![]() |
Kayaks or sort of.
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "riverman" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... I don't doubt that some sort of legal action might be undertaken successfully against the manufacturers and/or whoever else may be responsible for portraying such an activity as being safe. Frankly, I don't have much of a problem with it either. But it does raise some interesting ethical and common sense issues. Just how much responsibility should manufacturers or promoters of products and activities that are inherently unsafe, to one degree or another, assume? Does anyone really believe that adults need to be warned about the risks associated with sky diving, smoking, hot coffee, pyrotechnics, running across flaming coals, wading in streams, guns, electricity, hypothermia, or a virtually endless list of other hazards? I agree with your assessment, except for one important detail. SeaEagle in particular specifically advertised that their boats were so safe that you could stand up in them and fish without fear of falling overboard. Its one thing to assume that the public knows more than it does. Its another to actually misrepresent something to enhance sales. If they merely showed the pictures and said nothing about it, that would be a different matter. This is probably the difference between the two advertisements. Yep, that IS an important detail. And, as I said, I don't have a problem with your family suing the manufacturers of the boat. Nor, for that matter, do I have any illusions about what my opinions on the matter should be worth to you. However, callous as it may sound under the circumstances, if I were afraid of water and a poor swimmer I don't think I would have put their claims to the test. For anyone with a personal connection to this event, even a connection as tenuous as a cyber friendship, it is of course a tragedy, one of countless such tragedies that occur all over the world every day. Obviously, the vast majority of us have no connection whatsoever (beyond a shared humanity) with most such events. When we ARE connected, I think it is instructive to ponder on how we react to similar situations when we are not. Well and delicately worded, Wolfie, and for the record, (strange as it seems), your opinions actually do matter to me. And my family and I decided not to sue the manufacturer because of your specific reasons: dad had a large responsibility to be accountable for himself. If I didn't have so much experience in boats, I might not be so acutely aware of the share of responsiblity that he had. I contacted the owner directly, and got him to promise to make changes to his website: all passengers in rapidly moving boats must have PFDs on, all children in any boats must have PFDs on, no fishermen are standing and casting in small boats unless the boat is grounded, and a large safety message is linked to his page outlining that self-responsibility boatowners have. He adhered to our agreement for about a year, then slowly started slipping the old pictures back in.... --riverman |
Kayaks or sort of.
Worked with a couple of PHDs psychologist ( check the spelling on
that) that said they could not. It turned out to be true. The rats need the whiskers to know where there nose is. If they don't know it goes under water more and they drown. These were big fat dumb white rats, never had the chance to test it on whild rats. "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "B J Conner" wrote in message ... I use to take care of some Charles River rats. They were second generation cesarian delivered rats, After the first experiment they were to be disposed of. Some we took to a snake farm where they made treats for rattle snakes the size of stove pipes. We tested several batches to find out if rats can swim without there wiskers, Have you ever tried it?? Nope. Why were you interested in whether or not they could swim without their whiskers? Wolfgang |
Kayaks or sort of.
"riverman" wrote in message ... ...I contacted the owner directly, and got him to promise to make changes to his website: all passengers in rapidly moving boats must have PFDs on, all children in any boats must have PFDs on, no fishermen are standing and casting in small boats unless the boat is grounded, and a large safety message is linked to his page outlining that self-responsibility boatowners have. He adhered to our agreement for about a year, then slowly started slipping the old pictures back in.... Ah, there was another chapter! Well, that changes the story considerably, I think. One hopes to read in the epilogue that the ******* was gutted. Wolfgang |
Kayaks or sort of.
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "riverman" wrote in message ... ...I contacted the owner directly, and got him to promise to make changes to his website: all passengers in rapidly moving boats must have PFDs on, all children in any boats must have PFDs on, no fishermen are standing and casting in small boats unless the boat is grounded, and a large safety message is linked to his page outlining that self-responsibility boatowners have. He adhered to our agreement for about a year, then slowly started slipping the old pictures back in.... Ah, there was another chapter! Well, that changes the story considerably, I think. One hopes to read in the epilogue that the ******* was gutted. Wolfgang Yup, which brings me to my original query... --riverman |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter