![]() |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
"Wayne Knight" wrote in message oups.com... On Nov 9, 12:08 pm, "Wolfgang" wrote: Man sagt auch schleppen................... Ist wohl nicht sonderlich bekannt in Amerika, aber fast jeder hier benutzt es. Nur um es klarzustellen......... As you yourself have pointed out on several occasions, the bulk of the readers and writers in r.o.f.f. are American. It should come as no surprise that we communicate in American English. In discussing "Trailing" He essentially said "one sometimes uses the term dragging, it not particularly well known (our used) in America but almost everyone here (europe) uses it. I see. Does he say anything about why he thinks this is germane? Just to clear things up." Once again, clarity is likely to have profoundly little effect on all of this......but thanks, anyway. :) Wayne I prefer the Umqua parachute hopper myself Never tried that one. I used to use a foam bodied variation of the Letort. Fast and easy to tie, and it worked well enough, but esthetically lacking. These days I don't bother with a lot of different patterns. Pretty much stick to the bullet head. Wolfgang |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:34:07 +0100, MC wrote:
Sorry about the e-mail. G-mail is acting up and I had to use another account, was incorrectly set up. Yeah. RW uses the same excuse. d;o) |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:08:37 -0800, Wayne Knight
wrote: On Nov 9, 12:08 pm, "Wolfgang" wrote: Man sagt auch schleppen................... Ist wohl nicht sonderlich bekannt in Amerika, aber fast jeder hier benutzt es. Nur um es klarzustellen......... As you yourself have pointed out on several occasions, the bulk of the readers and writers in r.o.f.f. are American. It should come as no surprise that we communicate in American English. In discussing "Trailing" He essentially said "one sometimes uses the term dragging, it not particularly well known (our used) in America but almost everyone here (europe) uses it. Just to clear things up." Wayne I prefer the Umqua parachute hopper myself He also said this: "One may troll with flies, ( actually, the correct term is still "trailing")," The correct term is "trolling". |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
"Mike" wrote in message ps.com... On 9 Nov, 20:09, "Wolfgang" wrote: "MC" wrote in message ... Wolfgang wrote: You thought right, but the fly in the link is not a Joeīs Hopper, Ah! My mistake. I thought the label up near the top of the page.....the one that says, "Joe's Hopper".....referred to the fly pictured on that page, the fly that looks just like the Joe's Hoppers I used to to tie.....and use.....quite successfully. it is a variation with a chenille or wool body. Oh dear, outfoxed again! Wolfgang who confesses to despair at ever figuring out what folks think they gain from pretending to believe that they fool anyone. Some things are quite frustrating. Ain't it the truth? I canīt figure out why people might prefer humble bull**** to simple facts. But you have no trouble at all pretending to believe they prefer pompous bull**** (and outright lies) to either. Go figure. It says "India" on many car tyres, but they donīt all come from there. Profundity, thy name is mikie. Wolfgang The only way to know what or why the might prefer something is to ask them, or attempt to discover it from what they write. All these thousands of years of philosophizing.......and it took till now for someone to think of that. Ain't it a wonderment? Ain't you? Of course, that presupposes that they even know what they prefer and why, and that they are capable of expressing it, or even understanding the question, sadly not often the case with some here. So it seems. You calling me a liar does not make it so. No, but your lies do. I donīt pretend to believe anything. Thus leading one to the inescapable conclusion that you believe the things you write here. Learning can lead to dismal results, ainna? Pompous or otherwise, which incidentally is mostly in the mind of the reader, especially in this medium, facts are facts, and bull**** is bull****. Well, as the sole proprietor of facts, this leaves you in a position that most people wouldn't find such a miserable burden. Makes you wonder, don't it? Quite apart from anything else, it really is quite funny when you, Fortenberry, or a couple of others, hold forth on pomposity, especially in the pompous manner to which you are apparently accustomed. Doesn't bother me much. I have it from an unimpeachable source that pomposity is mostly in the mind of the reader. Wolfgang |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
On Nov 9, 2:43 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:08:37 -0800, Wayne Knight The correct term is .... The correct term for you is whatever you use and the correct term for Mr. Connor is whatever term he uses. More often I've heard the term trolling used but I've also heard the term trailing used. I never heard the term drag used except when recovery teams would drag the bottom to find property and bodies. At the end of the day what does it matter other than a reason to post a bunch of posts excerbating an already bad situation? I always thought Mike's use of "fly dressing" instead of fly tying was kind of holier than thou until I had more exposure to some European tiers, both in person and via correspondence and they all use the term dressing instead of tying. I've started many a time to challenge him on it and in the end I am glad I didn't because my cultural experiences took it in a way that it was not being intended. That we all fish different waters, often have different preferences- including the posting of trip reports, and use different terms does not make one "right", just different. Drop the hard-ons for a moment and think about the cultural and life experience variances. It's really hard to discuss the merits of the message when the messenger is going to be eviserated first. Calling a person mistaken and calling a person a liar is basically saying the person is wrong and they may be, but which would you rather be called? My 1/10th of Ken's 20 cents worth. But then again, Wolfgang used a foam bodied hopper imitation and I'd rather aplogize on Roff than use a foam bodied trout fly. And I'd rather fish live bait than use any chenile on a dry fly. g |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
On 9 Nov, 22:50, Wayne Knight wrote:
On Nov 9, 2:43 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:08:37 -0800, Wayne Knight The correct term is .... The correct term for you is whatever you use and the correct term for Mr. Connor is whatever term he uses. More often I've heard the term trolling used but I've also heard the term trailing used. I never heard the term drag used except when recovery teams would drag the bottom to find property and bodies. At the end of the day what does it matter other than a reason to post a bunch of posts excerbating an already bad situation? I always thought Mike's use of "fly dressing" instead of fly tying was kind of holier than thou until I had more exposure to some European tiers, both in person and via correspondence and they all use the term dressing instead of tying. I've started many a time to challenge him on it and in the end I am glad I didn't because my cultural experiences took it in a way that it was not being intended. That we all fish different waters, often have different preferences- including the posting of trip reports, and use different terms does not make one "right", just different. Drop the hard-ons for a moment and think about the cultural and life experience variances. It's really hard to discuss the merits of the message when the messenger is going to be eviserated first. Calling a person mistaken and calling a person a liar is basically saying the person is wrong and they may be, but which would you rather be called? My 1/10th of Ken's 20 cents worth. But then again, Wolfgang used a foam bodied hopper imitation and I'd rather aplogize on Roff than use a foam bodied trout fly. And I'd rather fish live bait than use any chenile on a dry fly. g At one time, people differentiated between "trolling and trailing" ( Some still do) in that trolling required weight on the line. Trailing did not. However that may be, nice to hear a balanced point of view. I do like some foam flies a lot, but I agree with you on the chenille! :) TL MC |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:23:54 -0800, Mike
wrote: Quite apart from anything else, it really is quite funny when you, Fortenberry, or a couple of others, hold forth on pomposity, especially in the pompous manner to which you are apparently accustomed. Mike, afaik, no one except you tells another person that the fly he has been successful with is "no good". Nor does anyone correct someone's use of a valid word, "trolling". You are a pompous, arrogant ass, and your posts prove it time and time again. "If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging." LaCourse |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:50:46 -0800, Wayne Knight
wrote: That we all fish different waters, often have different preferences- including the posting of trip reports, and use different terms does not make one "right", just different. Drop the hard-ons for a moment and think about the cultural and life experience variances. It's really hard to discuss the merits of the message when the messenger is going to be eviserated first. Calling a person mistaken and calling a person a liar is basically saying the person is wrong and they may be, but which would you rather be called? I can appreciate that, Wayne. However if I was to tell you that you were using an incorrect word to describe an action, I believe you would find fault with it. We, in the U.S., call it trolling. "Trailing" is NOT the correct word as far as Americans are concerned. To tell someone that trolling is the wrong word is simply being arrogant. I called Willi a liar because it was not the truth. I should have called him incorrect. My bad and I will apologize to him. Dave |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
On 9 Nov, 23:22, Dave LaCourse wrote:
I called Willi a liar because it was not the truth. I should have called him incorrect. My bad and I will apologize to him. Dave You lied LaCourse, and you are still lying. The crap you write is also incredibly childish and boring. MC |
Newbie Question: What hopper pattern?
Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:24:19 -0500, jeff wrote: "trail": [def. #14] - "to fish by trailing a line from a moving boat; troll." I stand corrected on the dictionary fact. It is, however, not called trailing in the U.S. And I believe you know that. Dave i have always called and known it as trolling...don't know if everybody in the u.s. calls it the same, but that may be true. still, i had no difficulty accepting "trailing" as accurate, nor did i have a visceral response to the statement as made by its author. i suspect there may be an interesting etymology lesson behind the words. jeff |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004 - 2006 FishingBanter