![]() |
Names to know
"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message ... rw wrote: [They] violated every single principle of the Powell Doctrine. Pretty much. wolves drove the elk off. Time for wolf population control? My understanding is that they are essentially at carrying capacity. Maybe time for a little predator-on-predator thinning... Ooh! Ooh! I remember that one! Don Knotts beats the snot out of a big ugly alien, right? Wolfgang who remembers, not entirely without a tinge of nostalgia, a time when prey species knew their place. |
Names to know
Jonathan Cook wrote:
rw wrote: [They] violated every single principle of the Powell Doctrine. Pretty much. wolves drove the elk off. Time for wolf population control? My understanding is that they are essentially at carrying capacity. Maybe time for a little predator-on-predator thinning... Population control? Time for "predator-on-predator thinning?" Our wolves are regularly shot, both legally when they get into trouble with livestock, and illegally when some asshole trigger-happy ignorant bozo gets the chance. I celebrate the fact that wolves are back in this area in substantial numbers. (They've always been here, but they were comparatively rare.) I've seen three this year -- two in Idaho and one in Montana right across the border. Elk have incredible senses of smell and hearing. They can run full speed across what looks like impossible terrain. They can easily jump any fence they're likely to encounter. Why are they so fit? It's because of predators -- primarily wolves. The reintroduction of wolves into central Idaho have definitely changed the way that elk are behaving. The bulls aren't bugling nearly as frequently, so as not to expose themselves. The elk are herding up in larger numbers (only the slowest ones get killed), and they're hanging out in higher open ground. This makes elk hunting far more challenging, but that's as it should be, IMO. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Names to know
"rw" wrote in message m... Jonathan Cook wrote: rw wrote: [They] violated every single principle of the Powell Doctrine. Pretty much. wolves drove the elk off. Time for wolf population control? My understanding is that they are essentially at carrying capacity. Maybe time for a little predator-on-predator thinning... Population control? Time for "predator-on-predator thinning?" Our wolves are regularly shot, both legally when they get into trouble with livestock, and illegally when some asshole trigger-happy ignorant bozo gets the chance. I celebrate the fact that wolves are back in this area in substantial numbers. (They've always been here, but they were comparatively rare.) I've seen three this year -- two in Idaho and one in Montana right across the border. Elk have incredible senses of smell and hearing. They can run full speed across what looks like impossible terrain. They can easily jump any fence they're likely to encounter. Why are they so fit? It's because of predators -- primarily wolves. The reintroduction of wolves into central Idaho have definitely changed the way that elk are behaving. The bulls aren't bugling nearly as frequently, so as not to expose themselves. The elk are herding up in larger numbers (only the slowest ones get killed), and they're hanging out in higher open ground. This makes elk hunting far more challenging, but that's as it should be, IMO. But surely you'd agree that anyone would be justified in shooting a wolf under duress......right? I mean, say for instance, if one threatened his dog or something.......right? :) Wolfgang who, it must be admitted, sometimes gets just a wee bit sad contemplating a hypothetical world in which dumbasses were aware of, or could remember, what they said. :) |
Names to know
Wolfgang wrote:
But surely you'd agree that anyone would be justified in shooting a wolf under duress......right? I mean, say for instance, if one threatened his dog or something.......right? :) Absolutely. If one comes after my dog and I'm armed, I'm going to shoot. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Names to know
"rw" wrote in message m... Wolfgang wrote: But surely you'd agree that anyone would be justified in shooting a wolf under duress......right? I mean, say for instance, if one threatened his dog or something.......right? :) Absolutely. If one comes after my dog and I'm armed, I'm going to shoot. You ever wonder how life might be different if you believed in something? My advice is to go out and find something.....ANYTHING.....to believe in. Wolfgang who won't be holding his breath. |
Names to know
Wolfgang wrote:
"rw" wrote in message m... Wolfgang wrote: But surely you'd agree that anyone would be justified in shooting a wolf under duress......right? I mean, say for instance, if one threatened his dog or something.......right? :) Absolutely. If one comes after my dog and I'm armed, I'm going to shoot. You ever wonder how life might be different if you believed in something? My advice is to go out and find something.....ANYTHING.....to believe in. Belief and faith are overrated. I prefer knowledge based on evidence. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Names to know
rw wrote: Belief and faith are overrated. I prefer knowledge based on evidence. Ah! Quite so......very logical. So, Spock, if someone were to predict that a particular highly specific event was going to occur and then an hour later it happened just as predicted......what would you deduce from that? Wolfgang watch! :) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter