![]() |
Beginner's fishing setup
On 4 Oct 2004 12:13:26 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote:
"Don Phillipson" wrote in news:s118d.2222 : Line weight is governed by the size of fly you want to cast -- for panfish, probably #16 as the smallest dry fly to size #2 streamers. I think you could successfully fish a long time for bluegill without ever going above a size 10 popper. Personally, I'd go closer to a 3-wt than a 6 wt. Perhaps 4wt would be the best compromise. There are some situations that might be unfishable with a 3-wt, but you'll have a nicer time the 80% of the time you can fish with it. I totally agree on the 3 weight. Not only would it make the panfishing a lot more fun, it'd leave room for a 5 weight when the gear-whoredom sets in ;-) /daytripper (buying adviser to the stars ;-) |
Beginner's fishing setup
daytripper wrote in
: On 4 Oct 2004 12:13:26 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote: "Don Phillipson" wrote in news:s118d.2222 : Line weight is governed by the size of fly you want to cast -- for panfish, probably #16 as the smallest dry fly to size #2 streamers. I think you could successfully fish a long time for bluegill without ever going above a size 10 popper. Personally, I'd go closer to a 3-wt than a 6 wt. Perhaps 4wt would be the best compromise. There are some situations that might be unfishable with a 3-wt, but you'll have a nicer time the 80% of the time you can fish with it. I totally agree on the 3 weight. Not only would it make the panfishing a lot more fun, it'd leave room for a 5 weight when the gear-whoredom sets in ;-) /daytripper (buying adviser to the stars ;-) Would it be harder to learn to cast with a 3-wt? Scott |
Beginner's fishing setup
Thanks! I would assume that a 3 weight is a lighter line and that the
higher numbered flys are smaller ... man, I need a book ... I don't know what I'm talking about. Just thinking about it, I would guess that with a lightweight line and a lightweight fly that I can't cast very far. I'm really excited to try it. I saw some combos at Wal-mart, but they were all 6 weight. Looks like I'll have to pick up that Fly Fishing for Dummies book that I saw yesterday. Paul "daytripper" wrote in message ... On 4 Oct 2004 12:13:26 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote: "Don Phillipson" wrote in news:s118d.2222 : Line weight is governed by the size of fly you want to cast -- for panfish, probably #16 as the smallest dry fly to size #2 streamers. I think you could successfully fish a long time for bluegill without ever going above a size 10 popper. Personally, I'd go closer to a 3-wt than a 6 wt. Perhaps 4wt would be the best compromise. There are some situations that might be unfishable with a 3-wt, but you'll have a nicer time the 80% of the time you can fish with it. I totally agree on the 3 weight. Not only would it make the panfishing a lot more fun, it'd leave room for a 5 weight when the gear-whoredom sets in ;-) /daytripper (buying adviser to the stars ;-) |
Beginner's fishing setup
"Paul Lester" wrote in
: Thanks! I would assume that a 3 weight is a lighter line and that the higher numbered flys are smaller ... man, I need a book ... I don't know what I'm talking about. Just thinking about it, I would guess that with a lightweight line and a lightweight fly that I can't cast very far. I'm really excited to try it. I saw some combos at Wal-mart, but they were all 6 weight. Looks like I'll have to pick up that Fly Fishing for Dummies book that I saw yesterday. Paul I would recommend the Orvis Flyfishing Guide by Tom Rosenbauer. You can get it online at Orvis (follow the trail to flyfishing accessories/books and videos) at any Orvis shop, or many flyfishing shops. It's a great beginners guide, and about the same price as any "Dummies" book. Scott |
Beginner's fishing setup
On 4 Oct 2004 22:36:17 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote:
daytripper wrote in : On 4 Oct 2004 12:13:26 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote: "Don Phillipson" wrote in news:s118d.2222 : Line weight is governed by the size of fly you want to cast -- for panfish, probably #16 as the smallest dry fly to size #2 streamers. I think you could successfully fish a long time for bluegill without ever going above a size 10 popper. Personally, I'd go closer to a 3-wt than a 6 wt. Perhaps 4wt would be the best compromise. There are some situations that might be unfishable with a 3-wt, but you'll have a nicer time the 80% of the time you can fish with it. I totally agree on the 3 weight. Not only would it make the panfishing a lot more fun, it'd leave room for a 5 weight when the gear-whoredom sets in ;-) /daytripper (buying adviser to the stars ;-) Would it be harder to learn to cast with a 3-wt? I would think that would only be the case if one was dealing with wind. That's the wild card. All else equal (rod action, for instance) and with a leader appropriate for the line and lure, with any properly mated rod and line the casting stroke should be essentially the same regardless of weight. /daytripper (that's my story and I'm sticking to it ;-) |
Beginner's fishing setup
Paul wrote:Thanks! I would assume that a 3 weight is a lighter line and that
the higher numbered flys are smaller ... man, I need a book ... I don't know what I'm talking about. Just thinking about it, I would guess that with a lightweight line and a lightweight fly that I can't cast very far. I'm really excited to try it. I saw some combos at Wal-mart, but they were all 6 weight. Looks like I'll have to pick up that Fly Fishing for Dummies book that I saw yesterday. Paul Please go to WWW.FFF.org amd seek out the nearest fly fishing club and seek help there. Most offer classes where you will learn the basics and join them on one of their outings where you will have a chance to learn to play. Our local Bass Pro offers free classes every Saturday to introduce you to the sport. Something similar should be available at most fly shops. They need you to learn so you can spend money there. We all spend way too much money on our hobbies. Big Dale |
Beginner's fishing setup
"Tim J." wrote in message news:J818d.65404$He1.29595@attbi_s01... Don Phillipson wrote: "Paul Lester" wrote in message .. . I want to fish some of the smaller lakes and ponds, from shore, for panfish. Primarily bluegill, crappie, etc. From what I've read, perhaps 5 weight or 6 weight would work for me, and I understand that weight-forward line is better than single weight, or that double taper is the best Buy from a local FF specialist store, if there is one and if you trust its advice. If not, choose a balanced outfit from a reliable mail-order vendor for total cost over $100 and under $250. . . . or Frank Church will send you a complete kit for free. ;-) -- TL, Tim (who loves ya, Franky?) http://css.sbcma.com/timj only if ya ask real nice, and bat your eyelashes at him.... SEG sanke- who knew those false lashes would be good for something one day ;-) |
Beginner's fishing setup
"Scott Seidman" wrote in message . 1.4... I would recommend the Orvis Flyfishing Guide by Tom Rosenbauer. You can get it online at Orvis (follow the trail to flyfishing accessories/books and videos) at any Orvis shop, or many flyfishing shops. It's a great beginners guide, and about the same price as any "Dummies" book. Scott Books and videos are good, but I would have to say, a hands on class or better yet, a one on one session with an instructor is best. And of course lots of practicing. Take it slow, and learn your basics. It's harder to correct someone with a bad habit than it is for someone who is just starting. As for set-up, you can always rent or borrow the equipment before you make a purchase. I would also stay away from on line purchases for flyrods, even thought you can get good deals. It's best to cast the rod with the correct weight line to get a good feel of the rod action. -tom |
Beginner's fishing setup
Big Dale wrote:
Please go to WWW.FFF.org amd seek out the nearest fly fishing club I'm bettin' Big Dale meant http://www.fedflyfishers.org/ HTH, Russell |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter