![]() |
line choice for beginner
"Greg Pavlov" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:36:42 +0200, "Mike Connor" wrote: For a long time, most rods had two ratings marked on the butt i.e #6/#7 or similar. This was usually a manufacturers recommendation that the rod would cast a DT#6 or a WF#7. This is because a WF line of the same rating as the DT would be too light to load the rod at short range, ... I believe that it is the other way around: for longer casts one must shoot line, or shoot more line, with the WT, so it helps to have more weight in the first 30 feet. As you pointed out, for a given line weight rating, the first 30 feet should be apx the same weight whether the line is a DT or WT, so for short distances the rod loading should be the same with either. SNIP What you say is basically correct. A WF line is merely a shooting head with integrated running line, designed for long casting, and using a haul to shoot line. It will cast a lot further than a comparable DT, ( if you can use it!:)). But here we are talking about short range use, ( for beginners to boot!), and in such a case a heavier line loads the rod more easily. TL MC |
line choice for beginner
Bill Curry wrote: I would be interested in hearing what lines someone would use in drift boat situations, that is something I haven't experienced, but if it's like fishing from a canoe, like up here - except more stable I suspect - again, would not the WF line be an advantage? I generally use a heavier rod when I've fished from a drift because long quick casts are often necessary. I agree on large river in a drift boat, a WT line is an advantage. However, that is not day to day fishing for me or most people. Willi |
line choice for beginner
"Willi" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Mike Connor wrote: AFTM In grains In grams In ounces 3 100 +/- 6 6.48 0.228 4 120 +/- 6 7.78 0.274 5 140 +/- 6 9.07 0.32 6 160 +/- 8 10.42 0.366 7 185 +/- 8 11.99 0.422 8 210 +/- 8 13.61 0.48 9 240 +/- 10 15.55 0.55 10 280 +/- 10 18.14 0.64 11 330 +/- 12 21.38 0.75 12 380 +/- 12 24.62 0.86 From what I understand, some of the new lines out there are really now outside the above limits. IE. a line sold as a 5 weight is really about a 5 and a 1/2 weight or even slightly more. (Maybe someone in the business can comment) When the line manufacturers start deviating from a "standard" it makes it difficult for the public to make a reasonable decision. Add to this all the new specialty lines out there, and the decision is even harder. Willi That is correct Willi. The trick here is to bamboozle people into using a heavier line, which to some extent will cast more easily at short range. As very few people use these lines at any distance, they never notice, and can of course cast more easily. They could do exactly the same if they wanted, simply by using a DT one rating higher. It is generally easier for beginners to cast heavier ( Floating!!!!) lines, as they can feel the rod loading more easily. This of course has a number of disadvantages. Presentation suffers, distance ( assuming the requisite casting capability) is not so easily achievable, larger ( = heavier) reels are required, etc etc. Airflo is the main manufacturer doing this, none of the responsible ones are. I would not even use an airflo line to tie up my tomatoes, ( if I had any tomatoes!). TL MC |
line choice for beginner
"Allen Epps" schrieb im Newsbeitrag et... SNIP Mike, Wow, hard to believe that things can go that wrong with something as important to my "life liberty and pursuit of happiness" as basic as fishing. I've heard similar horror stories about the Green's in Australia from a liasion officer. Thanks for the info. Allen Indeed! Germany is a free and democratic country consisting of Federal States, with a constitution, etc etc. But it is not the same constitution that America has! Neither are the politics very similar at the moment! You are very lucky indeed to have the advantages you have in America. Even if you do occasionally end up with a loony for president :) TL MC |
line choice for beginner
"Allen Epps" wrote in message et... In article , Mike Connor wrote: snipped With regard to the "thousands" of people I have taught to cast. This sounds ridiculous of course, but is a fact. Where I live, people are obliged to take a number of tests before they can go fishing. For a long time I instructed large numbers of people wishing to do this. Often up to a hundred or more at a time, and several times a year. Normally, most could cast well enough to pass the test after two Saturday mornings instruction, and a couple of days practicing on their own. TL MC Mike, A bit off topic for the subject but I was intrigued by the idea of required instruction prior to taking up fishing. Driving, sure (in fact, most in the US ought to go back for a refresher! ) Hunting, makes good sense as you're dealing with potentially lethal mistakes, but fishing? Is it conservation that they want to teach or is it a safety issue? I fish with Frank Reid regularly so no one is more aware of the dangers of fishing than me (and I've pulled some pretty stupid stuff myself I just don't share it!) but I can't think of any classroom or on-the-water course that would have saved me. Happy Easter Allen Catonsville, MD Hi Allen, Mike and I had a little bit of recollection a few years ago as I recall about fishing in Germany. As you were in the military, as me, certain "rules", at the time were made much easier for US military personnel. Certainly the standard Germany bureaucratic things happen, but as I recall, I had to only show a US license, from any state, spend a long time waiting in an office, a military ID, then get a license. . .with a small fee. Of course, most areas after that were pay as you go, and stocked trout, but kinda neat, if flyfishing was allowed. ( generally couldn't catch and release) Residents have to go through a much more regulated process to get a license. . .uhhh . . .with money. BestWishes, DaveMohnsen Denver |
line choice for beginner
In article . net,
DaveMohnsen wrote: "Allen Epps" wrote in message et... In article , Mike Connor wrote: snipped With regard to the "thousands" of people I have taught to cast. This sounds ridiculous of course, but is a fact. Where I live, people are obliged to take a number of tests before they can go fishing. For a long time I instructed large numbers of people wishing to do this. Often up to a hundred or more at a time, and several times a year. Normally, most could cast well enough to pass the test after two Saturday mornings instruction, and a couple of days practicing on their own. TL MC Mike, A bit off topic for the subject but I was intrigued by the idea of required instruction prior to taking up fishing. Driving, sure (in fact, most in the US ought to go back for a refresher! ) Hunting, makes good sense as you're dealing with potentially lethal mistakes, but fishing? Is it conservation that they want to teach or is it a safety issue? I fish with Frank Reid regularly so no one is more aware of the dangers of fishing than me (and I've pulled some pretty stupid stuff myself I just don't share it!) but I can't think of any classroom or on-the-water course that would have saved me. Happy Easter Allen Catonsville, MD Hi Allen, Mike and I had a little bit of recollection a few years ago as I recall about fishing in Germany. As you were in the military, as me, certain "rules", at the time were made much easier for US military personnel. Certainly the standard Germany bureaucratic things happen, but as I recall, I had to only show a US license, from any state, spend a long time waiting in an office, a military ID, then get a license. . .with a small fee. Of course, most areas after that were pay as you go, and stocked trout, but kinda neat, if flyfishing was allowed. ( generally couldn't catch and release) Residents have to go through a much more regulated process to get a license. . .uhhh . . .with money. BestWishes, DaveMohnsen Denver Dave, I was lucky enough to make a half dozen trips to Alaska (Yakitat) with my grandfather before he passed away. There was always the same group of four German gentleman there fishing at the same time as us (late June for Sockeyes and Kings) . Only one spoke any English and he spoke about how much different the fishing was but we really didn't talk about regulations more just the type and environment. One of the other gents was the tyer of the group and he and I would set our vices up on the porch rail outside our rooms and tie after dinner. I recall a couple of the hundreds of fish we caught but more sharing a common interest without little means to communicate. I was always popular though since I brought beer from Seattle as the only beer they had available was "both kinds, Bud and Bud light" When I was in Aviano for the Kosovo debacle I saw lot of very large rainbows in the river near where we were staying and one of the other guys looked into fishing but it seemed much as you said, money and paperwork and we really didn't have much time to do any anyway. Thanks for the info. Allen |
line choice for beginner
"DaveMohnsen" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ink.net... "Allen Epps" wrote in message et... In article , Mike Connor wrote: snipped With regard to the "thousands" of people I have taught to cast. This sounds ridiculous of course, but is a fact. Where I live, people are obliged to take a number of tests before they can go fishing. For a long time I instructed large numbers of people wishing to do this. Often up to a hundred or more at a time, and several times a year. Normally, most could cast well enough to pass the test after two Saturday mornings instruction, and a couple of days practicing on their own. TL MC Mike, A bit off topic for the subject but I was intrigued by the idea of required instruction prior to taking up fishing. Driving, sure (in fact, most in the US ought to go back for a refresher! ) Hunting, makes good sense as you're dealing with potentially lethal mistakes, but fishing? Is it conservation that they want to teach or is it a safety issue? I fish with Frank Reid regularly so no one is more aware of the dangers of fishing than me (and I've pulled some pretty stupid stuff myself I just don't share it!) but I can't think of any classroom or on-the-water course that would have saved me. Happy Easter Allen Catonsville, MD Hi Allen, Mike and I had a little bit of recollection a few years ago as I recall about fishing in Germany. As you were in the military, as me, certain "rules", at the time were made much easier for US military personnel. Certainly the standard Germany bureaucratic things happen, but as I recall, I had to only show a US license, from any state, spend a long time waiting in an office, a military ID, then get a license. . .with a small fee. Of course, most areas after that were pay as you go, and stocked trout, but kinda neat, if flyfishing was allowed. ( generally couldn't catch and release) Residents have to go through a much more regulated process to get a license. . .uhhh . . .with money. BestWishes, DaveMohnsen Denver It is not actually all that expensive to get a licence. Most clubs charge about thirty dollars for the complete course. Registered and examined instructors give their time free. ( Although some try to make money flogging gear, or "sponsoring" tackle shops!). The licence itself is also cheap enough, although this varies from State to State. In some places it must be renewed ( for a fee) yearly, in others at three year intervals, and in still others it is for life. German fishery law is governed federally, but national law overrides it. As a foreigner, you can get a licence relatively easily, but you will still have problems finding somewhere to fish, as most clubs, ( who have the best water) will not allow anybody to fish who has not passed the test, even if they have a licence! Catch 22. You can fish put and takes, and private water for a fee, as long as you have a licence. For more info, have a look here; http://www.cybertrout.com/germany.htm http://www.users.odn.de/~odn03061/ TL MC |
line choice for beginner
From: "Mike Connor"
These tests, including 36 hours mandatory classroom instruction, six hours casting instruction ( extra if you want to flyfish, the basic tests are only for spincasting), a valid and current first aid certificate, and a current police report, followed by the practical and theoretical tests, are a legal requirement before one may obtain a licence. WoW! That's more than I had to do to get a concealed carry handgun permit in the gun unfriendly People's Republic of Massachusetts. Is there any logic at all in imposing these requirements for a fishing license, or is it all emotional issues by the greens? (You Nader folks paying attention to this?) George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
line choice for beginner
From: "Mike Connor"
Even if you do occasionally end up with a loony for president :) It's been that way for some time and is unlikely to change anytime soon, whether the vote goes D, R, or I. You'd have to be looney just to want the job. George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter