![]() |
Farmed salmon
Mike Connor wrote:
You are quite correct of course. Shellfish farming is generally relatively harmless, indeed in many cases positively beneficial. Relatively large amounts of catfish ( pangasius) are being imported into Europe, and these are mainly grown on in rice paddies and similar. They are native to the Mekong Delta, among other places. ( I donīt like the taste of this, but many apparently do). On the international trade front, an interesting and entirely bizarre sidenote is that U.S. catfish farmers first brought action with the International Trade Commission (and also, I believe, with the WTO) to prevent East Asian (mainly Vietnamese) farmers from marketing Pangasius spp. in the U.S. under the name "catfish", because U.S. catfish are different species. They later brought a second action (and recently won) against the supposed "dumping" in the U.S. of Vietnamese catfish (i.e., Pangasius). JR |
Farmed salmon
"Mike Connor" Mike-Connor wrote in message
s.com... snip Research is being done into alternative feeds for salmonids and other more or less pure predators, but as usual, too little and too late! Unfortunately, at the present time, the massive use of wild fish protein outweighs any other feed. Plans are also afoot, and quite well advanced, to start whitefish farming at various locations in Europe. ( Cod). This will doubtless cause further havoc! TL MC FWIW I copied some information from a 1999 parliamentary report from Sth Australia following massive pilchard kills along the southern coast. I do not know if there is yet full agreement on the conclusion that the virus originated from contaminated pilchards imported from the Americas that were fed to caged bluefin tuna and snapper. At the very least this gives some indication of the potential problems that can result from relatively unregulated industries such as aquaculture. The consequences of similar outbreaks in the struggling cod population are quite frightening. Vaughan 2. PILCHARD DEATHS In 1995, and again in 1998, a massive number of pilchards died in the waters of southern Australia. The deaths began near Eyre Peninsula, South Australia, and spread east and west at a rate of approximately 30 km per day. The fish suffered from gill lesions that caused asphyxiation. It has been difficult to estimate the total volume of fish killed, however, SARDI estimates were that 65 000 tonnes of pilchards had been affected in 1998, compared with an estimated 40 000 tonnes in 1995. The Western Australian fishery authorities estimate that in 1998, 30% of the total biomass was removed. The pilchard kills in both 1995 and 1998 have been attributed to a Herpesvirus of unknown origin. The virus in both the 1995 and 1998 kills appears to be the same based on genetic analysis but this work has not been finalised. |
Farmed salmon
JR wrote:
... What IS the emoticon for tongue-in-cheek, anyway? ... It's not universal, but in some of the groups I frequent deliberate hyperbole, exaggeration for effect and tongue- in-cheek comments are enclosed in # ... #. For example I posted the following just the other day: # You military types are SO much smarter and SO much better at critical thinking and naturally you have access to SO much more information than all us mere civilians who just listen to sound bites with our heads up our asses. # HTH -- Ken Fortenberry |
Farmed salmon
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message gy.com... ...HTH #Immeasurably# :) Wolfgang |
Farmed salmon
"JR" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... SNIP On the international trade front, an interesting and entirely bizarre sidenote is that U.S. catfish farmers first brought action with the International Trade Commission (and also, I believe, with the WTO) to prevent East Asian (mainly Vietnamese) farmers from marketing Pangasius spp. in the U.S. under the name "catfish", because U.S. catfish are different species. They later brought a second action (and recently won) against the supposed "dumping" in the U.S. of Vietnamese catfish (i.e., Pangasius). JR I believe there are moves afoot to do something similar here, as the term "Catfish" here is synonymous with "Wels". ( Silurus glanis). I have a vague recollection of reading a short article about the impending forced removal of the term "catfish" from the packaging, ( because it misrepresented the contents), but it is a while ago now, and I canīt remember where I read it, or in what precise connection. There has been some mild unrest about the sale of this stuff here, but not sufficient to upset many, or make any headlines. The only real fish farming of any volume here ( freshwater) is carp, and salmonids, with some eels. The eels are only reared from elvers. As yet, nobody has found a way to get them to breed in captivity. They are in any case in severe decline. Actually, there is a very great deal of misrepresentation on fish packaging. All sorts of weird and wonderful names are thought up by the industry to make various things more acceptable to consumers. The German terms would mean nothing to you, but the same thing goes on in the UK, with terms like "Rock salmon", and others. There are no such animals, these are names made up by the industry. TL MC |
Farmed salmon
"Vaughan Hurry" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... SNIP FWIW I copied some information from a 1999 parliamentary report from Sth Australia following massive pilchard kills along the southern coast. I do not know if there is yet full agreement on the conclusion that the virus originated from contaminated pilchards imported from the Americas that were fed to caged bluefin tuna and snapper. At the very least this gives some indication of the potential problems that can result from relatively unregulated industries such as aquaculture. The consequences of similar outbreaks in the struggling cod population are quite frightening. Vaughan SNIP I have seen some reports on these and other kills, but as you say, they were actually inconclusive. Nevertheless, it is highly likely that infected feed was the cause of the problem you mentioned, and of others, and even without absolutely conclusive proof, one would imagine that at least some precautions would be taken in future. Indeed, the prospect of similar havoc being wreaked on the already struggling cod stocks is very sobering indeed. Bass stocks are also on the verge of extinction, ( although this is due mainly to overfishing). There are quite a few stocks of various fish in various places which are endangered for a number of reasons. Even mild outbreaks of any new "artificial" diseases in the whitefish populations would be devastating. Quite apart from all the subjects covered in this thread, pollution, and eutrophication are also major problems which must be addressed. If one waits for all the studies to be conclusively concluded before taking action, or introducing regulatory measures, there will be no point anyway, the problem will have solved itself, as there will be no fish left to worry about. In the light of the problems caused by sea-farming generally, conclusively proven or otherwise, it is absolute madness to embark on ventures like cod farming, etc. Hopefully it can be nipped in the bud, but things are not looking too good right now. Unfortunately, common sense does not often prevail against greed. TL MC |
Farmed salmon
"Willi" wrote in message ... Greg Pavlov wrote: There are degrees of separation betw marine and land animal husbandry, but many fewer than you indicate. You grew up with the former firmly in place, so it is a given. The former has been going on for many thousand years. These animals are now domesticated and methods of safely raising them has been well worked out and even then things like Mad Cow do crop up... Safely? Hm......ever been to the southwestern U.S? Saharan Africa? Central Asia? the Middle East? Seen pictures, perhaps? Wolfgang who, though not entirely content with the world, is at least glad that he is not a grass nor an herbaceous plant. |
Farmed salmon
"Willi" wrote in message ... SNIP World wide, however, things are not as good. Many of the developing Countries around the world are exploiting their natural resources in ways similar to what we did during the Industrial Revolution. Actually I think there is a big difference in the chemistry of "our" industrial revolution pollution and the industrial pppollution of the industrialization of the 2nd and third world. Example: plastics/polymers and even simple chemicals like household clorine played a very small role in "our" IR, where as they are major in the IR going on today. The 2 situations ARE similar as far as wood and paper making (clorine etc) waste, tanneries, meat packing and similar are concerned. perhaps someone on the board has more specifics. Dave |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004 - 2006 FishingBanter