Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 11, 11:49 am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote:

Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs.

There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk

Well I certainly am sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities. I
merely thought that somebody who doesn´t mind when people are referred
to as nazi homos, or Cun** or a whole lot of of other similar
pleasantries, would hardly be offended at precisely those people being
referred to as degenerate pigs. My mistake. No problem, I am sure I
will make many more.

MC

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On 12 Apr 2007 03:15:34 -0700, wrote:

On Apr 11, 11:49 am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote:

Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs.

There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk

Well I certainly am sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities. I
merely thought that somebody who doesn´t mind when people are referred
to as nazi homos, or Cun** or a whole lot of of other similar
pleasantries, would hardly be offended at precisely those people being
referred to as degenerate pigs. My mistake. No problem, I am sure I
will make many more.


Mike, Fortenberry and Richard *are* human beings, not degenerate pigs.
They are not degenerate human beings either. They have opinions just
like you. If they call you names, ignore them. You fall for the trap
every time they bait you and you can not see it. They are better at
this than you are, and probably take delight in every angry post you
make.

You will never destroy roff. There are too many good people here (and
that includes the two mentioned above) for you or anyone else to
succeed. By even attempting such a scheme says volums about your
integrity. If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue
your present course, more and more people are going to be against you.

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 12 Apr 2007 03:15:34 -0700, wrote:

On Apr 11, 11:49 am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote:

Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs.

There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk

Well I certainly am sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities. I
merely thought that somebody who doesn´t mind when people are referred
to as nazi homos, or Cun** or a whole lot of of other similar
pleasantries, would hardly be offended at precisely those people being
referred to as degenerate pigs. My mistake. No problem, I am sure I
will make many more.

Mike, Fortenberry and Richard *are* human beings, not degenerate pigs.
They are not degenerate human beings either. They have opinions just
like you. If they call you names, ignore them. You fall for the trap
every time they bait you and you can not see it. They are better at
this than you are, and probably take delight in every angry post you
make.

You will never destroy roff. There are too many good people here (and
that includes the two mentioned above) for you or anyone else to
succeed. By even attempting such a scheme says volums about your
integrity. If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue
your present course, more and more people are going to be against you.

They are dishonourable degenerate assholes, who hide behind their
keyboards in order to safely abuse others. I don´t know how many times
I have to tell you this, but I am not in the least angry. I am merely
carrying out what is necessary to achieve my aims.

You don´t know anything at all about my integrity, and the rest of
your post is a load of nonsense as well. You are just a dumbo. It is
always very surprising to a lot of people what one determined and
resourceful person can achieve, given sufficient motivation. I am
going to wipe your stupid face in the **** you flung at me.

Come back and tell me about my integrity when you and the other dumb
assholes are the only people left here, trading puerile insults with
each other, for lack of sense and imagination.

MC

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:


If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue
your present course, more and more people are going to be against you.

What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you
even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I
continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be
against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies.
Why don´t you just wait and see what happens?
Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about
like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either,
it is a matter of personal honour.

MC

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

wrote in message
Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about
like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either,
it is a matter of personal honour.

If I may ask directly then, what does your honour demand by way of
satisfaction?

If you're looking for an apology from individuals or the group, I daresay
you're not likely to get that on your present course.

If you demand that all who have slighted or insulted you in the past be
forever banished from this group, I fear you are setting unrealistic goals.
No one has that power, and it isn't going to happen. You know that.

If you demand, alternatively, that this group dissolve, thus depriving those
posters of their forum, this too is unrealistic. Your present course of
action is, I daresay, leading in exactly the opposite direction. At best,
you will drive off only the "benign" posters, for those who thrive on the
confrontation are enjoying the contest and will be the last ones to leave.
You are merely harming innocents, those who actually seek knowledge, those
who you claim to want to help. Furthermore, your volume of posts serves to
inflate the perceived popularity of the group more so than to destroy it.
The more you post, the statistically stronger ROFF becomes.

By all means, carry on if you like; but I can't see where it's going to
satisfy your honour as much as irredeemably harm it.

Joe F.

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 12, 3:41 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message
Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about
like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either,
it is a matter of personal honour.

If I may ask directly then, what does your honour demand by way of
satisfaction?

If you're looking for an apology from individuals or the group, I daresay
you're not likely to get that on your present course.

If you demand that all who have slighted or insulted you in the past be
forever banished from this group, I fear you are setting unrealistic goals.
No one has that power, and it isn't going to happen. You know that.

If you demand, alternatively, that this group dissolve, thus depriving those
posters of their forum, this too is unrealistic. Your present course of
action is, I daresay, leading in exactly the opposite direction. At best,
you will drive off only the "benign" posters, for those who thrive on the
confrontation are enjoying the contest and will be the last ones to leave.
You are merely harming innocents, those who actually seek knowledge, those
who you claim to want to help. Furthermore, your volume of posts serves to
inflate the perceived popularity of the group more so than to destroy it.
The more you post, the statistically stronger ROFF becomes.

By all means, carry on if you like; but I can't see where it's going to
satisfy your honour as much as irredeemably harm it.

Joe F.

I am not demanding anything at all. As you quite rightly point out,
any demands at all would be completely unrealistic. Also, I have no
more right to make demands than anybody else. Neither do I expect to
gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. The
"benign" posters will have no trouble at all staying in contact, or in
posting elsewhere if they wish. Only the filth will be contained here.
Isolating filth is a public service, like containing rats or
cockroaches. They can trade filth among themselves as much as they
like, nobody will care, but they cant damage any decent people.

Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety
per cent of the posts are just rubbish.

MC

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

wrote in message
Neither do I expect to
gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions.

Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time
doing it?

Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety
per cent of the posts are just rubbish.

That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has
always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't
significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without
you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no
satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption?

Joe F.

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 12, 4:20 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message
Neither do I expect to
gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions.

Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time
doing it?

Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety
per cent of the posts are just rubbish.

That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has
always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't
significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without
you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no
satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption?

Joe F.

One learns a lot.

MC

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 12, 5:35 am, wrote:
On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:

If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue
your present course, more and more people are going to be against you.

What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you
even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I
continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be
against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies.
Why don´t you just wait and see what happens?
Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about
like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either,
it is a matter of personal honour.

MC

You've already lost the war no matter how many "allies"
you bring in. Sorry Mike, but you are acting just like
GeorgeG.
Sincerely,
- Ken

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean
 

On Apr 12, 4:20 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message
Neither do I expect to
gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions.

Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time
doing it?

Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety
per cent of the posts are just rubbish.

That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has
always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't
significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without
you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no
satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption?

Joe F.

One learns a lot.

MC