Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

JR wrote:
gary wrote [sic]:

Don't like the pressure on our natural resourse? Then write and demand
immigratiion reform. Not Bushes either.

Thanks, Gary, but I've already written and demanded that troglodyte
racist ****heads not be allowed to fish, hunt, pick their noses,
defecate, or breathe anywhere near any of our natural resources.

I figure that should leave LOTS of room for the rest of us.

Wouldn't it be pretty to think so, but I'm afraid there are more racist
scum like gary than you'd imagine. They don't crawl out from under their
rocks very often, but still they lie buried in the filth of the American
psyche festering and oozing in the pus of their hate-filled ignorance.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

"Wolfgang" wrote...
"Warren" wrote...
net wrote...
Great term Warren, I'll remember it. Since I've been in the habit
of
kill filing muskie's new addresses as soon as he posts
sometj=hing, I
might have missed this from long ago.

Actually, I see very little of Ken and none of Muskie no matter what
name he uses. I created these rules with my news reader so that any
posts that are cross posted to more than two groups are ignored and
threads with OT in the subject that have Forty as the author are
marked as ignored. Works freaking great. Thankfully Ken is kind
enough to put OT in his subject line so I don't have to plonk him
completely. With these two rules and one person in the "Bozo Bin,"
ROFF has become much more enjoyable for me. Your really should
check
out MicroPlanet Gravity. It's free and has some pretty damn good
features and rule making capabilities.

Peekaboo, I see you! :)

Wolfgang
who remains unconvinced that keeping your eyes tightly closed while
eating boogers is an effective method for convincing a room full of
observers that you don't eat boogers.

I really don't have anything to add, but I thought Warren should read this.
:)))
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:05:58 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

JR wrote:
gary wrote [sic]:

Don't like the pressure on our natural resourse? Then write and demand
immigratiion reform. Not Bushes either.

Thanks, Gary, but I've already written and demanded that troglodyte
racist ****heads not be allowed to fish, hunt, pick their noses,
defecate, or breathe anywhere near any of our natural resources.

I figure that should leave LOTS of room for the rest of us.

Wouldn't it be pretty to think so, but I'm afraid there are more racist
scum like gary than you'd imagine. They don't crawl out from under their
rocks very often, but still they lie buried in the filth of the American
psyche festering and oozing in the pus of their hate-filled ignorance.


how is asking for immgration reform racist?

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

bones wrote in news:2e2l10ll45ul0tc3m0d957hf0thsu2ti12@
4ax.com:

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:05:58 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

JR wrote:
gary wrote [sic]:

Don't like the pressure on our natural resourse? Then write and demand
immigratiion reform. Not Bushes either.

Thanks, Gary, but I've already written and demanded that troglodyte
racist ****heads not be allowed to fish, hunt, pick their noses,
defecate, or breathe anywhere near any of our natural resources.

I figure that should leave LOTS of room for the rest of us.

Wouldn't it be pretty to think so, but I'm afraid there are more racist
scum like gary than you'd imagine. They don't crawl out from under their
rocks very often, but still they lie buried in the filth of the American
psyche festering and oozing in the pus of their hate-filled ignorance.


how is asking for immgration reform racist?

Asking for immigration reform is not, in itself, racists. Linking it to
natural resource use, though, is an interesting link.

The more problems a person tends to blame on "them", the more questionable
the motivation

Scott

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

Scott Seidman wrote:
bones wrote in news:2e2l10ll45ul0tc3m0d957hf0thsu2ti12@
4ax.com:

Asking for immigration reform is not, in itself, racists. Linking it to
natural resource use, though, is an interesting link.

It's a natural and appropriate link. Natural resource use is directly
related to population growth. Immigration (legal and illegal) is the
major source of population growth in the US.

The more problems a person tends to blame on "them", the more questionable
the motivation

My opinion, FWIW, is that our population (meaning the US, in this case)
is large enough. In fact, it's too large already. If that makes me a
racist in anyone's opinion, **** them.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

bones wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:05:58 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:


JR wrote:

gary wrote [sic]:


Don't like the pressure on our natural resourse? Then write and demand
immigratiion reform. Not Bushes either.

Thanks, Gary, but I've already written and demanded that troglodyte
racist ****heads not be allowed to fish, hunt, pick their noses,
defecate, or breathe anywhere near any of our natural resources.

I figure that should leave LOTS of room for the rest of us.

Wouldn't it be pretty to think so, but I'm afraid there are more racist
scum like gary than you'd imagine. They don't crawl out from under their
rocks very often, but still they lie buried in the filth of the American
psyche festering and oozing in the pus of their hate-filled ignorance.



how is asking for immgration reform racist?

"Immigration Reform" on the face of it, is no more racist than
"State's Rights" but both are codewords for a racist agenda and
I don't make a distinction between those who espouse a racist
agenda and racists.

When you conflate "Immigration Reform" with overpopulation, you're
a racist. Period, end of paragraph.

There's gonna be a hell of fight in the Sierra Club over this.
If you're a member of the Sierra Club, and not a racist or a
misguided fool pursuing a racist agenda, please, PLEASE vote
in the April elections.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

On 30 Jan 2004 16:53:54 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

bones wrote in news:2e2l10ll45ul0tc3m0d957hf0thsu2ti12@
4ax.com:

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:05:58 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

JR wrote:
gary wrote [sic]:

Don't like the pressure on our natural resourse? Then write and demand
immigratiion reform. Not Bushes either.

Thanks, Gary, but I've already written and demanded that troglodyte
racist ****heads not be allowed to fish, hunt, pick their noses,
defecate, or breathe anywhere near any of our natural resources.

I figure that should leave LOTS of room for the rest of us.

Wouldn't it be pretty to think so, but I'm afraid there are more racist
scum like gary than you'd imagine. They don't crawl out from under their
rocks very often, but still they lie buried in the filth of the American
psyche festering and oozing in the pus of their hate-filled ignorance.


how is asking for immgration reform racist?

Asking for immigration reform is not, in itself, racists. Linking it to
natural resource use, though, is an interesting link.

The more problems a person tends to blame on "them", the more questionable
the motivation

Scott


Of what "race" are "them"?

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:10:24 -0700, rw
wrote:


It's a natural and appropriate link. Natural resource use is directly
related to population growth. Immigration (legal and illegal) is the
major source of population growth in the US.


The third rail for the Sierra Club......

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

bones wrote in
:

On 30 Jan 2004 16:53:54 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

bones wrote in news:2e2l10ll45ul0tc3m0d957hf0thsu2ti12@
4ax.com:

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:05:58 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

JR wrote:
gary wrote [sic]:

Don't like the pressure on our natural resourse? Then write and
demand immigratiion reform. Not Bushes either.

Thanks, Gary, but I've already written and demanded that
troglodyte racist ****heads not be allowed to fish, hunt, pick
their noses, defecate, or breathe anywhere near any of our natural
resources.

I figure that should leave LOTS of room for the rest of us.

Wouldn't it be pretty to think so, but I'm afraid there are more
racist scum like gary than you'd imagine. They don't crawl out from
under their rocks very often, but still they lie buried in the filth
of the American psyche festering and oozing in the pus of their
hate-filled ignorance.


how is asking for immgration reform racist?

Asking for immigration reform is not, in itself, racists. Linking it
to natural resource use, though, is an interesting link.

The more problems a person tends to blame on "them", the more
questionable the motivation

Scott


Of what "race" are "them"?


Pick your favorite. It makes little difference, so long as "them" is not
"us". It's just too easy to pass the buck, and blame your situation on
others.

Scott

Tell your senators to defeat the Bush-Cheney energy bill
 

rw wrote in
:

Scott Seidman wrote:
bones wrote in news:2e2l10ll45ul0tc3m0d957hf0thsu2ti12@
4ax.com:

Asking for immigration reform is not, in itself, racists. Linking it
to natural resource use, though, is an interesting link.

It's a natural and appropriate link. Natural resource use is directly
related to population growth. Immigration (legal and illegal) is the
major source of population growth in the US.

The more problems a person tends to blame on "them", the more
questionable the motivation

My opinion, FWIW, is that our population (meaning the US, in this
case) is large enough. In fact, it's too large already. If that makes
me a racist in anyone's opinion, **** them.


Census bureau estimates show that the natural increase (births-deaths)
exceeds the net migration by more than 50%, at least between 2000 and 2001.
Immigration is certainly a major player, but not --the-- major player.
Given the current birth rates, the US tops the list of developed nations at
2.1 births per woman.

In addition, I'm not sure that Natural resource use is directly related to
population growth in the US in this global economy. Think about how much
of our forests get exported. You might be able to better link natural
resource use and world population, but it might not make that much of a
difference where the people are actually located. I might be able to float
the argument that its the rich people and corporations in the world that
use much of the resources, and that poor illegals contribute more to food
production than food and resource consumption.

I think population growth is a problem as well. I have no kids. How many
do you have?

Scott