![]() |
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
wrote in message ps.com... rw wrote: wrote: You should know better. Fishing will not be banned, only golfing for fish will be banned. Fishing for sound biological management reasons will never be banned. What make you think that C&R trout fishing isn't a sound biological management practice in many cases? It's never, ever necessary. A 'practical; slot limit can be set just above or below the target. Imagine a 1 trout over 5 pounds limit, for example. Far more defensable to fish for food than to fish for fun, again, the Norwegians explain this better than I can. That's because for those of us who read only English, their explanations (in the original) are a great deal more comprehensible than yours. Wolfgang |
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
wrote in message ps.com... It's never, ever necessary. A 'practical; slot limit can be set just above or below the target. Imagine a 1 trout over 5 pounds limit, for example. Far more defensable to fish for food than to fish for fun, again, the Norwegians explain this better than I can. Your pal, TBone A cash flow runs through it When I fished Alaska, I got a chance to talk with the locals. When I mentioned catch and release, they laughed. Other than being upset with the outfitters, advertisements and hoards of fisherman that upset their rivers, they only fish to feed their families. On the river, we saw a boat with two Eskimos, husband and wife on our last day on the river, they caught one king salmon and that was it, back to home. They probably come out once a week for their catch. We also chat with Eskimos from the village of Quinhagak, Alaska, our last campout before pickup. I was amazed to see how primitive they still were, where the whole village still goes out to hunt whale. They actually ring a village bell when a whale is spotted off shore. Nothing is wasted of a whale when they catch them. fwiw, -tom |
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
|
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
|
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
|
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
Dave LaCourse wrote: On 31 Jul 2006 08:16:02 -0700, wrote: You MUST kill every brook trout, and you are required to release all Greenbacks. Now, when the greenbacks can withstand some mortality, that will be allowed. As it is, the culling of all the brook trout is beneficial, even considering the mortality of C&R. Uhhh, there ain't any greenbacks in the Rapid. There wouldn't have been any brookies either if the state didn't make it C&R. Really? Even if it had been limited fishing? Even if it had been 1 brook trout over 30 pounds? C'mon, I know you're smarter than this Dave. Regarding the "Breeding stock" - is there some problem in your drainage with the viability of eggs or the survivabilty of the fry, or is there some genetic predisposition towards smaller fish that is being compensated for. And what is the management goal, as many fish as possible of as many large fish as possible. Tim |
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
On 31 Jul 2006 11:55:33 -0700, wrote:
The fact that she has extreme views on man's relationship to animals is not a good argument for the simple fact that, when 250 million people are asked the question: Is it ethical to hurt, mutilate, deform, stress and kill a wild animal, solely for fun?", you will get at least 249,999,982 million "No's". The other 18 are the bedwetters that will grow up to be serial killers. Or rodeo cowboys... I think it's that simple. Simple is as simple does. -- Charlie... http://www.chocphoto.com |
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
|
On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter