do. Well, that and the fact that so many play so gently with you. :) Hee, hee, hee... Again, I accept your proposal...wanna bet on the outcome? Sure. You bring the dartboard......and the absinthe. I got Oprah and Emeril on DVD. Wolfgang who, it must be admitted, has always been a bit rougher with his toys than the other kids. Hmmm...maybe a big handful of Albolene would cut down on the irritation... Maybe. I'm sure we are all eager to hear the results of the experiment While from a humanity standpoint I hope that helps, from a keeping-down-lunch standpoint, I don't care to know if it did, Humanity has nothing to do with it.......toys aren't people. Wolfgang |
What's a boy to do?
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "Kevin Vang" wrote in message It's an illusion. Obviously, you can never reach the wall because you can subdivide the remaining distance to it in half infinitely. Naturally, it follows that you are infintely adding increments of distance to that already travelled. This will, eventually, result in travelling an infinite distance. This is all very tiring. There is also the mental strain of dealing with the proposition of an infinite distance yet to go. You are actually dropping of sheer exhaustion about half way to the wall. Lively discussion then ensues... You should direct some of your less gifted students to leave the classroom and come here. This will have the salutary effect of raising the IQ in both places. :) Unfortunately, by your logic, they can't get here either. :-( --riverman (and exactly where they ARE has historically been the source of lively teacher's room discussions for an eternity, or more.) |
What's a boy to do?
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:27:39 -0600, Kevin Vang wrote:
In article t, says... The two are on the football field goal line and on the other goal line is the best of the Dallas cheerleaders, buck naked. The mathman and the engineer are told the first person that gets there gets to do any thing they desire with the lassie. Only rule is you can only move 1/2 the distance to the goal in any one move. The mathman says no use to start as it is an infinite series and you will never get there. The engineer, says 8 moves and I can be close enough for my purposes. Then "mathman" clearly didn't know what he was talking about. I do this in my Calc II class every year when we get to the chapter on infinite series. I don't have any nekkid cheerleaders, Yeah, the odds of most mathematicians having any of THEM is infinitely small... but I stand at one wall Now, that, they often do... TC, R ....oh, please...fine, fine, fine: G... |
What's a boy to do?
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:00:17 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote:
Again, I accept your proposal...wanna bet on the outcome? Sure. You bring the dartboard......and the absinthe. I got Oprah and Emeril on DVD. Hang on a minute....first things first. How much would you like to lose? 2500USD? 1000EURO? 1000GBP? |
What's a boy to do?
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:14:56 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote: The two are on the football field goal line and on the other goal line is the best of the Dallas cheerleaders, buck naked. The mathman and the engineer are told the first person that gets there gets to do any thing they desire with the lassie. Only rule is you can only move 1/2 the distance to the goal in any one move. The mathman says no use to start as it is an infinite series and you will never get there. The engineer, says 8 moves and I can be close enough for my purposes. And while these two geniuses were figuring, calculating, and such, any actual man present would say "rules my ass," walk on down and make her see God a few times, help her up on her shaking, bowed legs, get her a real nice dress, and take her to drinks and dinner...and if things continue to go well, probably spend the night at her place... HTH, R ....I mean, really...what guy with any sense at all worries about all this theoretical gibberish when there's real, good-looking pussy just 300 feet away... |
What's a boy to do?
wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:00:17 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote: Again, I accept your proposal...wanna bet on the outcome? Sure. You bring the dartboard......and the absinthe. I got Oprah and Emeril on DVD. Hang on a minute....first things first. How much would you like to lose? 2500USD? 1000EURO? 1000GBP? Sure. What time shall I expect you? Wolfgang oh, we're going to have so much fun! |
What's a boy to do?
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:26:25 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote:
wrote in message .. . On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:00:17 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote: Again, I accept your proposal...wanna bet on the outcome? Sure. You bring the dartboard......and the absinthe. I got Oprah and Emeril on DVD. Hang on a minute....first things first. How much would you like to lose? 2500USD? 1000EURO? 1000GBP? Sure. What time shall I expect you? Yeah, that's what I thought...you puss out before you're forced to welsh on the bet...run back under the porch, lil' pup... |
What's a boy to do?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter