OT For my good friend, Ken
 

OT For my good friend, Ken
 

For my good friend, Ken
 

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:15:05 -0400, jeff miller
wrote:

wrote:
On 15-Jun-2008, "Tim J." wrote:


I'd just appreciate it if YOU would read your posts before you hit the
send
button. It is a bit rude to gush nonsensical crap all over Usenet. Someone

has to clean up, you know. ;-)


Timmy my man!

Are you the usenet police again?
If so then go after those who post their politics on ROFF without an OT
'
Otherwise find something better to do than pull my chain
Work on your car?
Paint?
Pull your own chain?
Legthen your acronym list for ROFF or even masturbate.

My posts do make a modicum of sense to many in the English speaking world

Now if you do NOT like my politics, Timmy , or you do not like me or if you
really want to pull my chain - - Don't
waste my time
I do have better things to do than respond to your BS.
so
Instead - put your head in the toilet bowl and flush.

But really behind all the words what I am saying loud and clear is **** off!

Comprende hombre?
Es claro?

Fred

...and herein is the conundrum. of all the folks i know or have
experienced here, and despite his evenly-tempered republican affiliation
(which i attribute solely to some cosmic anomaly and for which i forgive
him easily), Tim is as fine and welcome a personality and individual on
this group as one is likely to find on the internet or anywhere else for
that matter. folks i've met, and whose opinion i value and who have
spent time with him in person, speak well of him. my own e-mail
communications with him also prove to me the incomparable balance and
worth of his opinions. frankly, if he said i was full of ****, i'd
trust his opinion and reassess my own conduct.

Um...if he were to declare you as being full of ****, then your opinion
of the folks whose opinions you value would be suspect...further, their
opinions would be suspect as they choose to not only associate with, but
opine to persons who acknowledge their own full-of-****ness, albeit via
proxy...therefore, it would seem that given the above you being full
of **** and all, the fact that you trust Tim's opinion based on the
afore-demonstrable suspect opinions of others, wouldn't mean ****
because Tim's opinion of your full-of-****ness might be full of ****...

That said, I don't need to know other folks' opinion(s) about Tim to
come right out and say that if he said you were full of ****, well,
****, I'd say that he knew his ****, too...oh, OK...G...

based on your writings
fred, and only on your writings here (a very, very poor indicator, in my
personal experience...but all i have), you're full of **** fred.

Yeah, OK, so there is THAT...

think
about it...or don't. comprendre indeed...

PIE A LA MODE! CAFE SIN LECHE! MANGIA, MANGIA!

TC,
R

jeff

OT For my good friend, Ken
 

wrote:
On 15-Jun-2008, "Tim J." wrote:

I'd just appreciate it if YOU would read your posts before you hit
the send button. It is a bit rude to gush nonsensical crap all over
Usenet. Someone has to clean up, you know. ;-)

Timmy my man!

Are you the usenet police again?

All I'm saying, Fred, is this place is one where what you write is
important. It is the only means anyone here has to judge your stance or
understand what you're saying. A typo here or there is not the problem with
your posts. Most of the time I have to read them several times before I can
even venture a guess at what you're trying to say. Slow down, read what you
wrote, adjust it so the points are clear, and THEN hit send.

If so then go after those who post their politics on ROFF without an
OT '

Posting politics without OT in the subject isn't that big of a deal, and,
IMHO just stating OT doesn't make it okay to post anything you want. Go back
through all ROFF's posts over the years, and you'll find precious little
regarding my politics. I've made enough forays into some of the political
threads so my politics aren't a secret, and that's about all. The people
here know I dress to the right - so what. I can't help it if all those
left-dressers are dead wrong. ;-)

Otherwise find something better to do than pull my chain
Work on your car?
Paint?
Pull your own chain?
Legthen your acronym list for ROFF

DAMN! I should have known you were writing in acronyms. Can you go back and
explain them to me?

or even masturbate.

Hmmmm . . . got a thing for masturbation today, have we?

My posts do make a modicum of sense to many in the English speaking
world

Shall we take a vote? ;-)

Now if you do NOT like my politics, Timmy , or you do not like me or
if you really want to pull my chain - - Don't waste my time

sigh Once again, this has nothing to do with your politics. If you want to
damn Dick Cheney to a life of boils and pestilence, go ahead (not that you
haven't done this on an almost daily basis), but please make sure I can
understand what you wrote. THEN I can tell you you're full of **** for
something other than your communication skills.

I do have better things to do than respond to your BS. so
Instead - put your head in the toilet bowl and flush.

But really behind all the words what I am saying loud and clear is
**** off!

Nope. I'll be right here waiting for your next set of instructions.

Comprende hombre?
Es claro?

Well, I think you made yourself clear (?) to me, and have probably exposed
some deep nastiness you didn't intend to others here as well.
--
TL,
Tim
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

OT For my good friend, Ken
 

jeff miller wrote:
wrote:
On 15-Jun-2008, "Tim J." wrote:


I'd just appreciate it if YOU would read your posts before you hit
the send
button. It is a bit rude to gush nonsensical crap all over Usenet.
Someone has to clean up, you know. ;-)


Timmy my man!

Are you the usenet police again?
If so then go after those who post their politics on ROFF without
an OT '
Otherwise find something better to do than pull my chain
Work on your car?
Paint?
Pull your own chain?
Legthen your acronym list for ROFF or even masturbate.

My posts do make a modicum of sense to many in the English speaking
world Now if you do NOT like my politics, Timmy , or you do not like me
or
if you really want to pull my chain - - Don't
waste my time
I do have better things to do than respond to your BS.
so
Instead - put your head in the toilet bowl and flush.

But really behind all the words what I am saying loud and clear is
**** off! Comprende hombre?
Es claro?

Fred

...and herein is the conundrum. of all the folks i know or have
experienced here, and despite his evenly-tempered republican
affiliation (which i attribute solely to some cosmic anomaly and for
which i forgive him easily), Tim is as fine and welcome a personality
and individual on this group as one is likely to find on the internet
or anywhere else for that matter. folks i've met, and whose opinion
i value and who have spent time with him in person, speak well of
him. my own e-mail communications with him also prove to me the
incomparable balance and worth of his opinions. frankly, if he said
i was full of ****, i'd trust his opinion and reassess my own
conduct. based on your writings fred, and only on your writings here
(a very, very poor indicator, in my personal experience...but all i
have), you're full of **** fred. think about it...or don't. comprendre
indeed...

Wow. I'm going to have to meet this Tim guy one of these days. He sounds
like a great fella! ;-)

Thanks, Jeff. It may not all be true, but it was nice to read anyway. . .
and, it goes without saying ('tho that never stopped me before) that I've
never found you to be full of ****. Wrong-minded, yes, but not full of ****.
;-)
--
TL,
Tim
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

For my good friend, Ken
 

"salmobytes" wrote in message
. ..
Dave LaCourse wrote:


I spent 20 years in the Navy with blacks, some of them very dear
friends. There are other stories in my life concerning the N word,
but why should I repeat them? You wouldn't believe me, would you?
And the use of African American, or Black, or Negro, or Colored is but
a change in the way we address African Americans. It has nothing to
do with PC and everything to do with how you were brought up and your
own actions as an adult..

Dave


I do believe you Dave. I believe you hate the n-word the same way I do.
Which means you practice PC. That was my point.

Are you sure you are not confusing PC and non-bigot?

john

For my good friend, Ken
 

salmobytes wrote:
salmobytes wrote:
........Too much off topic stuff about the war.

This is pretty hot stuff. I still get smoke coming out of my ears
now, some 40 years later, when ever I think about it. And yet a lot
of readers managed to weigh in and say what they think without resorting
to flames and insults. That part was gratifying.
I respect Dave LaCourse. I don't agree with much he has to say
politically. But I do respect him (redneck mf that he is).

OT For my good friend, Ken
 

wrote in message
...
Hmmm...to paraphrase Sol Wachtler, if a halfway decent prosecutor can
get an average grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, it would seem a
bunch of tubesteaks could impeach any President with nothing but
baloney...and as with most tubesteaks and bologna, one would be left
asking, "where's the beef...?"

that was my thinking.....sort of.

And lastly, there's the numerous potential dangers in it - for example,
if something particularly ugly had been found, but kept secret for
security reasons, can you imagine the backlash if the House attempted to
impeach and had their case totally destroyed? Or worse, suppose the
ranking/entitled members already know, yet allow something to move
forward?

Rick, you're overanalyzing here, I think.....still and all, there certainly
IS a track record for impeaching with a shaky, almost non-existent chance
for conviction. When all is said and done, though, any talk of impeachment 7
1/2 years into an 8 year term is political theater, and all concerned here
know it.
Tom

OT For my good friend, Ken
 

wrote in message
...
Timmy my man!

Are you the usenet police again?
If so then go after those who post their politics on ROFF without an OT
'
Otherwise find something better to do than pull my chain

if there are Usenet rules of ANY type, number 1 might be:
Don't tell others what to do or not do. It's asking for trouble.



My posts do make a modicum of sense to many in the English speaking world


ahh, here's where the problem lies. You believe the above. Sadly, you are
mistaken. Many of your posts are nonsensical gibberish that either annoys,
insults or bores
those attempting to give you the respect required to read it. Sorry if that
statement cuts, but go back and call up your own posts and try to read them
cold.

But really behind all the words what I am saying loud and clear is ****
off!

Comprende hombre?
Es claro?


nice touch. Extra points for gibberish in more than one language!
Tom

OT For my good friend, Ken
 

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:07:30 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
Hmmm...to paraphrase Sol Wachtler, if a halfway decent prosecutor can
get an average grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, it would seem a
bunch of tubesteaks could impeach any President with nothing but
baloney...and as with most tubesteaks and bologna, one would be left
asking, "where's the beef...?"

that was my thinking.....sort of.

And lastly, there's the numerous potential dangers in it - for example,
if something particularly ugly had been found, but kept secret for
security reasons, can you imagine the backlash if the House attempted to
impeach and had their case totally destroyed? Or worse, suppose the
ranking/entitled members already know, yet allow something to move
forward?

Rick, you're overanalyzing here, I think

Maybe, but see below...

.....still and all, there certainly
IS a track record for impeaching with a shaky, almost non-existent chance
for conviction. When all is said and done, though, any talk of impeachment 7
1/2 years into an 8 year term is political theater, and all concerned here
know it.

Talk of impeachment at any point in Bush's time in office thus far would
have been "political theater" (which is not the same thing as me
offering any opinion on Bush's Presidency beyond the evidence required
to impeach). But are you suggesting that most members of the House are
above political theater? I'd offer that if the Dems thought they had a
decent script, they'd have happily struck up the band and began singing
"Springtime for Hussein" (with all the Dem Reps doing the can-can,
forming a big spinning Scud launcher). Unfortunately for them, the
script they have would make "Showgirls Go To Ishtar" (A Bialystock/Bloom
Production, Directed by Roger De Brise) look like "To Kill A
Mockingbird."

TC,
R


Tom