![]() |
What I learned today.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:53:30 -0600, Conan The Librarian
wrote: wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:46:38 +0000, "W. D. Grey" wrote: In article , Ken Fortenberry writes Paul Prudhomme is an American chef credited with making Cajun cooking popular. Um, not among Cajuns he ain't...they were eating it before he was born... Well, yeah ... and there was French cuisine before Julia Child came on the scene, too. No ****? Thanks for the explanation Ken. Must look up some recipes for this type of grub. There are no _recipes_ per se for much of Cajun or Creole cooking. Oh, sure, there are "recipes" out there by the ton, but much of both styles of cooking is simply cooking with what's available and adding cayenne, thyme, garlic, a mirepoix-ish saute of onions, sweet/green/bell peppers, and celery (no carrots ala French cooking), and Worchestershire to individual taste. Very few Cajuns or Creoles make "standards" the same way...which, I suppose, makes them, um, well, not standard, depending on your POV. So how would you suggest that a newcomer to Cajun food learn how to cook it? I figure recipes might be a handy substitute for those of us who don't have relatives who came over on the boats from Acadia. Look at the general array of flavoring ingredients and techniques used and go from there. There's nothing wrong with following a precise recipe, but since most Cajun and Creole cooks really don't, there's no reason that a person who is at least moderately familiar with food, herbs and spices, and cooking should, either. But perhaps most importantly, unlike, for example, baking, there really isn't _a_ recipe for most dishes, so even if you and Bill were to find recipes from two different sources and prepare them exactly as intended, you would almost certainly have something somewhat different from Bill although both preparations would likely be broadly similar. Take, for example, the aforementioned "Shrimp Creole" - some "recipes" (family "recipes") start with a medium brown roux and some don't use any roux at all, but all are basically Creole mirepoix and tomatoes, thyme, garlic, etc., and shrimp over rice. TC, R Chuck Vance |
What I learned today.
wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:53:30 -0600, Conan The Librarian wrote: So how would you suggest that a newcomer to Cajun food learn how to cook it? I figure recipes might be a handy substitute for those of us who don't have relatives who came over on the boats from Acadia. Look at the general array of flavoring ingredients and techniques used and go from there. There's nothing wrong with following a precise recipe, but since most Cajun and Creole cooks really don't, there's no reason that a person who is at least moderately familiar with food, herbs and spices, and cooking should, either. But perhaps most importantly, unlike, for example, baking, there really isn't _a_ recipe for most dishes, so even if you and Bill were to find recipes from two different sources and prepare them exactly as intended, you would almost certainly have something somewhat different from Bill although both preparations would likely be broadly similar. Take, for example, the aforementioned "Shrimp Creole" - some "recipes" (family "recipes") start with a medium brown roux and some don't use any roux at all, but all are basically Creole mirepoix and tomatoes, thyme, garlic, etc., and shrimp over rice. You know, oddly, with repetition, this is all starting to sound vaguely familiar. I mean, I can't speak for anyone else here, but to me this looks suspiciously like what cooks do in out of the way places like Italy, France, Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, Sptizbergen, Swaziland, Sumatra, West Allis, Sierra Leone, Canada, Sri Lanka, Mexico, Mongolia, Angola, Liberia, Poland, Colombia, Archangel, Portugal, suburban Geneva, Georgia (no, the other one), Greenland, Delhi (the city, not the sandwich shop......well, o.k., maybe that too), Kamchatka, Kansas City, Khartoum, Kenosha, Kankakee, Bolivia, Honduras, Hawaii, Terre Haute, Tahiti, Tangiers, Tanzania, Potch Chee Nunk, Pittsburgh, Potsdam, Panama, Cairo, Cairo (most definitely NOT the same place.....as anyone who has been forced to stay there for a weekend by virtue of car trouble can attest!), Wellington, Washington, Westphalen, West Allis (yeah, it's worth going back to......trust me), West by God Virginia, Colonial Williamsburg (gotta love their Christmas coffee table book!), Peru (no, the other one), Haiti, Cuba, Bermuda, Easter Island, Christmas Island, Nomanisan Island, North Korea, South Korea, Chic Korea (where all the smart shoppers go!), Vietnam, Vincennes, Vatican City, Versailles (rhymes with Lauderdale's), Fort Lauderdale (see "Versailles"), Chippendale's, Fort Atkinson, Fort Worth, Woolworth's, and Tiddly on the Marsh. Which is to say that those who grew up there almost certainly did. Others, maybe not. HTH., really. HOO! HOO! HOO! HOO! HOO! HOO! Wolfgang o.k., yeah, canada is a bit of a stretch.......call it culinary license. |
What I learned today.
|
What I learned today.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:49:32 -0600, Conan The Librarian
wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:53:30 -0600, Conan The Librarian wrote: wrote: In article , Ken Fortenberry writes Paul Prudhomme is an American chef credited with making Cajun cooking popular. Um, not among Cajuns he ain't...they were eating it before he was born... Well, yeah ... and there was French cuisine before Julia Child came on the scene, too. No ****? Yes, really. And yet she was still credited with making French cuisine popular. (Just like Prudhomme was with Cajun food.) FWIW, it was probably more to do with Justin Wilson than Prudhomme as Prudhomme isn't really a "Cajun" chef, he's more of a Creole chef (he got his start at Commander's), and his "blackened" redfish is neither Creole or Cajun, but a happy accident. There are no _recipes_ per se for much of Cajun or Creole cooking. Oh, sure, there are "recipes" out there by the ton, but much of both styles of cooking is simply cooking with what's available and adding cayenne, thyme, garlic, a mirepoix-ish saute of onions, sweet/green/bell peppers, and celery (no carrots ala French cooking), and Worchestershire to individual taste. Very few Cajuns or Creoles make "standards" the same way...which, I suppose, makes them, um, well, not standard, depending on your POV. So how would you suggest that a newcomer to Cajun food learn how to cook it? I figure recipes might be a handy substitute for those of us who don't have relatives who came over on the boats from Acadia. Look at the general array of flavoring ingredients and techniques used and go from there. Hmmm ... do you think a cookbook might be a good place to look for that sort of information? No, I don't. I prefer to see and sample dishes and go from there, whatever the cuisine. But I also realize that some have _no_ access to trying certain things, and so, if you or they do need to use a cookbook for a general sense of what ingredients are used, that's fine. But I'd offer that attempting to use _recipes_ from a cookbook will not produce "true" Cajun or Creole food. There's nothing wrong with following a precise recipe, but since most Cajun and Creole cooks really don't, there's no reason that a person who is at least moderately familiar with food, herbs and spices, and cooking should, either. I dunno ... if someone asks about Cajun recipes I'd be inclined to just give them Cajun recipes. Cajun and Creole "recipes" aren't as structured as, for example, many continental recipes (part. sauces), and are "morphed" from their native meanings - for examples, ask 100 Cajuns and 100 Creoles for gumbo "recipes" and you'll get about 500 "recipes," and, Creole grillades have nothing to do with grilling - and as such, they don't really lend themselves to recipes in the sense of a fixed list of ingredients with precise amounts. IMO, it would be like trying to give someone a recipe for "art" or "music." YMMV, of course. TC, R Chuck Vance (that's not really so hard, is it?) |
What I learned today.
On 13 Dec, 10:30, "W. D. Grey" wrote:
Do you keep a toilet roll in the fridge, just in case ?....:-) -- Bill Grey I have had a few Cajun dishes, ( no idea of the recipes), and they were very spicy indeed. Similar in some ways to some Spicy Indian or other Asian food. The meals I had were very nice though. Quite popular in Sweden. You need to listen to something like this while you are eating it; http://tinyurl.com/3cmsby I enjoyed it anyway, and I like the music as well! TL MC |
What I learned today.
wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:49:32 -0600, Conan The Librarian wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:53:30 -0600, Conan The Librarian wrote: wrote: In article , Ken Fortenberry writes Paul Prudhomme is an American chef credited with making Cajun cooking popular. Um, not among Cajuns he ain't...they were eating it before he was born... Well, yeah ... and there was French cuisine before Julia Child came on the scene, too. No ****? Yes, really. And yet she was still credited with making French cuisine popular. (Just like Prudhomme was with Cajun food.) FWIW, it was probably more to do with Justin Wilson than Prudhomme as Prudhomme isn't really a "Cajun" chef, he's more of a Creole chef (he got his start at Commander's), and his "blackened" redfish is neither Creole or Cajun, but a happy accident. There are no _recipes_ per se for much of Cajun or Creole cooking. Oh, sure, there are "recipes" out there by the ton, but much of both styles of cooking is simply cooking with what's available and adding cayenne, thyme, garlic, a mirepoix-ish saute of onions, sweet/green/bell peppers, and celery (no carrots ala French cooking), and Worchestershire to individual taste. Very few Cajuns or Creoles make "standards" the same way...which, I suppose, makes them, um, well, not standard, depending on your POV. So how would you suggest that a newcomer to Cajun food learn how to cook it? I figure recipes might be a handy substitute for those of us who don't have relatives who came over on the boats from Acadia. Look at the general array of flavoring ingredients and techniques used and go from there. Hmmm ... do you think a cookbook might be a good place to look for that sort of information? No, I don't. I prefer to see and sample dishes and go from there, whatever the cuisine. But I also realize that some have _no_ access to trying certain things, and so, if you or they do need to use a cookbook for a general sense of what ingredients are used, that's fine. But I'd offer that attempting to use _recipes_ from a cookbook will not produce "true" Cajun or Creole food. There's nothing wrong with following a precise recipe, but since most Cajun and Creole cooks really don't, there's no reason that a person who is at least moderately familiar with food, herbs and spices, and cooking should, either. I dunno ... if someone asks about Cajun recipes I'd be inclined to just give them Cajun recipes. Cajun and Creole "recipes" aren't as structured as, for example, many continental recipes (part. sauces), and are "morphed" from their native meanings - for examples, ask 100 Cajuns and 100 Creoles for gumbo "recipes" and you'll get about 500 "recipes," and, Creole grillades have nothing to do with grilling - and as such, they don't really lend themselves to recipes in the sense of a fixed list of ingredients with precise amounts. IMO, it would be like trying to give someone a recipe for "art" or "music." YMMV, of course. And so it turns out that, as is so often the case here, this whole brouhaha is the result of yet another simple misunderstanding, resulting from a failure to state the case clearly and simply. Cajun and Creole cooks (in their native habitat) don't write recipes for the things they cook because no one (in their native habitat) can read them. Wolfgang hey, it ain't nothin to embarrassed about......my sicilian grandmother, my french grandmother, my german grandmother, my russian grandmother, my polish grandmother, my sonoran grandmother, my michoahacan grandmother, my vietnamese grandmother, my mandarin grandmother, my hungarian grandmother, my orthodox jewish grandmother, my greek grandmother, my persian grandmother, my tatar grandmother, and my puerto rican grandmother couldn't read either. doesn't matter......they passed their recipe (such as it is)on to me orally and, unlike those crazy cajuns and creoles, they ALL made their samosas EXACTLY the same way anyhow! :) |
What I learned today.
