Obama's gone and done it
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
snip

. There's more "honor" in a big, stinking
pile of John Kerry's **** than in all the ****ing swiftboaters
combined.
Snip

Ken Fortenberry

Yeah, I guess that statements like the above don't quite reach the level of
cannonization.

Bob Weinberger



** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Obama's gone and done it
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
I'd say the same damn
thing if a group of scumbags tried to smear John McCain's military
service.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Actually many did (including some in ROFF)but you were silent on that issue.
Though because they supported your cause, I guess that you didn't consider
them scumbags.

Bob Weinberger


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Obama's gone and done it
 

Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
There's more "honor" in a big, stinking
pile of John Kerry's **** than in all the ****ing swiftboaters
combined.
Snip

Yeah, I guess that statements like the above don't quite reach the level of
cannonization.

That wasn't canonizing Kerry, that was insulting swiftboaters.
You could substitute a big, stinking pile of my own **** and
that too would have more "honor" than all the swiftboaters
combined.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Obama's gone and done it
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...

That wasn't canonizing Kerry, that was insulting swiftboaters.
You could substitute a big, stinking pile of my own **** and
that too would have more "honor" than all the swiftboaters
combined.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Yeah, I guess its some solace to you that your **** tries to make up for
your own deficiencies ;).

Bob Weinberger


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Obama's gone and done it
 

Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
That wasn't canonizing Kerry, that was insulting swiftboaters.
You could substitute a big, stinking pile of my own **** and
that too would have more "honor" than all the swiftboaters
combined.

Yeah, I guess its some solace to you that your **** tries to make up for
your own deficiencies ;).

At least my ****, unlike your own, doesn't find its way to roff. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

Obama's gone and done it
 

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...

At least my ****, unlike your own, doesn't find its way to roff. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry


Lie detector \..............................!/ .

BTW a few posts back you stated "And as for blind partisanship, I'd say the
same damn thing if a group of scumbags tried to smear John McCain's military
service." That is an outright lie. Many (including several right here on
roff ) did exactly that, while your silence in response was deafening. But,
in your defense, I guess that, because they shared your blind partisanship,
you didn't consider them scumbags.

Bob Weinberger


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Obama's gone and done it
 

Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
At least my ****, unlike your own, doesn't find its way to roff. ;-)

Lie detector \..............................!/ .

BTW a few posts back you stated "And as for blind partisanship, I'd say the
same damn thing if a group of scumbags tried to smear John McCain's military
service." That is an outright lie. Many (including several right here on
roff ) did exactly that, while your silence in response was deafening.

I don't recall any smears of McCain's military service being posted
to roff. Did someone accuse McCain of being a traitor or a glory
hound or of calling his dress whites a polyester leisure suit from
the '70's ? You know, dishonoring his uniform ? If so, I don't recall
it. There were some questions raised about his competence as a pilot
since he wrecked more than his fair share of airplanes but I don't
recall any smears.

But,
in your defense, I guess that, because they shared your blind partisanship,
you didn't consider them scumbags.

If anybody lied about McCain's military service on roff then they
are scumbags and I was remiss in not saying so, but I don't recall
that happening.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Obama's gone and done it
 

DaveS wrote:
On Nov 20, 10:24 am, Peaceful Bill
wrote:
SNIP

You are just one of those folks who cannot admit you've made a
mistake. Here we've got one damn mess and instead of adapting, bozos
like you keep ****ing into the wind, searching and stretching common
sense and twisting new info in some pathetic and endless insistence
that you were right all along and isn't it just like you say it is.


Did I ever say that Bush made no mistakes? That Bush is the greatest
president in the history of the U.S.? What I have said is that some of
his mistakes were blown out of proportion and that he gets the blame for
problems created either 1 outside his control, or 2 before he took
office. Bush made some serious blunders. No doubt. Many of the
problems (particularly economic) that we have today were created during
previous administrations (not just Clinton), Bush just didn't take
action to fix them. And that is inexcusable.


[snip of lines of even more ideological disagreement accompanied with demeaning comparisons and stereotyping]


There are several folks here who I radically disagree with, some who
also advance some of the same bankrupt nonsense as yourself, but their
contributions on the fishing side and on the comradeship side
constitute a worthwhile package of a person. You may be a great guy
in person, but until you come up with some fishing content to balance
out your bull****, I will resist responding to your stuff. Plonk.

Dave
And I will focus more on the fishing side of ROFF

Admit I was wrong? Let's look at some of the outrageous statements made
that you seem to find OK:

"Bush drowned a city."

Bush had nothing to do with drowning a city. The levee broke during a
hurricane. That's what drowned N.O. There was a slow response from
FEMA. That does seem to be Bush's responsibility. But he did not bomb
the levee.

"Bush lost an American city."

See above. The city was flooded. Bush did not flood N.O.

"Bush lied."

If that were so, he would have been impeached. And if he did, so did
every one of his predecessors. Was he the worst? Hell, no. Try
Johnson. So why is Bush singled out for this? Ideology.

"Bush is the worst president in history"

Well, that is highly subjective, but its hard to ignore the MASSIVE
failings and corruption under Carter. IMO, Carter holds that position
until someone dethrones him. And even in his worst of days, Bush is not
even close to Carter. More like somewhere between Johnson and Nixon.

"Bankrupt nonsense"

Another ideologically inspired comment as much as if I would say the
same about liberal ideals.


All these exaggerated accusations are simply partisan mush from those
who are ideologically opposed to Bush. I expect to read the same kind
of partisan criticisms about Obama. In fact, its already out there and
he hasn't even taken office yet.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not here to say that Bush was a great
president. Far from it. He was not good at all. But he was not the
worst.


I have posted flyfishing info. You seem to ignore that. I haven't had
as much time fishing as I would have liked. My job, before retirement,
kept me on the road a lot more than I would have preferred, but I still
got out a few times a year (mostly Alaska). I am hoping to increase
on-water time in the future.