onchorynchus salar
 

onchorynchus salar
 

On Mar 28, 4:46 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
riverman wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Exactly. You took my words, twisted them into a slur against gays
and then attributed the slur back to me. If you had one shred of
decency you'd be ashamed and embarrassed to lie like that.
Your apparent fascination with other men´s rear ends is most
unfortunate, and it must be a terrible burden for you, as is your
distressing propensity for lying, and then trying to rationalise it
when caught out.
Amazing isn't it ? How your only defense is to accuse someone of
the very things you've just been caught doing.

Quite apart from all that, why are you hijacking yet another thread
with your poisonous garbage?
Get used to it. You have become a laughingstock and you are not
welcome here amongst all us ignorant dumbos.

Hold on there, turbo; 'all'?

I'm going on the record as stating that Mike is a friend of mine, and
you most definately do NOT speak for me when you say he is unwelcome
here.

As always I speak only for myself and I've had quite enough
of His Royal Mikeness' bull****. The guy is quite obviously
disturbed and a disgusting piece of foul-mouthed garbage as
well.

--
Ken Fortenberry

QUOTE


You have two daughters, right ? A nice piece of 14 year old pussy, and
a
sweet little 8 year old ****, as I recall. Thank your lucky stars and
the
accident of your skin color that you and the whore you married are not
at
all concerned with the effects of subtle and pervasive racism.

**** you, Steve, and the horse you rode in on.

--
Ken Fortenberry


UNQUOTE

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...34fafec64707a9

MC

onchorynchus salar
 

onchorynchus salar
 

On Mar 28, 5:29 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
As always I speak only for myself and I've had quite enough
of His Royal Mikeness' bull****. The guy is quite obviously
disturbed and a disgusting piece of foul-mouthed garbage as
well.

QUOTE
snip

You've reposted that same ancient quote several times now. In
the context of the flame war in which it occurred it was quite
appropriate. I thought so then, I think so now. Racial slurs
are *not* acceptable and if you want to insist that they are
then surely you won't mind if someone wants to refer to your
family in the same way that you refer to theirs. The point was
not well taken, as I recall, but it was well made, even if a
tad over the top.

None of which excuses your foul-mouthed insults and scurrilous
lies.

--
Ken Fortenberry

The only one lying and issuing foul-mouthed insults here is you. As
has been proven.

MC

onchorynchus salar
 

onchorynchus salar
 

On Mar 28, 6:09 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
None of which excuses your foul-mouthed insults and scurrilous
lies.

The only one lying and issuing foul-mouthed insults here is you. As
has been proven.

LOL !! Either you've got a very short memory or you're lying
again, you silly little madman.

--
Ken Fortenberry

My memory is absolutely first class, and of course like everybody else
here I have access to the archives in any case.

Your behaviour is quite obviously irrational. Most people here are
perfectly well aware of that.

MC

onchorynchus salar
 

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
wrote:

Ken Fortenberry wrote:

As always I speak only for myself and I've had quite enough
of His Royal Mikeness' bull****. The guy is quite obviously
disturbed and a disgusting piece of foul-mouthed garbage as
well.


QUOTE
snip


You've reposted that same ancient quote several times now. In
the context of the flame war in which it occurred it was quite
appropriate. I thought so then, I think so now. Racial slurs
are *not* acceptable and if you want to insist that they are
then surely you won't mind if someone wants to refer to your
family in the same way that you refer to theirs. The point was
not well taken, as I recall, but it was well made, even if a
tad over the top.

Maybe you could take the time to look up what "racial slur" I was guilty
of. After all, it was my daughters and my wife that you were referring to.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

onchorynchus salar
 

onchorynchus salar
 

rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
You've reposted that same ancient quote several times now. In
the context of the flame war in which it occurred it was quite
appropriate. I thought so then, I think so now. Racial slurs
are *not* acceptable and if you want to insist that they are
then surely you won't mind if someone wants to refer to your
family in the same way that you refer to theirs. The point was
not well taken, as I recall, but it was well made, even if a
tad over the top.

Maybe you could take the time to look up what "racial slur" I was guilty
of. After all, it was my daughters and my wife that you were referring to.

As you well know, the racial slur was "squaw". It is most
certainly a racial slur whether you want it to be or not.

--
Ken Fortenberry

onchorynchus salar
 

On Mar 28, 7:24 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
You've reposted that same ancient quote several times now. In
the context of the flame war in which it occurred it was quite
appropriate. I thought so then, I think so now. Racial slurs
are *not* acceptable and if you want to insist that they are
then surely you won't mind if someone wants to refer to your
family in the same way that you refer to theirs. The point was
not well taken, as I recall, but it was well made, even if a
tad over the top.

Maybe you could take the time to look up what "racial slur" I was guilty
of. After all, it was my daughters and my wife that you were referring to.

As you well know, the racial slur was "squaw". It is most
certainly a racial slur whether you want it to be or not.

--
Ken Fortenberry

I am simply sick of wasting my time with you. You are just a pain. So
I will ignore you completely from now on.

MC