TR
 

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:46 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:22:33 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:53:58 -0500, Dave LaCourse
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:10:05 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

Do you really not understand, Dave?

Mike has never rained the litany of foul, hate-filled lying invectives you
have laid on me for years.

But yet he is as guilty as any for the hate-filled lies published on
these pages. You and I have had our differences and it all stems from
those two claves. I do not appreciate paying for the room both times,
nor for all of the gas except one fill-up. There were *no* lies,
Dave, concerning those claves, and you know it. I talked to Tom Brown
and he confirms the amount of beer we bought for *everyone*, not just
you.

That, in all its simplicity, is the difference...

Right. I get the blame for all the hate on roff and your buddies Ken,
Wolfgang, and Mikey go scott free. Like I said, your slip is showing.

Hope your wife and family enjoy the start of the Holidays...

Had the kids and all the grandkids plus a fishing buddy and his wife
for dinner. Thank you for your good will sentiment. Hope you and
yours are well.

Well, **** me running...hey, it's a start...now grow some hair, kiss
each other, and think about if a tank of gas or whatever other
chicken-**** nonsense was worth it...and if either of you can honestly
say "yes," print this post out and show it to someone who will have the
common sense to slap the **** out of you...

HTH,
R

Call me a cynic, but I sincerely doubt you have or had any intentions of HTH.

OK, you're a cynic...whose sincere doubter is in need of a tune-up...or
maybe some higher octane gasoline...

I sincerely hoped it helped, but I didn't wish it with all my heart or
anything...

And, no, this had nothing to do with gasoline, and if you have two brain cells
still functioning, you know that as well as anyone...

Hell, you two aren't even sure of what it's about, and if you think I've
read or intend to read all of silly-assed back-and-forth crapola, you
don't have two brain cells functioning. I have read bits and pieces and
generally know what the gist of the slapfight is: you accuse, he
accuses, ad infinitum. It isn't a debate or even an argument, it's two
silly old ladies carrying a grudge over something in which they don't
even remember the details. I figured two grown men had more of a
life...heck, one of y'all has Simms waders, for gosh sakes...

HTH...but, I readily admit, if it doesn't, that's you problem, not mine,
R

/daytripper

TR
 

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:40:24 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:14:11 -0600, wrote:

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:51:36 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Mike wrote:
... Mr.Fortenberry,

I can not change what is, or what has been, but I can at least attempt
to change your perceptions of it, indeed, I constantly try to change
my own, as otherwise I would learn nothing. ...

You're not gonna change my perception of your vicious, foul-mouthed
personal attacks. It's like I said in another thread, you ride the
prevailing winds of roff and at this holiday moment the winds are
blowing towards sweetness and light. I'm guessing it won't be long
before sweetness and light is forgotten and you revert to form.

Now, see 'tripper, here's where a "grow the **** up" is not only
appropriate, but well-earned and much-deserved...so, on that note:

Ken, grow the **** up.

YFCOTGC,
R

First, Richard, I never said "grow the **** up". Accuracy counts.


Second, you continue to treat these things as some form of sport. Your
constant interjections into the Mike/Dave/Ken affair, in particular, are
particularly telling in that regard, and you really ought to consider they are
not taken as humorous, but instead, as goading.

Hey, take 'em however you want - that's on you. I know how I mean what
I write, and if you had any real interest in finding out how I meant
something when you weren't sure, you could ask rather than decide and
pronounce. I don't recall ever being unwilling to answer someone who
honestly asked, "Hey, what did you mean by that...?"...OTOH, I can't
honestly remember many folks asking such here on ROFF, so I suppose
you're in the majority, at least...

Third, that is why I said - and you deserve - "grow up", to you...

Oh, lighten the **** up,
R

/daytripper

TR
 

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:29:13 -0600, wrote:

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:40:24 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

First, Richard, I never said "grow the **** up". Accuracy counts.


Second, you continue to treat these things as some form of sport. Your
constant interjections into the Mike/Dave/Ken affair, in particular, are
particularly telling in that regard, and you really ought to consider they are
not taken as humorous, but instead, as goading.

Hey, take 'em however you want - that's on you. I know how I mean what
I write, and if you had any real interest in finding out how I meant
something when you weren't sure, you could ask rather than decide and
pronounce. I don't recall ever being unwilling to answer someone who
honestly asked, "Hey, what did you mean by that...?"...OTOH, I can't
honestly remember many folks asking such here on ROFF, so I suppose
you're in the majority, at least...

My theory: the majority have figured out there is more useful information
content provided by the constant drone of a 120mm case cooling fan than that
contained in your posts....

/daytripper (mind you - it's just a theory ;-)

TR
 

wrote in message
...

Hey, take 'em however you want - that's on you. I know how I mean what
I write, and if you had any real interest in finding out how I meant
something when you weren't sure, you could ask rather than decide and
pronounce. I don't recall ever being unwilling to answer someone who
honestly asked, "Hey, what did you mean by that...?"...OTOH, I can't
honestly remember many folks asking such here on ROFF, so I suppose
you're in the majority, at least...

No matter how often it's repeated, this one slays me every time! :)

Third, that is why I said - and you deserve - "grow up", to you...

Oh, lighten the **** up,

Idiot.

Wolfgang

TR
 

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:46 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:22:33 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:53:58 -0500, Dave LaCourse
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:10:05 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

Do you really not understand, Dave?

Mike has never rained the litany of foul, hate-filled lying invectives
you
have laid on me for years.

But yet he is as guilty as any for the hate-filled lies published on
these pages. You and I have had our differences and it all stems from
those two claves. I do not appreciate paying for the room both times,
nor for all of the gas except one fill-up. There were *no* lies,
Dave, concerning those claves, and you know it. I talked to Tom Brown
and he confirms the amount of beer we bought for *everyone*, not just
you.

That, in all its simplicity, is the difference...

Right. I get the blame for all the hate on roff and your buddies Ken,
Wolfgang, and Mikey go scott free. Like I said, your slip is showing.

Hope your wife and family enjoy the start of the Holidays...

Had the kids and all the grandkids plus a fishing buddy and his wife
for dinner. Thank you for your good will sentiment. Hope you and
yours are well.

Well, **** me running...hey, it's a start...now grow some hair, kiss
each other, and think about if a tank of gas or whatever other
chicken-**** nonsense was worth it...and if either of you can honestly
say "yes," print this post out and show it to someone who will have the
common sense to slap the **** out of you...

HTH,
R

Call me a cynic, but I sincerely doubt you have or had any intentions of
HTH.

OK, you're a cynic...whose sincere doubter is in need of a tune-up...or
maybe some higher octane gasoline...

I sincerely hoped it helped, but I didn't wish it with all my heart or
anything...

And, no, this had nothing to do with gasoline, and if you have two brain
cells
still functioning, you know that as well as anyone...

Hell, you two aren't even sure of what it's about, and if you think I've
read or intend to read all of silly-assed back-and-forth crapola, you
don't have two brain cells functioning. I have read bits and pieces and
generally know what the gist of the slapfight is: you accuse, he
accuses, ad infinitum. It isn't a debate or even an argument, it's two
silly old ladies carrying a grudge over something in which they don't
even remember the details. I figured two grown men had more of a
life...heck, one of y'all has Simms waders, for gosh sakes...

HTH...but, I readily admit, if it doesn't, that's you problem, not mine,

And yet you feel compelled to add nothing......at great length. Why is
that?

Wolfgang
who can hardly wait to be treated to yet more clarity.

TR
 

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:19:06 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:29:13 -0600, wrote:

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:40:24 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

First, Richard, I never said "grow the **** up". Accuracy counts.


Second, you continue to treat these things as some form of sport. Your
constant interjections into the Mike/Dave/Ken affair, in particular, are
particularly telling in that regard, and you really ought to consider they are
not taken as humorous, but instead, as goading.

Hey, take 'em however you want - that's on you. I know how I mean what
I write, and if you had any real interest in finding out how I meant
something when you weren't sure, you could ask rather than decide and
pronounce. I don't recall ever being unwilling to answer someone who
honestly asked, "Hey, what did you mean by that...?"...OTOH, I can't
honestly remember many folks asking such here on ROFF, so I suppose
you're in the majority, at least...

My theory: the majority have figured out there is more useful information
content provided by the constant drone of a 120mm case cooling fan than that
contained in your posts....

/daytripper (mind you - it's just a theory ;-)

Well, all I can say is that you sure are a dedicated theorist, what with
having read every single post I've ever made, all the while already
KNOWING how little information content would be provided. I'm sure the
majority appreciates your sacrifice...

And there you are,
R

TR
 

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:19:06 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:29:13 -0600, wrote:

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:40:24 -0500, daytripper
wrote:

First, Richard, I never said "grow the **** up". Accuracy counts.


Second, you continue to treat these things as some form of sport. Your
constant interjections into the Mike/Dave/Ken affair, in particular, are
particularly telling in that regard, and you really ought to consider
they are
not taken as humorous, but instead, as goading.

Hey, take 'em however you want - that's on you. I know how I mean what
I write, and if you had any real interest in finding out how I meant
something when you weren't sure, you could ask rather than decide and
pronounce. I don't recall ever being unwilling to answer someone who
honestly asked, "Hey, what did you mean by that...?"...OTOH, I can't
honestly remember many folks asking such here on ROFF, so I suppose
you're in the majority, at least...

My theory: the majority have figured out there is more useful information
content provided by the constant drone of a 120mm case cooling fan than
that
contained in your posts....

/daytripper (mind you - it's just a theory ;-)

Well, all I can say is that you sure are a dedicated theorist, what with
having read every single post I've ever made, all the while already
KNOWING how little information content would be provided.

O.k., here's how this works. It is only through continued monitoring and
analysis that your preternaturally consistent failure to provide anything
resembling content can be confirmed. I mean, assuming that you will
continue as before will probably be good enough for those to whom content is
superfluous anyway.....and yes, this may well constitute a majority
here.....but for some of us (those with at least a minimal awareness of
probabilities), your amazing unbroken streak of irrelevant and meaningless
inanity is as fascinating as it is unnatural, and so, reading every post
with a certain attention to detail IS absolutely necessary.

Leaves you in sort of an excruciating little bind, ainna? :)

I'm sure the majority appreciates your sacrifice...

I do.

And there you are,

Yes, here we are.

Wolfgang
who, if he were terrified of attentive audiences, believes he could find a
solution to the problem.......elsewhere.

TR
 

Wolfgang wrote:
wrote in message
...

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:46 -0500, daytripper
wrote:


On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:22:33 -0600, wrote:


On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:53:58 -0500, Dave LaCourse
wrote:


On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:10:05 -0500, daytripper
wrote:


Do you really not understand, Dave?

Mike has never rained the litany of foul, hate-filled lying invectives
you
have laid on me for years.

But yet he is as guilty as any for the hate-filled lies published on
these pages. You and I have had our differences and it all stems from
those two claves. I do not appreciate paying for the room both times,
nor for all of the gas except one fill-up. There were *no* lies,
Dave, concerning those claves, and you know it. I talked to Tom Brown
and he confirms the amount of beer we bought for *everyone*, not just
you.

That, in all its simplicity, is the difference...

Right. I get the blame for all the hate on roff and your buddies Ken,
Wolfgang, and Mikey go scott free. Like I said, your slip is showing.

Hope your wife and family enjoy the start of the Holidays...

Had the kids and all the grandkids plus a fishing buddy and his wife
for dinner. Thank you for your good will sentiment. Hope you and
yours are well.

Well, **** me running...hey, it's a start...now grow some hair, kiss
each other, and think about if a tank of gas or whatever other
chicken-**** nonsense was worth it...and if either of you can honestly
say "yes," print this post out and show it to someone who will have the
common sense to slap the **** out of you...

HTH,
R

Call me a cynic, but I sincerely doubt you have or had any intentions of
HTH.

OK, you're a cynic...whose sincere doubter is in need of a tune-up...or
maybe some higher octane gasoline...

I sincerely hoped it helped, but I didn't wish it with all my heart or
anything...


And, no, this had nothing to do with gasoline, and if you have two brain
cells
still functioning, you know that as well as anyone...

Hell, you two aren't even sure of what it's about, and if you think I've
read or intend to read all of silly-assed back-and-forth crapola, you
don't have two brain cells functioning. I have read bits and pieces and
generally know what the gist of the slapfight is: you accuse, he
accuses, ad infinitum. It isn't a debate or even an argument, it's two
silly old ladies carrying a grudge over something in which they don't
even remember the details. I figured two grown men had more of a
life...heck, one of y'all has Simms waders, for gosh sakes...

HTH...but, I readily admit, if it doesn't, that's you problem, not mine,


And yet you feel compelled to add nothing......at great length. Why is
that?

Wolfgang

He's after you title of best typist in ROFF.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

TR
 

"rw" wrote in message
...

He's after you title of best typist in ROFF.

Leading one quite naturally to the obvious question: is there ANYONE in
this news group (or in this world, for that matter) of whom you are NOT
insanely jealous for even the least amount of attention he or she gets for
even the most insignificant of accomplishments, activities, thoughts or
anything else?

Wolfgang
who, if treated to just one more diffident exposure of brilliant casting
wrenched forth from a reluctant hero by a clamoring and adoring public
(which, how on earth did they ferret out this closely held secret in the
first place, huh?), will undoubtedly find it just about as hilarious as the
last one. :)

p.s. got any award winning doggies?

TR
 

Wolfgang wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
...


He's after you title of best typist in ROFF.


Leading one quite naturally to the obvious question: is there ANYONE in
this news group (or in this world, for that matter) of whom you are NOT
insanely jealous for even the least amount of attention he or she gets for
even the most insignificant of accomplishments, activities, thoughts or
anything else?

Well, let's see.

I'm not jealous of Harry Mason for his excellent flies and tutorials.

I'm not jealous of Willi for being a superb, if unorthodox, fly fisherman.

I'm not jealous of RDean for being a better typist than I.

And, finally, I am most definitely NOT jealous of your sense of humor.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.