OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 1 May 2006 20:32:11 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote:


Wolfgang
aaaand we're off! :)

Well, duh...you (and your imaginary "we") have been "off" in at least
two senses for as long as you've been posting to ROFF

And what would those two be?

...and while I'd
guess long before that, I've found no evidence...well, you know...

Boring.

Wolfgang

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

"Benjamin Turek" wrote in message
news:Quz5g.39221$C63.2596@trnddc06...
I did a google search on it, I didn't get any results that I could
understand.

Hm......well, no surprises there.

Wolfgang

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

rw wrote:
wrote:
Excuse me for butting in, but . . . . . .

Dave LaCourse wrote:

On 1 May 2006 11:42:03 -0700, "
wrote:


[a lot of venomous slander]


Point it out, please.

The charity thingy? Read all about it in the Boston Globe.

First PH: His crew said there was no action. The doc that removed it
said it was US.


The crew said no such thing.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'll bet you think that Al Gore didn't claim that he
invented the Internet, too.

What are you talking about?

He DID invent the internet.

Doug Reese

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

On 1 May 2006 18:44:37 -0700, wrote:

Excuse me for butting in, but . . . . . .

Check out the Boston Globe story on Kerry's charity giving. It's
true.

His discharge papers where signed by a "board of officers". It was on
his web site during the presidential campaign. They were signed
during the Carter administration.

He did go to Paris while on active duty and "conferred" with the North
Viet Nam peace delegates.

He did lie before Congress and the American people and even said he
wish he could take back those words.

As far as his medals: you believe what you read and I'll believe what
I read. That's why we have vanilla and chocolate. The man *did not*
receive wounds that warranted three PHs.

You just don't go to the px and buy a movie camera and reenact a
skirmish to use for your political career in the future. Nor do you
talk about what kind of a hero you were and actually show the film to
the public. The man is a phony.

"Can I get me a huntin' license here?"

Dave

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 1 May 2006 18:44:37 -0700, wrote:

Excuse me for butting in, but . . . . . .

Check out the Boston Globe story on Kerry's charity giving. It's
true.

His discharge papers where signed by a "board of officers". It was on
his web site during the presidential campaign. They were signed
during the Carter administration.

He did go to Paris while on active duty and "conferred" with the North
Viet Nam peace delegates.

He did lie before Congress and the American people and even said he
wish he could take back those words.

As far as his medals: you believe what you read
and I'll believe what
I read. That's why we have vanilla and chocolate.

Precisely.

You were reading about all this.

I experienced it.

The man *did not*
receive wounds that warranted three PHs.

Wounds don't warrant PH's based on severity. Are you under the
assumption they do?

You just don't go to the px and buy a movie camera and reenact a
skirmish to use for your political career in the future.

There was no re-enacting.

I was there, and there was NO re-enacting.

Doug Reese

Nor do you
talk about what kind of a hero you were and actually show the film to
the public. The man is a phony.

"Can I get me a huntin' license here?"

Dave

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

On 2 May 2006 05:20:55 -0700, wrote:

Wounds don't warrant PH's based on severity. Are you under the
assumption they do?

No, only that they must be by enemy fire. He never received a wound
under enemy fire, including the rice in the buttocks.

You just don't go to the px and buy a movie camera and reenact a
skirmish to use for your political career in the future.

There was no re-enacting.

I was there, and there was NO re-enacting.

He bought the camera in the px *after* the incident, and returned and
filmed himself playing hero, walking around with the M-16 *with his
finger on the trigger*. It *was* a re-enactment.

Can you explain why he lied to Congress? To the American people?
Can you explain why his discharge papers are *not* signed by Sec Nav,
but instead by a board of officers?
Can you explain why he went to Paris and talked to our enemies while
he was on active duty and we were at war with them?
Can you explain why he threw his medals over the fence, yet has them
today, and uses them as a political crutch?
Can you explain why the little creep would give only $300 to charity
with an income of $300,000.00.

Dave

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

Other than not a taking a slot in an NG outfit or a spot in an
intelligence unit ( both of which would have assured he wouldn't have a
chance at a PH) and marrying more money that you tell us why you hate
him so much.
Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 2 May 2006 05:20:55 -0700, wrote:

Wounds don't warrant PH's based on severity. Are you under the
assumption they do?

No, only that they must be by enemy fire. He never received a wound
under enemy fire, including the rice in the buttocks.

You just don't go to the px and buy a movie camera and reenact a
skirmish to use for your political career in the future.

