![]() |
|
OT, OT, OT....Plea for geek help
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:03:41 +0100, "Thomas Schreiber"
wrote: In my experience, Systemworks is more trouble than it's worth. It made good sense for the early versions of Windows where many basic functions were missing, but for the later versions, especially XP, it just gets in the way. I would un-install it and buy the plain Norton Anti-Virus program. If you can selectively install Anti-Virus from Systemworks that would suffice. L I use Bullguard. It has both an Antivirus, Firewall and Backup feature. The last featue I dont use, but the other two features, works great. And Bullguard has a more frequent virusdefinition update than Symantec. Really? All of our systems run NAV, barely a day goes by that they all haven't taken a virus definitions update, and according to the logs on this particular system it had two updates on Friday. /daytripper (So, more than daily? That'd be "user-belligerent-ware" ;-) |
OT, OT, OT....Plea for geek help
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:03:41 +0100, "Thomas Schreiber"
wrote: In my experience, Systemworks is more trouble than it's worth. It made good sense for the early versions of Windows where many basic functions were missing, but for the later versions, especially XP, it just gets in the way. I would un-install it and buy the plain Norton Anti-Virus program. If you can selectively install Anti-Virus from Systemworks that would suffice. L I use Bullguard. It has both an Antivirus, Firewall and Backup feature. The last featue I dont use, but the other two features, works great. And Bullguard has a more frequent virusdefinition update than Symantec. Really? All of our systems run NAV, barely a day goes by that they all haven't taken a virus definitions update, and according to the logs on this particular system it had two updates on Friday. /daytripper (So, more than daily? That'd be "user-belligerent-ware" ;-) |
OT, OT, OT....Plea for geek help
LD Whitley wrote:
In my experience, Systemworks is more trouble than it's worth. It made good sense for the early versions of Windows where many basic functions were missing, but for the later versions, especially XP, it just gets in the way. I would un-install it and buy the plain Norton Anti-Virus program. If you can selectively install Anti-Virus from Systemworks that would suffice. This turned out to be a workable solution. I have an older machine and OS (98 SE), and it seems that all of Systemworks was taking up too much of system resources (I've already installed the maximum memory the machine will take). Installing NAV alone has freed up enough resources to make IE work properly, and I can run Norton Utilities from the CD. Not an ideal solution, but an OK fix until I can buy a new machine next year. Thanks to all who responded. JR |
OT, OT, OT....Plea for geek help
LD Whitley wrote:
In my experience, Systemworks is more trouble than it's worth. It made good sense for the early versions of Windows where many basic functions were missing, but for the later versions, especially XP, it just gets in the way. I would un-install it and buy the plain Norton Anti-Virus program. If you can selectively install Anti-Virus from Systemworks that would suffice. This turned out to be a workable solution. I have an older machine and OS (98 SE), and it seems that all of Systemworks was taking up too much of system resources (I've already installed the maximum memory the machine will take). Installing NAV alone has freed up enough resources to make IE work properly, and I can run Norton Utilities from the CD. Not an ideal solution, but an OK fix until I can buy a new machine next year. Thanks to all who responded. JR |
OT, OT, OT....Plea for geek help
"JR" wrote in message .. . SNIP This turned out to be a workable solution. I have an older machine and OS (98 SE), and it seems that all of Systemworks was taking up too much of system resources (I've already installed the maximum memory the machine will take). Installing NAV alone has freed up enough resources to make IE work properly, and I can run Norton Utilities from the CD. Not an ideal solution, but an OK fix until I can buy a new machine next year. Thanks to all who responded. JR Well you might like to try these as well; http://www.flashpeak.com/ ( Slim Browser, freeware) http://www.jfitz.com/software/RAMpage/ They run very well on 98SE machines, increasing both performance and stability. TL MC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter