Ted Kennedy
 

On 2009-08-30 17:09:11 -0400, "Tom Littleton" said:

sort of a testament to the taste. Each to their owng!

Well, of course! But try telling that to Richard.

Ted Kennedy
 

On 2009-08-30 17:32:40 -0400, said:

Um, what makes you so sure the "woman" who drinks them is a woman,
then...? And
how do you know you've never seen one?

Uh, how 'bout the fact she is married (for 30 years) to the same man,
and has three grown kids that look alot like her. You don't suppose
those big bossoms of hers are fake ......... nah.......she's a gal.
Works (worked) for my wife for 20 years.

As far as seeing a drag queen..... I can only imagine that I would spot
one. See 'em on the tv once in awhile. I figgered it was one of them
N'orlins thingy because you are always talking about them. I haven't
heard anyone on roff refer to drag queens except you. You know, as
Oppie would say, "Birds of the feather flock together,", or at least I
*think* it was "flock". YMMV, btw.

d;o)

Ted Kennedy
 

Tom Littleton wrote:
"Todd" wrote in message ...
John,

The woman was pregnant, probably with his kid, and
she did not drown. She suffocated. So, somehow,
the drunk managed to get out of the car underwater
and close the door behind himself so she would
suffocate instead of drown. I say "murder one".


and I say you are not too bright if you actually believe that. As to her
pregnancy, I haven't heard that mentioned, in any reasonable forum. For the
other part, please demonstrate for us all how one can open, and then shut, a
car door behind oneself while not allowing water inside.

Tom,

I was trying to say it was darn next to impossible for
him to get out of the car and leave her to suffocated
and not drown. Also his actions after the crash, walking
by fire stations, waiting for the crash to be found by
others, waiting till he was lawyered up before
reporting, are that of a guilty man. Again, based on
his actions, I strongly suspect he was not even in the
car when it went overboard. Again I say "murder one".


Just my 2 cents.

you have a highly inflated sense of worth, based on reading this, Todd.

Tom


Especially if you mis read what I was saying.

I do think what we conservatives need to understand,
and it is demonstrated amply here by our liberal friend,
is that their morality is no longer the same as ours.
Right and Wrong are that of the Marxists. "Right" is what
servers their cause ("revolutionary") and "Wrong" is what
does not serve their cause ("counter revolutionary").

Liberals will accept any kind of odious behavior from their
heroes if their hero advances their cause. I firmly
believe they wound not have criticized President Clinton
if he had raped a woman on the White House lawn and
it had been caught on three home videos.

I can not wait for the liberal weaping when their precious
Comandante en Jefe Fidel Castro finally kicks the
bucket.

-T

Ted Kennedy
 

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:

the coroner determined that Mary Jo lived 2 – 3 hours after the
crash.

Teddy told JOKES about it!

If I had accidentally killed someone, I would
be horrified by it. Not told jokes about it.
His actions are that of a guilty man. As
I have said before "murder one".

-T

Ted Kennedy
 

"Todd" wrote in message ...
~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:

the coroner determined that Mary Jo lived 2 – 3 hours after the
crash.

Teddy told JOKES about it!

If I had accidentally killed someone, I would
be horrified by it. Not told jokes about it.
His actions are that of a guilty man. As
I have said before "murder one".

-T

So it follows that Dick Cheney and his minon's outing of Valerie Plame
Wilson is quite comparable to Kennedy's actions, right.

Op

Ted Kennedy
 

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
David LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry said:
Tom Littleton wrote:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock
homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ...

Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National.
I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until
Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it.

I doubt there will be any "hatefest", unlike the one's I saw being
broken up at Arlington for KIA military.

The hatefest has already started in the right-wing blogosphere and
on the Limbaugh show. I was talking about the creeps and wingnuts
of roff.


Ken,

You need to actually listen to Rush for two weeks or so
before calling what he is doing a "hatefest". If you
want to hear hate, listen to the Kennedy trashing
Bork or Thomas. By the way, Rush is playing back
Kennedy's speeches from the senate floor. Do you
consider judging Kennedy by his own words to be "hate"?

And remember in a political debate, the first one
to call the other one names looses.

-T

Ted Kennedy
 

Todd wrote:
Ken,
snip

Arguing with you would be like arguing with the dining room table.
I have no desire to do so.

Try to find some time to go fly fishing, and tight lines to you.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ted Kennedy
 

On Aug 30, 7:53*pm, Todd wrote:
Tom Littleton wrote:
"Todd" wrote in ...
John,

The woman was pregnant, probably with his kid, and
she did not drown. *She suffocated. *So, somehow,
the drunk managed to get out of the car underwater
and close the door behind himself so she would
suffocate instead of drown. *I say "murder one".

and I say you are not too bright if you actually believe that. As to her
pregnancy, I haven't heard that mentioned, in any reasonable forum. For the
other part, please demonstrate for us all how one can open, and then shut, a
car door behind oneself while not allowing water inside.

Tom,

I was trying to say it was darn next to impossible for
him to get out of the car and leave her to suffocated
and not drown. *Also his actions after the crash, walking
by fire stations, waiting for the crash to be found by
others, waiting till he was lawyered up before
reporting, are that of a guilty man. *Again, based on
his actions, I strongly suspect he was not even in the
car when it went overboard. *Again I say "murder one".

Just my 2 cents.

you have a highly inflated sense of worth, based on reading this, Todd.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

Especially if you mis read what I was saying.

I do think what we conservatives need to understand,
and it is demonstrated amply here by our liberal friend,
is that their morality is no longer the same as ours.
Right and Wrong are that of the Marxists. *"Right" is what
servers their cause ("revolutionary") and "Wrong" is what
does not serve their cause ("counter revolutionary").

Liberals will accept any kind of odious behavior from their
heroes if their hero advances their cause. *I firmly
believe they wound not have criticized President Clinton
if he had raped a woman on the White House lawn and
it had been caught on three home videos.

I can not wait for the liberal weaping when their precious
Comandante en Jefe Fidel Castro finally kicks the
bucket.

-T

Moron.

g.

Ted Kennedy
 

Mark Bowen wrote:
"Todd" wrote in message ...
~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
the coroner determined that Mary Jo lived 2 – 3 hours after the
crash.

Teddy told JOKES about it!
If I had accidentally killed someone, I would
be horrified by it. Not told jokes about it.
His actions are that of a guilty man. As
I have said before "murder one".

-T

So it follows that Dick Cheney and his minon's outing of Valerie Plame
Wilson is quite comparable to Kennedy's actions, right.

Op


Mark,

Everyone to the same standards. The law needs to be for everyone.
Not one for elites and one for the rest of us.

Are you serious about your Dick Cheney remark? He did not
"out" Plame. Richard Armitage did. Here is a reference for
you.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wi...rie-plame-leak

Just out of curiosity, how does Ted Kennedy murdering
a girl compare to Richard Armitage's outing of a CIA
administrative office worker whose employment was
public knowledge? By chance, were you just looking
to see if I had a double standard and that was just
what came to mind? Okay if you did.

And Richard Armitage told the investigator the day he
started the investigate. He investigated anyway.
Karl Rove was part of a political witch hunt -- liberals
hate him. How would you like it if you were subjected to the same
question over and over and over and lost track of
what you said hours earlier. And, over a crime that
wasn't even a crime that you had nothing to with.
This is the tools of tyranny. What happened to Karl
Rove was hideous.

We need you liberals to stand with us and stop
this kind of tyranny. I would have screamed foul
if Karl Rove was a Liberal. Will you scream foul
regardless of ones political persuasion over
this kind of tyranny?

First they came for the jews ...

-T

Ted Kennedy
 

On Aug 30, 8:36*pm, Todd wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
David LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry said:
Tom Littleton wrote:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock
homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ...

Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National.
I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until
Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it.

I doubt there will be any "hatefest", unlike the one's I saw being
broken up at Arlington for KIA military.

The hatefest has already started in the right-wing blogosphere and
on the Limbaugh show. I was talking about the creeps and wingnuts
of roff.

Ken,

You need to actually listen to Rush for two weeks or so
before calling what he is doing a "hatefest". *If you
want to hear hate, listen to the Kennedy trashing
Bork or Thomas. *By the way, Rush is playing back
Kennedy's speeches from the senate floor. *Do you
consider judging Kennedy by his own words to be "hate"?

And remember in a political debate, the first one
to call the other one names looses.

Imbecile.

g.
feeling looser already.

Ted Kennedy
 

On Aug 30, 9:39*pm, Todd wrote:


First they came for the jews ...

Should have started with the cretins.

g.

Ted Kennedy
 

On Aug 30, 1:07*pm, David LaCourse wrote:
On 2009-08-30 12:51:21 -0400, Mike said:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...hing.fly/about

The all time posting champ, Wolfgang, with *16,786 posts? *No wonder he
lost his mcw.edu address. *snicker *And, no, I had nothing to do with
it.

Davey, aka idiot, moron, killer, .............d;o)

Imbecile.

g.

Ted Kennedy
 

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Todd wrote:
Ken,
snip

Arguing with you would be like arguing with the dining room table.
I have no desire to do so.

:-)

Try to find some time to go fly fishing, and tight lines to you.

You know it really is a universal cure all.

-T

Ted Kennedy
 

Giles wrote:
On Aug 30, 8:36 pm, Todd wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
David LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry said:
Tom Littleton wrote:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock
homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ...
Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National.
I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until
Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it.
I doubt there will be any "hatefest", unlike the one's I saw being
broken up at Arlington for KIA military.
The hatefest has already started in the right-wing blogosphere and
on the Limbaugh show. I was talking about the creeps and wingnuts
of roff.
Ken,

You need to actually listen to Rush for two weeks or so
before calling what he is doing a "hatefest". If you
want to hear hate, listen to the Kennedy trashing
Bork or Thomas. By the way, Rush is playing back
Kennedy's speeches from the senate floor. Do you
consider judging Kennedy by his own words to be "hate"?

And remember in a political debate, the first one
to call the other one names looses.

Imbecile.

g.
feeling looser already.

Listen to Rush for a few weeks. Then call him. He
loved reasoned debates with Liberals. If you identify
yourself as one, you will go to the top of the list.
His show is a blast when he gets reasonable liberals
on his show. He gives them tons of time. (Not the
ones who just yell and call names, which means they
are feeling instead of thinking. And have a hard
time living in a representative republic.)

Give it a try.

-T

Ted Kennedy
 

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:55:28 +0100, Lazarus Cooke
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

Gordon Brown and Silvio
Berlusconi can come over and run in 2012...

Oh they're both awful. But they got to where they are through their own
merits, not because of who Pop or Big Brother was. And neither of them
are ex-movie stars.

...and maybe if Liz and Phil moved to some small place...like Monaco...they
might be able to have _some_ influence over things, seeing as they have no
influence and are ignored by all at home...

But no-one WANTS Liz or Phil to have power.

Really? _No one_? I mean, like, have you asked Liz and Phil...?

That's the point.

Well, maybe, but it's not much of one...

Like George Bush, they're not very bright (although Liz is much, much
brighter than her idiot son Charles).

And what makes you think Bush isn't "very bright?" IOW, on what do you base
your assessment of his intelligence? And what about Liz and Phil, and Charles?

But they don't need to be.

Why?

It's only the US electorate that wants movie stars and Royalty to have
political power.

Um...Sarkozy...and his real low-key, frumpy, publicity-shy wives...in case you
didn't know, Sarkozy was actually born into "royalty/nobility" as most would
informally define the term.

Lazarus

Being (IIRC) an ex-pat Anglophile/Europhile is all well and good if that's what
you want to be, but do try to keep things in perspective. The "electorate," be
it in the US or elsewhere, is pretty much made up of people, and in my
considerable experience, people are, in many ways, pretty much the same the
world over. And history clearly indicates they have been for some time.

HTH,
R

Ted Kennedy
 

On Aug 30, 9:58*pm, Todd wrote:
Giles wrote:
On Aug 30, 8:36 pm, Todd wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
David LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry said:
Tom Littleton wrote:
Well, I suppose we can now expect about 5 days of round-the-clock
homage to the late Sen. Kennedy. ...
Ted Kennedy will be put in the ground on Saturday at Arlington National.
I hope the creeps and the wingnuts will have the decency to wait until
Saturday night to start their hatefest. But I kinda doubt it.
I doubt there will be any "hatefest", unlike the one's I saw being
broken up at Arlington for KIA military.
The hatefest has already started in the right-wing blogosphere and
on the Limbaugh show. I was talking about the creeps and wingnuts
of roff.
Ken,

You need to actually listen to Rush for two weeks or so
before calling what he is doing a "hatefest". *If you
want to hear hate, listen to the Kennedy trashing
Bork or Thomas. *By the way, Rush is playing back
Kennedy's speeches from the senate floor. *Do you
consider judging Kennedy by his own words to be "hate"?

And remember in a political debate, the first one
to call the other one names looses.

Imbecile.

g.
feeling looser already.

Listen to Rush for a few weeks. *Then call him. *He
loved reasoned debates with Liberals. *If you identify
yourself as one, you will go to the top of the list.
His show is a blast when he gets reasonable liberals
on his show. *He gives them tons of time. *(Not the
ones who just yell and call names, which means they
are feeling instead of thinking. *And have a hard
time living in a representative republic.)

Give it a try.

Cretin.

g.

Ted Kennedy
 

On Aug 30, 6:36*pm, Todd wrote:

You need to actually listen to Rush for two weeks or so
before calling what he is doing a "hatefest". *If you
want to hear hate, listen to the Kennedy trashing
Bork or Thomas. *By the way, Rush is playing back
Kennedy's speeches from the senate floor. *Do you
consider judging Kennedy by his own words to be "hate"?

And remember in a political debate, the first one
to call the other one names looses.

-T- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So that name calling loser would be you right? Calling TK a murderer?
So what's this thing you have for Rush? He is a druggie, plain and
simple, an entertainer, with a disease on record usually associated
with unprotected excessive anal abuse. Sad, and I hope he stays clean,
but have you ever questioned why his particular brand of standup is so
appealing to you? Or to that alienated demographic of largely older,
uneducated, couch potatoes which the market research shows he appeals
to, (and which the corporate radio groups purchase to fill the
programming slots of weak market stations)? And if you hate America so
much why do you stay here?

Dave
Ideology Sucks

Ted Kennedy
 

On Aug 29, 7:46*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
He ignored facts and as President Reagan said, “facts are stubborn
things”. I remember in the early 1970s, Kennedy, a leading advocate
for amnesty for draft dodgers, took questions at a public event (at
least he had the honor to do this unlike current politicians). A man
got up, told him he’d lost his son in Vietnam and asked just how he
could be such an advocate for amnesty when his own brother, JFK,
started the Vietnam War and his brother’s appointees (MacNamara, Rusk,
Westmoreland) had so thoroughly botched it. Ted mumbled something
incoherent and called on someone else with a friendlier question.
Facts are stubborn things.

Facts are stubborn. You probably were too young to know the history of
French and American envolvement in Indochina. And are now too stupid
and ill equipped to understand or even access the work of the OSS and
the CIA in that theater of operations to grasp anything other than
your dumb assed blame JFK screed. Try Truman and Ike fool.

As to your thinly veiled violence threats . . . the moment you Nazi
suckups pick up a gun will be your ticket to a lifetime of service as
a bitch for youir Aryan brothers behind bars. Say all the stupid crap
you want and who gives a ****. However your assination drivel is way
out of line and if you keep it up you will get your wish of a Nazi
boyfriend behind bars. You have a family and a business. Show some
self control.

Dave

Ted Kennedy
 

Ted Is Dead
Let this thread die also

Fred

Ted Kennedy
 

On Sep 8, 6:53*pm, "Fred" wrote:
Ted Is Dead
Let this thread die also

Well....there.....that should do it.

g.

Ted Kennedy
 

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
He ignored facts and as President Reagan said, “facts are stubborn
things”.

Reagan never had an original thought in his life. John Adams wrote
"Facts are stubborn things" in 1770.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Ted Kennedy
 

On Sep 9, 9:02*pm, rw wrote:
~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
He ignored facts and as President Reagan said, “facts are stubborn
things”.

Reagan never had an original thought in his life. John Adams wrote
"Facts are stubborn things" in 1770.

So are lies. John should have known that.....lots of people
did....long before 1770.

g.
who knows that this is what comes of believing that aphorisms are an
adequate substitute for acumen.