There was no re-enacting.

I was there, and there was NO re-enacting.

He bought the camera in the px *after* the incident, and returned and
filmed himself playing hero, walking around with the M-16 *with his
finger on the trigger*. It *was* a re-enactment.

Can you explain why he lied to Congress? To the American people?
Can you explain why his discharge papers are *not* signed by Sec Nav,
but instead by a board of officers?
Can you explain why he went to Paris and talked to our enemies while
he was on active duty and we were at war with them?
Can you explain why he threw his medals over the fence, yet has them
today, and uses them as a political crutch?
Can you explain why the little creep would give only $300 to charity
with an income of $300,000.00.

Dave

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

On 2 May 2006 05:20:55 -0700, wrote:


You just don't go to the px and buy a movie camera and reenact a
skirmish to use for your political career in the future.

There was no re-enacting.

I was there,

WOW! COOL! You were at the PX camera-shopping with John Kerry!?
BA-A-A-A-D ASS! Did they have a bunch of cool Nikons all real cheap and
****?

there was NO re-enacting.

Yeah, you said that already...of course, how exciting would it have been
to re-enact going to the PX...even with John Kerry...were there gooks
and charlies and VCs and other little yaller devils shooting at y'all
from the canned vegetable isle and ****? Did ya ever have to leap over
a tiger trap full of punjis just so you could use your secret Kaolin Wu
Dang Kung Fu grip on an arvin? Come on, Geor...er, Ramb...er, Doug, you
can tell us...

Doug Reese

Hey! THE Doug Reese? I know about you! You're that Usenut Kook
Award-winning wannabe journalist who, depending on where his tinfoil hat
is pointed, either was or wasn't "in the 'nam," was or wasn't with
Kerry, was or wasn't on a swift, was or wasn't on his meds...

....oh, BTW - Rambo, meet Col. Flagg, Col. Flagg, meet Rambo - you boys
have A LOT to talk to yourselves about...

Hee, hee, hee,
R

OT For Louie From Bob Kerrey
 

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 2 May 2006 05:20:55 -0700, wrote:

Wounds don't warrant PH's based on severity. Are you under the
assumption they do?

No, only that they must be by enemy fire. He never received a wound
under enemy fire, including the rice in the buttocks.

You just don't go to the px and buy a movie camera and reenact a
skirmish to use for your political career in the future.

There was no re-enacting.

I was there, and there was NO re-enacting.

He bought the camera in the px *after* the incident,

Totally false.

and returned and
filmed himself playing hero, walking around with the M-16 *with his
finger on the trigger*. It *was* a re-enactment.

You really need to do a little research. He bought the camera when he
was in Cam Ranh, at the beginning of his time in Vietnam. It is the
same camera bought by thousands of guys over there, including many
other Swift Boat guys.

The Silver Star incident occured Feb 28, 1969, when he was at a place
called An Thoi. I doubt they even had a PX there. But let's just assume
they did.

The Swift Boats went up the Dong Cung Canal precisely two times. That's
it, twice.

The first was Feb 28. The second was March 13, with four Swift Boats
involved. (Kerry left Vietnam in late March)

We had a guy killed that day. There was no filming whatsoever. There
was no visit to the site of the Silver Star incident.

The filming that was done, was on Feb 28, after things died down. We
stayed at the site for a while -- perhaps 30 minutes or longer.

If there was any "re-enacting" done, there were three boats present and
plenty of guys who would have witnessed it. No one has come forward,
including the only member of the Swift Boat Veterans for "truth".

Most of the footage Kerry took while in Vietnam was of the scenery. He
wasn't in it much at all. What little had him in it, you have seen.

And if you want to call him walking for a few seconds with an M-16
"re-enacting", have at it. But that is exactly what just about every
guy, with any type of camera, did over there. It was hardly unusual.
And few would call it re-enacting.

As usual, when I call people on repeating falsehoods, they respond with
a whole laundry list of questions for me. I usually ignore them, but if
it makes you happy to make a big deal about that . . then be happy.

Doug Reese

Can you explain why he lied to Congress? To the American people?
Can you explain why his discharge papers are *not* signed by Sec Nav,
but instead by a board of officers?
Can you explain why he went to Paris and talked to our enemies while
he was on active duty and we were at war with them?
Can you explain why he threw his medals over the fence, yet has them
today, and uses them as a political crutch?
Can you explain why the little creep would give only $300 to charity
with an income of $300,000.00.

Dave