I miss
 

seeing Joe Fleischman here. Has anyone heard anything from the fire
juggler?
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

I miss
 

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

seeing Joe Fleischman here. Has anyone heard anything from the fire
juggler?

I asked this question about a month ago and no
one around at that point knew anything.

I miss
 

GregP wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

seeing Joe Fleischman here. Has anyone heard anything from the fire
juggler?

I asked this question about a month ago and no
one around at that point knew anything.

That means I gave you a whole month to find him. Any luck? ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

I miss
 

GregP wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

seeing Joe Fleischman here. Has anyone heard anything from the fire
juggler?

I asked this question about a month ago and no
one around at that point knew anything.

That means I gave you a whole month to find him. Any luck? ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

I miss
 

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:41:39 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

That means I gave you a whole month to find him. Any luck? ;-)


I reported him to John A, told him that Joe was a high-tech
programmer who suspiciously mucked around with sheep
for a hobby, and they're hard at work trying to find him. Of
course, it's not clear that anyone will ever know if they find
him ("material witness" and all that).

Now aren't you glad you asked ?

I miss
 

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:41:39 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

That means I gave you a whole month to find him. Any luck? ;-)


I reported him to John A, told him that Joe was a high-tech
programmer who suspiciously mucked around with sheep
for a hobby, and they're hard at work trying to find him. Of
course, it's not clear that anyone will ever know if they find
him ("material witness" and all that).

Now aren't you glad you asked ?

I miss
 

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

seeing Joe Fleischman here. Has anyone heard anything from the fire
juggler?


And I suppose it's time to mention Bob Weinburger, too. He came to
the Driftless Clave and now seems to have drifted away immediately
thereafter. That's over a month ago. BTW, I don't recall seeing
George Cleveland posting the last couple of weeks, either, but he
might be off on a vacation with the family.

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

I miss
 

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 02:52:56 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

BTW, I don't recall seeing
George Cleveland posting the last couple of weeks, either, but he
might be off on a vacation with the family.

He posted a few times within the last week. Not very
memorably, I gather.

I miss
 

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:23:29 -0400, GregP
wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 02:52:56 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

BTW, I don't recall seeing
George Cleveland posting the last couple of weeks, either, but he
might be off on a vacation with the family.

He posted a few times within the last week. Not very
memorably, I gather.


Hmmm... Actually I've been busy doing espionage for the Canadian
government. After Bush announces his big push for the Cato Institutes
"Ownership Society" tonight and people are left without any employer
health insurance (other than a little lump sum and maybe a $1000 check
from the U.S. and the admonishment to "Go buy your own") we feel the
time will be right to take the northern tier of states back into the
folds of the Commonwealth.

God Save the Queen!

g.c.

I miss
 

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:23:29 -0400, GregP
wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 02:52:56 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

BTW, I don't recall seeing
George Cleveland posting the last couple of weeks, either, but he
might be off on a vacation with the family.

He posted a few times within the last week. Not very
memorably, I gather.


Hmmm... Actually I've been busy doing espionage for the Canadian
government. After Bush announces his big push for the Cato Institutes
"Ownership Society" tonight and people are left without any employer
health insurance (other than a little lump sum and maybe a $1000 check
from the U.S. and the admonishment to "Go buy your own") we feel the
time will be right to take the northern tier of states back into the
folds of the Commonwealth.

God Save the Queen!

g.c.

I miss
 

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


And I suppose it's time to mention Bob Weinburger, too.

I sent a message to Bob around a month ago and did not receive anything
back?

JT

I miss
 

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


And I suppose it's time to mention Bob Weinburger, too.

I sent a message to Bob around a month ago and did not receive anything
back?

JT

I miss
 

"Jeff Taylor" wrote in message
...

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


And I suppose it's time to mention Bob Weinburger, too.

I sent a message to Bob around a month ago and did not receive
anything
back?

Bob posted a message on Monday in answer to "Gary"'s question of
whether or not anyone had ever fished Cow Creek. He said "Yes".

He was right.

Wolfgang

I miss
 

"Jeff Taylor" wrote in message
...

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


And I suppose it's time to mention Bob Weinburger, too.

I sent a message to Bob around a month ago and did not receive
anything
back?

Bob posted a message on Monday in answer to "Gary"'s question of
whether or not anyone had ever fished Cow Creek. He said "Yes".

He was right.

Wolfgang

I miss
 

Hmmm... Actually I've been busy doing espionage for the Canadian
government. After Bush announces his big push for the Cato Institutes
"Ownership Society" tonight and people are left without any employer
health insurance (other than a little lump sum and maybe a $1000 check
from the U.S. and the admonishment to "Go buy your own") we feel the
time will be right to take the northern tier of states back into the
folds of the Commonwealth.

You can have Washington and Oregon, as long as we can keep Pennsylvania (I
like the fishing and the bears don't need socialized medicine). Also, if
you all take Mass., ya'll might finally get yourselves a decent hockey team.

--
Frank Reid
Reverse email to reply

I miss
 

Frank Reid wrote:
Hmmm... Actually I've been busy doing espionage for the Canadian
government. After Bush announces his big push for the Cato Institutes
"Ownership Society" tonight and people are left without any employer
health insurance (other than a little lump sum and maybe a $1000
check from the U.S. and the admonishment to "Go buy your own") we
feel the time will be right to take the northern tier of states back
into the folds of the Commonwealth.

You can have Washington and Oregon, as long as we can keep
Pennsylvania (I like the fishing and the bears don't need socialized
medicine). Also, if you all take Mass., ya'll might finally get
yourselves a decent hockey team.

Why? Is the Red Wing franchise moving to MA?
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

I miss
 

You can have Washington and Oregon, as long as we can keep
Pennsylvania (I like the fishing and the bears don't need socialized
medicine). Also, if you all take Mass., ya'll might finally get
yourselves a decent hockey team.

Why? Is the Red Wing franchise moving to MA?

Okay, amend that to a hockey team with a decent history. By the way, we'll
take that Montreal basabaroo team here down in DC if you don't mind.

--
Frank Reid
Reverse email to reply

I miss
 

You can have Washington and Oregon, as long as we can keep
Pennsylvania (I like the fishing and the bears don't need socialized
medicine). Also, if you all take Mass., ya'll might finally get
yourselves a decent hockey team.

Why? Is the Red Wing franchise moving to MA?

Okay, amend that to a hockey team with a decent history. By the way, we'll
take that Montreal basabaroo team here down in DC if you don't mind.

--
Frank Reid
Reverse email to reply

I miss
 

"Jeff Taylor" wrote in message
...

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


And I suppose it's time to mention Bob Weinburger, too.

I sent a message to Bob around a month ago and did not receive anything
back?

JT

I'm still here. Since I tend to avoid most word games and political BS, I
haven't had much to post.

Jeff,
I missed your message. We should still get together next month to chase some
chromers. I've been doing very well for large Browns on dries on the river
we fished together. I'll be gone from 9/17 to 10/8 ( 9/17-9/21 floating the
Klickitat for steelhead, 9/23-10/8 on Kodiak Is. for Silvers), but give me a
shout after I get back. The river should be prime then.


--
Bob Weinberger
La, Grande, OR

place a dot between bobs and stuff and remove invalid to send email

I miss
 

"Jeff Taylor" wrote in message
...

"Cyli" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:41:40 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


And I suppose it's time to mention Bob Weinburger, too.

I sent a message to Bob around a month ago and did not receive anything
back?

JT

I'm still here. Since I tend to avoid most word games and political BS, I
haven't had much to post.

Jeff,
I missed your message. We should still get together next month to chase some
chromers. I've been doing very well for large Browns on dries on the river
we fished together. I'll be gone from 9/17 to 10/8 ( 9/17-9/21 floating the
Klickitat for steelhead, 9/23-10/8 on Kodiak Is. for Silvers), but give me a
shout after I get back. The river should be prime then.


--
Bob Weinberger
La, Grande, OR

place a dot between bobs and stuff and remove invalid to send email

I miss
 

"Frank Reid" moc.deepselbac@diersicnarf wrote in message
...
Hmmm... Actually I've been busy doing espionage for the Canadian
government. After Bush announces his big push for the Cato Institutes
"Ownership Society" tonight and people are left without any employer
health insurance (other than a little lump sum and maybe a $1000 check
from the U.S. and the admonishment to "Go buy your own") we feel the
time will be right to take the northern tier of states back into the
folds of the Commonwealth.

You can have Washington and Oregon, as long as we can keep Pennsylvania (I
like the fishing and the bears don't need socialized medicine). Also, if
you all take Mass., ya'll might finally get yourselves a decent hockey
team.

--
Frank Reid
Reverse email to reply
"Treaty of 1846
Article II.
From the point at which the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude shall be
found to intersect the great northern branch of the Columbia River, the
navigation of the said branch shall be free and open to the Hudson's Bay
Company, and to all British subjects trading with the same, to the point
where the said branch meets the main stream of the Columbia, and thence down
the said main stream to the ocean, with free access into and through the
said river or rivers, it being understood that all the usual portages along
the line thus described shall, in like manner, be free and open. In
navigating the said river or rivers, British subjects, with their goods and
produce, shall be treated on the same footing as citizens of the United
States; it being, however, always understood that nothing in this article
shall he construed as preventing, or intended to prevent, the government of
the United States from making any regulations respecting the navigation of
the said river or rivers not inconsistent with the present treaty. "



I guess we have to let them into the Oregon Country, but nothing says they
get to sleep on any park benches.

About joining the northland, more likely we take back some land into the
Oregon Country and start the N.W. anew.

We can open talks at the next western clave if we can get a Canadian to
attend.

I miss
 

"Frank Reid" moc.deepselbac@diersicnarf wrote in message
...
Hmmm... Actually I've been busy doing espionage for the Canadian
government. After Bush announces his big push for the Cato Institutes
"Ownership Society" tonight and people are left without any employer
health insurance (other than a little lump sum and maybe a $1000 check
from the U.S. and the admonishment to "Go buy your own") we feel the
time will be right to take the northern tier of states back into the
folds of the Commonwealth.

You can have Washington and Oregon, as long as we can keep Pennsylvania (I
like the fishing and the bears don't need socialized medicine). Also, if
you all take Mass., ya'll might finally get yourselves a decent hockey
team.

--
Frank Reid
Reverse email to reply
"Treaty of 1846
Article II.
From the point at which the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude shall be
found to intersect the great northern branch of the Columbia River, the
navigation of the said branch shall be free and open to the Hudson's Bay
Company, and to all British subjects trading with the same, to the point
where the said branch meets the main stream of the Columbia, and thence down
the said main stream to the ocean, with free access into and through the
said river or rivers, it being understood that all the usual portages along
the line thus described shall, in like manner, be free and open. In
navigating the said river or rivers, British subjects, with their goods and
produce, shall be treated on the same footing as citizens of the United
States; it being, however, always understood that nothing in this article
shall he construed as preventing, or intended to prevent, the government of
the United States from making any regulations respecting the navigation of
the said river or rivers not inconsistent with the present treaty. "



I guess we have to let them into the Oregon Country, but nothing says they
get to sleep on any park benches.

About joining the northland, more likely we take back some land into the
Oregon Country and start the N.W. anew.

We can open talks at the next western clave if we can get a Canadian to
attend.

I miss
 

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang

I miss
 

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang

I miss
 

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang

I miss
 

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang


Can't get anything past you. ;). But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".


--
Bob Weinberger
La, Grande, OR

place a dot between bobs and stuff and remove invalid to send email

I miss
 

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang


Can't get anything past you. ;). But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".


--
Bob Weinberger
La, Grande, OR

place a dot between bobs and stuff and remove invalid to send email

I miss
 

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:nwrZc.744$xr1.169@trnddc04...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang


Can't get anything past you. ;).

So I've heard.

But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".

Note that I didn't disagree. :)

Sorry I missed you in Minnehoovia. Life has a way of presenting both
conveniences and inconveniences.......but selecting for the latter
preferentially. :(

Wolfgang

I miss
 

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:nwrZc.744$xr1.169@trnddc04...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang


Can't get anything past you. ;).

So I've heard.

But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".

Note that I didn't disagree. :)

Sorry I missed you in Minnehoovia. Life has a way of presenting both
conveniences and inconveniences.......but selecting for the latter
preferentially. :(

Wolfgang

I miss
 

Bob Weinberger wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang



Can't get anything past you. ;). But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"

Willi

I miss
 

Bob Weinberger wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang



Can't get anything past you. ;). But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"

Willi

I miss
 

"Willi" wrote in message
...


Bob Weinberger wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang



Can't get anything past you. ;). But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"

The careful reader will have noted that I agreed with Bob and amplified on
that theme in a response to Bob posted (according to my computer clock) some
17 minutes before your astute observation and implicit comment on character.

Wolfgang
or maybe i missed something.

I miss
 

"Willi" wrote in message
...


Bob Weinberger wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in message
news:SuqZc.168$H26.83@trnddc07...

...I tend to avoid most word games...

Yes. :)

Wolfgang



Can't get anything past you. ;). But note the use of the weasel words
"tend" & "most".



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"

The careful reader will have noted that I agreed with Bob and amplified on
that theme in a response to Bob posted (according to my computer clock) some
17 minutes before your astute observation and implicit comment on character.

Wolfgang
or maybe i missed something.

I miss
 

Wolfgang wrote:



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"


The careful reader will have noted that I agreed with Bob and amplified on
that theme in a response to Bob posted (according to my computer clock) some
17 minutes before your astute observation and implicit comment on character.

Wolfgang
or maybe i missed something.



As for the time, although it was posted after your second post, I hadn't
read your second post until "now". The way I generally post is to read
through ROFF and put any posts I want to responding to in a Drafts
folder and then when I get a chance, I go back and respond to them as a
group. (Which is why my posts are generally grouped together in terms of
the time stamp.)

I was just giving you **** about your "careful reader" comments. It was
a dig but it wasn't meant as an assault on your character (I'd be more
direct if I want to do that!). I also don't think that being a "careful
reader" or not is a matter of character.

Willi

I miss
 

Wolfgang wrote:



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"


The careful reader will have noted that I agreed with Bob and amplified on
that theme in a response to Bob posted (according to my computer clock) some
17 minutes before your astute observation and implicit comment on character.

Wolfgang
or maybe i missed something.



As for the time, although it was posted after your second post, I hadn't
read your second post until "now". The way I generally post is to read
through ROFF and put any posts I want to responding to in a Drafts
folder and then when I get a chance, I go back and respond to them as a
group. (Which is why my posts are generally grouped together in terms of
the time stamp.)

I was just giving you **** about your "careful reader" comments. It was
a dig but it wasn't meant as an assault on your character (I'd be more
direct if I want to do that!). I also don't think that being a "careful
reader" or not is a matter of character.

Willi

I miss
 

"Willi" wrote in message
...


Wolfgang wrote:



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"


The careful reader will have noted that I agreed with Bob and amplified
on
that theme in a response to Bob posted (according to my computer clock)
some
17 minutes before your astute observation and implicit comment on
character.

Wolfgang
or maybe i missed something.



As for the time, although it was posted after your second post, I hadn't
read your second post until "now".

Yeah, I guessed that.

The way I generally post is to read
through ROFF and put any posts I want to responding to in a Drafts
folder and then when I get a chance, I go back and respond to them as a
group. (Which is why my posts are generally grouped together in terms of
the time stamp.)

I assumed that.

I was just giving you **** about your "careful reader" comments. It was
a dig but it wasn't meant as an assault on your character (I'd be more
direct if I want to do that!). I also don't think that being a "careful
reader" or not is a matter of character.

And I knew that. :)

Wolfgang

I miss
 

"Willi" wrote in message
...


Wolfgang wrote:



But that would mean that Wolfgang would have to be what he calls a
"careful reader!"


The careful reader will have noted that I agreed with Bob and amplified
on
that theme in a response to Bob posted (according to my computer clock)
some
17 minutes before your astute observation and implicit comment on
character.

Wolfgang
or maybe i missed something.



As for the time, although it was posted after your second post, I hadn't
read your second post until "now".

Yeah, I guessed that.

The way I generally post is to read
through ROFF and put any posts I want to responding to in a Drafts
folder and then when I get a chance, I go back and respond to them as a
group. (Which is why my posts are generally grouped together in terms of
the time stamp.)

I assumed that.

I was just giving you **** about your "careful reader" comments. It was
a dig but it wasn't meant as an assault on your character (I'd be more
direct if I want to do that!). I also don't think that being a "careful
reader" or not is a matter of character.

And I knew that. :)

Wolfgang

I miss
 

bugcaster wrote:

[snipperoo]

I guess we have to let them into the Oregon Country, but nothing says they
get to sleep on any park benches.

About joining the northland, more likely we take back some land into the
Oregon Country and start the N.W. anew.

We can open talks at the next western clave if we can get a Canadian to
attend.

I'm married to a Canadian, and I fished the Crow last month.

Does that count?


Chuck Vance (and I stayed in a Holiday Inn once)

I miss
 

bugcaster wrote:

[snipperoo]

I guess we have to let them into the Oregon Country, but nothing says they
get to sleep on any park benches.

About joining the northland, more likely we take back some land into the
Oregon Country and start the N.W. anew.

We can open talks at the next western clave if we can get a Canadian to
attend.

I'm married to a Canadian, and I fished the Crow last month.

Does that count?


Chuck Vance (and I stayed in a Holiday Inn once)

I miss
 

"Conan the Librarian" wrote in message
...
I'm married to a Canadian, and I fished the Crow last month.

Does that count?


Chuck Vance (and I stayed in a Holiday Inn once)

Works for me.

Still wanting to get up to Canada and fish, if they let me in.