![]() |
trout fishin' ravens
"Willi" wrote in message ... B J Conner wrote: A group of crows is not a flock but a "murder". Anyone know the derivation of that? Willi Willi Wrote: Anyone know the derivation of that? Maybe because of their association with dead things? Possibly a once existing misconception that the crows themselves were responsible for the deaths of the carrion with which they were associated? Although it does not answer the question, there is an interesting web-site that discusses the origins of representing groups of animals through the use of collective nouns: http://en2.wikipedia.org/wilki/collective_noun Snakefiddler- |
trout fishin' ravens
Wolfgang wrote:
"Willi" wrote in message ... B J Conner wrote: A group of crows is not a flock but a "murder". Anyone know the derivation of that? I do. But I'm not telling cuz you were mean to me. :( "The phrase, according to James Lipton in his An Exaltation of Larks, dates from 1450 in the form a mursher of crowys. It was a murther of crowes by 1476. Whether it arose because murdering was thought to be a characteristic of crows or simply as a negative comment upon flocks of crows is not known. The mursher form is problematic, however, as we must wonder if it was not intended as murder but was mistakenly interpreted as such." http://www.takeourword.com/TOW173/page2.html -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter