For Agent Users
 

On 1 Sep 2004 05:18:24 GMT, "David Snedeker" wrote:

I choose to see it as that, rare as a quark,
"Wolfgang error."

Maybe you meant as hard to detect as a quark? Quarks aren't exactly rare. FWIW
--
Charlie...

For Agent Users
 

"Cyli" wrote
wrote:





Judging just by your sig, cyli, I would never have thought that you'd be
so ANAL.


I'm never quite sure which end of the squirrel in the attic I'm
talking to.


hilarious.

yfitons
wayno

For Agent Users
 

"Cyli" wrote
wrote:





Judging just by your sig, cyli, I would never have thought that you'd be
so ANAL.


I'm never quite sure which end of the squirrel in the attic I'm
talking to.


hilarious.

yfitons
wayno

For Agent Users
 

"Charlie Choc" wrote in message
...
On 1 Sep 2004 05:18:24 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:

I choose to see it as that, rare as a quark,
"Wolfgang error."

Maybe you meant as hard to detect as a quark? Quarks aren't exactly rare.
FWIW

Well, in that case the only real resemblance is their shared ability to pass
unnoticed through even the densest objects.

Wolfgang

For Agent Users
 

"Charlie Choc" wrote in message
...
On 1 Sep 2004 05:18:24 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:

I choose to see it as that, rare as a quark,
"Wolfgang error."

Maybe you meant as hard to detect as a quark? Quarks aren't exactly rare.
FWIW

Well, in that case the only real resemblance is their shared ability to pass
unnoticed through even the densest objects.

Wolfgang

For Agent Users
 

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
I'm never quite sure which end of the squirrel in the attic I'm
talking to.

Doesn't matter, really. What's important is the ability to determine
which end you're LISTENING to.

Wolfgang

For Agent Users
 

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
I'm never quite sure which end of the squirrel in the attic I'm
talking to.

Doesn't matter, really. What's important is the ability to determine
which end you're LISTENING to.

Wolfgang

For Agent Users
 

Wolfgang wrote:
"Charlie Choc" wrote in message
...

On 1 Sep 2004 05:18:24 GMT, "David Snedeker"

wrote:

I choose to see it as that, rare as a quark,
"Wolfgang error."


Maybe you meant as hard to detect as a quark? Quarks aren't exactly rare.

FWIW

Well, in that case the only real resemblance is their shared ability to pass
unnoticed through even the densest objects.

Those are neutrinos, not quarks.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

For Agent Users
 

"rw" wrote in message
...
Wolfgang wrote:
"Charlie Choc" wrote in
message
...

On 1 Sep 2004 05:18:24 GMT, "David Snedeker"


wrote:

I choose to see it as that, rare as a quark,
"Wolfgang error."


Maybe you meant as hard to detect as a quark? Quarks aren't
exactly rare.

FWIW

Well, in that case the only real resemblance is their shared
ability to pass
unnoticed through even the densest objects.

Those are neutrinos, not quarks.

Huh? I thought neutrinos was a kind of sheep.

Wolfgang

For Agent Users
 

rw wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:

"Charlie Choc" wrote in message
...

On 1 Sep 2004 05:18:24 GMT, "David Snedeker"


wrote:

I choose to see it as that, rare as a quark,
"Wolfgang error."


Maybe you meant as hard to detect as a quark? Quarks aren't exactly
rare.


FWIW

Well, in that case the only real resemblance is their shared ability
to pass
unnoticed through even the densest objects.


Those are neutrinos, not quarks.


See Dave?

Willi