![]() |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 08:40:19 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: George Cleveland wrote: Yeah yeah yeah... so they say. But is it the government my two sons deserve? I deserve it because I didn't walk into the Swedish immigration office in Stockholm and ask for asylum when I was there when I was 18. Typical "liberal" position - "I deserve a reward because I _didn't_ do whatever..." ... Huh ? Did you deliberately misread George's post are where you taught creationism in science class ? ;-) Huh, right back at ya? If I understand the first part, no, I didn't misread anything. He said: " I deserve it because I didn't..." Puhlease, you deliberately misstated George's position as "I deserve a reward" when, unless you're way dumber than you look, you know that he meant he deserves bad government but his sons do not. Yet another typical US "liberal" view - that being able to not only have just about complete freedom of speech and to have any say in government at all isn't a reward. Maybe instead of Sweden, you guys might want to look into moving to, oh, maybe Zimbabwe. IAC, he said he deserved something for doing nothing, and his sons deserved something else for doing nothing. So tell us Rick, what have you ever done to deserve the many advantages you have other than be born to the right parents ? I have no obligation to explain, much less justify, anything to anyone here for a number of reasons, and chief among them in this case is because I'm not running for POTUS, nor asking anyone to vote or otherwise support me in such an endeavor, nor have I claimed that I deserve anything. Uh huh, and I've never heard anyone on this forum say that Obama deserved anything either. What I've heard in this forum is that Obama is the best candidate for the job among those left in the running. OK. Why is he the best candidate? HTH, R |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
|
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:24:18 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: Puhlease, you deliberately misstated George's position as "I deserve a reward" when, unless you're way dumber than you look, you know that he meant he deserves bad government but his sons do not. Yet another typical US "liberal" view - ... Yet another typical GOP diversion and attack. The GOP style modern conservative can't address the issues because their positions are intellectually and morally bankrupt, always have been but it's just now becoming obvious. Note to Rick: "America Love It Or Leave It" was a stupid slogan even when it wasn't old and stale. Uh, yeah - "Those Goddamned mother****ing sonofabitch ******* cocksucker Republicans called us liberals an impolite name..." wailed the poor little "liberal." "WOW! It must have been pretty bad..." "They called us 'hypocrites'..." Uh huh, and I've never heard anyone on this forum say that Obama deserved anything either. What I've heard in this forum is that Obama is the best candidate for the job among those left in the running. OK. Why is he the best candidate? Because he's a liberal. Duh. Well, now, finally some honesty...I can see Obama's new slogan now: "Change we can bull**** you about" HTH, R |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:36:50 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote: wrote in message .. . I suspect that I work at least as much, if not more, on things at least as mentally and physically difficult, if not more so, and do so for a longer period of time, on most days than many of "the rest of 'us'" and have for many years. speaking of mentally difficult, reading this sentence required that I spike my morning coffee(hell, I'm allowed, it's my birthday.....)! And, to think, I figured that I'd mastered the 'run-on sentence'!!vbseg Tom Happy birthday, Tom. Geo. C. |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:04:57 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:56:37 -0500, George Cleveland wrote: On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:58:17 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: OK. It will be tragic, sure, but in no way unjust. - JR Not unjust. The Tyranny of the masses. Or as someone else once , people get the government they deserve. --riverman Yeah yeah yeah... so they say. But is it the government my two sons deserve? I deserve it because I didn't walk into the Swedish immigration office in Stockholm and ask for asylum when I was there when I was 18. Typical "liberal" position - "I deserve a reward because I _didn't_ do whatever..." ... Huh ? Did you deliberately misread George's post are where you taught creationism in science class ? ;-) So tell us Rick, what have you ever done to deserve the many advantages you have other than be born to the right parents ? And there you are, Well, there *you* are, most of the rest of us had to work for it. Maybe I didn't make myself clear. I deserve to live under a McCain/Mooselini government because I had the chance to move to Sweden when I was 18 and Sweden was granting draft age Americans political asylum at the time. I knew it. Thought about it. And wimped out. Even though I really liked the country. My kids did not have that chance and hence do not deserve to live under the tender mercies of right wing religious zealots. Geo. C. |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: What I've heard in this forum is that Obama is the best candidate for the job among those left in the running. OK. Why is he the best candidate? Because he's a liberal. Duh. Well, now, finally some honesty... There will always be those rabid GOP partisans and dumb**** religious whackjobs who consider "liberal" a dirty word but many Americans are no longer buying that bull****. The pendulum has swung. Tom Delay, Phil Gramm, Randy Cunningham et al. have killed what was left of GOP Conservatism and the GOP has nothing left but a warmongering old nutcase from the past and a gun- toting grandma of the Christian Taliban. And there's some more honesty for you. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
On Sep 7, 8:46*am, wrote:
NICE OF YOU TO ASK RICHARD. Obama is the best candidate because he offers the best chance to untangle the grubby hands of the "end of the road-er" right wing America haters, from around the neck of the USA, the best hope for democracy on the planet. Obama holds out the possibility that traitors and that those who have put selfishness and their feudalistic belief in their right to a free ride, up as their false God, will find justice AFTER a trial, and not at the end of a rope or firing squad like they deserve for their treason. IF Obama is elected I fully expect some of these people will flee the USA with their loot. Obama for me holds out the hope that the Constitutional protections of the individual will be restored and those in the current administration who have waged war against the Bill of Rights, and profited immensely from corruption and the cynical slaughter of our young soldiers amplified by faulty equipment, rotted food, and careerist leadership, will meet their deserved fate at the hands of the American people. Obama for me holds out the possibility of America for Americans, a peaceful and helpful partner with the World, and the beginning of the end of the systematic plundering of the world's resources and trained people to prop up the sniveling nouveau riche purveyors of trash culture. Forget Obama, this election holds out the chance that working people can reclaim their stake in this country thru the ballot box, and send a signal that the stealing, corruption, and secret dealing is either over or there will be hell to pay. Dave Today the Bush administration NATIONALIZED one half of the US mortgage industry. I wonder how many Bush butt lickers even noticed? |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
JR wrote in :
Our generation was born with the gift of the U.S. Constitution. It benefits from the wealthiest, strongest economy the world has ever seen. It has a free press and, thanks to the internet, access to almost unlimited amounts of information. It has open and free elections. Except the current administration has been using the Constitution as toilet paper. First choice to me would be the ticket that is more likely to honor and rebuild the separation of powers. McCain seems to be a stooge to the same folks that Bush stooges for (is stooge a verb??), and Palin seems rabid, so hope doesn't run high for me that they're the ticket. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Why McCain / Palin is OK with me
On 8 Sep 2008 13:09:50 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: JR wrote in : Our generation was born with the gift of the U.S. Constitution. It benefits from the wealthiest, strongest economy the world has ever seen. It has a free press and, thanks to the internet, access to almost unlimited amounts of information. It has open and free elections. Except the current administration has been using the Constitution as toilet paper. What do you see as some examples of this? TC, R |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter