For Agent Users
 

"snakefiddler" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...


You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem,
Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote,
maybe?

Wolfgang



ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-)
snake

Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether one
has read "Delta of Venus". :)

Wolfgang
hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out......it's all about
pu.......um.......well, never mind.

For Agent Users
 

"snakefiddler" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...


You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem,
Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote,
maybe?

Wolfgang



ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-)
snake

Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether one
has read "Delta of Venus". :)

Wolfgang
hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out......it's all about
pu.......um.......well, never mind.

For Agent Users
 

rw wrote:



Those are neutrinos, not quarks.


don't you mean "neuticles"?

For Agent Users
 

rw wrote:



Those are neutrinos, not quarks.


don't you mean "neuticles"?

For Agent Users
 

wrote:



Don't confuse Davie, he's onto another great conspiracy. :-)
- Ken

that's undeniably funny... scored high on my chuckle meter anyway.

jeff

For Agent Users
 

wrote:



Don't confuse Davie, he's onto another great conspiracy. :-)
- Ken

that's undeniably funny... scored high on my chuckle meter anyway.

jeff

For Agent Users
 

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:13:46 -0400, Jeff Miller
wrote:



rw wrote:



Those are neutrinos, not quarks.


don't you mean "neuticles"?

It always has to be about 40, doesn't it.
--
Charlie...

For Agent Users
 

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:13:46 -0400, Jeff Miller
wrote:



rw wrote:



Those are neutrinos, not quarks.


don't you mean "neuticles"?

It always has to be about 40, doesn't it.
--
Charlie...

For Agent Users
 

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"snakefiddler" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...


You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein,
Steinem,
Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry.
Um........Capote,
maybe?

Wolfgang



ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-)
snake

Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether
one
has read "Delta of Venus". :)


"one's" poor copy, (which was purchased back in the late seventies), has
been so *ravished*, (how's that for an appropraite reference ;-)?), that
"one" cannot pick it up without some of the pages falling out.
i continue to work on her diary piece by peice......

Wolfgang
hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out......


it's all about
pu......


nah, that book, i would argue, makes a strong feminist statement, and is a
work that reflects the unapologetic shedding of social sexual conventions
assigned to women. some folks, however, may have trouble appreciating it in
it's deeper context.

my concern is that some folks are un-likely to see it as anything more than
a collection of penthouse letters.

it's all about
pu......

ah, wolfie- i have a feeling you know it is about much more than that, (see
the above statement)

.um.......well, never mind.

o.k.


snake ;-)

For Agent Users
 

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"snakefiddler" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...


You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein,
Steinem,
Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry.
Um........Capote,
maybe?

Wolfgang



ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-)
snake

Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether
one
has read "Delta of Venus". :)


"one's" poor copy, (which was purchased back in the late seventies), has
been so *ravished*, (how's that for an appropraite reference ;-)?), that
"one" cannot pick it up without some of the pages falling out.
i continue to work on her diary piece by peice......

Wolfgang
hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out......


it's all about
pu......


nah, that book, i would argue, makes a strong feminist statement, and is a
work that reflects the unapologetic shedding of social sexual conventions
assigned to women. some folks, however, may have trouble appreciating it in
it's deeper context.

my concern is that some folks are un-likely to see it as anything more than
a collection of penthouse letters.

it's all about
pu......

ah, wolfie- i have a feeling you know it is about much more than that, (see
the above statement)

.um.......well, never mind.

o.k.


snake ;-)