![]() |
Dual nymphs
On Sat, 03 May 2008 00:19:17 -0500, wrote:
Put up or shut up, It would be a waste of precious time, Richard. NO ONE can cast sixty feet of line with a conventional fly rod - say a 9 ft 5 weight - without using a false cast and thereby a back cast. We're gonna hafta call you Lefty Dean before long. tagh d;o) |
Dual nymphs
"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... NO ONE can cast sixty feet of line with a conventional fly rod - say a 9 ft 5 weight - without using a false cast and thereby a back cast. hmmm....not even by letting out, say 45 feet of line into the flow, then roll casting and feeding the other 15 feet on the roll?? I'm not sure that can't be done. Not all all sure. Tom |
Dual nymphs
On Sat, 03 May 2008 10:41:13 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote: On Sat, 03 May 2008 00:19:17 -0500, wrote: Put up or shut up, It would be a waste of precious time, Richard. NO ONE can cast sixty feet of line with a conventional fly rod - say a 9 ft 5 weight - without using a false cast and thereby a back cast. Uh-huh...sounds a whole lot like the wiggling of a loud-mouthed coward. You never said anything about "conventional" or "a 9 ft. 5 weight" or no back cast when you were running your mouth about "big bucks" and how it couldn't be done without a false cast: "I would still pay big bucks to see you cast 60 feet of line *without* a false cast (which would require a back cast), eh?" It's becoming obvious that you don't have anywhere near the stones to actually follow through with what you ran your mouth about OR have the stones to admit that you popped off a bit quick, but just to finish it - I'll do it as you offered, and do it with a conventional fly rod - heck, some special rod isn't necessary anyway. What's your idea of "big bucks" - $50,000.00 US dollars? $10,000.00 US dollars? How many US dollars do you consider "big bucks?" We're gonna hafta call you Lefty Dean before long. And "we're" gonna have to call you a loud-mouthed puss right here and now... Put up or shut up, R tagh d;o) |
Dual nymphs
On Sat, 03 May 2008 14:58:11 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote: hmmm....not even by letting out, say 45 feet of line into the flow, then roll casting and feeding the other 15 feet on the roll?? I'm not sure that can't be done. Not all all sure. Would YOU want to fish like that? A nymph (usually fished weighted) would drag down some of the line. Try it, Tom, and get back to us. d;o) |
Dual nymphs
|
Dual nymphs
Dave LaCourse wrote:
snip I've always wanted to meet you anyway, but having been to Mississippi and Louisiana after Katrina, have no interest whatsoever of returning. Do hope you understand, bucko. You have no idea what you're missing. New Orleans is recovering nicely from The Storm and rdean is a most gracious host and tour guide (for a liberal ;-). -- Ken Fortenberry |
Dual nymphs
|
Dual nymphs
On Sat, 03 May 2008 16:46:44 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: You have no idea what you're missing. New Orleans is recovering nicely from The Storm and rdean is a most gracious host and tour guide (for a liberal ;-). After the two trips to Waveland and vicinity in the months after Katrina, I have no desire to suffer through that heat and humidity again. I am sure NO is nice, and I know Richard would be a gracious host and tour guide, but thanks and no thanks about going to NO. OTOH, Bud drinkers should go he http://www.brackenspub.com/beer.swf d;o) Louie |
Dual nymphs
On Sat, 03 May 2008 13:16:42 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote: On Sat, 03 May 2008 11:42:07 -0500, wrote: It's obvious you don't have the balls or the "big bucks" to put up or shut up, so that's about the end of it. Hey, tell ya what..... Hey, I'll tell you what - you're all mouth. The next time we are at a clave together (oh, just remembered, you don't clave.... do you fly fish?), I'll give you my 8'9" Winston LT5, rigged normally for nymphing (unweighted #18 pheasant tail and small shot, 7 1/2 ft leader [plus 18" tippet], floating Cortland line) and if you can cast the nymph 60 feet without falsecasting (and no floating the line downstream or rollcasting several times [which is really false casting]), I'll give you $100. Hell, it would be worth a hundred bucks to learn HOW to cast a five weight 60 feet without falsecasting. And, we are talking conventional fly rod and a conventional cast. No fair tying a large weight to the line to get distance (you know....whirly birding that sucker around and around and then chucking it). Just a normal 5 weight fly rod, reel, line, leader, split shot, fly, with 60 feet of line lying at your feet.... now cast that without falsecasting. I'd love to see it. The original conversation was about nymphing. That is my nymphing set up. A hundred bucks if you can. SNICKER More wiggling. You never said anything about fishing rigs, gear types, or any other qualifiers: "I would still pay big bucks to see you cast 60 feet of line *without* a false cast (which would require a back cast), eh?" You offered. I accepted your offer. And if hundred bucks is your idea of "big bucks," you're not even worth fooling with even if you had the stones to stand by your words or the honor to admit your ****-up. You called the game, but don't have the balls (or the bucks) to play. I'm done with it, R |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter