Wolfgang wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
nk.net...

Not only was it funny, but it was funny at your expense. I can't ask much
more than that.


Say, what's that come to in simple linear equations?

Tell us once again how you can stretch tippet to half its original
diameter while winding it around a pencil.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

riverman wrote:
Thats hilarious, and I'm sure we'll equally enjoy the explanation of
why you posted it in this thread....

--riverman
(who always knew the solution to any problem was a bigger hammer)

Now THERE'S the problem with Google! You missed the text I quoted (you
didn't click on the stupid google link to "quoted text"). AND you're not
quoting anyone else's text so we can't tell WHAT in the heck you're
talking about! Just pay your 10 Euros and don't let this happen again.
:)
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

Wolfgang wrote:

Try hard not to think of me naked.

I thinking of it. It's hilarious.

Is your head about to explode?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"Wolfgang" wrote

Try hard not to think of me naked.

Wolfgang
oh, go on.....try......how hard can it be? :)
oh, god, how sick, but how hilarious, in context; the essence of
gonzo... i can only hope that you would wear, only for barnard, an
alligator tail...

yfitons
wayno (this is becoming unmanageable)

Wayne Harrison wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote


Try hard not to think of me naked.

Wolfgang
oh, go on.....try......how hard can it be? :)
oh, god, how sick, but how hilarious, in context; the essence of
gonzo... i can only hope that you would wear, only for barnard, an
alligator tail...


yfitons
wayno (this is becoming unmanageable)

Yes, it is becoming unmanageable. You can't manage how to quote.

Right now I'm imagining you naked. It's not a pretty image. I see a
boozy, over-the-hill ambulance chaser with a tiny little pee-pee nearly
covered by a sagging pot belly.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"rw" wrote

Right now I'm imagining you naked. It's not a pretty image. I see a boozy,
over-the-hill ambulance chaser with a tiny little pee-pee nearly covered
by a sagging pot belly.

there could never be more convincing evidence than this post to
illustrate that you are ****ed up as a soup sandwitch.

i have never imagined you naked. i am not a masochist.

i have never handled a civil personal injury lawsuit in my 36 years as a
lawyer. i am interested in ambulances only to the extent that they can
swiftly carry my dying ass to an emergency room.

i can't imagine that you really know the size of my penis, or that you
would ever think about it, unless you were ****ed up as a soup sandwich;
which, of course, you obviously are.

steve, your attempt to engage me in some childish contest of insults is
laughable. to put the matter down to your level of understanding, as the
trailer trash are prone to say, here in the old north state, you are
bringing a knife to a gunfight. heheheheh.

hilarious.

awh

"rw" wrote in message
k.net...
Wolfgang wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
nk.net...

Not only was it funny, but it was funny at your expense. I can't ask much
more than that.


Say, what's that come to in simple linear equations?

Tell us once again how you can stretch tippet to half its original
diameter while winding it around a pencil.

Pull.

Wolfgang

"rw" wrote in message
k.net...
Wolfgang wrote:

Try hard not to think of me naked.

I thinking of it. It's hilarious.

Is your head about to explode?

Pull my finger. :)

Wolfgang
um......that's not my finger. :(

Wayne Harrison wrote:

steve, your attempt to engage me in some childish contest of insults is
laughable. to put the matter down to your level of understanding, as the
trailer trash are prone to say, here in the old north state, you are
bringing a knife to a gunfight. heheheheh.

I just said what I *imagined*. It's not necessarily the case in fact.
Are you saying that you don't have a tiny little pee-pee?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Wolfgang wrote:

"rw" wrote in message
k.net...

Wolfgang wrote:

"rw" wrote in message
hlink.net...


Not only was it funny, but it was funny at your expense. I can't ask much
more than that.


Say, what's that come to in simple linear equations?

Tell us once again how you can stretch tippet to half its original
diameter while winding it around a pencil.


Pull.

Try it. See if it works, then get back to us.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"rw" wrote

I just said what I *imagined*. It's not necessarily the case in fact. Are
you saying that you don't have a tiny little pee-pee?

truly pathetic.

people here will conclude that you are a fool.

"rw" wrote in message
ink.net...
Wolfgang wrote:

"rw" wrote in message
k.net...

Wolfgang wrote:

"rw" wrote in message
thlink.net...


Not only was it funny, but it was funny at your expense. I can't ask
much more than that.


Say, what's that come to in simple linear equations?

Tell us once again how you can stretch tippet to half its original
diameter while winding it around a pencil.


Pull.

Try it. See if it works, then get back to us.

O.k......it worked.

Wolfgang

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:55:07 GMT, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"rw" wrote

I just said what I *imagined*. It's not necessarily the case in fact. Are
you saying that you don't have a tiny little pee-pee?

truly pathetic.

people here will conclude that you are a fool.

Ya know, you'd think some of y'all would get tired of being so
presumptuous and just assuming you can speak for ALL of the people
here...you never think that at least some folks here don't consider
themselves as part of the oft-invoked "we." For example, you presume to
use "will" when some of the supposed all-encompassing group, my ownself
included, have long ago concluded that...sheesh...

yftbrfwnvm,
R
....oh, right - Y our F riend T rapped B y R ising F lood W aters N ear
V ancleave M ississippi...

On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 19:40:50 -0500, Peter Charles
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:54:56 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
3.1.4...
"riverman" wrote in news:1112387530.898094.201520
@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

Well, it looks like individual.net pulled their free service as
threatened. Has anyone found a replacement free news server?

--riverman



I'm paying the 10 Euros a year for individual.net. They make it easy (if
you hit the button for English!!), its a reasonable rate for a dependable
service. I think its worth it.

Ditto. Closed the deal just yesterday. My first ever transaction in Euros!
:)

Wolfgang
um......does anyone know what i paid in real money? :(



10 Euros

HTH

Peter

Which would be lessee, the square root of 400%, stretched 54 times, and
carry the double naught, is 234 Pounds, Canadian.

H _T_ H,
R
.....yeah, yeah, yeah, I know what you're thinking: Canadian currency is
based on dollars, not Pounds...I know that, but I mean 234 pounds of
Canadian bills (oh, any denomination will do)...or Budweiser ...

How did the charges look when they were posted? I am hesitant to use them,
until I know what the currency exchange looks like.
"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Charlie Choc" wrote in message
...
On 1 Apr 2005 15:14:42 -0800, "riverman" wrote:

That is most strange! I just went through the process, and it says the
only options are to use this German paypal thingy, or else do a wire
transfer. Are you at individual.net's page? Post a link.

It looks like the German Paypal thingy takes credit cards.

Took mine.

Wolfgang
well, a piece of it anyway.

" Nartker" wrote in message
...
How did the charges look when they were posted? I am hesitant to use
them, until I know what the currency exchange looks like.

Ten Euros was all it said. I wasn't up to date on the exchange rate, but
was fairly confident that the difference was considerably less than an order
of magnitude. :)

Riverman stated yesterday that it actually works out to about $14 U.S. As I
actually used a debit card rather than a credit card, the transaction should
show up in my checking account (which I can easily track online) within the
next couple of days.....assuming it goes through in about the usual time.
It hasn't yet; I just looked. If you like, I can keep you posted.

Wolfgang

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:55:07 GMT, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"rw" wrote

I just said what I *imagined*. It's not necessarily the case in fact.
Are
you saying that you don't have a tiny little pee-pee?

truly pathetic.

people here will conclude that you are a fool.

Ya know, you'd think some of y'all would get tired of being so
presumptuous and just assuming you can speak for ALL of the people
here...you never think that at least some folks here don't consider
themselves as part of the oft-invoked "we." For example, you presume to
use "will" when some of the supposed all-encompassing group, my ownself
included, have long ago concluded that...sheesh...

You're wasting your time.......dicklet. People here long ago concluded that
you are a fool.

Wolfgang
which, if you think about it, is a powerful argument in favor of weighing
the evidence and then reaching the right conclusion.

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:55:07 GMT, "Wayne Harrison" wrote:

people here will conclude that you are a fool.

People 'here' conclude all kinds of **** in case you hadn't noticed.
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com/ - photo galleries
http://www.chocphoto.com/roff

I'm posting with Google. We took some sit down skiers to Taos today
and I sandwiched it with two sessions on the slightly off color Rio
Grande. SKUNKED. bruce h

On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 08:29:57 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:55:07 GMT, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"rw" wrote

I just said what I *imagined*. It's not necessarily the case in fact.
Are
you saying that you don't have a tiny little pee-pee?

truly pathetic.

people here will conclude that you are a fool.

Ya know, you'd think some of y'all would get tired of being so
presumptuous and just assuming you can speak for ALL of the people
here...you never think that at least some folks here don't consider
themselves as part of the oft-invoked "we." For example, you presume to
use "will" when some of the supposed all-encompassing group, my ownself
included, have long ago concluded that...sheesh...

You're wasting your time.......dicklet. People here long ago concluded that
you are a fool.

Aside from the non sequitur "me, too!"-ness of your reply, the
difference between us is that you desperately care about what "people"
think about such things, both as they apply to both yourself and others,
and I don't...

Wolfgang
which, if you think about it, is a powerful argument in favor of weighing
the evidence and then reaching the right conclusion.

Yeah, that'd be the type of argument a person of your limited sense
would think is powerful...I'd prefer to weigh the right evidence and
then reach a conclusion...

Eleven and a half eagles..........dick

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 08:29:57 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:55:07 GMT, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"rw" wrote

I just said what I *imagined*. It's not necessarily the case in fact.
Are
you saying that you don't have a tiny little pee-pee?

truly pathetic.

people here will conclude that you are a fool.

Ya know, you'd think some of y'all would get tired of being so
presumptuous and just assuming you can speak for ALL of the people
here...you never think that at least some folks here don't consider
themselves as part of the oft-invoked "we." For example, you presume to
use "will" when some of the supposed all-encompassing group, my ownself
included, have long ago concluded that...sheesh...

You're wasting your time.......dicklet. People here long ago concluded
that
you are a fool.

Aside from the non sequitur "me, too!"-ness of your reply, the
difference between us is that you desperately care about what "people"
think about such things, both as they apply to both yourself and others,
and I don't...

Which brings to mind a question I've been meaning to ask for some time but
kept forgetting.......and, given your stated contempt for what others may
think of you, I'm sure that you'll answer honestly.

Would you say that Berry, Brewer, and King are close personal
friends......or just the sort that you are forever doomed to admire from a
respectful distance?

Wolfgang
which, if you think about it, is a powerful argument in favor of weighing
the evidence and then reaching the right conclusion.

Yeah, that'd be the type of argument a person of your limited sense
would think is powerful...I'd prefer to weigh the right evidence and
then reach a conclusion...

I'm sure no one here has ever doubted it. :)

Eleven and a half eagles..........dick

Gonzo!

Wolfgang

On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:57:06 -0500, "Wolfgang" yapped:


Just more non sequitur ankle-biting from a scared, yappy little pup who
wishes it could be a real big dog...better just stay under the porch or
the dog catcher is gonna get you and take you in...well, at least you'd
get your shots...and be spayed...

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:57:06 -0500, "Wolfgang" yapped:


Just more non sequitur ankle-biting from a scared, yappy little pup who
wishes it could be a real big dog...better just stay under the porch or
the dog catcher is gonna get you and take you in...well, at least you'd
get your shots...and be spayed...

Gonzo! Stupendously gonzo!

But you didn't answer my question. I repeat; would you say that Berry,
Brewer, and King are close personal friends......or just the sort that you
are forever doomed to admire from a respectful distance?

Wolfgang

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:41:13 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:57:06 -0500, "Wolfgang" yapped:


Just more non sequitur ankle-biting from a scared, yappy little pup who
wishes it could be a real big dog...better just stay under the porch or
the dog catcher is gonna get you and take you in...well, at least you'd
get your shots...and be spayed...

Gonzo! Stupendously gonzo!

But you didn't answer my question.

No, I didn't, and I'd hope a smart lil' yapper like you can reach an
accurate conclusion about part two...

I repeat;

Yeah, generally...ad nauseam...

would you say that Berry, Brewer, and King are close
personal friends......or just the sort that you
are forever doomed to admire from a respectful distance?

Still licking your own privates in public, little puppy?

Now go play with the rest of the litter - you're just boring to me for
the present.

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:41:13 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:57:06 -0500, "Wolfgang" yapped:


Just more non sequitur ankle-biting from a scared, yappy little pup who
wishes it could be a real big dog...better just stay under the porch or
the dog catcher is gonna get you and take you in...well, at least you'd
get your shots...and be spayed...

Gonzo! Stupendously gonzo!

But you didn't answer my question.

No, I didn't, and I'd hope a smart lil' yapper like you can reach an
accurate conclusion about part two...

I repeat;

Yeah, generally...ad nauseam...

would you say that Berry, Brewer, and King are close
personal friends......or just the sort that you
are forever doomed to admire from a respectful distance?

Still licking your own privates in public, little puppy?

Now go play with the rest of the litter - you're just boring to me for
the present.

What is it that makes Richard so afraid? Do you honestly believe that
someone is going to reach out through your monitor and grab you?

You know......that can't happen if you turn it off.

Wolfgang
BOO! :)

riverman wrote:
Well, it looks like individual.net pulled their free service as
threatened. Has anyone found a replacement free news server?

--riverman


news.arcor.de is free, if you register under:
http://www.arcor.de/content/index.html

Greetings,

Alex