OT Internet protocol
 

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Well, I *know* the P doesn't stand for pretty. d;o)



WYAMF and GUSYH after that, NDTBF

OT Internet protocol
 

On Sun, 11 May 2008 20:34:39 -0700, rw
wrote:

How about POSWDOGWWTAGMNFHAPGBISLO?

(Pathetic old ****heel with delusions of grandeur who will trash a good
man's name for his ancient partisan grudge because it sounds like Osama.)

Too long. But SGMWPPP ain't.

(Silly Girly Man With Pretty Purple Purse)

d;op

OT Internet protocol
 

"rw" wrote in message
m...
JT wrote:

Someone once compared ROFF to sitting around a camp fire or in a bar with
a bunch a guys... Most anything can and will be discussed, you will
disagree with some of the stuff that is mentioned and dislike some of the
participants. Would you go *off* as you have sitting around the camp
fire? I think not...

The difference is that in ROFF no one can punch you in the nose if you
cross the bounds of decent behavior. Wolfgang and Fortenberry would long
since have had the **** kicked out of them if they acted the way they do
in ROFF in the bars I frequent.

One of the great values of Usenet is that it provides opportunities for
helping those who think that punching people in the nose for identifying
people who are likely to punch people in the nose for things they say to
expose themselves. Usenet is also valuable for identifying those who think
that punching people in the nose for things they say on Usenet is a good
idea......whether or not they choose to participate themselves. Another
legitimate use for Usenet is in identifying those who think it's a good idea
to punch people in the nose for what they say on Usenet, threaten to do so,
and then scurry away when presented with the opportunity. What Usenet is
NOT good for is bolstering self-esteem by repeated demonstrations of a gross
inability to behave like an adult and find ways to interact in a civilized
fashion with other adults.

As for the establishments in which you rent friends......who cares?

Wolfgang

OT Internet protocol
 

wrote in message
...


What does Wolfgang say??

Well, some might suggest that you could easily find out by reading what he
says.......but that raises certain problems, doesn't it? Others might
wonder why the issue looms so large in your mind. Hell, *I* don't care
nearly as much about what Wolfgang says as you do!

Wolfgang

OT Internet protocol
 

wrote in message
...
I am sure that ROFF has lost a lot iof good people because of Wolf**** and
the fat pirate

It's a shame. They could have stayed if someone had informed them that all
they needed to do was to jab large flaming embers in their eyes.

I went back and looked at some of Wolf****'s posts
What a mealy mouthed little weasel scumbag
He has abosolutley NOTHING to say
except his potshots at al

Al is dangerous, ubiquitous and insidious. So clever and elusive is he
that most people aren't even aware of his existence. My hat is off to
anyone who takes potshots at him.

I could see people wanting to beat him up.

Sure, a certain class of people......as is amply demonstrated here with
great regularity. Nevertheless, I remain firmly convinced that taking
potshots at him will eventually result in the desired elevation of
character.

I could and would beat his ass if I met him

Meeting him is not likely. No one has yet come forward and admitted to
having done so. This is precisely why I keep reminding you of his presence.
In any event, as he is a more or less complete enigma, I suggest that who
might do what to whom upon a chance encounter is open to some doubt.

Killfiling the amnnoying twit is easier

Sure, but which one is he?

The thing is
As my posting grew
The more these fools would attack and make snide and stupid comments on
every posts

A natural consequence of the envy you inspire.

However they are dead now!

And yet they live on in the minds of their ardent admirers.

Wolfgagng died in a pile of his own excremet and useless verbaige

Icky. Messy. One is tempted to hope for something nobler for oneself.

Littleton and Nakashima are OK also by my book

That's it? Nobody else?

Wolfgang
looks like the rest of y'all got some soul searching to do.

OT Internet protocol
 

wrote:
On 11-May-2008, jeff miller wrote:

Sorry, Fred. My job is correcting top-posters only. Someone else is
in charge of OT patrol.

Everyone specializes these days
Doctors used to treat everything
Now they specialize so you have to go to 5 or 10 of 'em

So now we have specialized internet protocol critics , top posting
critics, acronym critics etc

Unbelievable.

There's an opening for Cheif Speling Corecter, if you're interested.
--
TL,
Tim
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

OT Internet protocol
 

"JR" wrote in message
...

...What folks do or say on roff, though, doesn't mean ****.

Well said.

Um.......but it raises a knotty bit of paradox, ainna?

Wolfgang
who sees a world pregnant with meaning wherever he looks.

OT Internet protocol
 

From the subject I thought there was going to be a question about
packet fragmentation or NAT or at least something _interesting_ ...
boy was I disappointed :-)

Jon.

OT Internet protocol
 

On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:04:56 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

wrote:
On 11-May-2008, jeff miller wrote:

Sorry, Fred. My job is correcting top-posters only. Someone else is
in charge of OT patrol.

Everyone specializes these days
Doctors used to treat everything
Now they specialize so you have to go to 5 or 10 of 'em

So now we have specialized internet protocol critics , top posting
critics, acronym critics etc

Unbelievable.

There's an opening for Cheif Speling Corecter, if you're interested.

Y'all ain't done filled the gramer gruu position already, has ya...?

Dickie Da Critter

OT Internet protocol
 

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...
It's a shame. They could have stayed if someone had informed them that
all they needed to do was to jab large flaming embers in their eyes.


a bit excessive, dontcha think?

I then note that he stated:
Littleton and Nakashima are OK also by my book

ok., pass the embers.
Tom