![]() |
five-point political agenda
|
five-point political agenda
Dave LaCourse wrote in
: If you continue to run bozos like Kerry and Gore, you will *never* win the WH. And if by chance they *do* win, God help us. Dave Boy, I was thinking the opposite when GW won for the first time ("won" in quotes). I thought "Well, how much damage can he do?" Live and learn -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
five-point political agenda
Scott Seidman wrote:
Dave LaCourse wrote in : If you continue to run bozos like Kerry and Gore, you will *never* win the WH. And if by chance they *do* win, God help us. Dave Boy, I was thinking the opposite when GW won for the first time ("won" in quotes). I thought "Well, how much damage can he do?" Live and learn What worries me is that this arrogant, incompetent, ignorant, increasingly desperate bozo has another 33 months in office. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
five-point political agenda
rw wrote in
m: Scott Seidman wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote in : If you continue to run bozos like Kerry and Gore, you will *never* win the WH. And if by chance they *do* win, God help us. Dave Boy, I was thinking the opposite when GW won for the first time ("won" in quotes). I thought "Well, how much damage can he do?" Live and learn What worries me is that this arrogant, incompetent, ignorant, increasingly desperate bozo has another 33 months in office. The guys approval rating just fell to 32%, so he's officially lower than Carter now. My bet is that the environment is too partisan now for him to get much closer to Nixon's record -- but I think he's going to make a go for it! -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
five-point political agenda
Dave LaCourse wrote:
I remember the Carter years (made a helluva lot of money in the money market btw) You just can't resist this stuff, can you? No one but you gives a **** how much money you made. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
five-point political agenda
"Tim J." wrote in message ... Danl typed: "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... [snip] Gas prices are high, but they are high worldwide. Get the Dems to allow drilling off of California and Alaska and the price of gas would go down. Take away the last fed gas tax ($.50/gallon) voted in by Al Gore when the Senate was dead-locked at 50/50, and your gas would be alot cheaper. I don't know about your math, but that would be $12 less a tank where I buy gas. Ya think those folks at WM you are so concerned about could find something to do with that $12? Hmmmm....if you're paying .50/gallon or more Federal gas tax, you must be special. The latest figures I can find have the fed gas tax at .184/gallon. What did I miss, Dave? When did Al Gore increase the Fed gas tax by fifty cents a gallon? I don't know about your math and ....errr...I don't think you do either BSEG http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgastaxes.asp http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/1054.html Yeah, I didn't quite understand that math either. In most states, the state tax exceeds the fed. http://tinyurl.com/r4pce Add the two together and you get close to that $.50 figure. -- TL, Tim ------------------------- Oh, BTW, the federal tax on gasoline more than tripled (that means "times 3", Dave) from 4 cents per gallon in 1982 to 14.1 cents per gallon in 1991. I believe that Mr. Reagan and Mr. Bush (the smart one) held the veto power during this period of time. Mr. Gore was too busy inventing the internet to cast any deciding votes in a 50/50 split congress at the time. Danl http://api-ep.api.org/filelibrary/Hi...01918-2002.pdf |
five-point political agenda
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:18:38 +0800, "riverman" wrote: Hopefully. Hopefully it is funny, or hopefully you wish Bush was dead? You can't *possibly* hate *anyone* that much, can you? I could/can! It hasn't seemed to bothered him a bit that tens of thousands of Afghan and Iraqi civilians have died to satisfy his lust for the almighty dollar. Op |
five-point political agenda
Dave LaCourse wrote in
: I remember the Carter years (made a helluva lot of money in the money market btw), and I don't want to return to those days. I guess stagflation doesn't scare you. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
five-point political agenda
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:29:38 -0700, wrote:
You are correct, but Dave is correct also. It might work for Brazil, but at the current efficiency there isn't enough corn/sugar cane/etc to supply a country like the US. Many years ago we (the US) gave up on nuclear power. It can be safe (France gets much of their power from nuclear), yet politicians say no. These same pols say no to wind power when it's in their state near their summer palaces. There are numerous ways we can use nature to suplement our use of fossil fuels, but we will get nowhere with the Dems/Repubs in both houses. Use of the tides, wind, corn for fuel, and other alternatives will never happen until it is too late. We should be building hydro power dams, nuclear reactors, and drilling for oil where we have yet to drill. Then, and only then, can we be energy independent. The US is too large a country to expect conservation to work to any degree. Food has to move from Cal and Fla to the east and mid-west, people do not live near their employment and must drive their cars to work. Mass transit is a joke in most places. Plus, consider all the pick-up trucks/vans, delivery trucks, etc. doing business in your town. They can't do it on corn. |
five-point political agenda
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:00:40 -0600, rw
wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: I remember the Carter years (made a helluva lot of money in the money market btw) You just can't resist this stuff, can you? No one but you gives a **** how much money you made. I know. But if it ****es you off.......... d;o) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter