For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:28:28 GMT, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:


"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

Wolfgang
an even more sobering thought: there isn't a state in the union.....there
isn't a country in the world.....that would prohibit this thing from
breeding and assuming the responsibility of raising children.

As entertaining as it has been watching grown men get all worked up about
essentially nothing, and even though my reading of the statements made and
their meaning conforms with yours and Opies's, it is somewhat heartening to
know that at least two of the participants in this quite ridiculous tiff
have chosen not to breed. 8 D

Bob Weinberger


Well said. And much better expressed than I could have put it. Though
since I know and rather like two of the non-breeders, one could hope
that the other side is equally in favour of holding that status for
themselves.
--

r.bc: vixen
Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc..
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

In article ,
says...

wrote in message
...
Ummmmm.....didn't you trim out the part of my post where Jon Cook tried
to explain it to you? Didn't Joe(y) himself explain that that's not
what he was saying?

Are you just embarrassed because you called someone names for not being
able to read when all along it was you who read it wrong?
- Ken

Umm...Dear Ken the IGNORANT SLUT:

Jon's explanation make no sense whatsoever

Looks like you folks had quite a day today. Unfortunately I can't
access these lists at work so can't join in the fun until the evening.

Jon and Ken both have it 100% correct.

"
Joe's meaning (as claimed in his other post):

[your bogus claim] [of living in a high-tech mecca]

Your interpretation:

[your bogus claim of living in] [a high tech mecca]
"

You read it wrong and it appears to me that you and Wolfgang
are too proud or stupid or gutless to admit that you were
acting like asses.

I have no need to engage in ****ing contests with two
obviously reading challenged people who have no intention
of listening. So this is my only rebuttal.

- I did not say or mean or imply that Opie lived in a
high-tech mecca.
- I assume that Opie knows where he lives and it makes
absolutely no sense that I would disagree with him on
where he says he lives.
- If you insist that I am lying, then explain why I
posted the unemployment figures for the "hightech"
west coast vs North Carolina.

Last word of advice, and yes I'm sure you'll both have
snide little comments throughout. You might want to think
twice before calling people names over reading ability.
I did a little google searching and you both have a history
of reading people's posts wrong. Those in glass houses
and all that.

Oh and yeah, you can try to fool yourselves all you want,
but even you know that you both ****ed up. Everyone else,
or at least everyone else who wasn't disgusted by all this
stupidity, knows that you two ****ed up too.

Learn how to ****in' read, you morons!!!

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

In article ,
lid says...
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:28:28 GMT, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:


"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

Wolfgang
an even more sobering thought: there isn't a state in the union.....there
isn't a country in the world.....that would prohibit this thing from
breeding and assuming the responsibility of raising children.

As entertaining as it has been watching grown men get all worked up about
essentially nothing, and even though my reading of the statements made and
their meaning conforms with yours and Opies's, it is somewhat heartening to
know that at least two of the participants in this quite ridiculous tiff
have chosen not to breed. 8 D

Bob Weinberger


Well said. And much better expressed than I could have put it. Though
since I know and rather like two of the non-breeders, one could hope
that the other side is equally in favour of holding that status for
themselves.

My apologies to all of you who had to deal with this nonsense.

Sorry, but I've already bred.
I'm done breeding, but not practicing :-), if that makes you feel
better.

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:42:50 -0400, "Opie"
wrote:

I don't have a million dollars to retire on, so what you propose will
likely
be an impossible challenge, but thanks for sharin'.

You could have $10 Mil and you *still* wouldn't have a life, Mark.
Life isn't about money.

Last I remember, you were that one who said that one couldn't live without a
million dollars at retirement. So, life must be about money, right?

Op --rw was right. you do try to stir up **** with each visit to ROFF!--

Well, I sure as hell didn't start this dumbass thread, which is what
is stirring up the ****.

If you weren't interested in dumbass threads, then you wouldn't have
participated in a thread with the SUBJECT: For Joe, Ken J. and all
*disinterested parties*, now would you have?

Dave, you're just another moron to spank.

Op

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

wrote in message
...
In article .com,
says...

wrote:

Joey said, " I never said that you live in a high-tech mecca.....I

He was lying. That's what liars do.

And you're a dumbass. :)

Wolfgang
oh, and you know he was lying......and that makes yoy a liar too.

It's a small man that can't admit when he's wrong......

Ooh! Aphorisms! I LOVE those things!

Beats the hell out of thinking, huh? :)

.....it's a tiny man who calls someone else names when they
themselves are wrong.....

It's an unusual tiny man who finds himself in the plural.

how tall are you again?

About 5'9".

Wolfgang

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

On 11 Jul 2006 19:58:24 -0700, "bruiser"
wrote:

Reading this thread has been fun, but I'd really rather be camped out
at Beaver Creek listening to Willi, Warren, and RW argue : -)

bruce h

From the few posts I've read in this thread, I'd offer it'd be more fun
to be camped out IN Beaver Creek listening to Willi, Warren, and RW
snore...

TC,
R

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...
In article ,
says...

wrote in message
...
Ummmmm.....didn't you trim out the part of my post where Jon Cook tried
to explain it to you? Didn't Joe(y) himself explain that that's not
what he was saying?

Are you just embarrassed because you called someone names for not being
able to read when all along it was you who read it wrong?
- Ken

Umm...Dear Ken the IGNORANT SLUT:

Jon's explanation make no sense whatsoever

Looks like you folks had quite a day today.

I've had worse.

Unfortunately I can't
access these lists at work so can't join in the fun until the evening.

Life can be cruel.

Jon and Ken both have it 100% correct.

You're a liar.

"
Joe's meaning (as claimed in his other post):

[your bogus claim] [of living in a high-tech mecca]

Your interpretation:

[your bogus claim of living in] [a high tech mecca]
"

You read it wrong and it appears to me that you and Wolfgang
are too proud or stupid or gutless to admit that you were
acting like asses.

You read it wrong......or you had no idea what you were saying.
Interestingly, it is impossible to tell which is the case. Then again, the
evidence also allows the conclusion that you read it wrong AND you had no
idea (and still don't) of what you were saying. Hm.......the principle of
occam's razor strongly suggests one should take the latter view. O.k., I
can live with that.

I have no need to engage in ****ing contests with two
obviously reading challenged people who have no intention
of listening.

And yet, here you are.

So this is my only rebuttal.

Well, we'll see about that.

- I did not say or mean or imply that Opie lived in a
high-tech mecca.

No one has suggested that you did so. What you DID do was suggest that HE
said so......when, in fact, he said precisely the opposite. It is endlessly
fascinating that you and Jon and kennie cannot grasp this simple fact.
English is reputedly a difficult language for non-native speakers to learn
but linguists agree that it is no more so than any other for those who grow
up enmeshed in it. A vast body of evidence here in ROFF suggests otherwise.
:)

- I assume that Opie knows where he lives and it makes
absolutely no sense that I would disagree with him on
where he says he lives.

I don't believe that his knowledge of geography and his place within a
particular bit of it is germaine......nor do you or anyone else involved in
this little charade but hey, knock yourself out.

- If you insist that I am lying,

From here, it doesn't look like there's any question about that.

then explain why I
posted the unemployment figures for the "hightech"
west coast vs North Carolina.

Actually, I think it would be more interesting for YOU to explain what the
hell that has to do with the question under consideration. At the very
least, it provides you with yet another opportunity to to demonstrate that
you STILL don't have any idea of what that question is.

Last word of advice, and yes I'm sure you'll both have
snide little comments throughout.

Ouch.

You might want to think
twice before calling people names over reading ability.

Might. Might not.

I did a little google searching and you both have a history
of reading people's posts wrong.

Would it be too much to ask for you to publish a comprehensive list? Maybe
we could all learn something from it.

Those in glass houses and all that.

And all what?

Oh and yeah, you can try to fool yourselves all you want,
but even you know that you both ****ed up. Everyone else,
or at least everyone else who wasn't disgusted by all this
stupidity, knows that you two ****ed up too.

Mark: "...I can see that you wouldn't understand that knot
(obroff) all of us live in the Mecca of hi-tech."

Joe: "Remember this started with your bogus claim of living
in a 'high-tech mecca'."

Learn how to ****in' read, you morons!!!

Hee, hee, hee.

Wolfgang
who just LOVES quotation marks! :)

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:28:28 GMT, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:

As entertaining as it has been watching grown men get all worked up about
essentially nothing, and even though my reading of the statements made and
their meaning conforms with yours and Opies's, it is somewhat heartening
to
know that at least two of the participants in this quite ridiculous tiff
have chosen not to breed. 8 D

Doctor, we have a winner in the balcony! ;-)

Could you possibly be any more pathetic?

Wolfgang
who thinks not.

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

wrote in message
...
On 11 Jul 2006 19:58:24 -0700, "bruiser"
wrote:

Reading this thread has been fun, but I'd really rather be camped out
at Beaver Creek listening to Willi, Warren, and RW argue : -)

bruce h

From the few posts I've read in this thread, I'd offer it'd be more fun
to be camped out IN Beaver Creek listening to Willi, Warren, and RW
snore...

You've read every word of it, pored over it carefully (well, as carefully as
you are capable of) searching for something......ANYTHING......that will
help you break the endless cycle of being screamingly funny when serious and
deathly dull when trying to be funny. It won't work. You know it won't
work. But you can't stop. After all, what else is there?

I mean, really, what else can you do?

Seriously.

HTH.

Seriously. :)

Wolfgang

For Joe, Ken J. and all disinterested parties
 

In article , says...

"Joe" wrote in message
Jon and Ken both have it 100% correct.

You're a liar.

I love it. You actually think that this "liar, liar" defense
of yours does something other than highlight the weakness
your argument. Sticks and stones tiny man.
- Ken