Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

Tim J. wrote:
typed:
Correctamundo Giuseppi! ...

Since Ken is obviously asleep at the switch, I'll have to step in here.

Fred, you may not speak or understand mindless drivel, but you sure can
write it. ...

I watch Jon Stewart's "The Daily Show" at 10:00 Central and
then I'm down for the night. I don't sit in front of a computer
screen 24 hours a day like some loony fruitcake and his gaggle
of sockpuppets.

And yes Fred, you ignorant slut, learn some friggin' manners
and post in a way that isn't rude to the reader. It's just as
easy to construct a readable post using conventional netiquette
as it is to be a rude ****tard.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

"rw" wrote in message
m...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Well, yes, you're right.....of course. Yes, it IS all about you and yes,
everybody here DOES know it and no, there is nothing anyone can do to make
SOME people admit it despite your uncanny ability to pack so much
astonishing information into one single (and highly original) locution
while, on the other hand, yes, we all believe that you STILL have enough
money to rent all the friends you need.

Wolfgang
who feels that in this august company belaboring the fact that reading
between the letters, like any other simple skill, becomes easier with
practice, would be superfluous.

Not meaning to leave Stevie out...
 

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:39:59 -0600, rw
wrote:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Aw, Stevie, my bad...while referring to you as a "nappy-headed Nazi homo
ho" doesn't quite fit, I'll be happy to state you are a Pampers-load...

Golly, didn't mean to leave you out,
Dickie

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

rw wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Not even original, much less funny.

Who are you trying to emulate, Wolfie or rdean ? I don't
remember which one of them started the zzzzzzzz shtick.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
t...
rw wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Not even original, much less funny.

Who are you trying to emulate, Wolfie or rdean ? I don't
remember which one of them started the zzzzzzzz shtick.

Check your notes.

Wolfgang

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Apr 11, 7:59 am, wrote:
No ****ing doubt - Jose
I am a disturbed mo fo"
Disturbed about a lot of things The planet,Iraq, Iran our rivers, people
who
throw beercans ourt the car window, your nutso posts and talking about
pigs

you must have known!

True...

We just yesterday got three little pigs to fatten butcher and then eat
in 3
mos atheir names are Cheney Bush & Rumsfeld.

Fred

Your post is unintelligible. For meaningful communication in this
medium, it is necessary to conform to certain rules governing the use
of written English. Should you not be privy to these rules, which is
apparently the case, then you might as well refrain.

Or simply confine yourself to statements like "Again you sure are a
fat creep! " which although not apparently addressed to anybody in
particular, you later stated to be directed at myself, and which you
finally managed to complete, doubtless after prodigious mental effort,
on your second attempt.

MC


As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only
when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that
because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin
to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that
might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to
post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have
no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of
reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of
thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and
positively contributing to ROFF in the first place.

Jeremy Moe

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only
when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that
because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin
to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that
might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to
post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have
no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of
reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of
thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and
positively contributing to ROFF in the first place.

Jeremy Moe

I don´t have a dispute as such, I merely reply occasionally to
insulting posts. Anybody may post here, including dumbos, and they
frequently do. If you wish to "constructively and positively"
contribute here, although I cant really see why anybody would want to,
in the meantime, then posting something about fly-fishing or related
subjects is more likely to achieve such an aim, than posting negative
criticism of others.

Correct English usage is required for meaningful communication.
Posting gibberish is simply pointless, although there is nothing to
prevent anybody doing so.

MC

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

wrote in message
ups.com...


I don´t have a dispute as such, I merely reply *occasionally* to
insulting posts. snip
MC

emphasis added.. ROFLMAO. Definately the ROFF understatement of the decade.

Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 12, 2:36 am, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

I don´t have a dispute as such, I merely reply *occasionally* to
insulting posts. snip

MC

emphasis added.. ROFLMAO. Definately the ROFF understatement of the decade.

Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR

Probably escaped your notice, but I did not reply to most, merely a
few of them.

Just for the record.

MC

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 11, 1:19 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:


I watch Jon Stewart's "The Daily Show" at 10:00 Central and
then I'm down for the night. I don't sit in front of a computer
screen 24 hours a day like some loony fruitcake and his gaggle
of sockpuppets.

And yes Fred, you ignorant slut, learn some friggin' manners
and post in a way that isn't rude to the reader. It's just as
easy to construct a readable post using conventional netiquette
as it is to be a rude ****tard.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Tut tut....for somebody who constantly maintains he is opposed to foul
mouthed invective you certainly engage in a lot of it. Calling a bloke
a "slut" is a very strange thing to do. Perhaps you need a nappy
change?

MC