A perfect example:
I Googled "grillades" so as to perhaps post a link, and the first hit produced is this description: "This is a terrific, hearty meal that is generally eaten at breakfast or brunch in New Orleans, I like it for a Sunday evening meal. Grillades (pronounced GREE-yahds) are made with Round Steak, of Beef or Veal, although you could use pork. This dish like many other greats from New Orleans, comes from meager times, when a piece of meat needed to be stretched to feed a whole family. A Grillade is a square of meat cut from the Round Steak, or whichever piece of meat that you've chosen. I love to take an inexpensive, tough cut of meat, and turn it into something spectacular! Round Steak is a powerhouse of flavor, that with some time and tenderness will be tender and mouthwatering. Grits have never really caught on with most Yankees, I don't understand this because a lot of folks go crazy over Polenta, which is basically a yellow version of Grits. I personally think it's all about the name; Polenta flows from the tongue, while the word Grits comes from your mouth like a shotgun blast! This dish will also go nicely with Boiled Rice, but please try it with the Grits, they take on the flavor of the sauce in a really nice, creamy way. I prefer the longer cooking Grits, sometimes called Old Fashioned, which are a little bit harder to find up north as opposed to the instant variety. If you're not crazy about just plain old Grits, get fancy and serve this alongside Caryn's Gorgonzola Grit Cakes from Delicious! Delicious!." It then proceeds to give a _recipe_ that, well, isn't contradicted by the above description, but is not really the way many make it (including everyone I know who makes it). It seemingly, however, would produce something that most would recognize. http://neworleanscuisine.blogspot.co...lades-and.html Then compare the above to the description followed by the recipe from John Folse, who says grillades are slivers of pork, but follows it with a somewhat different round steak _recipe_: http://www.jfolse.com/recipes/breakf...reakfast07.htm It isn't the way folks I know make it either, but again, they'd generally recognize it as "grillades." TC, R |
What I learned today.
|
What I learned today.
wrote in message ... A perfect example: I Googled "grillades" so as to perhaps post a link, and the first hit produced is this description: "This is a terrific, hearty meal that is generally eaten at breakfast or brunch in New Orleans, I like it for a Sunday evening meal. Grillades (pronounced GREE-yahds) are made with Round Steak, of Beef or Veal, although you could use pork. This dish like many other greats from New Orleans, comes from meager times, when a piece of meat needed to be stretched to feed a whole family. A Grillade is a square of meat cut from the Round Steak, or whichever piece of meat that you've chosen. I love to take an inexpensive, tough cut of meat, and turn it into something spectacular! Round Steak is a powerhouse of flavor, that with some time and tenderness will be tender and mouthwatering. Grits have never really caught on with most Yankees, I don't understand this because a lot of folks go crazy over Polenta, which is basically a yellow version of Grits. I personally think it's all about the name; Polenta flows from the tongue, while the word Grits comes from your mouth like a shotgun blast! This dish will also go nicely with Boiled Rice, but please try it with the Grits, they take on the flavor of the sauce in a really nice, creamy way. I prefer the longer cooking Grits, sometimes called Old Fashioned, which are a little bit harder to find up north as opposed to the instant variety. If you're not crazy about just plain old Grits, get fancy and serve this alongside Caryn's Gorgonzola Grit Cakes from Delicious! Delicious!." It then proceeds to give a _recipe_ that, well, isn't contradicted by the above description, but is not really the way many make it (including everyone I know who makes it). It seemingly, however, would produce something that most would recognize. http://neworleanscuisine.blogspot.co...lades-and.html Then compare the above to the description followed by the recipe from John Folse, who says grillades are slivers of pork, but follows it with a somewhat different round steak _recipe_: http://www.jfolse.com/recipes/breakf...reakfast07.htm It isn't the way folks I know make it either, but again, they'd generally recognize it as "grillades." O.k., seriously, do you believe that there is just ONE recipe in this world for lasagna? sauerbraten? dolmades? enchiladas? pirogy? lo mein? chicken pullao? Do you actually think there's something unique about food preparation in the region you live in based on whether or not people consult written recipes? Is there ANYTHING in this world that you really DO know something about? Wolfgang the only thing more amazing than people thinking they can get away with demented crap like this is that they're right. :) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter