![]() |
Maine Misadventure
riverman wrote:
"Memphis Jim" wrote in message oups.com... This post was buried in an older thread. I feel so proud of it I want it up front. It's about a recent experience I had in Downeast Maine. Sounds like my entire teenage years. I spent many a summer (and winter) in the blueberry barrens. By the way, the region you were headed for (sounds like around Cathance Lake?) is not so great for winter fishing. --riverman While we are on the subject of Maine, may I ask, how far outside of Maine is is where a "camp" must properly be called a "cottage"? I always want to call people's summer homes "camps" no matter how many luxuries they contain. Pete |
Maine Misadventure
"Peter A. Collin" wrote in message ... riverman wrote: "Memphis Jim" wrote in message oups.com... This post was buried in an older thread. I feel so proud of it I want it up front. It's about a recent experience I had in Downeast Maine. Sounds like my entire teenage years. I spent many a summer (and winter) in the blueberry barrens. By the way, the region you were headed for (sounds like around Cathance Lake?) is not so great for winter fishing. --riverman While we are on the subject of Maine, may I ask, how far outside of Maine is is where a "camp" must properly be called a "cottage"? I always want to call people's summer homes "camps" no matter how many luxuries they contain. I think it has more to do with yearly income than anything else. Everyone I knew who had one, had a 'summah camp out in the woods'. Out of staters who could afford a summah place in Maine had a 'cottage on the lake'. I think once you are out of ME, NH and VT, you can call them 'Cottages'. I suppose it really has to do with what you use them for. Camps are used mostly to hunt from, I think. And even if you don't hunt, if some owner sometime in the past used it for hunting, its a camp. --riverman |
Maine Misadventure
"Peter A. Collin" wrote in message
While we are on the subject of Maine, may I ask, how far outside of Maine is is where a "camp" must properly be called a "cottage"? Vermont. Joe F. |
Maine Misadventure
There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and
parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Now in most of Maine, smaller farms are not economically productive (with the exception of Aroostook County in the northeast of the state where potato farms predominate). Over the past hundred years, much of interior Maine that used to be farmland has reverted back to woods. At the same time, over the last 40 years or so the population of the state has consolidated toward coast, toward the southwest, and toward urban areas, such that there are towns throughout Maine that are slowly dimming and blinking out. Close to where I will be living there is one town that no longer exists as a coporate entity, Centerville, and two others that are trying to go in that direction, Whitneyville, and Cooper (on Cathance Lake) Deorganization means lower taxes for these towns on the brink. When deorganization succeeds, local control of the community is given up. This ultimately furthers the trend toward forested land. Finally, much of the land in Maine is owned by international timber companies. Currently they are managing much of the land for pulp production, and letting forests regrow. If you didn't know better you might assume much of the land is preserved. The town where I am buying a house once had about 2500 people and was an industrial center for cutting wood (thorough water power). Now the mills are gone, along with the dams (thank goodness). If you didn't know the history of the town it would be hard to imagine how industrial the town was in the past. That is what I meant. |
Maine Misadventure
Thanks Petah I appreciate your comments. Good to know that there are
former Mainers on the board. |
Maine Misadventure
That's exactly my point.
As my wife and I looked at new places to settle, we found that we were attracted to places with zero or negative growth rates, places where strip mall development and suburbanization was not occurring. (I live in Memphis, Tennessee, a healthy hub of suburbanization, where no development project is ever turned down, so I know of which I speak). We have found that while we did not necessarily want to live in the woods, we did want to live in a place where the suburban imprint had not taken over. Places like Maine, apart from southern Maine, northern Vermont, and northern and western New York fit the bill. If you haven't been to rural sections of New York, you really cannot appreciate how rural it can be. |
Maine Misadventure
The tension you feel when you realize that you are really lost, really
in the middle of no where, and you really have to consider what the weather and nature have in store for you is a real moment of clarity. |
Maine Misadventure
The exact place I was heading toward was the Blog Brook Flowage, North
of Cherryfield, in Deblois township (Delorme map 25). I really didn't think the fishing would be good, but I had a fly rod and was ready to try. I didn't have a boad, canoe, float tube, etc. so I was trying to find water that had a little movement. |
Maine Misadventure
Willi wrote:
Memphis Jim wrote: There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Thanks, your and Greg's explanation make sense. For some stupid reason, I assumed that since our Country's population is growing, all areas of the Country would have population increases. Check out: http://www.patagonia.com/enviro/repo...o_common.shtml -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Maine Misadventure
Memphis Jim wrote:
There are several long term trends that are making parts of Maine, and parts of other states in the northern U.S. have more wilderness. In the case of Maine, much of the state used to support a small farm economy when the U.S. was much more agrarian than it is now. Thanks, your and Greg's explanation make sense. For some stupid reason, I assumed that since our Country's population is growing, all areas of the Country would have population increases. The area I live in and the areas I most visit all are places with considerable growth and the issues are dealing with this growth while still retaining the open space that makes the areas desirable. Although ranching isn't profitable for smaller operations (and VERY difficult even for big ones), the land they're on is very valuable and many ranches get sold and developed into "gentleman ranchettes". Thankfully the majority of the mountainous areas in CO, NM, WY, MT, and UT are National Forests. Hopefully they'll stay that way. Willi |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter