FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   rod/line weight (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=3344)

Sierra fisher December 29th, 2003 06:21 AM

rod/line weight-new heavier weight forward lines
 
You're pulling my leg, Bill. You know more about rods and lines than anyone
else on this board.


"Bill Kiene" wrote in message
m...
Hello SF,

That is excellent information.

Thanks.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA, USA
www.kiene.com

"Sierra fisher" wrote in message
...

Line weights are determined by the weight of the first 35' of the line.
Rods are designed to load with most of this line out of the guides.

However
a lot of your fishing is with less than 35' of line outside of the

guides.
If the majority of your fishing is with 20 or 25' of line out, you might
want to get a heavier line so that this shorter section will come closer

to
the wieght that the rod is designed for.

"Bill Kiene" wrote in message
m...
Something reasonably new are these "half-size heavier" weight forward
floating fly lines.

SA/Mastery makes the "GPX" series and Rio makes the "Rio Grand" that

come
only in weight forward floating lines and are about a half size

heavier
than
the normal weight forward lines.

For example you might think of these as a "WF 5.5 F".

Today this is what we put on most faster rods and it has been working

very
well for us.

It is also good for the new fly casters because they can feel the rod

load
better.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA, USA
www.kiene.com

"Dan" lose wrote in message
...


If it is as crucial as I have been led to believe that the line

weight
matches the rod weight, what weight line does one use if a rod

described
as
a "4/5" weight?

Dan






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.554 / Virus Database: 346 - Release Date: 12/20/2003






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.554 / Virus Database: 346 - Release Date: 12/20/2003



Bill Kiene December 29th, 2003 05:52 PM

rod/line weight-new heavier weight forward lines
 
SF,

I was thanking you for being a good participant on this board by sharing
important knowldge you have aquired.

I am always impressed with the knowledge of people on this board and I do
learn something here daily.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA, USA
www.kiene.com








"Sierra fisher" wrote in message
...
You're pulling my leg, Bill. You know more about rods and lines than

anyone
else on this board.


"Bill Kiene" wrote in message
m...
Hello SF,

That is excellent information.

Thanks.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA, USA
www.kiene.com

"Sierra fisher" wrote in message
...

Line weights are determined by the weight of the first 35' of the

line.
Rods are designed to load with most of this line out of the guides.

However
a lot of your fishing is with less than 35' of line outside of the

guides.
If the majority of your fishing is with 20 or 25' of line out, you

might
want to get a heavier line so that this shorter section will come

closer
to
the wieght that the rod is designed for.

"Bill Kiene" wrote in message
m...
Something reasonably new are these "half-size heavier" weight

forward
floating fly lines.

SA/Mastery makes the "GPX" series and Rio makes the "Rio Grand" that

come
only in weight forward floating lines and are about a half size

heavier
than
the normal weight forward lines.

For example you might think of these as a "WF 5.5 F".

Today this is what we put on most faster rods and it has been

working
very
well for us.

It is also good for the new fly casters because they can feel the

rod
load
better.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA, USA
www.kiene.com

"Dan" lose wrote in message
...


If it is as crucial as I have been led to believe that the line

weight
matches the rod weight, what weight line does one use if a rod

described
as
a "4/5" weight?

Dan






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.554 / Virus Database: 346 - Release Date: 12/20/2003






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.554 / Virus Database: 346 - Release Date: 12/20/2003





Wayne December 31st, 2003 12:07 AM

rod/line weight
 
most fish ARE suspect ;-)
--
Wayne
To Fish is Human...To Release Divine!

"Larry and a cat named Dub" wrote in message
m...
Wayne Did you or a fish make up your signature?
Personally I suspect the fish





katie star January 1st, 2004 12:53 AM

rod/line weight
 
"Bill Kiene" wrote in message news:mzHHb.2998

Hi Bill, you seem very knowledgeable, can you give a list of weights
compared to fly sizes? Like a table, I would guess the following
values would be close

rod/reel weight fly size
2 weight 22-26
3 weight 20
4 weight 16 -20
5 weight 14 -16
6 weight 12 -16
7 weight 10 -12
8 weight 6 - 10
9 weight 2- 8

Willi January 1st, 2004 01:45 AM

rod/line weight
 


katie star wrote:

"Bill Kiene" wrote in message news:mzHHb.2998

Hi Bill, you seem very knowledgeable, can you give a list of weights
compared to fly sizes? Like a table, I would guess the following
values would be close

rod/reel weight fly size
2 weight 22-26
3 weight 20
4 weight 16 -20
5 weight 14 -16
6 weight 12 -16
7 weight 10 -12
8 weight 6 - 10
9 weight 2- 8




It's not as straight forward as that. Heavy or very large flies would be
difficult or impossible to cast with the lighter weight rods. All weight
rods can fish a MUCH wider range of fly sizes than what you list and
fish them well. For example, a six weight could handle the whole range
of flies sizes that you listed.

Although SOMETIMES fly size in a consideration in choosing what weight
rod to use, more often it's the water you're going to fish and the size
of the fish you might encounter.

Willi







Wayne P January 1st, 2004 03:32 AM

rod/line weight
 
This is interesting . . . . But my fly size to rod wgt is something like
this . . .

4wt - trout rod - typically 12 and smaller. Sometimes a 6 - 8 streamer . . .
5 wt - former trout rod, panfish etc - all of the above plus size 4-8
clousers for white bass, something along the lines of a "chuck & duck". Man
it hurts :-)
6 wt - just bought it havnt used it yet . . . . . hmmmm need to get a line
for it.
7 wt - white bass, bass etc - mainly 6 and larger

This is nothing scientific nor is it from anyone that knows anything. It's
simply what I tend to use on each rod that Iown considering the fish I am
fishing for using that particular rod . . .

wayne



"Willi" wrote in message
...


katie star wrote:

"Bill Kiene" wrote in message news:mzHHb.2998

Hi Bill, you seem very knowledgeable, can you give a list of weights
compared to fly sizes? Like a table, I would guess the following
values would be close

rod/reel weight fly size
2 weight 22-26
3 weight 20
4 weight 16 -20
5 weight 14 -16
6 weight 12 -16
7 weight 10 -12
8 weight 6 - 10
9 weight 2- 8




It's not as straight forward as that. Heavy or very large flies would be
difficult or impossible to cast with the lighter weight rods. All weight
rods can fish a MUCH wider range of fly sizes than what you list and
fish them well. For example, a six weight could handle the whole range
of flies sizes that you listed.

Although SOMETIMES fly size in a consideration in choosing what weight
rod to use, more often it's the water you're going to fish and the size
of the fish you might encounter.

Willi









Sierra fisher January 1st, 2004 04:26 PM

rod/line weight
 
One fo the biggest factors in deciding what weight rod you will use is the
wind you anticipate finding.


"katie star" wrote in message
om...
"Bill Kiene" wrote in message news:mzHHb.2998

Hi Bill, you seem very knowledgeable, can you give a list of weights
compared to fly sizes? Like a table, I would guess the following
values would be close

rod/reel weight fly size
2 weight 22-26
3 weight 20
4 weight 16 -20
5 weight 14 -16
6 weight 12 -16
7 weight 10 -12
8 weight 6 - 10
9 weight 2- 8



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.556 / Virus Database: 348 - Release Date: 12/27/2003



Ernie January 1st, 2004 05:22 PM

rod/line weight
 

"katie star" wrote in message
om...
Hi Bill, you seem very knowledgeable, can you give a list of

weights
compared to fly sizes? Like a table, I would guess the

following
values would be close


Rod size is more related to the type of water and the fish, than
to the fly. Small weight rods for small streams and small fish.
Medium weight rods for lakes, rivers and medium fish. Large
weight rods for large rivers, ocean, stripers, salmon and
steelhead.
Ernie



ArnSaga January 1st, 2004 05:46 PM

rod/line weight
 
(katie star) BRBR
Like a table, I would guess the following
values would be close

rod/reel weight fly size
2 weight 22-26
3 weight 20
4 weight 16 -20
5 weight 14 -16
6 weight 12 -16
7 weight 10 -12
8 weight 6 - 10
9 weight 2- 8 BRBR

You can cast a #8 Clouser Minnow with a 3 weight. I've cast larger Dahlberg
Divers for bass on a pond when wind and high water drove me and my 3 wt. off a
trout stream. Not well or far, but well enough to catch fish. You can cast a
#26 Trico with a 10 wt., though it lacks a tad of elegance. Wind and fish
targeted make more difference than the size of the fly. You owe the fish a
quick battle if you're going to release it and a strong rod relative to fish
size can help.

Glenn
GKT

Skwala January 2nd, 2004 04:44 PM

rod/line weight
 

"Wayne" wrote in message
t...
Dan, the line weight does, indeed, need to match the rod. Most rods are
made to handle a line weight one above or one below the noted rod weight.
Given today's "fast" or stiffer rods, most rods tend to handle a line

weight
one over quite well, if not better than that listed on the rod. A 4/5

line
weight rod should handle a 4 weight line (probably a bit stiff) and a 5
weight line and a good possibility a 6 weight line. If you use floating
lines you have more flexibility than using sinking lines, sink-tip lines,

or
shooting heads. Castability can change when "over-lining" a rod with

these
weights more so than with floating lines. Depending on manufacturer, I
would venture to say you would probably do better with a 5 weight line on
your rod.
--
Wayne
To Fish is Human...To Release Divine!


Years ago, I knew a fellow that fished a 9 WT DT on a 5 WT rod, seems he
exclusively fished small brushy streams in SW Montana.

Having about 10 feet of 9 WT line past the tip of his rod gave him all he
needed to cast, without getting all hung up in the bushes.

He seemed to be having fun... I never tried it as I fished mainly the bigger
rivers back then.

Skwala





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter