So I guess all those bastids.....
 

"jeff" wrote in message
news:YEBvg.30902$8q.27371@dukeread08...

$10,000 that the fawn lake ken and i are disputing is substantially more
than "an unfishable mass of weeds" and that it contains worthy fish. any
takers?

On August 13th or 14th I'll visit the said disputed lake, make sure you have
your checkbook when I pick you up at the airport in September. Your credit
is good with me :)

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

bruiser typed:
jeff wrote:
(snip)

Just post the freaking pictures somewhere where we can see them
already! A few Montana and Wyoming pictures and a few words about the
fishing would be nice.

As always, Jeff, my offer of posting your photos on my website stands.
Just email them to timj at sbcma dot com. For those new here, these are
some previous photo essays: http://css.sbcma.com/timj/roffpics/
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

Ken Fortenberry wrote:



Mums the word, yeah right. It must take no small amount of
effort to doctor digital photos and concoct a phony TR.


pathetic...but i guess you've got to maintain your facade and claim in
some way. in this statement you are calling chas, john, choc, warren,
me, and joe liars, cheats, and conspirators about fawn lake.

tell you what, i'll put all of my boats and all of my fishing rods and
reels...including the sal****er rods and reels... up against your canoes
and all of your rods and reels. i say the fawn lake in dispute exists
(the one we both have been talking about in yellowstone), that it is not
an unfishable mass of weeds, that it is a fishable lake, and that it
holds brook trout over 15 inches that can be caught on a fly. you say it
is an unfishable mass of weeds. whoever is telling the truth takes all.
we'll let wayno, tim j., stan gula, willi (and any other impartial,
objective person you find acceptable) determine who's telling the truth
based on all of the facts, photos, and witnesses. what say kenny? or
are you all hat and no cattle?

jeff

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

bruiser wrote:

jeff wrote:
(snip)

Just post the freaking pictures somewhere where we can see them
already! A few Montana and Wyoming pictures and a few words about the
fishing would be nice.

bruce h


patience grasshopper...there's fun brewing.

jeff

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

Wayne Knight wrote:

"jeff" wrote in message
news:YEBvg.30902$8q.27371@dukeread08...


$10,000 that the fawn lake ken and i are disputing is substantially more
than "an unfishable mass of weeds" and that it contains worthy fish. any
takers?


On August 13th or 14th I'll visit the said disputed lake, make sure you have
your checkbook when I pick you up at the airport in September. Your credit
is good with me :)



....no problem. take pictures.

jeff

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

rw wrote:

jeff wrote:


it's not "little more than a patch of weed." it's a full and deep body
of water, with big brook trout in it. the other fawn lake is outside
ynp...and neither of us were talking about it. and, i suspect the fun
isn't over yet.


Stop teasing us, goddamn it! Photos, man. Photos!


gotta get the bets right first. g

jeff

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

jeff wrote:
rw wrote:

jeff wrote:


it's not "little more than a patch of weed." it's a full and deep
body of water, with big brook trout in it. the other fawn lake is
outside ynp...and neither of us were talking about it. and, i suspect
the fun isn't over yet.



Stop teasing us, goddamn it! Photos, man. Photos!


gotta get the bets right first. g

Multiple choice -- Will Fortenberry:

(a) be the laughingstock of ROFF

(b) pretend nothing happened and that he's right, goddamnit

(c) disappear in shame, never to be heard from again

(d) none of the above

(e) all of the above

(f) admit he's wrong

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

rw wrote:

Multiple choice -- Will Fortenberry:

(a) be the laughingstock of ROFF

(b) pretend nothing happened and that he's right, goddamnit

(c) disappear in shame, never to be heard from again

(d) none of the above

(e) all of the above

(f) admit he's wrong

I'm gonna guess (d).

--
Ken Fortenberry

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:36:00 -0600, rw wrote:

jeff wrote:
rw wrote:

jeff wrote:


it's not "little more than a patch of weed." it's a full and deep
body of water, with big brook trout in it. the other fawn lake is
outside ynp...and neither of us were talking about it. and, i suspect
the fun isn't over yet.



Stop teasing us, goddamn it! Photos, man. Photos!


gotta get the bets right first. g

Multiple choice -- Will Fortenberry:

(a) be the laughingstock of ROFF

(b) pretend nothing happened and that he's right, goddamnit

(c) disappear in shame, never to be heard from again

(d) none of the above

(e) all of the above

(f) admit he's wrong

He's already (a), but he'll try (b) - again.
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

So I guess all those bastids.....
 

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
rw wrote:


Multiple choice -- Will Fortenberry:

(a) be the laughingstock of ROFF

(b) pretend nothing happened and that he's right, goddamnit

(c) disappear in shame, never to be heard from again

(d) none of the above

(e) all of the above

(f) admit he's wrong


I'm gonna guess (d).


I figure (b), but the honest thing would be (f).

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.