![]() |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Where's the Unibomber when we really need him. (Just joking FBI screener) ;-II Dave That´s "Unabomber". Must be the Unibomber's brother. Excuse me Mike, but next time you live in a country ruled by a man who says that God tells him which countries to invade, where the government protects companies who defraud millions of their pensions, where the primative religion of snake-handlers and illiterates defines what birth control methods will be legal, where the poor are taxed so the rich will have more to spend, and where angry children are often armed with automatic weapons, . .. . maybe I'll listen to you for advise as to what is and what is not reasonable. Dave Ideology fa schifo |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... SNIP You STILL believe that scum of this sort is motivated by greed? Well, isn't that just precious! Is it any wonder that scum of this sort remains eternally leagues ahead of you? Wolfgang greed, as an ideology, is passé.......been that way for centuries. sucks.......ainna? :) True to form, you once again reveal a near complete ignorance of current events, much less the background of the key actors. Im curious: as much as you pee on your feet, do you at least remove your shoes when you enter other's houses? And . . . were you bit by the Weekly Reader when you were a kid or what? Dave |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
|
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Must be the Unibomber's brother. Excuse me Mike, but next time you live in a country ruled by a man who says that God tells him which countries to invade, where the government protects companies who defraud millions of their pensions, where the primative religion of snake-handlers and illiterates defines what birth control methods will be legal, where the poor are taxed so the rich will have more to spend, and where angry children are often armed with automatic weapons, . . . maybe I'll listen to you for advise as to what is and what is not reasonable. Dave Ideology fa schifo I was not giving you advice, merely providing information which you apparently lack. Should you seriously be of the opinion that such a man as the unabomber would solve any of the problems you keep waffling about on here, then you do not need advice, you need therapy. QUOTE FROM WIKIPEDIA Dr. Theodore John Kaczynski, Ph.D., also known as the Unabomber (born May 22, 1942) is a Polish-American terrorist who attempted to fight against what he perceived as the evils of technological progress by sending mail bombs to various people over almost eighteen years, killing three and wounding 29. He was the target of the FBI's most expensive manhunt ever. Before his identity was known, the FBI referred to him as the UNABOM (from "university and airline bomber"). Variants of the code name appeared when the media started using the codename, including Unabomer, and Unabomber. UNQUOTE MC |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
wrote in message ... In article , says... "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "David Snedeker" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. SNIP Where's the Unibomber when we really need him. (Just joking FBI screener) ;-II Dave That?s "Unabomber". Must be the Unibomber's brother. Excuse me Mike, but next time you live in a country ruled by a man who says that God tells him which countries to invade, where the government protects companies who defraud millions of their pensions, where the primative religion of snake-handlers and illiterates defines what birth control methods will be legal, where the poor are taxed so the rich will have more to spend, and where angry children are often armed with automatic weapons, . . . maybe I'll listen to you for advise as to what is and what is not reasonable. Dave Ideology fa schifo You forgot dogs and cats living together........angry children armed with automatic weapons???? Talk about fear-mongering. - Ken P.S. Before you give yourself a heart attack responding, do yourself a favor and look up automatic weapons. Automatic weapons are practically outlawed (there's about 200-300K mostly owned by Hollywood and collectors) and are rarely used in crimes. Hey, I could go for a positive note. So . . . where might you suggest I "look up automatic weapons" to get your sublime point of view. And please let me know what non-automatic weapons the various kid shooting up their school mates, and doing the drive-bys etc.. favor. Or maybe we are going to revisit that canard of an argument that denies that a glock is an automatic weapon and the very existance of assault rifles depend on what the definition of "is," is. In which case please spare me from such enlightenment. Dave Ideology fa schifo |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"David Snedeker" wrote in message . .. "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... SNIP You STILL believe that scum of this sort is motivated by greed? Well, isn't that just precious! Is it any wonder that scum of this sort remains eternally leagues ahead of you? Wolfgang greed, as an ideology, is passé.......been that way for centuries. sucks.......ainna? :) True to form, you once again reveal a near complete ignorance of current events, much less the background of the key actors. Oh? There are new developments in your psychosis that I haven't been informed of? DO tell! :) Im curious: Would that you actually were........it would make a difference in your life that you can't imagine. as much as you pee on your feet, do you at least remove your shoes when you enter other's houses? Having spent a good deal of time cleaning toilets, I've made of point achieving good aim. If someone or something gets peed upon you may rest assured that the warm wet sensation you experience so often is no accident. And my shoes are a good deal cleaner than what is festering in your head. That said, shoe removal on entry has been my default action for years.......not that it's much of an issue......I don't get invited in all that often. And . . . were you bit by the Weekly Reader when you were a kid or what? I read it regularly throughout my years of elementary education....six, maybe seven years. Upon greater exposure to the wider world.....school, libraries, the street, etc., I quickly learned that there are other commendable sources of information. Some of them even surpass "Weekly Reader" in both breadth and depth of news coverage. Not that they aren't still good.....they ARE....but an occasional peek at something else probably wouldn't do you much harm at your age. But, go easy on the PG 13 stuff on TV and at the movies unless your Mom says it's o.k.........o.k.? Wolfgang any of y'all ever get that strange tingly sorta premonition that your about to get cuffed.......again!? |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
wrote in message ... ...Automatic weapons are practically outlawed.... So is crack......and crank. Wolfgang and not a moment too soon......whew! um......come to think of it, homicide is practically outlawed too. well, it's good to know we won't have THAT to worry about anymore! :) |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
wrote in message Uh, huh - so we should protect the FFing streams at the cost of the national interest I would see your side, if I could find one bit of "national interest" beyond personal enrichment on lands purchased on behalf of the nation as a whole. Even with the exemptions, why should the government be selling off(at bargain rates) National Forest lands?? Plus, if it was in the "National Interest", they probably wouldn't have to sneak it into legislation, but could proudly pass it as a stand alone measure........just my guess. Tom |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
"Johnson" wrote in message oups.com... Wow that was perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen posted. Puhleeze, you haven't read much of ROFF for very long have you?bseg Tom |
Anyone Here Have a Republican Congressman
Thomas Littleton wrote:
I would see your side, if I could find one bit of "national interest" beyond personal enrichment on lands purchased on behalf of the nation as a whole. Even with the exemptions, why should the government be selling off(at bargain rates) National Forest lands?? Plus, if it was in the "National Interest", they probably wouldn't have to sneak it into legislation, but could proudly pass it as a stand alone measure........just my guess. You can see the deficit reduction bill in its current form by going he http://thomas.loc.gov , clicking on Search Bills and Resolutions, then typing in "HR 4241" for the bill number. The relevant sections are 6201 to 6207, under TITLE VI--COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES, Subtitle B--Miscellaneous Amendments Relating to Mining. At risk are millions of acres of National Forest land and Bureau of Land Management land, which have almost endless hunting and fishing opportunities..... opportunities now accessible to everyone, not just to the scions of Dean Foods and their ilk. Now maybe it's just me, but I tend to think that reclassification of our public lands should only be done through an entirely open and transparent process into which the public has significant input, not through “miscellaneous amendments” to a budget bill. JR |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter