![]() |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:34:18 -0600, Warren wrote:
wrote... On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:59:46 GMT, "Larry L" wrote: in a conservative publication http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html My, does this sound familiar . . . . Does any of this? http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml :-) All of it sounds distressingly familiar. Even Saddam believed he had gas and bio-weapons, however, none of those politicians quoted by Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein lies the difference. Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:34:18 -0600, Warren wrote: wrote... On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:59:46 GMT, "Larry L" wrote: in a conservative publication http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html My, does this sound familiar . . . . Does any of this? http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml :-) All of it sounds distressingly familiar. Even Saddam believed he had gas and bio-weapons, however, none of those politicians quoted by Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein lies the difference. Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote: none of those politicians quoted by Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein lies the difference. That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-) |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote: none of those politicians quoted by Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein lies the difference. That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-) |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:29:47 GMT, Bones wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles wrote: none of those politicians quoted by Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein lies the difference. That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-) see my other reply For the record, I thought the Kosovo intervention was wrong-headed as well. At least the motivations for it had some grounding in a humanitarian cause. Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:41:23 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:29:47 GMT, Bones wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles wrote: none of those politicians quoted by Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein lies the difference. That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-) see my other reply For the record, I thought the Kosovo intervention was wrong-headed as well. At least the motivations for it had some grounding in a humanitarian cause. Yeah, taking out Saddam "al Schweitzer" Hussein was a blow to humanitarian causes everywhere... R |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:41:23 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:29:47 GMT, Bones wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles wrote: none of those politicians quoted by Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein lies the difference. That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-) see my other reply For the record, I thought the Kosovo intervention was wrong-headed as well. At least the motivations for it had some grounding in a humanitarian cause. Yeah, taking out Saddam "al Schweitzer" Hussein was a blow to humanitarian causes everywhere... R |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
wrote in message ... Ok, where are you big ol' queens registered? I'd feel like a real heel not sending something to the wedding...lessee...a DVD of La Cage?...naw, y'all both probably have copies...a weekend getaway at Fire Island?...naw, no point in subjecting a couple of cracker packers to that kind of ridicule...AHA! A great big bucket of kosher pickles, a dozen foot-long Hebrew Nationals, and a crate of KY! The perfect gift for you two lovebirds! Congrats, you big silly jabbering loonies, you, Pug or Kug or Dickie or whatever Dear Pug Knuckler Come on Pug, you can answer the question. Are you making money off this war? Its a very simple question. A little or a lot? Fat cost plus contract, or just the usual? Normal kickback or just a campaign contribution thru a fictitious cutout? Or even an "honest (for Haliburton at least) competitive" deal among friends? Lets hear from someone in the know. How about it Pug? You cashing in on this War thingy? Dave |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
wrote in message ... Ok, where are you big ol' queens registered? I'd feel like a real heel not sending something to the wedding...lessee...a DVD of La Cage?...naw, y'all both probably have copies...a weekend getaway at Fire Island?...naw, no point in subjecting a couple of cracker packers to that kind of ridicule...AHA! A great big bucket of kosher pickles, a dozen foot-long Hebrew Nationals, and a crate of KY! The perfect gift for you two lovebirds! Congrats, you big silly jabbering loonies, you, Pug or Kug or Dickie or whatever Dear Pug Knuckler Come on Pug, you can answer the question. Are you making money off this war? Its a very simple question. A little or a lot? Fat cost plus contract, or just the usual? Normal kickback or just a campaign contribution thru a fictitious cutout? Or even an "honest (for Haliburton at least) competitive" deal among friends? Lets hear from someone in the know. How about it Pug? You cashing in on this War thingy? Dave |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho
"B J Conner" wrote in message news:mUFfd.3925$jD4.1196@trnddc06... Somebody is paying him something. Cheny probably fell in love with him when he saw him pull 29.92 on an onion sack. Yesterday was St. Crispins day, I wonder if the vultures and chicken hawks have a day to reminisce and chortle over their foul deeds. Oppooortunity my friend. In War there is opportunity, money to be made, contracts to write, budgets to loot. And it mostly comes out of the Social Security surplus. See, its all Joe Sixpack's money, right there for the stealing. Nice and neat. Its Joe's blood, Joe's social security, and Joe's kid's future. Its predatory capitalism at its best and if you wrap it in the ol red, white and blue, Joe might even steal it for you. Keep Joe in the dark, keep Joe in debt and, hell Joe might even thank you for ****ing him out of his birthright of freedom. Dave |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter