un hinged.....
 

DaveS = un hinged dem clown....(another one )

Rip down your lie Mr. Beancounter.
 

On Jan 8, 6:27*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
DaveS = un hinged dem clown....(another one )

Beancounter you are pushing it. A liar is a liar is a liar. You have a
chance to admit your post was false. You might even have had reason to
believe who ever gave the turd to you was someone you trusted. But as
this situation demonstrates even folk with a tilt toward conservative
politics have a problem with your patently false, phony sourced, big
lie stuff. Especially when you lie using their name. Professor Olson
for example, See, if its your opinion, then I may disagree and think
what you say is true or false; but when you attribute to another
person falsely, that's a whole nuther level of hurt.

Stop and think about what you did. Your post was attributed to
Professor Olson, a law school prof, a National Rifle Association Board
member, a pro-gun lawyer and firearms instructor, who says clearly on
a Hemline University website that he . . .

"(I) did not author any part of either email. I've been trying to
kill this fallacy for nearly 10 years. I didn't have any part of it
in 2000 and I still have no
part of the email in regards to the 2008 election."

http://law.hamline.edu/node/784

How about this. You Email Professor Olson, show him what you posted
and attributed to him, and ask him if he said or wrote what you said
he did? That might shame you into being straight.

Or will you continue to dance around this flame of racist, neo-Fascism
that has so mesmerized you, that you lose even the ability to say "NO"
to the most preposterous falsified materials?

Dave

what a douche bag...........
 

what a douche bag ...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp

Thought we agreed to leave out profane stuff from the Subject line?
 

On Jan 8, 4:02*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
what a douche bag * *...

* * *http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp

I assume you just forgot, and that you plan to honor what you
promised, right?

Dave

"everything is bushes fault, waaa, waaaa, waaaa... " .......... (what the douch bag says yesterday )
 

a douch bag is not profane, it is a description of our
clown in chief...mm, mm, mm,




On Jan 8, 5:15*pm, DaveS wrote:
On Jan 8, 4:02*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:

what a douche bag * *...

* * *http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp

I assume you just forgot, and that you plan to honor what you
promised, right?

Dave

Rip down your lie Mr. Beancounter.
 

On Jan 8, 12:23*pm, DaveS wrote:
On Jan 8, 6:27*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:

DaveS = un hinged dem clown....(another one )

Beancounter you are pushing it. A liar is a liar is a liar. You have a
chance to admit your post was false. You might even have had reason to
believe who ever gave the turd to you was someone you trusted. But as
this situation demonstrates even folk with a tilt toward conservative
politics have a problem with your patently false, phony sourced, big
lie stuff. Especially when you lie using their name. Professor Olson
for example, See, if its your opinion, then I may disagree and think
what you say is true or false; but when you attribute to another
person falsely, that's a whole nuther level of hurt.

Stop and think about what you did. Your post was attributed to
Professor Olson, a law school prof, a National Rifle Association Board
member, a pro-gun lawyer and firearms instructor, who says clearly on
a Hemline University website that he . . .

"(I) did not author any part of either email. *I've been trying to
kill this fallacy for nearly 10 *years. *I didn't have any part of it
in 2000 and I still have no
part of the email in regards to the 2008 election."

http://law.hamline.edu/node/784

How about this. You Email Professor Olson, show him what you posted
and attributed to him, and ask him if he said or wrote what you said
he did? *That might shame you into being straight.

Or will you continue to dance around this flame of racist, neo-Fascism
that has so mesmerized you, that you lose even the ability to say "NO"
to the most preposterous falsified materials?

Dave

This saddens me greatly. I am, by default, a conservative, because
Libertarians, by definition, are incapable of organizing. As such, I
am embarrassed by those such as beanie, in the same way I am
embarrassed by the way that folks such as, for instance, MSNBC, will
invite a spokesman for the NRA on to present "fair share" views. They
invariably seek out a fat, sloppy bubba, dressed in camo fatigues,
with tobacco spittle on a shaggy beard, and s 250 word vocabulary as
representative of NRA members.

Sadly, beanie does the same for conservatives. An intelligent person
-- even a SEMI-intelligent person -- will admit to a mistake of fact,
regardless of what it does to a taken position. Interpretation of
facts, however, remain just that: interpretation, with all the biases,
misconceptions, preconceptions, and prejudices tagging along.

In sum: GROW THE **** UP, beanie, and act like an adult.

cheers

oz, always willing to help

yet another dem racist.........
 

[A]s Hillary bungled Caroline, Bill’s handling of Ted was even worse.
The day
after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making
the
case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner
that
deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a
friend,
Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would
have
been getting us coffee.

Rip down your lie Mr. Beancounter.
 

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...

This saddens me greatly. I am, by default, a conservative, because
Libertarians, by definition, are incapable of organizing. As such, I
am embarrassed by those such as beanie, in the same way I am
embarrassed by the way that folks such as, for instance, MSNBC, will
invite a spokesman for the NRA on to present "fair share" views. They
invariably seek out a fat, sloppy bubba, dressed in camo fatigues,
with tobacco spittle on a shaggy beard, and s 250 word vocabulary as
representative of NRA members.

Sadly, beanie does the same for conservatives. An intelligent person
-- even a SEMI-intelligent person -- will admit to a mistake of fact,
regardless of what it does to a taken position. Interpretation of
facts, however, remain just that: interpretation, with all the biases,
misconceptions, preconceptions, and prejudices tagging along.

In sum: GROW THE **** UP, beanie, and act like an adult.

cheers

oz, always willing to help

A conservative that I can appreciate!

Good on ya, Oz

Op

butt boy in the coffie shop....
 

[A]s Hillary bungled Caroline, Bill’s handling of Ted was even worse.
The day
after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making
the
case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a
manner
that
deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a
friend,
Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would
have
been getting us coffee.

butt boy in the coffie shop....
 

WASHINGTON – The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate apologized on
Saturday for comments he made about Barack Obama's race during the
2008 presidential bid and are quoted in a yet-to-be-released book
about the campaign.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then-
Sen. Barack Obama as "light skinned" and "with no Negro dialect,
unless he wanted to have one." Obama is the nation's first African-
American president.