A dumbo thread
 

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:31:59 -0800, Mike
wrote:

You are just a bull****ter LaCourse, and a time waster. I have no need
to refute any of your obvious bull****, apart from anything else it
simply reeks of hypocrisy and self interest. You are not a
knowledgeable angler LaCourse, you are a frustrated old wannabe,
trying to project an image.


And yet, yet, here you are, wasting time bul****ting with a
bullshiiter.

No, Mike, I really am not a "knowledgeable angler", but I sure to
catch a helluva lot of fish every time I go out, using all four
disciplines and variations of them. All you seem to do is *talk*
about how much you know.

Old wannabe? Hahahaha. Well, I am old, older than you fer sure, but
I'll bet I can take you physically in just about any venue (except
running). I have set my image in this newsgroup along time ago. I
need not project anything. (Jump right in Mikey, Jr. d;o)

Frustrated? Don't think so, Mike. I get in more fishing, and sex
with a female, than you do. I don't have to wank it, Mike. How 'bout
you? Old bachelor. No sex. Frustrated just a little, Mike?

Why not come to the Western Clave. I bet I could get Fortenberry to
go. Hey, one on one. All that frustration, rage and hate boiling to
the surface. Why old Ken wouldn't stand a chance with a tough guy
like you.

dave

A dumbo thread
 

On 7 Nov, 00:37, Mike wrote:
On 7 Nov, 00:31, Scott Seidman wrote:



Mike wrote in news:1194389914.438199.141110
@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com:

If you think it is school-yard ****, why are you engaging in it? Are
you a silly schoolboy? Or a nasty vicious arsehole trying to damage
somebody because you feel like it, or because you enjoy it, or because
you are simply a fool, who posts one thing and does another?

Mike, I'm trying to shut up a bully who post hateful invective. That would
be you. It doesn't make me feel good. It makes me feel bad. I pity
someone who's ego is as large as yours when it is simultaneously as fragile
as yours.

I'll remind you that I started posting this bull**** when you out and out
said that Ken was trying to manipulate people when he posted about the
death of his daughter some time ago (if anyone thinks this is about Ken's
dog, you stand corrected). This was unprompted by anyone--you hadn't
previously posted a word, and nobody posted anything to you.

This was as cruel a statement as I've ever heard posted here on ROFF in all
the years I've been participating-- which might well be twice as many years
as you. It is behavior that needs correcting.

In all those years, I can probably count on one hand the number of people
that I've had serious arguments with-- and three of those people are
probably you! Let's compare this to you. You end up in serious arguments
in just about every forum you participate in. On ROFF, this usually takes
the form of rampages lasting for days and days and days, which makes one
suspect you are on one hell of a bender or having a psychotic episode.
Then, you often get caught creating alter egos to support you.

Seriously, Mike, your clear overreaction to a few web-slung insults, your
constant repetition of how you were "hurt" or otherwise wronged, and your
whole "with me or against me" attitude really doesn't paint a great picture
of your stability. You should most definitely print out what you see onhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_personality_disorder, and chat
about it with your doctor. Some of this type of stuff might even be brought
about by organic inflammatory disease.

Also,http://www.palace.net/~llama/psych/bpd.html.
"
8. Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment

* Splitting: the self and others are viewed as "all good" or "all
bad." Someone with BPD said, "One day I would think my doctor was the best
and I loved her, but if she challenged me in any way I hated her. There was
no middle ground as in like. In my world, people were either the best or
the worst. I couldn't understand the concept of middle ground."
* Alternating clinging and distancing behaviors (I Hate You, Don't
Leave Me). Sometimes you want to be close to someone. But when you get
close it feels TOO close and you feel like you have to get some space. This
happens often.
* Great difficulty trusting people and themselves. Early trust may have
been shattered by people who were close to you.
* Sensitivity to criticism or rejection.
* Feeling of "needing" someone else to survive
* Heavy need for affection and reassurance
* Some people with BPD may have an unusually high degree of
interpersonal sensitivity, insight and empathy"

This is you all over, Mike. Get yourself some help.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

I only bothered reading the first sentence dumbo. So I am a bully? I
suppose the rest of you dumbos posting purely personal attacks for the
sole purpose of doing me some personal damage are veritable paragons
of sweetness and light?

You are just a dumbo, and not worthy of any particular notice.

MC

Oh, and furthermore dumbo, your amateur psychology is a load of old
bull****. Were any of what you write true, you could simply ignore
me, but you don´t. If i cared about what you dumbos think, I would not
even post here. Despite my constantly telling you the absolute truth,
you are still too stupid to grasp it.

I don´t care what you write or think, and there is absolutely nothing
you can do to stop me writing whatever I please. Any sensible person
would long since have realised that the nonsense you are propagating
is absolutely futile. But you aren´t a sensible person are you? As you
have repeatedly proven.

MC

A dumbo thread
 

On 6 Nov 2007 20:01:47 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Mike wrote in news:1194378766.554974.3440
:

You can not provoke or insult me Kennyboy. You managed to upset and
hurt me once very badly, as you have also done to many others, but you
will never manage it again Kennyboy, because I have you pegged, and I
also have the truth on my side.

You keep saying this, Mike. There don't seem to be many others who Ken
seems to have hurt. Yeah, he's ****ed quite a bit of people off, but this
is schoolyard ****. If you're hurt by this type of stuff, you are way to
sensitive to have an outgoing internet hookup.

Man, *that* needed to be said. Well done. Scott.

A dumbo thread
 

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:00:32 -0800, Mike
wrote:

All I have to do Kennyboy is keep posting the truth. It makes
absolutely no difference what you post. Or what Seidmann, LaCourse,
or any of the other idiots post.

In other words, all roffians are idiots. I don't see anyone on your
side, Connor. Most don't like these ****ing contest, but like Scott
said, this is a playground. If you can not take an insult, please
leave. You've made quite an ass out of yourself on this trip, Connor.
Go away and come back again a month or so from now.

It is for your own good.

A dumbo thread
 

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:00:32 -0800, Mike
wrote:

The only thing it serves to accomplish is that decent people will
avoid them too, knowing what they are capable of.

Scott Seidman, Asadi, Joe F., Frank Sr., BJ, et al are the most decent
people you will *ever* meet, Connor. They may disagree among
themselves on many subjects, just as they disagree with you, but they
are honorable people To malign them simply because they disagree with
your looniness is a travesty.

Dave (who could get a number of people to say I am a decent man....
well two anyway.......d;o()

A dumbo thread
 

On 6 Nov 2007 22:04:13 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Ken Fortenberry wrote in news:0s5Yi.435
:

First off, I'm not discriminating against him. I treat all
arrogant, pompous gasbags pretty much the same, both the
sane ones and the insane ones. And then too, actual
discrimination is not within my power anyway, I can't deny
him a job, an apartment or admission to his school of choice.

I think that's part of the Net Kooks with Disabilities Act.


splork mu vang You have GOT to put a warning sign on these one
liners. You are scaring my dog, Jenny.

A dumbo thread
 

Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
...
You also don't pass the smell test. Just a few weeks ago you
were so destitute because of the loss of a measly $300 that
you wondered aloud how you would eat. And yet this week you
post what purports to be a recent TR that included a charter
into the Baltic. You must think we're pretty stupid here at roff.
Hell, you've even invented a college degree for yourself. LOL !!
You don't have a degree, you're a self-proclaimed high school
dropout with a collection of mostly useless certificates from a
motley assemblage of third rate trade schools ! Who in the hell
are you trying to impress with all your bull**** ?
Geezus, but you're pathetic.

Quite apart from,
anything else, people know you are a pathological liar. ...

I'm a liar ? Nope, that won't do because everything I posted
here was first posted here by you yourself. You were either
lying the first time you posted your educational history here
or this time, but either way *you're* the liar. How in the hell
would I know, or even give a **** about your education ? I'm
just pointing out how your story has changed under duress.

You must think roff has a very short memory and that we're
all quite stupid.

Other people have amply proven that you are a liar Kennyboy, It is a
matter of fact, and on record.

It's like I told you Mike, you don't pass the smell test
and Google is not your friend. A person of your fragile
and unbalanced mental state has no business participating
in electronic forums of any kind. Give it up and seek help.

--
Ken Fortenberry

A dumbo thread
 

On 7 Nov, 00:42, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:31:59 -0800, Mike
wrote:

You are just a bull****ter LaCourse, and a time waster. I have no need
to refute any of your obvious bull****, apart from anything else it
simply reeks of hypocrisy and self interest. You are not a
knowledgeable angler LaCourse, you are a frustrated old wannabe,
trying to project an image.

And yet, yet, here you are, wasting time bul****ting with a
bullshiiter.

No, Mike, I really am not a "knowledgeable angler", but I sure to
catch a helluva lot of fish every time I go out, using all four
disciplines and variations of them. All you seem to do is *talk*
about how much you know.

Old wannabe? Hahahaha. Well, I am old, older than you fer sure, but
I'll bet I can take you physically in just about any venue (except
running). I have set my image in this newsgroup along time ago. I
need not project anything. (Jump right in Mikey, Jr. d;o)

Frustrated? Don't think so, Mike. I get in more fishing, and sex
with a female, than you do. I don't have to wank it, Mike. How 'bout
you? Old bachelor. No sex. Frustrated just a little, Mike?

Why not come to the Western Clave. I bet I could get Fortenberry to
go. Hey, one on one. All that frustration, rage and hate boiling to
the surface. Why old Ken wouldn't stand a chance with a tough guy
like you.

dave

I never bull**** LaCourse, I have absolutely no reason to. It is
apparently your entire stock in trade.

Even were I in a position to physically damage either you or
Fortenberry, I would not do so for a number of reasons. It would
provide you with ammunition, it would doubtless cost me very large
hospital bills on your account, not to mention the other civil or
criminal damages you would then doubtless try to extract, it is not a
civilised or gentlemanly thing to do, and even after I had beaten both
of you soundly to a bloody pulp and a pile of moaning and abject ****,
you would still be pieces of filth, and because beating the hell out
of a nasty ****bag is not worth the temporary and righteous
satisfaction it would engender. so there is absolutely nothing to be
gained by doing it.

Egging people on to do others physical violence, as you repeatedly did
to RW by the way, is the action of a coward and an arsehole Lacourse.
Which you indubitably are. Thankfully, he was far too sensible to do
anything of the sort, or you would still be bragging about how you and
Fortenberry provoked and manipulated him and got him in jail. He is
far better served by holding you in contempt, and telling you so now
and again. This has gained him a great deal of respect, not least
from me, and I imagine from many others.

I am neither frustrated, nor do I hate anybody LaCourse. You keep
projecting your own feelings on to others.

Must be absolutely awful being you.

MC

A dumbo thread
 

On 7 Nov, 00:48, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:00:32 -0800, Mike
wrote:

All I have to do Kennyboy is keep posting the truth. It makes
absolutely no difference what you post. Or what Seidmann, LaCourse,
or any of the other idiots post.

In other words, all roffians are idiots. I don't see anyone on your
side, Connor. Most don't like these ****ing contest, but like Scott
said, this is a playground. If you can not take an insult, please
leave. You've made quite an ass out of yourself on this trip, Connor.
Go away and come back again a month or so from now.

It is for your own good.

I do not require an arsehole like you to translate my words LaCourse.
What I have written is plain enough. I am not going anywhere LaCourse.

MC

A dumbo thread
 

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:20:32 +0100, MC wrote:

It is rather amusing watching the dumbos here gathering like vultures, I
am involuntarily reminded of Gehrke and his "junk yard dogs" and "bottom
feeders".

You aren't a Gehrke, Mike. You could never attain his level of fly
fishing wisdom (wisdom, Mike, not knowledge), nor his skill as a
fisherman. Nor could you make a living off of fly fishing like he
did. To speak ill of the dead says volumes about your character.
Gehrke at times was an ass and got only what he deserved, much the
same as you today.

Again, anyone that disagrees with you is a dumbo. Sad, as just about
everyone has at *least* a baccalaureate degree, many with advanced
degrees in the arts and sciences. And you have........? No dumbos
here Mike. However there are lots of good folks who disagree with
much of what you believe and definitely how you act.

Dave