OT The Nature of Evil
 

Tim J. wrote:
GregP wrote:

Tim J. wrote:

He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)


A "conspiracy ?"


Yup - I'm assuming there was a female involved.


I guess that's what the RNC does to the faithful.


I wouldn't know. You'll have to to find out from one of them.

I agree with Tim on this one, and disagree with BJ Connor. BTW, I also
agree with John Kerry. Democrats (or liberals or whatever you want to
call them) shouldn't criticize Cheney's Vietnam-era deferments. After
all, Cheney himself said he "had other priorities," and I take him at
his word. He obviously had different priorities than Kerry, who served
"nobly," according to Bush.


--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

OT The Nature of Evil
 

Tim J. wrote:
GregP wrote:

Tim J. wrote:

He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)


A "conspiracy ?"


Yup - I'm assuming there was a female involved.


I guess that's what the RNC does to the faithful.


I wouldn't know. You'll have to to find out from one of them.

I agree with Tim on this one, and disagree with BJ Connor. BTW, I also
agree with John Kerry. Democrats (or liberals or whatever you want to
call them) shouldn't criticize Cheney's Vietnam-era deferments. After
all, Cheney himself said he "had other priorities," and I take him at
his word. He obviously had different priorities than Kerry, who served
"nobly," according to Bush.


--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

OT The Nature of Evil
 

rw wrote:
Tim J. wrote:
GregP wrote:
Tim J. wrote:

He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)

A "conspiracy ?"

Yup - I'm assuming there was a female involved.

I guess that's what the RNC does to the faithful.

I wouldn't know. You'll have to to find out from one of them.

I agree with Tim on this one . . .

Aw, ****! Now I have to rethink my whole position. :)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

OT The Nature of Evil
 

On 3 Sep 2004 20:20:08 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:


Greg do you seriously think that Tim would actually do any research
whatsoever to check out the character of the guy he was told to vote for?


Actually, yes, I do. But that doesn't mean that he believes
anything he reads :-)

OT The Nature of Evil
 

On 3 Sep 2004 20:20:08 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:


Greg do you seriously think that Tim would actually do any research
whatsoever to check out the character of the guy he was told to vote for?


Actually, yes, I do. But that doesn't mean that he believes
anything he reads :-)

OT The Nature of Evil
 

GregP wrote:
On 3 Sep 2004 20:20:08 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:


Greg do you seriously think that Tim would actually do any research
whatsoever to check out the character of the guy he was told to vote
for?

Actually, yes, I do. But that doesn't mean that he believes
anything he reads :-)

Very little, and certainly not much from roff. ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

OT The Nature of Evil
 

GregP wrote:
On 3 Sep 2004 20:20:08 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:


Greg do you seriously think that Tim would actually do any research
whatsoever to check out the character of the guy he was told to vote
for?

Actually, yes, I do. But that doesn't mean that he believes
anything he reads :-)

Very little, and certainly not much from roff. ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

OT The Nature of Evil
 

"Conan the Librarian" wrote in message
...
Wolfgang wrote:

Not only for business. War is also immensely popular as
entertainment. We owe our survival as a species to the fact that
historically war has been second only to sex as a leisure time
activity. For the moment, making babies is still more popular than
incinerating and exploding them. But, it's a precarious balance that
could, especially in this day of weapons of mass destruction in the
hands of immoral and irresponsible idiots, tip at any moment.

I think you're being a little hard on Dubya.

Hm.......well, let's see. It's got LaCourse's love of peace, Findley's
razor intellect, Barnard's respect for humanity, Janik's compassion and
literacy, Snedeker's keen grasp of the global geopolitical scene......and
Kennie's stupiferous command of the language. So.....um.....no, on the
whole I'd say that I've accorded the muderous imbecile a great deal more
respect and consideration than it has deserved. I'll work on that.

Chuck Vance (or is that Cheney ... or Rumsfeld ... or all of the
above?)

I'm no authority on maggots with which I've had no contact.. I'll leave
them to their above mentioned brethren.

Wolfgang

OT The Nature of Evil
 

"Conan the Librarian" wrote in message
...
Wolfgang wrote:

Not only for business. War is also immensely popular as
entertainment. We owe our survival as a species to the fact that
historically war has been second only to sex as a leisure time
activity. For the moment, making babies is still more popular than
incinerating and exploding them. But, it's a precarious balance that
could, especially in this day of weapons of mass destruction in the
hands of immoral and irresponsible idiots, tip at any moment.

I think you're being a little hard on Dubya.

Hm.......well, let's see. It's got LaCourse's love of peace, Findley's
razor intellect, Barnard's respect for humanity, Janik's compassion and
literacy, Snedeker's keen grasp of the global geopolitical scene......and
Kennie's stupiferous command of the language. So.....um.....no, on the
whole I'd say that I've accorded the muderous imbecile a great deal more
respect and consideration than it has deserved. I'll work on that.

Chuck Vance (or is that Cheney ... or Rumsfeld ... or all of the
above?)

I'm no authority on maggots with which I've had no contact.. I'll leave
them to their above mentioned brethren.

Wolfgang

OT The Nature of Evil
 

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 10:31:17 -0400, GregP
wrote:

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:34:01 -0500, George Cleveland
wrote:


You *did* say I hadn't been posting here enough lately Greg and Cyli,
didn't you?

Noooo, I didn't say that. I said that your posts didn't
seem to be making much of an impression, given
that Cyli said you hadn't been around in a while :-)

That is quite different from what I stated, isn't it. Sor..ooops.


g.c.