Watergate revisited
 

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:59:59 -0500, Conan The Librarian
wrote:


Want to go back and read your own words? You were practically
foaming at the mouth:


Wrong. I was sitting here gleefully typing away. I love Liberal's
hypocriCy in all of its many colors. It was pure joy to see how angry
you and your fellow libs (ooooops, assuming there [their, they're]
ain't I {me?}). While preparing dinner last evening, I heard the news
on TV. I broke into a big smile, *KNOWING* that the Liberal hypocrits
on roff would soon chime in with their warped opinions

How's come I can't call you on "imagination"? More hypocriCy no
doubt.

I really could shiv a git about my spelling, Chuck. So, I misspell a
word now and then. So what? I see words spelled incorrectly on the
news-feed banners all the time, poor grammar on the part of educated
men, as well as my fellow roffians who are far better educated than I
(me) but I don't feed on it the way you do. To phunny.

So, tell me a thing or two:
When did you become an anti-Clinton fan? During or after his first
term? After he perjured himself? After he obstructed justice? When
you realized he was a huckster? When?

Dave




hmmm... i reckon i qualify as a liberal (whatever that label means). i
also must admit i've been hypocritical on any number of matters
(frankly, i think every parent confronts his own hypocrisy on a regular
basis), so i'm fairly called a hypocrite too.

however, as a hypocritical liberal, i thought the whole scooterlibby
imbroglio a fascinating and stupid undertaking, typical of prosecutions
designed to extort incriminating statements and evidence about other
matters and other "targets". but, it only works when presidential
pardons aren't available and probable. this whole thing, like the
clinton impeachment, has been a horrible waste of resources and reveals
the worst edge of partisan politics. pursuing perjury charges against
some little nothing of a guy like libby while allowing his superiors to
get away with the big lies that proximately caused the death of
thousands of innocent men, women, and children is kafka-esque. we are
all hypocrites.

perjury renders a justice system impotent if not challenged. still, most
courts and prosecutors have developed methods of dealing with liars
short of perjury prosecutions. i guess i have a thick skin about
courthouse liars because i am convinced that only the church (temple,
mosque, etc.) holds more liars and hypocrites than the courthouse. in
more than 30 years of experience in the eastern nc court system, i am
aware of less than a handful of perjury indictments. if we prosecuted
all of the perjury occuring before grand juries and in trials...or even
a healthy minor portion of the provable perjury...we'd never have time
to prosecute anything else.

justice will be meted out best when obama is elected. g

jeff

Watergate revisited
 

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...
lasts until 2009 so that Bush can pardon him....

Oh? Bush will be serving a third term? So, you've heard something about
his forthcoming completion of the task of obliterating the U. S.
constitution that the rest of us are not yet privy to?

Assuming Bush serves his entire term, and there's no reason at this time to
assume he won't, Bush will serve as President until Jan 20, 2009 or so.
Technically David can get his wish without Bush obliteraing the US
Constitution.

Watergate revisited
 

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
...I hope
the hell that Libby's appeal lasts until 2009 so that Bush can pardon
him....

Oh? Bush will be serving a third term? So, you've heard something about
his forthcoming completion of the task of obliterating the U. S.
constitution that the rest of us are not yet privy to?

Wolfgang
who wishes he could.....but he cannot.....be the least bit perplexed that so
many here still take this hate-consumed illiterate piece of **** seriously.
:)

Watergate revisited
 

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:14:11 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:

Imbecile.

Whore monger

Idiot.

Wolfgang

Watergate revisited
 

"Wayne Knight" wrote in news:q_-
:

Technically David can get his wish without Bush obliteraing the US
Constitution


Too late

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Watergate revisited
 

jeff wrote in news:z8Aii.208005$dC2.61157
@newsfe13.lga:

pursuing perjury charges against
some little nothing of a guy like libby while allowing his superiors to
get away with the big lies that proximately caused the death of
thousands of innocent men, women, and children is kafka-esque.


And that's why the Administration is probably loving the brouhaha.


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Watergate revisited
 

justice will be meted out best when obama is elected. g


Sadly prophetic words, though not in the sense you intended, I fear.

Wolfgang



ancipital my good man...ancipital. and i intended every meaning...g
good of you to notice.

jeff

Watergate revisited
 

"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...
lasts until 2009 so that Bush can pardon him....

Oh? Bush will be serving a third term? So, you've heard something about
his forthcoming completion of the task of obliterating the U. S.
constitution that the rest of us are not yet privy to?

Assuming Bush serves his entire term, and there's no reason at this time
to assume he won't, Bush will serve as President until Jan 20, 2009 or so.
Technically David can get his wish without Bush obliteraing the US
Constitution.

Spoilsport. :)

Wolfgang

Watergate revisited
 

On 3 Jul 2007 21:45:30 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

there's a lot to be desired in Bush.

Of *course* there is lots to be desired in Bush, but given the choices
(Gore and Kerry), he was the ONLY choice I had.

Watergate revisited
 

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:40:24 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
.. .
...I hope
the hell that Libby's appeal lasts until 2009 so that Bush can pardon
him....

Oh? Bush will be serving a third term? So, you've heard something about
his forthcoming completion of the task of obliterating the U. S.
constitution that the rest of us are not yet privy to?

Correct me if I'm wrong, Whore Monger, but doesn't Bush's term go
until 2008? Yeah, I thought it did too. And doesn't he leave office
the very DAY that his replacement is sworn in? Check and see when
that is, and get back to me.


Wolfgang
who wishes he could.....but he cannot.....be the least bit perplexed that so
many here still take this hate-consumed illiterate piece of **** seriously.

Moronic whore monger.

Dave, who still cannot believe the whore monger has friends to fish
with that are not consumed by his hate.