![]() |
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
"David Snedeker" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... If the idiocy of notions about balance is not apparent at the end of half an hour, take up oil painting......it is much more amenable sagacious pronouncements based on specious "reasoning". Just have to vent your Nervous Nelly ****wit piehole I guess. Oh, you'll be guessing for a long, long time. :) Wolfgang the sun is settin' like molasses in the sky. |
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
|
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
Peter Charles wrote: With due respect to my esteemed colleagues, Wolfie and Mike (welcome back, BTW), would either of you gentlemen care to fish with a Tibor Gulfstream on the end of an SPL 0 wt.? (Ignoring in your case Wolfie, were you to be the owner, that this combination would have at least doubled your net worth -- which, of course, would result in an automatic and emphatic "Yes" from your quarter.) The size of reels do matter -- it's just a question of degree. Here's a thought experiment for the both of you. Gather a group of anglers with varying degrees of experience and ask them to participate in a blindfold test of five 9' - 4 wt. rods of different brands. All rods will be cast with 30' of the same line. However, we actually give them the same rod and line only equipped with reels of different weights and sizes. Do you think that would be sufficient difference to make at least some of them believe they are actually casting different rods? I do. Me too. But the way you set it up, I also think if you repeatedly handed them the same rod AND reel I think that most of them would believe they are actually casting different rods. Willi |
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
"Mike Connor" wrote in message om... "Dan" lose wrote in message ... Bill, Thanks for the simple answer. I was hoping there was one. I hope you feel better. Dan All the answers are simple, but many of the questions are extremely complicated. Half the battle is getting to the stage where you can ask the right questions, and then deciding which of the answers might be correct. TL MC ( Wolgang was right by the way, it does not matter much which reel you use). Actually, I've always found questions impenetrable.....and answers ludicrous. The trick, as you point out, is to match the correct selection from column A to its mate from column B. The result is purported to be illumination. Whole lotta darkness goin' on. Wolfgang who has found random selection to be generally as rewarding as any other method. :) |
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
"Peter Charles" wrote in message ... On 1 Dec 2003 18:28:00 -0800, (Mike Connor) wrote: "Dan" lose wrote in message ... Bill, Thanks for the simple answer. I was hoping there was one. I hope you feel better. Dan All the answers are simple, but many of the questions are extremely complicated. Half the battle is getting to the stage where you can ask the right questions, and then deciding which of the answers might be correct. TL MC ( Wolgang was right by the way, it does not matter much which reel you use). With due respect to my esteemed colleagues, Wolfie and Mike (welcome back, BTW), Thank you. would either of you gentlemen care to fish with a Tibor Gulfstream on the end of an SPL 0 wt.? Hm......well, I've got a pretty good idea what an SPL 0 wt. must be but, beyond the assumption that a Tibor Gulfstream is a fly reel.....and a heavy one....I really don't know what it is.......um......do I get to pick which ends it's on? (Ignoring in your case Wolfie, were you to be the owner, that this combination would have at least doubled your net worth -- which, of course, would result in an automatic and emphatic "Yes" from your quarter.) Oh, I wouldn't be so sure about that.....I already own a fifty dollar reel. The size of reels do matter -- I don't believe I ever suggested otherwise. it's just a question of degree. Yes, that's what I said. Here's a thought experiment for the both of you. Gather a group of anglers with varying degrees of experience and ask them to participate in a blindfold test of five 9' - 4 wt. rods of different brands. All rods will be cast with 30' of the same line. However, we actually give them the same rod and line only equipped with reels of different weights and sizes. Do you think that would be sufficient difference to make at least some of them believe they are actually casting different rods? Of course. Gosh, that was easy. I do. Well, I should certainly hope so. Wolfgang |
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
|
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 22:20:25 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote: Of course. Gosh, that was easy. I do. Well, I should certainly hope so. Wolfgang Isn't it wonderful when we agree -- a rendition of Kum By Ya can't be far behind. Now let's work on that rod & reel balance thingie. :) Peter P.S. A gulfsteam is a honking big 14 wt. sal****er reel but then you knew that already and was jus pulling my leg. Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
"Peter Charles" wrote in message ... .....A gulfsteam is a honking big 14 wt. sal****er reel but then you knew that already and was jus pulling my leg. Nope, didn't know that, but it's about what I assumed. Wolfgang |
Matching reel and line/rod weights. What can one get away with?
Peter Charles wrote in message . ..
With due respect to my esteemed colleagues, Wolfie and Mike (welcome back, BTW), would either of you gentlemen care to fish with a Tibor Gulfstream on the end of an SPL 0 wt.? (Ignoring in your case Wolfie, were you to be the owner, that this combination would have at least doubled your net worth -- which, of course, would result in an automatic and emphatic "Yes" from your quarter.) The size of reels do matter -- it's just a question of degree. Here's a thought experiment for the both of you. Gather a group of anglers with varying degrees of experience and ask them to participate in a blindfold test of five 9' - 4 wt. rods of different brands. All rods will be cast with 30' of the same line. However, we actually give them the same rod and line only equipped with reels of different weights and sizes. Do you think that would be sufficient difference to make at least some of them believe they are actually casting different rods? I do. Of course it would be silly to use a hopelessly overweight reel on any rod, but that was not the question. You could still fish with such a combination, ( assuming you can even get such a reel attached to the reel seat, which is unlikely!). Within "normal" limits, it does not matter which reel you use, or whether you use one at all. Your experiment might well result in the participants deciding that they were using different rods. It is however entirely subjective, and dependent on a number of factors. Most problems with reels, at least in regard to the perceived weight, arise because they are incorrectly attached to the rod, and thus farther away from the rod hand than they should be. You can test this quite easily. The further away from the reel you grip your rod, the more "weight" you will perceive in use. The closer your hand is to the reel, ( and assuming you do not continuously allow your wrist to "break" uncontrollably), the less "weight" you perceive. Even fairly large weight differences ( up to several ounces), make little or no difference to the "balance" of the gear, although of course the actual weight may indeed be greater. "Balance" has in any case nothing at all to do with the actual weight of any given set of equipment, but whether or not such equipment is indeed compatible per se, for the task it is being expected to accomplish. In the majority of cases, the lightest reel suitable for the task at hand is the best choice. Although if you need a reel with a lot of backing capacity for instance, then you must perforce choose a larger, and therefore heavier reel to start with. Lastly, the ONLY fly-fishing equipment which is built to a set of standard specifications, is the fly-line itself. The AFTM system specifies these. No other tackle, rods, reels, or anything else, is built to such specifications, and the "numbers" on such equipment are merely abitrary recommendations from the manufacturers. There is actually no such thing as a "standard" #8 reel for instance. Nor for that matter a "standard" #8 rod! All these numbers just confuse people anyway. TL MC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter