FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Lulea Sweden (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=16584)

Gordon MacPherson April 12th, 2005 10:16 AM

Lulea Sweden
 
Hi,
I will be in Lulea, Northern Sweden for a wedding July 21-26. Can
anyone give me information about FFing prospects (mainly trout but would
of course be intersted in sea trout and perhaps salmon (no real
experience of either of the latter))

Thanks,

Gordon


riverman April 12th, 2005 04:03 PM

Last I was there, there weren't no trout, sea trout or greyling. Not
even any bugs!
Vaughan, can you help this guy out?

--riverman

(and how's the new place looking?)


Vaughan Hurry April 12th, 2005 05:12 PM

riverman wrote:
Last I was there, there weren't no trout, sea trout or greyling. Not
even any bugs!
Vaughan, can you help this guy out?
=20
--riverman
=20
(and how's the new place looking?)
=20

Now be fair mate, we never actually drove through Lule=E5, so there might=
=20
have been fish there........ The yard is starting to thaw out and is=20
mostly ice clear and we haven't sunk too deep into the swamp. Then again =

the ground hasn't fully thawed yet so I am not feeling to cocky. In=20
another month I will know for sure. Are you coming by this summer? Or=20
are you busy getting organized for your little rant to the Orient? You=20
are welcome if you have the time. So far as I know no clave is planned=20
but plenty of fishing has been........

To answer the original question, some of the local boys are better to=20
give advice than I am, but you could look at:

http://biphome.spray.se/angler/ or
http://www.secretcreeks.com/ or
http://www.fjallen.nu/fiska/index_en.htm

to get an idea. There are LOTS of other sites and lots of great fishing. =

Lots of not so great as well so take a look at these sites and a map and =

then let us know how far do you want to travel and how long you have.....=
=2E.

/Vaughan

April 12th, 2005 11:08 PM



riverman wrote:
Last I was there, there weren't no trout, sea trout or greyling. Not
even any bugs!
Vaughan, can you help this guy out?
=20
--riverman
=20
(and how's the new place looking?)
=20

Now be fair mate, we never actually drove through Lule=E5, so there might=
=20
have been fish there........ The yard is starting to thaw out and is=20
mostly ice clear and we haven't sunk too deep into the swamp. Then again =

the ground hasn't fully thawed yet so I am not feeling to cocky. In=20
another month I will know for sure. Are you coming by this summer? Or=20
are you busy getting organized for your little rant to the Orient? You=20
are welcome if you have the time. So far as I know no clave is planned=20
but plenty of fishing has been........

To answer the original question, some of the local boys are better to=20
give advice than I am, but you could look at:

http://biphome.spray.se/angler/ or
http://www.secretcreeks.com/ or
http://www.fjallen.nu/fiska/index_en.htm

to get an idea. There are LOTS of other sites and lots of great fishing. =

Lots of not so great as well so take a look at these sites and a map and =

then let us know how far do you want to travel and how long you have.....=
=2E.

/Vaughan


Hi Gordon.. Vaughan, Riverman

Luleå, that's my "neighbourhood". I live 130km south of Luleå, but I
spent the whole autumn,
august to november, in Luleå. I did some flyfishing during my stay. Although
I already had some
ideas on where to go fishing, I started out talking to some guys in the
local fishing shop. For daytrips
they recommended Råne River (in swedish: Råneälven), being the closest spot
for decent
streamfishing for trout & grayling. It's about an hour of driving away,
north of Luleå. The Luleå
flyfishing club has an exclusive stretch for members in this river. But
that's only 4km out
of maybe 200km, so there's plenty of other spots to choose from. I had good
fishing for char, but
didnt catch any decent sized trouts. But it's a beautiful river and the
trouts are definately in there.

There are of course plenty of other waters too. The Åby River (Åbyälven) and
the Byske
River (Byskeälven) are also good alternatives about an hour of driving from
Luleå, both direction to the
south. Byske River is definately the most well-known of the mentioned
rivers. It's where to go if you'd
be interested in salmons. If trout is the target, any of the three rivers
would be good alternatives, I'd say.

I am also the webmaster of the secretcreeks.com-website, that Vaughan
referrred to.
If you go to www.secretcreeks.com, and click on 'Råneälven' or any of the
other rivers in the left
menu you'll find photos of the rivers. B.t.w., I just established a forum
on this site. Not overly enormous
activity there yet, but if you have more questions regarding fishing in
northern Sweden, please register
a user, post your questions and me, Vaughan or any of the other guys will
answer your questions.

Best Regards

/Erik Holmlund, Skellefteå
www.secretcreeks.com


Posted via http://scandicangler.com


riverman April 13th, 2005 09:33 PM

Vaughan Hurry wrote in message .. .
riverman wrote:
Last I was there, there weren't no trout, sea trout or greyling. Not
even any bugs!
Vaughan, can you help this guy out?
=20
--riverman
=20
(and how's the new place looking?)
=20

Now be fair mate, we never actually drove through Lule=E5, so there might=
=20
have been fish there........ The yard is starting to thaw out and is=20
mostly ice clear and we haven't sunk too deep into the swamp. Then again =

the ground hasn't fully thawed yet so I am not feeling to cocky. In=20
another month I will know for sure. Are you coming by this summer? Or=20
are you busy getting organized for your little rant to the Orient? You=20
are welcome if you have the time. So far as I know no clave is planned=20
but plenty of fishing has been........


I don't think I'll be able to get up there this summer, Vaughan. Congo
finishes late and Hong Kong starts early, so I only have 6 days open
before summer school, and 6 days after. Basically, this will be the
summer without a summer. Bummer.

However, SWMBO is starting her 2-year program in London this summer,
and I'm finishing mine this year, so next year I will have the entire
summer free. I might accompany her to the northlands and spend a big
chunk of it in scandahoovia. I have this sinking feeling that my
cherished summer trips up to that slice of heaven are tracking away
from me as life takes its course. You know how much I love that part
of the world, but sometimes life carries us in and out and its just
too damn hard to steer it. Are there any trips to NZ in your future?
I'd certainly be in interested in making my way down there to meet up
and fish.

--riverman

Vaughan Hurry April 13th, 2005 09:40 PM

riverman wrote:

I don't think I'll be able to get up there this summer, Vaughan. Congo
finishes late and Hong Kong starts early, so I only have 6 days open
before summer school, and 6 days after. Basically, this will be the
summer without a summer. Bummer.

However, SWMBO is starting her 2-year program in London this summer,
and I'm finishing mine this year, so next year I will have the entire
summer free. I might accompany her to the northlands and spend a big
chunk of it in scandahoovia. I have this sinking feeling that my
cherished summer trips up to that slice of heaven are tracking away
from me as life takes its course. You know how much I love that part
of the world, but sometimes life carries us in and out and its just
too damn hard to steer it. Are there any trips to NZ in your future?
I'd certainly be in interested in making my way down there to meet up
and fish.

--riverman


Bugger! I did kinda figure............NZ is possible over the next
couple of years but I am not sure, depends on how the research goes (and
the funding). I'll let you know if I get the chance. I have fished there
in February and July and both trips were amazing. Cicada fishing in
February was probably the most enjoyable.

Good luck in Hong Kong

Vaughan

riverman April 15th, 2005 12:52 PM

That's true. As a teacher, I am clearly aware that being away from the
desk for 8 weeks a year is one aspect of the job that most other
professions do not get. Teaching has it shortcomings, of course, but so
does every occupation. I like my job, and I like having some time in
the summer to go fishing!

And likewise, its not as much vacation as most think. Those of you in
the profession know what I am talking about, and most of those not in
the profession generally aren't convinced unless they had parents who
were teachers.

--riverman


Jeff Miller April 15th, 2005 01:17 PM

riverman wrote:

That's true. As a teacher, I am clearly aware that being away from the
desk for 8 weeks a year is one aspect of the job that most other
professions do not get. Teaching has it shortcomings, of course, but so
does every occupation. I like my job, and I like having some time in
the summer to go fishing!

And likewise, its not as much vacation as most think. Those of you in
the profession know what I am talking about, and most of those not in
the profession generally aren't convinced unless they had parents who
were teachers.

--riverman


i am frequently surprised by how few people really grasp or care about
the horrible inequity in the work environment and pay structure for our
public elementary and secondary school teachers. for any teacher who
cares about his/her profession, the workdays are unending and
obligations extend throughout the summer; too few folks appreciate the
devotion of those teaching the public's community of children; the
available classroom resources are always lean; course design and
management are often controlled by some bureaucrat in a central office,
bowing to political pressure; the kids are frequently hostile and behave
poorly, with little motivation for learning or to be taught; and the pay
is terrible. i'm ashamed to say that a 1st year teacher with a masters
degree and all proper teaching credentials in my city's schools has a
starting pay of a little over 29k...and it takes 20 years before he/she
can expect to earn over 40k.

it's shameful and ridiculous.

jeff (and none of my family were/are teachers)

Wayne Harrison April 15th, 2005 01:24 PM


"Jeff Miller" wrote

i'm ashamed to say that a 1st year teacher with a masters
degree and all proper teaching credentials in my city's schools has a
starting pay of a little over 29k...and it takes 20 years before he/she
can expect to earn over 40k.

it's shameful and ridiculous.


what, you mean to tell me that ron artest isn't worth, like, 40k a
****ing week?

yfitp
wayno (i mean, just think of the role model aspect!)



Wayne Knight April 15th, 2005 02:16 PM


Jeff Miller wrote:
i'm ashamed to say that a 1st year teacher with a masters
degree and all proper teaching credentials in my city's schools has a


starting pay of a little over 29k...and it takes 20 years before

he/she
can expect to earn over 40k.



Working 10 months out of the year, 29K would equate to 35K for the rest
of us. Not a bad start, when you consider how relatively easy it is to
obtain an education degree and the lack of real knowledge on a subject
needed to *teach* it in some states, it is not unrealistic to expect
lowered salaries. (Please note i did not say teachers did not *know*
their subjects in all cases)

Elementary and Secondary education is not the noble profession many
folks make it out to be. Can some teachers make a difference in some
kid's life, of course. it still does not the whole profession noble.

You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.

Wayne
I might have left this alone if I wasn't writing checks to the IRS and
state today after receiving my property tax bill yesterday. :(


Wayne Knight April 15th, 2005 02:17 PM


Jeff Miller wrote:
i'm ashamed to say that a 1st year teacher with a masters
degree and all proper teaching credentials in my city's schools has a


starting pay of a little over 29k...and it takes 20 years before

he/she
can expect to earn over 40k.



Working 10 months out of the year, 29K would equate to 35K for the rest
of us. Not a bad start, when you consider how relatively easy it is to
obtain an education degree and the lack of real knowledge on a subject
needed to *teach* it in some states, it is not unrealistic to expect
lowered salaries. (Please note i did not say teachers did not *know*
their subjects in all cases)

Elementary and Secondary education is not the noble profession many
folks make it out to be. Can some teachers make a difference in some
kid's life, of course. it still does not the whole profession noble.

You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.

Wayne
I might have left this alone if I wasn't writing checks to the IRS and
state today after receiving my property tax bill yesterday. :(


Joe Ellis April 15th, 2005 03:04 PM

In article .com,
"Wayne Knight" wrote:

Jeff Miller wrote:
i'm ashamed to say that a 1st year teacher with a masters
degree and all proper teaching credentials in my city's schools has a


starting pay of a little over 29k...and it takes 20 years before

he/she
can expect to earn over 40k.



Working 10 months out of the year, 29K would equate to 35K for the rest
of us. Not a bad start, when you consider how relatively easy it is to
obtain an education degree and the lack of real knowledge on a subject
needed to *teach* it in some states, it is not unrealistic to expect
lowered salaries. (Please note i did not say teachers did not *know*
their subjects in all cases)

Elementary and Secondary education is not the noble profession many
folks make it out to be. Can some teachers make a difference in some
kid's life, of course. it still does not the whole profession noble.

You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.

Wayne
I might have left this alone if I wasn't writing checks to the IRS and
state today after receiving my property tax bill yesterday. :(


You should have.

Let's look at some other things about teaching...

Out of that "not a bad start", you are required to take continuing education
courses... of course, you don't get PAID to take them, like in most other
professions... they're out of your own pocket. And of course they're only
available during the summertime. So much for that "10 months of the year" job.

You spend several hours a night grading papers, recording grades, writing lesson
plans, creating classroom materials, reading background material, correcting
textbooks, reading professional journals, contacting parents, other teachers,
administrators... So much for that "8 to 3" job...

You buy extra supplies (just little things like classroom materials for 30 kids,
extra reading material for the kids, all those little extras that make a
classroom more than an empty box with students in it) out of your own pocket, to
the tune of several thousand dollars a year (We have the receipts to prove
it...) So much for that "not a bad start"...

Any attempt to maintain classroom discipline is met with angry calls from
parents denying that their little darlings would EVER do anything disruptive
(despite the fact the the little "darling" has spent more time suspended than in
the classroom), and the fact that due to a few bad apples, a teacher can't even
hug a crying student on the playground anymore. Of course, the parents are
completely ignorant of the fact that if you let the TV raise the kids for the
first 6 years, there's almost nothing that a school can do to rescue them.

Not to mention the fact that anytime a school levy comes up, you have to act
like a beggar, pleading for the community to pass it so you will have a job the
next year.

Then you've got the school board that keeps the number of teachers as low as
possible, so that you're constantly at a load that is ONE student short of the
number that would require them to assign you an aide... and you're working with
special ed students that all have different needs, and writing 12 highly
detailed individual lesson plans a week (over the course of a year, over 1000
pages worth!).

On top of all that, after years and years of teaching in the highest stress
field, you're thrown out without even a gold watch when the strain gets to be
too much, with completely inadequate counselling and assistance available.

I was a substitute teacher for 2 years, and taught music for 7 years. I was a
profesional musician for over 30 years, and have 2 recordings to my credit. I
bacame a Mr. Mom after my son was born because it was clear there was no future
in teaching, and have made more money in retail hell than I ever did in
education. My wife taught "special needs" students (ages to 13, highest
functioning at about 2-3 grade)for 25 years. You clearly have NO idea what
teaching is really like. You probably wouldn't survive a week in an elementary
classroom, and a high school basic math or English class would eat you alive in
an hour.

Think about this - those taxes you pay aren't for the kids you may or may not
have in school any more, they're payments on the credit you were extended for
the education YOU received, and still use.

So go ahead and **** and moan about your taxes. Poor baby.

--
"What it all comes to is that the whole structure of space flight as it
stands now is creaking, obsolecent, over-elaborate, decaying. The field is
static; no, worse than that, it's losing ground. By this time, our ships
ought to be sleeker and faster, and able to carry bigger payloads. We ought
to have done away with this dichotomy between ships that can land on a planet,
and ships that can fly from one planet to another." - Senator Bliss Wagoner
James Blish - _They Shall Have Stars_

Wayne Knight April 15th, 2005 03:41 PM


Joe Ellis wrote:


You should have.

Let's look at some other things about teaching...

Out of that "not a bad start", you are required to take continuing

education
courses... of course, you don't get PAID to take them, like in most

other
professions... they're out of your own pocket. And of course they're

only
available during the summertime. So much for that "10 months of the

year" job.

Not what my sister endures. She manages to get hers in during the
school year.


You buy extra supplies (just little things like classroom materials

for 30 kids,
extra reading material for the kids, all those little extras that

make a
classroom more than an empty box with students in it) out of your own

pocket, to
the tune of several thousand dollars a year (We have the receipts to

prove
it...) So much for that "not a bad start"...


Seen the extra checks I used to write for supplies big guy? Seen the
tax treatment for teachers? Probably not.

On top of all that, after years and years of teaching in the highest

stress
field, you're thrown out without even a gold watch when the strain

gets to be
too much, with completely inadequate counselling and assistance

available.

Defined benefit pensions too. The private sector has been losing them
for years.

You probably wouldn't survive a week in an elementary
classroom, and a high school basic math or English class would eat

you alive in
an hour.


I subbed too. Math and Chemistry. Got quite a bit of work in too at the
time as I was employed in a clinical laboratory. Even considered doing
it for a living but my undergrad Chemistry degree and post graduate
work was not good enough for them, they wanted an education degree. At
that point the salary was comparable to my private sector income and
the benefits were definitely better.

My employer at one point *loaned* me to a school system. I taught
calculus and general chemistry for two hours each day for one year. I
enjoyed it. Even enjoyed doing lesson plans and grading tests. I take
work home now in the evening, I'm sure others do too. So what?

Think about this - those taxes you pay aren't for the kids you may or

may not
have in school any more, they're payments on the credit you were

extended for
the education YOU received, and still use.


My taxes are a civic duty to support vital government functions. As far
as I know, most citizens generally don't mind paying our fair share for
a community benefit. I do object to the education system not having to
live like the rest of us and tighten our belts peridocially. My fellow
citizens and I just got a levy increase for administrative and athletic
facilities. I'm all for high school sports, but seven million for a
football stadium is a little out of hand.

So go ahead and **** and moan about your taxes. Poor baby.


I would not go around calling those you feed you baby. Read the post
again, I said the education requirements were not tough. And I said it
was not the noble profession folks made it out to be. I never said it
was an easy job.

I knew someone would sputter bull**** rather than offer an intellectual
argument, speaks highly for some abilitiy to teach.

Wayne


David Snedeker April 15th, 2005 08:54 PM


"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
ups.com...

SNIP
I knew someone would sputter bull**** rather than offer an intellectual
argument, speaks highly for some abilitiy to teach.

Wayne


So the bottom line was that you couldn't cut it, you couldn't or wouldn't
make a career in teaching? Yet, you get to trash it and beauregard as if you
actually knew what the hell you were talking about?

As a retiree out of the human services I do not have to smile and be quiet
anymore when someone talks trash. Two of the things that account for allot
of what's wrong with this country is that most MEN do not know **** about
the health care system, or the education system. That makes them dangerous
in the voting booth, and total whiners for the most part in the nursing
homes and hospitals.

Teaching is possibly the most noble of the professions. My children were
well served by teachers, and most people can name teachers who had
considerable influence on their lives. My daughter is now a professor. Most
of the retired teachers I know are balanced and happy people, and most take
comfort that their pensions are not in the hands of corrupt corporations and
slimy politicians. And that is about as much justice as one should expect in
this sad-assed country.

Dave




Bob Patton April 16th, 2005 03:22 AM

"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
oups.com...

//snip//
Working 10 months out of the year, 29K would equate to 35K for the rest
of us. Not a bad start, when you consider how relatively easy it is to
obtain an education degree and the lack of real knowledge on a subject
needed to *teach* it in some states, it is not unrealistic to expect
lowered salaries. (Please note i did not say teachers did not *know*
their subjects in all cases)


Wayne, I used to think pretty much the same thing as you. Not any more. My
wife teaches four levels of Japanese at one of the local high schools here
in St Louis County. She spends more time working outside of class than
inside, and subject matter knowledge is the least of the issues. There's a
good summer break, but she works evenings and weekends grading papers,
preparing lesson plans, talking to parents, preparing special lesson plans
for students who are suspended (one of the more asinine punishments),
preparing other special plans for students with disabilities, working with
other students who need extra help, assisting others who want to do
independent study, and on and on. And what's the reward for long hours and
extra dedication? Nothing but the psychic reward of occasionally making a
difference in somebody's life.

In my world, and probably in yours, people get ahead by working harder:
bigger bonuses, promotions, more perqs, etc. But not teachers. A talented
teacher who works harder gets tougher students.

Elementary and Secondary education is not the noble profession many
folks make it out to be. Can some teachers make a difference in some
kid's life, of course. it still does not the whole profession noble.


Is ANY profession noble? My wife doesn't make much money. But when her
former students who are now FBI agents, lawyers, and teachers come back
years later to see her and tell her what a difference she made, it's a
pretty valuable reward. And when one of her best students - an honor roll
student and athlete - elected to join the Marines to get money for college
and law school, and then went to Afghanistan on October 2001, I think her
concern about him was second only to that of his parents.

I suspect that few people other than teachers and police officers get such a
picture of the social issues that this country faces. There are people in
this community who don't eat every day because they can't afford it. There
are kids in my wife's classes whose mothers work full time for the minimum
wage and can't make ends meet for their families. There are kids who go to
bed at night having had nothing to eat all day except the free lunch at
school, and are about the be evicted from their homes. That is absolutely
true. And we penalize the kids for that!

You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.


Yeah. Get a bunch of technicians who're good test takers but haven't the
foggiest notion about the real world. Doesn't do any good to raise the bar
if not enough people want to get in.

Imagine a kid from the inner city of St Louis who is bused to an affluent
school in St Louis county. His mother can hardly afford to buy him a pencil
and paper, but now he is immersed in a school with kids who drive BMWs. How
does he feel? What kind of character does it take to deal with that, and how
do teachers deal with the issues? Probably not by learning something from a
textbook and passing a test about it.

Wayne
I might have left this alone if I wasn't writing checks to the IRS and
state today after receiving my property tax bill yesterday. :(


I know. I paid mine today too. I figure a good bit of it went to pay for
propaganda development to convince people that the Administration wants to
improve the country.




Wolfgang April 16th, 2005 04:35 AM


"David Snedeker" wrote in message
...

"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
ups.com...

SNIP
I knew someone would sputter bull**** rather than offer an intellectual
argument, speaks highly for some abilitiy to teach.

Wayne


So the bottom line was that you couldn't cut it, you couldn't or wouldn't
make a career in teaching? Yet, you get to trash it and beauregard as if
you
actually knew what the hell you were talking about?

As a retiree out of the human services I do not have to smile and be quiet
anymore when someone talks trash. Two of the things that account for allot
of what's wrong with this country is that most MEN do not know **** about
the health care system, or the education system. That makes them dangerous
in the voting booth, and total whiners for the most part in the nursing
homes and hospitals.

Teaching is possibly the most noble of the professions. My children were
well served by teachers, and most people can name teachers who had
considerable influence on their lives. My daughter is now a professor.
Most
of the retired teachers I know are balanced and happy people, and most
take
comfort that their pensions are not in the hands of corrupt corporations
and
slimy politicians. And that is about as much justice as one should expect
in
this sad-assed country.


Yet another load of unmitigated (as well as unsubstantiated) horse**** from
our resident psychopath in the great northwest.

Wolfgang
who knows that have offspring, knowing a teacher or two, and being retired
from the public tit does not an authority make.



Cyli April 16th, 2005 09:38 AM

On 15 Apr 2005 06:17:02 -0700, "Wayne Knight"
wrote:

(snipped)

You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.



Good idea. When my daughter and I were doing a year of home schooling
for my grandson, I thought it might be easier all around if I got a
teaching certificate. So I took the test for practice. With no study
and half an hour left at the end of the test, I'd easily made a better
than passing grade. It could have been still better, but I was off on
some of the 'If little Susie slams little Tommy over the head with the
toy locomotive in kindergarten, what do you do about it?' questions.

So the degree has to count, as the state test here isn't worth doggie
doo. This did not fill me with confidence that the next year the
grandson would be sent out among educated folks with much knowledge to
impart to him. Luckily he's in a good school now, as are the
granddaughters, but if you take the local pot luck of schools and
teachers, you _will_ wind up with some people teaching who have not
proven to have knowledge of their subjects and are teaching only out
of a lesson book.

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: lid (strip the .invalid to email)

Wayne Knight April 16th, 2005 11:24 AM


"David Snedeker" wrote in message
...

So the bottom line was that you couldn't cut it, you couldn't or wouldn't
make a career in teaching? Yet, you get to trash it and beauregard as if
you
actually knew what the hell you were talking about?


I said I considered it, they wanted an education degree in that particular
school system. At the time I was doing post grad work in chemistry, and yes
I made a choice not to seek the edu degree.

Two of the things that account for allot
of what's wrong with this country is that most MEN do not know **** about
the health care system,


I have forgotten more about the health care system than you ever learned.

Teaching is possibly the most noble of the professions. My children were
well served by teachers, and most people can name teachers who had
considerable influence on their lives.


Oh bull****, if you're bleeding out from a chest wound, I'm sure you would
consider the trauma surgeon to be the most noble profession at the time, or
if your house was on fire....you get the idea. There are good teachers that
*inspire* kids but I'm sure your children were exposed to bad and medicore
teachers too, most of which they can't remember. No different than everyday
life and other people you come in contact with on a daily basis.

of the retired teachers I know are balanced and happy people, and most
take
comfort that their pensions are not in the hands of corrupt corporations
and
slimy politicians. And that is about as much justice as one should expect
in
this sad-assed country.


Oh come on, the country has issues, always has had issues We'll find a way
to survive Georgie and the sun will continue to rise in the east and set in
the west. As to your friends pensions, get a grip son, they were government
employees, and who do the governement employees actually work for? , hint,
it ain't the taxpayer.





Jeff Miller April 16th, 2005 11:43 AM

Wayne Harrison wrote:
"Jeff Miller" wrote

i'm ashamed to say that a 1st year teacher with a masters

degree and all proper teaching credentials in my city's schools has a
starting pay of a little over 29k...and it takes 20 years before he/she
can expect to earn over 40k.

it's shameful and ridiculous.



what, you mean to tell me that ron artest isn't worth, like, 40k a
****ing week?

yfitp
wayno (i mean, just think of the role model aspect!)



not to mention mcCant$... ;)

jeff

Wayne Knight April 16th, 2005 11:45 AM

"Bob Patton" wrote in message
...

In my world, and probably in yours, people get ahead by working harder:
bigger bonuses, promotions, more perqs, etc. But not teachers. A talented
teacher who works harder gets tougher students.


Haven't teachers sort of done that to themselves tho?

Is ANY profession noble?


IMO not really.

My wife doesn't make much money.


I understand fully what you are trying to say Bob and I;m sure your wife is
most excellent at what she does. Is it tough to make a living on what some
professions, including teaching pay. It sure the hell is and I would not
want to be doing that right now but that's not the relevant point.

I suspect that few people other than teachers and police officers get such
a picture of the social issues that this country faces. There are people
in this community who don't eat every day because they can't afford it.
There are kids in my wife's classes whose mothers work full time for the
minimum wage and can't make ends meet for their families. There are kids
who go to bed at night having had nothing to eat all day except the free
lunch at school, and are about the be evicted from their homes. That is
absolutely true. And we penalize the kids for that!


Do you think teachers and police officers really have the picture? I would
submit that they don't. I was one of *those people* . My mother still has
not recovered. We don;t penalize the kids, some ****ing know it all amateur
psychiatrist nobilese teacher brands the kid a special needs or targets him
as a trouble maker. I'm glad your wife can influence so many lifes and taht
Snedeker's girls had nothing but great kids, my teachers sucked
(figureatively speaking of course) and were more concerned with their
contract negotiations that if I could find the solution to a quadratic
equation, primarily because most of them had no idea what one was. And do
not get me started on how we were treated by the local police.

Yeah. Get a bunch of technicians who're good test takers but haven't the
foggiest notion about the real world. Doesn't do any good to raise the bar
if not enough people want to get in.


If a math professor in college does not know math, then it will come out and
they will be cut. Do the same in elememtary school, then maybe johnny could
read.

Imagine a kid from the inner city of St Louis who is bused to an affluent
school in St Louis county.


Again I don;t have to imagine what that is like.

I know. I paid mine today too. I figure a good bit of it went to pay for
propaganda development to convince people that the Administration wants to
improve the country.


Amen



Jeff Miller April 16th, 2005 11:58 AM

Cyli wrote:

On 15 Apr 2005 06:17:02 -0700, "Wayne Knight"
wrote:

(snipped)


You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.



but if you take the local pot luck of schools and
teachers, you _will_ wind up with some people teaching who have not
proven to have knowledge of their subjects and are teaching only out
of a lesson book.



....well lessee here...new teachers with a bs degree start at 26k...do
you really question what the smarter and more capable people usually
choose to do? hint...they don't remain in teaching in the public
schools. raise the salaries...you'll get better quality generally.

jeff

Bob Patton April 16th, 2005 02:37 PM

"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
...
"Bob Patton" wrote in message
...

//snip//
not get me started on how we were treated by the local police.


Not defending the police - just trying to make a point about some social
inequalities. There's a cop in SWMBO's school who is a very special person.
I know that's not always true.

There are some good teachers; there are a lot who don't care very much. Most
work for public school administrations run by politicians and entrenched
bureaucracies who have to worry more about being criticized for teaching
something controversial than about whether their kids can do quadratic
equations. Fortunately, in my wife's case she doesn't need the money - if
she did she wouldn't teach.

I work for a big bank and thought I knew something about bureaucracy. But
the education bureaucracy is something else again.

I've noticed in my work that some of the people who at the end of the day
are best at what they do aren't really motivated by money. There's some kind
of intangible reward that they get from doing a good job and being respected
for that. People who advance to high levels in search of more money have
different skills. And you can read about some of them in the newspapers -
and see some of them on perp walks - almost every day.

What do you suppose would motivate college students to consider becoming
teachers instead of, say, bankers?

Bob



Wayne Knight April 16th, 2005 03:08 PM

"Bob Patton" wrote in message
...
What do you suppose would motivate college students to consider becoming
teachers instead of, say, bankers?


Not everyone can be a banker, nor can everyone be a teacher. Sometimes its
the education that trips them up, sometimes its a desire, what makes folks
want to be divorce lawyers or groundskeepers. I am not attacking teaching
per se, just this noble profession bs and noting that the pay, while it
could be higher is not as bad as it is made out to be.

My daughter recently graduated from Michigan State and was accepted into a
top flight medical school. Over wine and along the Manistee River as we were
talking, I noted some hesitation in her voice when talking about it, after a
couple of hours she it came out that she had applied because of the earnings
level and a perceived pressure from me. She's not going to med school now,
but considering some more to her liking. BTW, after he relevation, she
considered teaching but guess what *they* wanted g.



JR April 16th, 2005 11:52 PM

Cyli wrote:
"Wayne Knight" wrote:

You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.


Good idea. When my daughter and I were doing a year of home schooling
for my grandson, I thought it might be easier all around if I got a
teaching certificate. So I took the test for practice. With no study
and half an hour left at the end of the test, I'd easily made a better
than passing grade.


Let's say a district or state decides to "raise the bar" by 1)
requiring a Masters of all new teachers and 2) instituting a teaching
certificate test say 5 to 10 times more rigorous than the current one
(to ensure "real knowledge on a subject").... but it keeps entry
salaries the same. What are the chances that even one more highly
qualified candidate will enter the applicant pool?

Raising the bar, by itself, does nothing, I think. Raise salaries,
though, and you can raise the bar to good effect.

JR

Cyli April 17th, 2005 01:30 AM

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:58:20 -0400, Jeff Miller
wrote:

Cyli wrote:

On 15 Apr 2005 06:17:02 -0700, "Wayne Knight"
wrote:

(snipped)


You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.



but if you take the local pot luck of schools and
teachers, you _will_ wind up with some people teaching who have not
proven to have knowledge of their subjects and are teaching only out
of a lesson book.



...well lessee here...new teachers with a bs degree start at 26k...do
you really question what the smarter and more capable people usually
choose to do? hint...they don't remain in teaching in the public
schools. raise the salaries...you'll get better quality generally.

jeff


That and the bureaucracy that gives them the job security that some
go to it for. You'd get some more of dingbats who'd have to go away
sometime, but you might have less of the "This is the lesson plan I
was given. This is all you will learn here." type who don't _know_
anything more than the lesson plan calls for. Make sure that the
arithmetic teacher knows arithmetic and in higher grades that the
chemistry teacher knows something more about chemistry than what he /
she learned in the one hour a day for one year they took it in
college.

Many of the teachers I had were, uh, not too bright, which I was,
fortunately, too young and ignorant myself to realize at the time,
though I sometimes wondered what was wrong. When my kids were in
school they were getting more teachers who cared about the kids and
their mental well-being, but there were still some of the kind from my
years around. And the new wave didn't seem to be much more
knowledgeable than the old teachers. My grandchildren got teachers
who were even more concerned, but for educational qualities, my older
daughter had to pick which schools they went to very carefully. My
youngest trusted in the system, which failed, so we did the home
schooling for a year and after that my older daughter inherited the
grandson, who was showing, even in a good school system, that he was
way ahead in education.

Now we did home schooling about the same way I fish. Whenever we all
felt like it and whatever looked interesting, though we did try to
stick to math lessons. And the kid still came out way ahead in
knowledge. Hmmmm.

This means a lot less of government oversight needed for teachers to
be free to be hired and fired and to teach away from the blasted
pre-ordained plans. Like I can see an end to that....

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: lid (strip the .invalid to email)

Wayne Harrison April 17th, 2005 01:55 AM


"JR" wrote Raising the bar, by itself,
does nothing, I think. Raise salaries,
though, and you can raise the bar to good effect.



i reckon you are right about that. for $40k a month, i will teach oral
hygiene in bedford-stuyvestant.

yfitons
wayno (well, for a year or two, anyway)



Jeff Miller April 17th, 2005 02:14 AM

Cyli wrote:


Now we did home schooling about the same way I fish. Whenever we all
felt like it and whatever looked interesting, though we did try to
stick to math lessons. And the kid still came out way ahead in
knowledge. Hmmmm.


and i have a nephew-in-law who was home schooled to age 16; he's barely
able to read...

so, how do we recognize, attract, and reward quality teachers?

Kevin Vang April 17th, 2005 03:06 AM

In article OLi8e.3183$Zr.991@lakeread08, d
says...

so, how do we recognize, attract, and reward quality teachers?



It's a non-trivial problem. As a college professor, I see the
results of the local school systems. A great many of the students
have shockingly poor math skills, which they often blame on the
terrible math teacher at their high school. I also see other
students with excellent math skills, which they often credit to
those very same teachers. I've been around here long enough
that many of the teachers are former students of mine, so I
have a pretty good idea of what they are like. We are fortunate
that the math education program here is controlled by the math
department and not the education department, so we have pretty
good quality control.

It's funny what you here about the teachers from their students
sometimes. I once happened to be with a group of teenage boys
who were talking about their math teacher like she was the
wicked witch of the west, so I asked who she was. I had to
laugh when they told me, because she was a former student of
mine. She was an outragously beautiful, blue-eyed blonde
Scandinavian beauty. By now she has probably reached the ripe
old age of 35, so I can't imagine she's too much worse for the
wear.

Kevin
(and she knew her math, too.)
--
reply to:
kevin dot vang at minotstateu dot edu

Bob Patton April 17th, 2005 03:13 AM

"Jeff Miller" wrote in message
news:OLi8e.3183$Zr.991@lakeread08...
//snip//...

so, how do we recognize, attract, and reward quality teachers?


Offer salaries and working conditions that make young people want to be
there. Then raise the bar on certifications and require continuing education
so that people who work there have peers that want to be there (as opposed
to having no alternative) because they're intellectually and professionally
stimulated. Rehabilitate or eliminate burnout cases.

Don't "punish" kids by suspending them and sending them home to empty
houses. Find things that need to be done at the school and make them do
that. For example, make them clean the bathrooms - with toothbrushes if the
offense is bad enough.

Bob



rw April 17th, 2005 03:36 AM

Kevin Vang wrote:

It's funny what you here about the teachers from their students
sometimes. I once happened to be with a group of teenage boys
who were talking about their math teacher like she was the
wicked witch of the west, so I asked who she was. I had to
laugh when they told me, because she was a former student of
mine. She was an outragously beautiful, blue-eyed blonde
Scandinavian beauty. By now she has probably reached the ripe
old age of 35, so I can't imagine she's too much worse for the
wear.


Maybe she's Glenda, the good witch. Now click your heels together and
say ...

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Wayne Knight April 17th, 2005 03:46 AM


"Bob Patton" wrote in message
...

Don't "punish" kids by suspending them and sending them home to empty
houses. Find things that need to be done at the school and make them do
that. For example, make them clean the bathrooms - with toothbrushes if
the offense is bad enough.


http://tinyurl.com/85td9



David Snedeker April 17th, 2005 07:06 AM


"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

Yet another load of unmitigated (as well as unsubstantiated) horse****

from
our resident psychopath in the great northwest.

Wolfgang
who knows that have offspring, knowing a teacher or two, and being retired
from the public tit does not an authority make.



Well you don't know much.

1. Most of my working life I owned and or managed private firms, so your
public tit comment is gratuitous.

2. As a part of my work Ive visited, observed, evaluated, consulted,
trained, advised etc in more schools, educational programs and classrooms
and shops than you or Knight will ever see or drive by, including urban
systems where you would most likely wet yourself within a half hour.

3. Ive spent a bit of time in hospitals, worked in one for a short time in
college, and hung out for about 6 months at a nursing home while my father
died. Turns out I seem to have a pretty high pain threshold. Doesn't make me
an expert, but I observed that men were bigger whiners and complainers when
sick than women. Why don't you ask some of the nurses, or maybe a few
mothers. Most men get queasy if they see their own blood, or even have to
clean up a little ****. And if you don't know that I know you have not been
around little kids much, and apparently don't like to get out of the lab
much.

4. Ive also worked with more than a few Older worker employment programs and
on a few class actions. In my personal experience, two occupational groups
stand out as being noticeably more well adjusted and "happy" in retirement:
Teachers, and surprising to me, highway patrol men.

For someone who works in the 5% difference drug realm, you sure play fast
and loose with the word "unsubstantiated."

Dave



David Snedeker April 17th, 2005 07:24 AM


"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
...


Well I don't have a clue what your point is.

I stand by my statement that from what I have seen in life and in my work,
teachers are an uncommonly dedicated lot, and seem to me to be generally
happy in retirement and uncommonly satisfied with how they have spent their
lives.

Wayne, I hope you are not holding up hospitals as bastions of efficiency and
cost effectiveness. And your comment about surgeons? . . . Noble would not
be my choice of adjectives. To me they are more like fighter pilots, same
kind of egos, reflexes etc. Definitely needed, interesting and talented . .
.. but noble? Sorry.

Dave
Dave



Wayne Knight April 17th, 2005 02:35 PM


"David Snedeker" wrote in message
...

Well I don't have a clue what your point is.


I stand by my statement that from what I have seen in life and in my work,
teachers are an uncommonly dedicated lot, and seem to me to be generally
happy in retirement and uncommonly satisfied with how they have spent
their
lives.


Teachers are not the only uncommonly dedicated lot David. You can put them
on a pedestal if you like, I won't. .

Wayne, I hope you are not holding up hospitals as bastions of efficiency
and
cost effectiveness.


No but I try everyday to make them that way. Like the education *system*,
they're a tough nut to bring to reality and make them work right.



Wolfgang April 17th, 2005 02:48 PM


"David Snedeker" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

Yet another load of unmitigated (as well as unsubstantiated) horse****

from
our resident psychopath in the great northwest.

Wolfgang
who knows that have offspring, knowing a teacher or two, and being
retired
from the public tit does not an authority make.



Well you don't know much.


Unlike you, I never claimed to.

1. Most of my working life I owned and or managed private firms, so your
public tit comment is gratuitous.


Most? To how many decimal places?

2. As a part of my work Ive visited, observed, evaluated, consulted,
trained, advised etc in more schools, educational programs and classrooms
and shops than you or Knight will ever see or drive by,


And you calculated that......how?

including urban
systems where you would most likely wet yourself within a half hour.


Urban systems? Yeah, I don't see much of that

3. Ive spent a bit of time in hospitals, worked in one for a short time in
college,


Well......gosh......I won't try to match that.

and hung out for about 6 months at a nursing home while my father
died. Turns out I seem to have a pretty high pain threshold.


What.....they put thumbscrews on you?

Doesn't make me an expert,


We agree on that much.

but I observed that men were bigger whiners and complainers when
sick than women.


And you know how impressive your observations are......right?

Why don't you ask some of the nurses, or maybe a few
mothers.


Mainly because I have no reason to suspect that any I am familiar with would
have any idea of or interest in your observations. There are other reasons,
but I suspect that one will suffice.

Most men get queasy if they see their own blood, or even have to
clean up a little ****.


You've traveled more widely than I suspected. I wasn't aware that you were
intimately familiar with most men.

And if you don't know that I know you have not been
around little kids much, and apparently don't like to get out of the lab
much.


Well, you don't know much.

4. Ive also worked with more than a few Older worker employment programs
and
on a few class actions.


Well......gosh.

In my personal experience, two occupational groups
stand out as being noticeably more well adjusted and "happy" in
retirement:
Teachers, and surprising to me, highway patrol men.


And one could hardly ask for better evidence than your personal experience,
huh?

For someone who works in the 5% difference drug realm, you sure play fast
and loose with the word "unsubstantiated."


O.k., why don't you see if you can point out what you have
substantiated......and how?

For that matter, why don't you see if you can elucidate for us just what any
of the self-congratulatory twaddle above has to do with the claim that
teaching is "possibly the most noble of the professions" or anything that
Wayne said in response to Mr. Ellis?

Good luck! :)

Wolfgang



Jeff April 17th, 2005 09:27 PM

um...well...since i'll be in a symbiotic if not parasitic position with
you in September, we'll simply have to disagree on this one right now
and i'll reserve my own special brand of diatribe for October when i'm
safely home in carolina land. G

but, about the only thing i'm able to do is raise a glass in the bar i'm
in... i think the alcohol tax benefits the schools and i'm doing my
part. g

jeff (who thinks 29k for a good teacher is simply unconscionable; and,
i'll bet i sent just as big a check to uncle as you did)

Wayne Knight wrote:

You want to raise teacher salaries? Raise the bar to get in.

Wayne
I might have left this alone if I wasn't writing checks to the IRS and
state today after receiving my property tax bill yesterday. :(


David Snedeker April 18th, 2005 04:51 AM


"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

Wolfgang, all I really needed to cite was your demonstrated whininess, and
the overwhelming weight of that by gender would alone tip the balance to the
male population. You have all the displaced cynicism of one of those who
lives far too close to the 5% significant difference rule. Kissy Kissy

Dave
Who confesses he gets far too much fun from poking dis cheesehead monkey.



Wayne Knight April 18th, 2005 05:18 AM


"Jeff" wrote in message
ink.net...
um...well...since i'll be in a symbiotic if not parasitic position with
you in September, we'll simply have to disagree on this one right now and
i'll reserve my own special brand of diatribe for October when i'm safely
home in carolina land. G


No you'll get the chance the first weekend of the show. We're meeting a
friend for beer and brats, Friday night or breakfast Sat morning. He takes
almost every summer off and fishes/guides the UP. And fwiw, he's a middle
school math teacher :). That's how he gets the summer off. Except when he
does insurance adjusting for the summer out in the rockies.

but, about the only thing i'm able to do is raise a glass in the bar i'm
in... i think the alcohol tax benefits the schools and i'm doing my part.
g


And michigan alcohol taxes are higher than most.

jeff (who thinks 29k for a good teacher is simply unconscionable; and,


I think 29K for most anything good is unconsiconable. .

i'll bet i sent just as big a check to uncle as you did)


The size of your check of no concern to me. However I applaud the proper use
of tax planning. Why some folks plan on getting a refund is beyond me.



Wolfgang April 18th, 2005 12:05 PM


"David Snedeker" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

Wolfgang, all I really needed to cite was your demonstrated whininess, and
the overwhelming weight of that by gender would alone tip the balance to
the
male population. You have all the displaced cynicism of one of those who
lives far too close to the 5% significant difference rule. Kissy Kissy


All you had to do was cite my demonstrated whininess.
Well......dang......that sure does sound like it means something. O.k.,
with your demonstrated expertise in teaching, it should be very simple for
you to explain, even to one with my limited capacity to comprehend, exactly
what that means.


Dave
Who confesses he gets far too much fun from poking dis cheesehead monkey.


Keep on enjoying! :)

Wolfgang



Jeff Miller April 18th, 2005 12:15 PM

Wayne Knight wrote:

"Jeff" wrote in message
ink.net...

um...well...since i'll be in a symbiotic if not parasitic position with
you in September, we'll simply have to disagree on this one right now and
i'll reserve my own special brand of diatribe for October when i'm safely
home in carolina land. G



No you'll get the chance the first weekend of the show. We're meeting a
friend for beer and brats, Friday night or breakfast Sat morning. He takes
almost every summer off and fishes/guides the UP. And fwiw, he's a middle
school math teacher :). That's how he gets the summer off. Except when he
does insurance adjusting for the summer out in the rockies.


well allrighty then... however, i suspect we'll need a third on my side
of the argument though, just in case we are forced to convince you of
the rightness of our position. g will he be fishing with us?



The size of your check of no concern to me. However I applaud the proper use
of tax planning. Why some folks plan on getting a refund is beyond me.


didn't think it was...but, it didn't affect my opinion about teachers or
salaries in the same manner, hence my silly comment. ...and, btw, isn't
it the truth that most salaried folks - esp. teachers - get a refund
because they know they haven't the ability or discipline to save, don't
make enough to save and pay expenses of living, and won't have the funds
to pay the tax due on april 15, so they select all the withholding
possible...? my planning as a quarterly estimated tax payer is simply to
send what i can spare when i can spare it and hope/pray it all works out
by april 15. it rarely does... now, enough of this unpleasantness.
soon come the u.p. and there's a mystery to solve. i (obviously and
admittedly) need more clues.

jeff




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter