FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Sandy? (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=29229)

Mike[_6_] November 8th, 2007 09:22 PM

Sandy?
 
On 8 Nov, 22:14, Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
LOL !! The only "abuse" Pittendrigh suffered was poster
after poster telling him he was way off base in trying
to blame the decline of roff on one person.


If you have an example of me "abusing" Pittendrigh I'm
sure you'll post it, but in the absence of same it is
safe to assume that you're just lying again. When will
you ever learn Your Loony Mikeness, Google is *not* your
friend.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec...ly/search?q=pi....
...
A large number of people agree with him.


That's a nice enough example of Pittendrigh on his pompous
high horse badmouthing me, and that's the post I was talking
about when I said poster after poster told him he was way off
base. As I recall practically nobody agreed with him.

So you're lying again, twice in the same thread and very
clumsily too. Congenital liars like you never learn, Google
is not your friend.

--
Ken Fortenberry


You failed to note the posts where you were badmouthing him, calling
him a dip**** etc etc.

Everybody knows you are a habitual liar Kennyboy, even about silly
things where there would be absolutely no need for any normal person
to lie, That is because you are a pathological liar Kennyboy, you can
īt stop it.

Your recollection is also extremely faulty, doubtless a result of
trying to remember what you lied about.

You upset many many people, and turn countless thread into **** with
your lies, bull****, and taunting Kennyboy. Nobody here even needs to
check Google to know that.

MC


Mike[_6_] November 8th, 2007 09:23 PM

Sandy?
 
On 8 Nov, 22:14, Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
LOL !! The only "abuse" Pittendrigh suffered was poster
after poster telling him he was way off base in trying
to blame the decline of roff on one person.


If you have an example of me "abusing" Pittendrigh I'm
sure you'll post it, but in the absence of same it is
safe to assume that you're just lying again. When will
you ever learn Your Loony Mikeness, Google is *not* your
friend.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec...ly/search?q=pi...
...
A large number of people agree with him.


That's a nice enough example of Pittendrigh on his pompous
high horse badmouthing me, and that's the post I was talking
about when I said poster after poster told him he was way off
base. As I recall practically nobody agreed with him.

So you're lying again, twice in the same thread and very
clumsily too. Congenital liars like you never learn, Google
is not your friend.

--
Ken Fortenberry


Oh and pardon me while I have a little snicker about a pratt like you
using the word pompous.

MC


Mike[_6_] November 8th, 2007 09:43 PM

Sandy?
 
On 8 Nov, 22:23, Mike wrote:
On 8 Nov, 22:14, Ken Fortenberry wrote:



Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
LOL !! The only "abuse" Pittendrigh suffered was poster
after poster telling him he was way off base in trying
to blame the decline of roff on one person.


If you have an example of me "abusing" Pittendrigh I'm
sure you'll post it, but in the absence of same it is
safe to assume that you're just lying again. When will
you ever learn Your Loony Mikeness, Google is *not* your
friend.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec...ly/search?q=pi...
...
A large number of people agree with him.


That's a nice enough example of Pittendrigh on his pompous
high horse badmouthing me, and that's the post I was talking
about when I said poster after poster told him he was way off
base. As I recall practically nobody agreed with him.


So you're lying again, twice in the same thread and very
clumsily too. Congenital liars like you never learn, Google
is not your friend.


--
Ken Fortenberry


Oh and pardon me while I have a little snicker about a pratt like you
using the word pompous.

MC


Incidentally Kennyboy, I donīt think you are solely responsible for
the "decline" of ROFF, but you are certainly a major factor. You are
also ably assisted by LaCourse and a few others. Who has become even
worse than usual of late. This effectively prevents decent people who
are interested in fishing from joining, and drives others away.

MC


Ken Fortenberry[_3_] November 8th, 2007 10:00 PM

Sandy?
 
Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry
That's a nice enough example of Pittendrigh on his pompous
high horse badmouthing me, and that's the post I was talking
about when I said poster after poster told him he was way off
base. As I recall practically nobody agreed with him.

So you're lying again, twice in the same thread and very
clumsily too. Congenital liars like you never learn, Google
is not your friend.


You failed to note the posts where you were badmouthing him, calling
him a dip**** etc etc. ...


If you have an example of me "abusing" Pittendrigh I'm
sure you'll post it, but in the absence of same it is
safe to assume that you're just lying again. When will
you ever learn Your Loony Mikeness, Google is *not* your
friend.

EOT for me.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Rick[_5_] November 8th, 2007 11:17 PM

Sandy?
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
So you're lying again, twice in the same thread and very
clumsily too. Congenital liars like you never learn, Google
is not your friend.


You failed to note the posts where you were badmouthing him, calling
him a dip**** etc etc. ...


If you have an example of me "abusing" Pittendrigh I'm
sure you'll post it, but in the absence of same it is
safe to assume that you're just lying again. When will
you ever learn Your Loony Mikeness, Google is *not* your
friend.

EOT for me.

--
Ken Fortenberry


Well Ken, looks like his loonyness is spewing forth his dribble again.. I
recall that you and I didn't see eye to eye on politcal stance, but I don't
recall that degrading to any attacks.. Guess that means we can disagree
without attacking each other? Unlike his loonyness Mike?? So I guess you can
get along with others unlike what Mikey says.. OH no hold the phone, someone
gets along with Ken and Dave and others... Go **** your hand Mike....

Rick



Dave LaCourse November 9th, 2007 03:39 AM

Sandy?
 
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:28:03 -0700, Willi
wrote:

Last place I know that Sandy posted was alt.flyfishing and even there
his thread got flamed and finalized by some name calling by LaCourse.


You're a liar, Willi. Return and read the thread. I never called
Sandy anything but.......wait for it......... Sandy.

Check it out.

I disagreed with him, that is all. I disagreed with him about fishing
the spawn. And I thought it was a civil conversation. The only name
calling was you calling me a "sour old man". Remember? d;o)

And, yeah, I don't expect an apology.

Dave



Mike[_6_] November 9th, 2007 03:44 AM

Sandy?
 
On 9 Nov, 04:39, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:28:03 -0700, Willi
wrote:

Last place I know that Sandy posted was alt.flyfishing and even there
his thread got flamed and finalized by some name calling by LaCourse.


You're a liar, Willi. Return and read the thread. I never called
Sandy anything but.......wait for it......... Sandy.

Check it out.

I disagreed with him, that is all. I disagreed with him about fishing
the spawn. And I thought it was a civil conversation. The only name
calling was you calling me a "sour old man". Remember? d;o)

And, yeah, I don't expect an apology.

Dave


Fortenberry is a bad influence on you:

QUOTE

Any fool, including you, can catch a spawning fish without even
trying. Put the lure in front of them and they will strike it. The
term "shooting fish in a barrel" was surely coined to describe fishing
the spawn. What's the matter, Tim, you can't catch fish the normal
way, ya gotta go after the spawners to feel macho? Jerk.

Dave

UNQUOTE

MC


Dave LaCourse November 9th, 2007 04:04 AM

Sandy?
 
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:44:19 -0800, Mike
wrote:

Any fool, including you, can catch a spawning fish without even
trying. Put the lure in front of them and they will strike it. The
term "shooting fish in a barrel" was surely coined to describe fishing
the spawn. What's the matter, Tim, you can't catch fish the normal
way, ya gotta go after the spawners to feel macho? Jerk.


And apparently you can not read, Connor. Willi said I called Sandy a
name. I did not. The entire conversation was civil. I called *Tim*
a fool and jerk, because that is what he was in that post.

And, yeah, I don't expect an apology from you either, but I do wish
you would get the player's names correct. Try to follow the thread,
Connor, instead of trying to exact your punishment on me. d;o)

Dave

Mike[_6_] November 9th, 2007 04:07 AM

Sandy?
 
On 9 Nov, 05:04, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:44:19 -0800, Mike
wrote:

Any fool, including you, can catch a spawning fish without even
trying. Put the lure in front of them and they will strike it. The
term "shooting fish in a barrel" was surely coined to describe fishing
the spawn. What's the matter, Tim, you can't catch fish the normal
way, ya gotta go after the spawners to feel macho? Jerk.


And apparently you can not read, Connor. Willi said I called Sandy a
name. I did not. The entire conversation was civil. I called *Tim*
a fool and jerk, because that is what he was in that post.

And, yeah, I don't expect an apology from you either, but I do wish
you would get the player's names correct. Try to follow the thread,
Connor, instead of trying to exact your punishment on me. d;o)

Dave


You can not read LaCourse, the phrase "Any fool, including
you..............." applies to anybody who fishes the spawn. You were
the only abusive person in that thread.

MC


Mike[_6_] November 9th, 2007 04:10 AM

Sandy?
 
On 9 Nov, 05:04, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:44:19 -0800, Mike
wrote:

Any fool, including you, can catch a spawning fish without even
trying. Put the lure in front of them and they will strike it. The
term "shooting fish in a barrel" was surely coined to describe fishing
the spawn. What's the matter, Tim, you can't catch fish the normal
way, ya gotta go after the spawners to feel macho? Jerk.


And apparently you can not read, Connor. Willi said I called Sandy a
name. I did not. The entire conversation was civil. I called *Tim*
a fool and jerk, because that is what he was in that post.

And, yeah, I don't expect an apology from you either, but I do wish
you would get the player's names correct. Try to follow the thread,
Connor, instead of trying to exact your punishment on me. d;o)

Dave


Also Willi did not say you called Sandy a name;

QUOTE

Last place I know that Sandy posted was alt.flyfishing and even there
his thread got flamed and finalized by some name calling by LaCourse.

Willi

UNQUOTE

Which is the absolute truth.

MC



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004 - 2006 FishingBanter