FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   So I guess all those bastids..... (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=22943)

Tim J. July 18th, 2006 11:18 AM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

rw typed:
I had a great day on Slough Creek with Frank and Willi and Danl and
Chas. It was easily my best Slough Creek day.


snip
Thanks for the TR and the photos on abpf. I'm gonna have to get my ass
out west one of these years.
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/



bruiser July 18th, 2006 01:18 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

rw wrote:

I'm breathlessly awaiting the Fawn Lake TR. It was either a 3-mile or an

11-mile hike in, depending on whom you listened to.


It also depends upon what page(s) you're looking at in the Montana
Gazeteer, or maybe Wyoming, or the map in your head.....

bruce h


John Hightower July 18th, 2006 03:00 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

"rw"
I'm breathlessly awaiting the Fawn Lake TR. It was either a 3-mile or an
11-mile hike in, depending on whom you listened to.

--


3.89 +/- as the crow flies. probably 4.25 actual walking distance. I'm
under orders not to say more. mums the word.

jh



Ken Fortenberry July 18th, 2006 09:23 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 
John Hightower wrote:
"rw"
I'm breathlessly awaiting the Fawn Lake TR. It was either a 3-mile or an
11-mile hike in, depending on whom you listened to.


3.89 +/- as the crow flies. probably 4.25 actual walking distance. I'm
under orders not to say more. mums the word.


It's a two-hour hike in and a two-hour hike out and when you
get there all you'll find is an unfishable mass of weeds.
Only pertinacious morons would waste a day trying to fish
up there when there's so many other, better, closer, less
griz-infested places to fish. There is no Fawn Lake, just a
wet spot full of weeds.

Mums the word, yeah right. It must take no small amount of
effort to doctor digital photos and concoct a phony TR.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Wayne Harrison July 18th, 2006 09:45 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote

It's a two-hour hike in and a two-hour hike out and when you
get there all you'll find is an unfishable mass of weeds.
Only pertinacious morons would waste a day trying to fish
up there when there's so many other, better, closer, less
griz-infested places to fish. There is no Fawn Lake, just a
wet spot full of weeds.


this is one of the very few post-modern roff ****ing contests that i
find truly humorous. one of its charming attributes is that the truth is
actually capable of being discerned. all it would take is the agreement by
both you and jeffie to meet on the ground in yellowstone, accompanied by a
few trustworthy witnesses (ah, now there's a potential problem), and each
walk together to the claimed "fawn lake" site.
if i had the money, and i don't, i would finance the entire undertaking
just to watch and listen as the "loser" rationalized his mistake.

yfitons
wayno(well, how 'bout it, louie, or richard, or rw...)



July 18th, 2006 10:29 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 
In article ,
says...

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote

It's a two-hour hike in and a two-hour hike out and when you
get there all you'll find is an unfishable mass of weeds.
Only pertinacious morons would waste a day trying to fish
up there when there's so many other, better, closer, less
griz-infested places to fish. There is no Fawn Lake, just a
wet spot full of weeds.


this is one of the very few post-modern roff ****ing contests that i
find truly humorous. one of its charming attributes is that the truth is
actually capable of being discerned. all it would take is the agreement by
both you and jeffie to meet on the ground in yellowstone, accompanied by a
few trustworthy witnesses (ah, now there's a potential problem), and each
walk together to the claimed "fawn lake" site.
if i had the money, and i don't, i would finance the entire undertaking
just to watch and listen as the "loser" rationalized his mistake.

yfitons
wayno(well, how 'bout it, louie, or richard, or rw...)


Anyone care to provide coordinates?
- Ken

John Hightower July 18th, 2006 10:38 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

"Ken Fortenberry"

It's a two-hour hike in and a two-hour hike out and when you
get there all you'll find is an unfishable mass of weeds.
Only pertinacious morons would waste a day trying to fish
up there when there's so many other, better, closer, less
griz-infested places to fish. There is no Fawn Lake, just a
wet spot full of weeds.

Mums the word, yeah right. It must take no small amount of
effort to doctor digital photos and concoct a phony TR.

--


Well, Ken, all I can say for sure is that I know for a fact that there are 4
people who can tell you exactly what the status of "Fawn Lake" was on
Saturday, July 15, 2006. Actually there are another 4-5 folks that could as
well but i/we didn't get their names.

john



Ken Fortenberry July 18th, 2006 10:54 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 
Wayne Harrison wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote

It's a two-hour hike in and a two-hour hike out and when you
get there all you'll find is an unfishable mass of weeds.
Only pertinacious morons would waste a day trying to fish
up there when there's so many other, better, closer, less
griz-infested places to fish. There is no Fawn Lake, just a
wet spot full of weeds.


this is one of the very few post-modern roff ****ing contests that i
find truly humorous. one of its charming attributes is that the truth is
actually capable of being discerned. all it would take is the agreement by
both you and jeffie to meet on the ground in yellowstone, accompanied by a
few trustworthy witnesses (ah, now there's a potential problem), and each
walk together to the claimed "fawn lake" site. ...


The most charming attribute of this particular squabble
is that Jeffie insists on hiking up there year after
year. Now that's charming. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry July 18th, 2006 11:02 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 
John Hightower wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry"
...
Mums the word, yeah right. It must take no small amount of
effort to doctor digital photos and concoct a phony TR.


Well, Ken, all I can say for sure is that I know for a fact that there are 4
people who can tell you exactly what the status of "Fawn Lake" was on
Saturday, July 15, 2006. Actually there are another 4-5 folks that could as
well but i/we didn't get their names.


So there were either 8 or 9 people at the so-called
Fawn Lake but you can't actually remember how many
people were there.

This oughta be good. Let me get the popcorn and settle
into my recliner, I've always been fond of fairy tales.

--
Ken Fortenberry

rw July 18th, 2006 11:10 PM

So I guess all those bastids.....
 
Wayne Harrison wrote:

this is one of the very few post-modern roff ****ing contests that i
find truly humorous. one of its charming attributes is that the truth is
actually capable of being discerned. all it would take is the agreement by
both you and jeffie to meet on the ground in yellowstone, accompanied by a
few trustworthy witnesses (ah, now there's a potential problem), and each
walk together to the claimed "fawn lake" site.
if i had the money, and i don't, i would finance the entire undertaking
just to watch and listen as the "loser" rationalized his mistake.

yfitons
wayno(well, how 'bout it, louie, or richard, or rw...)


Why should I waste my money? I can clearly see Fawn Lake on satellite
imagery in Google. Fortenberry is obviously full of ****. What makes it
funny is that he knows he's full of ****, but will refuse to admit it no
matter what.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter