![]() |
Landslide or not?
On Nov 7, 11:33*pm, DaveS wrote:
Biblical. Absolutely. I think The Lord has delivered the Bushies into our hands for correction and chastisement. So what are you going to do? Paint pictures of them sucking off monkey īs? Some of you people are obviously not compos mentis. The ****ing election is over, Obama won it, and you ought to be looking to the future and how things might be improved, but few of you are, instead you are wasting time and effort on nonsense and trivialities, and it appears there are some of you who are unable to grasp reality at all. The main cause of your failures, in many areas, is people like you. It makes little difference who nominally leads you, your individual behaviour is an excellent indicator of your collective behaviour. If you want things to change you have to change the things you can control, and basically the only thing you can control much is yourself. Although some of you obviously canīt even do that. Unlikely that you will even understand. Oh well................. |
Landslide or not?
"rw" wrote in message m... Peaceful Bill wrote: rw wrote: Peaceful Bill wrote: rw wrote: Charlie S. wrote: What was that I've been hearing about ACORN and the dubiosity of their massive registration near Orlando? I dunno. How many of the dubious registrants voted? Maybe the better question is how many times they voted. OK. How many voted at least once? Missed the questions again! How many voted more than once? How many bogus registrations were voted by "legitimate" registrants in addition to their own vote? How many voted as the the bogus registrant absentee and then voted again as their bogus and/or real identity on election day? I'm asking you, Peaceful. How many? This reminds me of why I have the moron PB in my killfile! I'd say there were at least hundreds of millions of illegal votes cast by those nefarious ACORNers. Op --too phunnie-- |
Landslide or not?
On Nov 7, 3:46*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote: rw wrote: Charlie S. wrote: What was that I've been hearing about ACORN and the dubiosity of their massive registration near Orlando? I dunno. How many of the dubious registrants voted? Maybe the better question is how many times they voted. ..... and the best question may be whether the Republicans will have a better chance at winning *next time* by blaming Acorn for their problems or taking a good hard objective look at themselves. |
Landslide or not?
Mr Opus McDopus--Mark H. Bowen wrote:
"rw" wrote in message m... Peaceful Bill wrote: rw wrote: Peaceful Bill wrote: rw wrote: Charlie S. wrote: What was that I've been hearing about ACORN and the dubiosity of their massive registration near Orlando? I dunno. How many of the dubious registrants voted? Maybe the better question is how many times they voted. OK. How many voted at least once? Missed the questions again! How many voted more than once? How many bogus registrations were voted by "legitimate" registrants in addition to their own vote? How many voted as the the bogus registrant absentee and then voted again as their bogus and/or real identity on election day? I'm asking you, Peaceful. How many? I'm just asking questions. You seem interested also. This reminds me of why I have the moron PB in my killfile! I'd say there were at least hundreds of millions of illegal votes cast by those nefarious ACORNers. Op --too phunnie-- Your moniker says it all. |
Landslide or not?
wrote in message ... On Nov 7, 3:46 pm, Peaceful Bill wrote: rw wrote: Charlie S. wrote: What was that I've been hearing about ACORN and the dubiosity of their massive registration near Orlando? I dunno. How many of the dubious registrants voted? Maybe the better question is how many times they voted. ..... and the best question may be whether the Republicans will have a better chance at winning *next time* by blaming Acorn for their problems or taking a good hard objective look at themselves. They may take back Congress in 2 years. The economy probably will be even worse then. Depends if they move somewhat to the middle. To the Goldwater middle. |
OT Landslide or not?
|
OT Landslide or not?
On Nov 8, 12:54*pm, "Fred" wrote:
Fred maybe if you hang around long enuf you will come to understand just why MC gets the response he does, left and right. It is, very briefly, because he is a big cry baby with a monster ego. His comments never have revealed ANY civic involvements, other than Mikey as all knowing expert on world fishing based on his experiences in a tiny fraction of the world. Even so he does know a lot, but you never are supposed to disagree. That challenges his "honor." Perhaps one day you will have this fraidy cat wish for your death across the reaches of the net because you disagree with one of his pronouncements, or do not kowtow to his weird sense of entitlement. I deal with his net stalking behaviour by imagining I am painting him expertly blowing monkeys. It helps. Dave I am positive about the USA and its future, Obama yes, but more than just this change. |
OT Landslide or not?
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:25:22 -0800 (PST), DaveS
wrote: On Nov 8, 12:54*pm, "Fred" wrote: Fred maybe if you hang around long enuf you will come to understand just why MC gets the response he does, left and right. It is, very briefly, because he is a big cry baby with a monster ego. His comments never have revealed ANY civic involvements, other than Mikey as all knowing expert on world fishing based on his experiences in a tiny fraction of the world. Even so he does know a lot, but you never are supposed to disagree. That challenges his "honor." Perhaps one day you will have this fraidy cat wish for your death across the reaches of the net because you disagree with one of his pronouncements, or do not kowtow to his weird sense of entitlement. I deal with his net stalking behaviour by imagining I am painting him expertly blowing monkeys. It helps. Well, now, there's your answer, Fred - you can imagine Dave imagining himself painting Mike blowing...oops...EXPERTLY blowing monkeys... Dave I am positive about the USA and its future, Obama yes, but more than just this change. Yeah, with folks like you and Fred in the USA, how can its future be anything but positive...well, once the proper people have been tortured and executed, of course... Sheesh, R ....and just how is it that you know the difference between "expertly" and oh, say, "mediocre" or "****-poor" when it comes to monkey blowing...? I mean, speaking only for myself, I'm not embarrassed to admit that I wouldn't know expertise in monkey blowing if I were looking right at it...and well, I guess I might as well also admit that I'd just be too polite to ask the monkey...hey, don't ask, don't tell... |
OT Landslide or not?
On Nov 8, 10:25*pm, DaveS wrote:
On Nov 8, 12:54*pm, "Fred" wrote: Fred maybe if you hang around long enuf you will come to understand just why MC gets the response he does, left and right. It is, very briefly, *because he is a big cry baby with a monster ego. His comments never have revealed ANY civic involvements, other than Mikey as all knowing expert on world fishing based on his experiences in a tiny fraction of the world. Even so he does know a lot, but you never are supposed to disagree. That challenges his "honor." Perhaps one day you will have this fraidy cat wish for your death across the reaches of the net because you disagree with one of his pronouncements, or do not kowtow to his weird sense of entitlement. I deal with his net stalking behaviour by imagining I am painting him expertly blowing monkeys. It helps. Dave I am positive about the USA and its future, Obama yes, but more than just this change. You really are a poor sad dumbo, completely balmy, and weird to boot. Extremely doubtful that anybody wants to hear about your perverse hallucinations, they merely indicate your lack of grip on reality. I would tell you to get a life, but it seems youīve already had it, such as it was. Always amazes me how a nutjob like you manages to survive long at all without intensive care. Anybody reading the ****e you post could make an excellent case for having you committed on grounds of insanity. Seems you canīt stand being just another useless and ineffectual dumbo, and itīs driven you potty. You are to be pitied more than anything else, but that still does not excuse your behaviour. |
OT Landslide or not?
On Nov 8, 9:54*pm, "Fred" wrote:
I would like to see the federal gov't spending our billions of tax $$ here on US citizens instead of bombing the desert making Raytheon and KBR etc wealthy I can control myself but honestly *I have little hope for the nation collectively I am skeptical about a country that idolizes rock stars and baseball players making untold millions I have little hope for the collective consciousness of the US people watching American Idol, Survivor and its untold # of spin offs and other **** like that. Yet I did see a ray of hope in this landslide I think that the results were as repudiation of the last 8 yrs of assholes running this country as it was a cry loud and clear for change! It is time for a change and I (still at this point an American citizen) am ready for it. Fred Itīs a little too simplistic to say that a country gets the government it deserves, but there is some truth in it. Unfortunately, the tendency is always to blame others for whatever goes wrong, and also to codify various things in order to have a target as such to rail at. In all the various political factions there are "good" and "bad" people, and there are a lot of people doing good and bad things for what they perceive as the right reasons, or for various other motivations like personal gain, power, religion, ideology, etc. Unfortunately, due to the mass involved, these things have become ever more complex and intertwined. It is quite impossible for any "normal" individual to influence these things, but one can still influence oneself. The more individuals there are doing "good" things, and eschewing "bad" things, the greater the tendency for the mass to do the same. In an ideal situation, this should automatically result in the greatest good for the greatest number. There will always be people who are dissatisfied with what they have, or how they live, quite regardless of how well off they are. Nevertheless, one must keep in mind that the Western world as a whole enjoys a very high standard of living, very much in advance of the rest of the world, and actually the majority of people have little to complain about. Also interesting is that the people who have the most are the ones who do the most complaining and whining for "more" and "better", or indeed begrudge others what they have, or indeed are. By and large, the standard of living, the value of life, freedom, and education, and indeed the average lifespan itself, have all increased steadily for a long time in all the Western nations. Many illnesses have been beaten, the "quality of life" as such is for very many people largely a matter of individual choice, free speech and the rule of law hold sway, people are safer and more secure than they ever have been. Individuals are of course still subject to the vagaries of the human condition, like illness, personal tragedy, and various random events causing them problems. Poverty and ignorance are still major problems, also largely a result of inadequate education. Various groups, and of course many individuals, still vie to control what other people do, or even think, power over others is apparently extremely important to them. There is little one can do about it, except resist to the best of oneīs ability. Even the simple fact that you can write whatever you want to on here is an indication that you are not only one of the privileged, but able to use that privilege in any way you please. What this actually means, is that you would be better off, and so might many others, if you ceased whining and complaining, and thought about what you might do to help those less well off than yourself. Who knows? You might then also be a great deal happier as well. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004 - 2006 FishingBanter