![]() |
For Agent Users
"Willi" wrote in message ... rw wrote: Wolfgang wrote: "Charlie Choc" wrote in message ... On 1 Sep 2004 05:18:24 GMT, "David Snedeker" wrote: I choose to see it as that, rare as a quark, "Wolfgang error." Maybe you meant as hard to detect as a quark? Quarks aren't exactly rare. FWIW Well, in that case the only real resemblance is their shared ability to pass unnoticed through even the densest objects. Those are neutrinos, not quarks. See Dave? Where!? Wolfgang dang.......missed him again. :( |
For Agent Users
Wolfgang wrote:
"rw" wrote in message ... Those are neutrinos, not quarks. Huh? I thought neutrinos was a kind of sheep. Once again, you are confused. You might be thinking of the quarterback for the Miami Dolphins. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
For Agent Users
Wolfgang wrote:
"rw" wrote in message ... Those are neutrinos, not quarks. Huh? I thought neutrinos was a kind of sheep. Once again, you are confused. You might be thinking of the quarterback for the Miami Dolphins. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
For Agent Users
"rw" wrote in message m... Wolfgang wrote: "rw" wrote in message ... Those are neutrinos, not quarks. Huh? I thought neutrinos was a kind of sheep. Once again, you are confused. You might be thinking of the quarterback for the Miami Dolphins. The nice thing about the easily led is that you always know exactly where they are. :) Wolfgang |
For Agent Users
"rw" wrote in message m... Wolfgang wrote: "rw" wrote in message ... Those are neutrinos, not quarks. Huh? I thought neutrinos was a kind of sheep. Once again, you are confused. You might be thinking of the quarterback for the Miami Dolphins. The nice thing about the easily led is that you always know exactly where they are. :) Wolfgang |
For Agent Users
|
For Agent Users
"Wolfgang" wrote: You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem, Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote, maybe? Ummm, let me guess. The defensive lineup up for the Denver Broncos? |
For Agent Users
"Jonathan Cook" wrote Anyways, I still think x-no-archive is a courtesy request, not legally binding, but hey i'm no lawyer, although i can skip the shift key as well as any of 'em... yfitloe, jon. i got it! i got it! it's "your friend in the land of enchantment"! yfitons wayno (and some cynics claim lawyers don't know their asses from first base, let alone new mexico...) |
For Agent Users
"Charlie Wilson" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote: You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem, Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote, maybe? Ummm, let me guess. The defensive lineup up for the Denver Broncos? Well, it WOULD, at last, make the game interesting. :) Wolfgang though, if coached by john irving, stevie and kennie would probably be tight ends. |
For Agent Users
Wayne Harrison wrote:
"Jonathan Cook" wrote Anyways, I still think x-no-archive is a courtesy request, not legally binding, but hey i'm no lawyer, although i can skip the shift key as well as any of 'em... yfitloe, jon. i got it! i got it! it's "your friend in the land of enchantment"! yfitons wayno (and some cynics claim lawyers don't know their asses from first base, let alone new mexico...) Those claims stand. Us techies figured out that sig hours ago. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter